A School-Based Intervention to Increase Lyme Disease Preventive Measures Among Elementary School-Aged Children

Nancy A Shadick, Melanie J Zibit, Elizabeth Nardone, Alfred DeMaria Jr, Christine K Iannaccone, Jing Cui, Nancy A Shadick, Melanie J Zibit, Elizabeth Nardone, Alfred DeMaria Jr, Christine K Iannaccone, Jing Cui

Abstract

Purpose: Educational interventions to reduce Lyme disease (LD) among at-risk school children have had little study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a short in-class LD education program based on social learning theory and the Health Belief Model (HBM) impacted a child's knowledge, attitude, and preventive behavior.

Methods: Students in grades 2-5 in 19 elementary schools were selected in an area that was highly endemic for LD. The children received an educational intervention or were on a wait list as controls. Their knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported preventive behaviors were surveyed before implementing the program and 1 year later. General linear regression analyses adjusting for age, gender, and baseline variables were used to measure the impact of the intervention.

Results: There were 3570 participants in the study: 1562 received the intervention, and 2008 were controls. The mean age for both groups was 9.1 years, with 53% women in the intervention group and 50% women in the control group. The children in the intervention group increased their overall knowledge of LD more than the children in the control group (overall knowledge score improvement, mean difference (SD) 1.38 (1.3) vs. 0.36 (1.3) p < 0.0001). All children in classes receiving the intervention reported an increase in precautionary behavior, positive attitude toward taking precautions, and self-efficacy compared with the wait list controls. Two LD cases were confirmed during the follow-up period, one in the intervention group and one in the controls.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that a short in-class educational program that includes elements of the HBM, including: (1) awareness and knowledge about the disease, (2) benefits of preventive behavior, and (3) confidence in ability to perform preventive behaviors can improve knowledge, attitude, and self-reported precautionary behavior among at-risk children. www.clinicaltrials.gov : NCT00594997.

Keywords: Ixodes; Lyme disease..

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Participants in elementary schools enrolled in the Lyme disease (LD) education program.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Health Belief Model elements within the LD education program.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Flow chart of the LD education program.

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on infecious diseases. Prevention of Lyme disease. Pediatrics 2000; 105(1 Pt 1):142–147
    1. Armstrong PM, Brunet LR, Spielman A, Telford SR, 3rd., Risk of Lyme disease: Perceptions of residents of a Lone Star tick-infested community. Bull World Health Organ 2001; 79:916–925
    1. Bacon RM, Kugeler KJ, Mead PS; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for Lyme disease—United States, 1992–2006. MMWR Surveill Summ 2008; 57:1–9
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 2004; 31:143–164
    1. Becker MH, Drachman RH, Kirscht JP. A new approach to explaining sick-role behavior in low-income populations. Am J Public Health 1974; 64:205–216
    1. Buller DB, Taylor AM, Buller MK, Powers PJ, et al. . Evaluation of the Sunny Days, Healthy Ways sun safety curriculum for children in kindergarten through fifth grade. Pediatr Dermatol 2006; 23:321–329
    1. Cartter ML, Farley TA, Ardito HA, Hadler JL. Lyme disease prevention—knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors among high school students in an endemic area. Conn Med 1989; 53:354–356
    1. Centers for Disease Control. Lyme disease knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors—Connecticut, 1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1992; 41:505–507
    1. Cheang KI. Effect of learner-centered teaching on motivation and learning strategies in a third-year pharmacotherapy course. Am J Pharm Educ 2009; 73:42.
    1. Clark RP, Hu LT. Prevention of lyme disease and other tick-borne infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2008; 22:381–396, vii
    1. Connally NP, Durante AJ, Yousey-Hindes KM, Meek JI, et al. . Peridomestic Lyme disease prevention: Results of a population-based case-control study. Am J Prev Med 2009; 37:201–206
    1. Daltroy LH, Phillips C, Lew R, Wright E, et al. . A controlled trial of a novel primary prevention program for Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses. Health Educ Behav 2007; 34:531–542
    1. de Vries H, van Dillen S. Prevention of Lyme disease in Dutch children: Analysis of determinants of tick inspection by parents. Prev Med 2002; 35:160–165
    1. Eisen R, Mead P. Prevention of Lyme disease. In: UpToDate, Steere AC. (Ed), UpToDate; Waltham, MA: (Accessed on January6, 2016).
    1. Falco RC, Fish D, Piesman J. Duration of tick bites in a Lyme disease-endemic area. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143:187–192
    1. Gould LH, Nelson RS, Griffith KS, Hayes EB, et al. . Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding Lyme disease prevention among Connecticut residents, 1999–2004. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2008; 8:769–776
    1. Hayes EB, Piesman J. How can we prevent Lyme disease? N Engl J Med 2003; 348:2424–2430
    1. Herrington JE. Risk perceptions regarding ticks and Lyme disease: A national survey. Am J Prev Med 2004; 26:135–140
    1. Hinckley AF, Connally NP, Meek JI, Johnson BJ, et al. . Lyme disease testing by large commercial laboratories in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:676–681
    1. Ley C, Olshen EM, Reingold AL. Case-control study of risk factors for incident Lyme disease in California. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142(9 Suppl): S39–S47
    1. Malouin R, Winch P, Leontsini E, Glass G, et al. . Longitudinal evaluation of an educational intervention for preventing tick bites in an area with endemic lyme disease in Baltimore County, Maryland. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:1039–1051
    1. McKenna D, Faustini Y, Nowakowski J, Wormser GP. Factors influencing the utilization of Lyme disease-prevention behaviors in a high-risk population. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2004; 16:24–30
    1. Orloski KA, Hayes EB, Campbell GL, Dennis DT. Surveillance for Lyme disease—United States, 1992–1998. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 2000; 49:1–11
    1. Payton JW, Wardlaw DM, Graczyk PA, Bloodworth MR, et al. . Social and emotional learning: A framework for promoting mental health and reducing risk behavior in children and youth. J Sch Health 2000; 70:179–185
    1. Poland GA. Prevention of Lyme disease: A review of the evidence. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76:713–724
    1. Redican KJ, Olsen LK, Mathis RM. A comparison of the cognitive effects of two prototype health education curriculums on selected elementary school children. J Sch Health 1979; 49:340–342
    1. Rimer BK, Glanz K, Rasband G. Searching for evidence about health education and health behavior interventions. Health Educ Behav 2001; 28:231–248
    1. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr 1974; 2:328–335
    1. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q 1988; 15:175–183
    1. Shadick NA, Daltroy LH, Phillips CB, Liang US, et al. . Determinants of tick-avoidance behaviors in an endemic area for Lyme disease. Am J Prev Med 1997; 13:265–270
    1. Smith G, Wileyto EP, Hopkins RB, Cherry BR, et al. . Risk factors for lyme disease in Chester County, Pennsylvania. Public Health Rep 2001; 116 Suppl 1:146–156
    1. Vazquez M, Muehlenbein C, Cartter M, Hayes EB, et al. . Effectiveness of personal protective measures to prevent Lyme disease. Emerg Infect Dis 2008; 14:210–216
    1. Weimer M. Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. 2nd Edition, San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass/Wiley; 2013
    1. Zibit M, Tooke S, Cui J, Maher N, Shadick N. Beyond Attitude, parental characteristics that predict children's tick checking behavior. Presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting at the American College of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, 2008

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi