Reduced-intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative disorders

Ginna G Laport, Brenda M Sandmaier, Barry E Storer, Bart L Scott, Monic J Stuart, Thoralf Lange, Michael B Maris, Edward D Agura, Thomas R Chauncey, Ruby M Wong, Stephen J Forman, Finn B Petersen, James C Wade, Elliot Epner, Benedetto Bruno, Wolfgang A Bethge, Peter T Curtin, David G Maloney, Karl G Blume, Rainer F Storb, Ginna G Laport, Brenda M Sandmaier, Barry E Storer, Bart L Scott, Monic J Stuart, Thoralf Lange, Michael B Maris, Edward D Agura, Thomas R Chauncey, Ruby M Wong, Stephen J Forman, Finn B Petersen, James C Wade, Elliot Epner, Benedetto Bruno, Wolfgang A Bethge, Peter T Curtin, David G Maloney, Karl G Blume, Rainer F Storb

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative strategy for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myeloproliferative disorders (MPD). We report the results of 148 patients (median age = 59 years old) with de novo MDS (n = 40), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after antecedent MDS/MPD (n = 49), treatment-related MDS (t-MDS) (n = 25), MPD (n = 27), and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) (n = 7) who underwent allogeneic HCT using a conditioning regimen of low-dose total body irradiation (TBI) alone (200 cGy) on day 0 (n = 5) or with the addition of fludarabine (Flu) 30 mg/m(2)/day on days -4 to -2 (n = 143). Postgrafting immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Seventy-five patients (51%) received an allograft from a matched related donor (MRD), and 73 patients (49%) were recipients of unrelated donor (URD) grafts. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute (gr II-IV) and chronic extensive graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD, cGVHD) between the recipients of related and unrelated donor grafts. By day +28, 75% of patients demonstrated mixed T cell chimerism. Graft rejection was seen in 15% of patients. With a median follow-up of 47 (range: 6-89) months, the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) are both 27% for all patients, with a relapse incidence of 41%. The 3-year RFS for the patients with de novo MDS, AML after antecedent MDS/MPD, t-MDS, MPD, and CMML were 22%, 20%, 29%, 37%, and 43%, respectively, and the 3-year OS was 20%, 23%, 27%, 43%, and 43%, respectively. The 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 32%. Factors associated with a lower risk of relapse were the development of extensive cGVHD and having a low risk or intermediate-1 risk International Prognostic Score for the de novo MDS patients. Nonmyeloablative HCT confers remissions in patients who otherwise were not eligible for conventional HCT but for whom relapse is the leading cause of treatment failure.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relapse-free Survival (years) by Disease Subgroup
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall Survival (years) by Disease Subgroup
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relapse Incidence (years) by Disease Subgroup
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relapse-free survival (years) by IPSS grouping. There was no significant difference in relapse-free survival (RR=1.38, p=0.37)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relapse/Progression Incidence (years) by IPSS grouping. The patients in the intermediate-2/high risk group had a significantly higher risk of relapse/progression (RR=2.92, p=0.04)

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi