The long-term impact of the MEMA kwa Vijana adolescent sexual and reproductive health intervention: effect of dose and time since intervention exposure

Aoife M Doyle, Helen A Weiss, Kaballa Maganja, Saidi Kapiga, Sheena McCormack, Deborah Watson-Jones, John Changalucha, Richard J Hayes, David A Ross, Aoife M Doyle, Helen A Weiss, Kaballa Maganja, Saidi Kapiga, Sheena McCormack, Deborah Watson-Jones, John Changalucha, Richard J Hayes, David A Ross

Abstract

Background: Despite recent decreases in HIV incidence in many sub-Saharan African countries, there is little evidence that specific behavioural interventions have led to a reduction in HIV among young people. Further and wider-scale decreases in HIV require better understanding of when behaviour change occurs and why. The MEMA kwa Vijana adolescent sexual and reproductive health intervention has been implemented in rural Mwanza, Tanzania since 1999. A long-term evaluation in 2007/8 found that the intervention improved knowledge, attitudes to sex and some reported risk behaviours, but not HIV or HSV2 prevalence. The aim of this paper was to assess the differential impact of the intervention according to gender, age, marital status, number of years of exposure and time since last exposure to the intervention.

Methods: In 2007, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in the 20 trial communities among 13,814 young people (15-30 yrs) who had attended intervention or comparison schools between 1999 and 2002. Outcomes for which the intervention had an impact in 2001 or 2007 were included in this subgroup analysis. Data were analysed using cluster-level methods for stratified cluster-randomised trials, using interaction tests to determine if intervention impact differed by subgroup.

Results: Taking into account multiplicity of testing, concurrence with a priori hypotheses and consistency within the results no strong effect-modifiers emerged. Impact on pregnancy knowledge and reported attitudes to sex increased with years of exposure to high-quality intervention.

Conclusions: The desirable long-term impact of the MEMA kwa Vijana intervention did not vary greatly according to the subgroups examined. This suggests that the intervention can have an impact on a broad cross-section of young people in rural Mwanza.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00248469.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Cohort diagram showing those eligible…
Figure 1. Cohort diagram showing those eligible for the 2007/8 MEMA kwa Vijana impact evaluation survey1.

References

    1. Monasch R, Mahy M. Young people: the centre of the HIV epidemic. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2006;938:15–41; discussion 317-341.
    1. WHO . ready.... go! The Talloires consultation to review the evidence for policies and programmes to achieve the global goals on young people and HIV/AIDS. Geneva. ; 2004. Steady....8
    1. UNAIDS Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic: 4th Global Report. Geneva. UNAIDS/04.16E UNAIDS/ 2004;04.16E:236.
    1. UN . Declaration of commitment on HIV/AIDS; 2001. UNGASS Goals.
    1. Trends in HIV prevalence and sexual behaviour among young people aged 15-24 years in countries most affected by HIV. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(Suppl 2):ii72–ii83.
    1. Ross DA, Dick B, Ferguson J. UNAIDS Inter-agency Task Team on Young People. Geneva: World Health Organization. ; 2006. Preventing HIV/AIDS in young people: a systematic review of the evidence from developing countries.348
    1. Napierala Mavedzenge S, Doyle AM, Ross DA HIV prevention in young people in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health. In Press.
    1. Hayes RJ, Changalucha J, Ross DA, Gavyole A, Todd J, et al. The MEMA kwa Vijana project: design of a community randomised trial of an innovative adolescent sexual health intervention in rural Tanzania. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2005;26:430–442.
    1. Ross DA, Changalucha J, Obasi AI, Todd J, Plummer ML, et al. Biological and behavioural impact of an adolescent sexual health intervention in Tanzania: a community-randomized trial. AIDS. 2007;21:1943–1955.
    1. Doyle AM, Ross DA, Maganja K, Baisley K, Masesa C, et al. Long-term biological and behavioural impact of an adolescent sexual health intervention in tanzania: follow-up survey of the community-based MEMA kwa Vijana Trial. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000287.
    1. Cowan FM, Pascoe SJ, Langhaug LF, Mavhu W, Chidiya S, et al. The Regai Dzive Shiri project: results of a randomized trial of an HIV prevention intervention for youth. AIDS. 24:2541–2552.
    1. Dixon-Mueller R. How young is “too young”? Comparative perspectives on adolescent sexual, marital, and reproductive transitions. Stud Fam Plann. 2008;39:247–262.
    1. Lagarde E, Auvert B, Chege J, Sukwa T, Glynn JR, et al. Condom use and its association with HIV/sexually transmitted diseases in four urban communities of sub-Saharan Africa. Aids. 2001;15(Suppl 4):S71–78.
    1. Maharaj P, Cleland J. Condom use within marital and cohabiting partnerships in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Stud Fam Plann. 2004;35:116–124.
    1. Wellings K, Collumbien M, Slaymaker E, Singh S, Hodges Z, et al. Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective. Lancet. 2006;368:1706–1728.
    1. Hayes R, Moulton LH. Cluster Randomised Trials. Morgan BJT, Keiding N, Van der Heijden P, Speed T, editors. CRC Pr l Llc. . 2008:336.
    1. Cheung YB, Jeffries D, Thomson A, Milligan P. A simple approach to test for interaction between intervention and an individual-level variable in community randomized trials. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:247–255.
    1. Sun X, Briel M, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ. 2010;340:c117.
    1. Yusuf S, Wittes J, Probstfield J, Tyroler HA. Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 1991;266:93–98.
    1. Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine--reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2189–2194.
    1. Magnani R, Macintyre K, Karim AM, Brown L, Hutchinson P, et al. The impact of life skills education on adolescent sexual risk behaviors in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2005;36:289–304.
    1. Meekers D, Agha S, Klein M. The impact on condom use of the “100% Jeune” social marketing program in Cameroon. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2005;36:530.e531.
    1. Kirby D, Laris BA, Rolleri LA. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International; 2006. The impact of Sex and HIV Education Programs in Schools and Communities on Sexual Behaviors Among Young Adults.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi