Cotton dust-mediated lung epithelial injury

G H Ayars, L C Altman, C E O'Neil, B T Butcher, E Y Chi, G H Ayars, L C Altman, C E O'Neil, B T Butcher, E Y Chi

Abstract

To determine if constituents of cotton plants might play a role in byssinosis by injuring pulmonary epithelium, we added extracts of cotton dust, green bract, and field-dried bract to human A549 and rat type II pneumocytes. Injury was measured as pneumocyte lysis and detachment, and inhibition of protein synthesis. Extracts of cotton dust and field-dried bract produced significant dose- and time-dependent lysis and detachment of both target cells, while green bract extract was less damaging. Extracts treated with polyvinylpolypyrrolidone to remove tannins produced significantly less injury. In contrast, purified 5,7,3',4'-tetrahydroxy-flavan 3,4-diol (THF), a tannin in cotton dust and bract, caused substantial cell damage. Field-dried bract extract and THF also produced dose-dependent inhibition of pneumocyte protein synthesis. Endotoxin levels did not correlate with observed injury. THF added to rat tracheal explants caused epithelial disruption and desquamation, whereas endotoxin did not. Instillation of cotton dust and field-dried bract extract in rat lungs produced disruption of bronchial epithelium and smooth muscle constriction, while polyvinylpolypyrrolidone-treated cotton dust extract produced no injury. These findings suggest that extracts of cotton plants are toxic to alveolar, tracheal, and bronchial epithelium and that THF or other tannins may be the responsible agents.

References

    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Oct;49(4):743-50
    1. Br Med J. 1960 Jan 30;1(5169):324-6
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Jun 23;618(3):510-23
    1. Chest. 1981 Apr;79(4 Suppl):43S-49S
    1. Environ Res. 1983 Oct;32(1):47-56
    1. Environ Res. 1980 Aug;22(2):476-84
    1. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1982 Nov;43(11):811-2
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Apr;129(4):523-7
    1. Lab Invest. 1974 Jan;30(1):76-84
    1. Lung. 1980;158(1):25-32
    1. Br J Ind Med. 1969 Oct;26(4):314-21
    1. Environ Res. 1983 Oct;32(1):62-71
    1. Br J Ind Med. 1971 Apr;28(2):143-51
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1976 Aug;16:89-98
    1. Chest. 1981 Apr;79(4 Suppl):38S-43S
    1. J Immunol. 1973 Feb;110(2):498-502
    1. J Occup Med. 1973 Mar;15(3):241-4
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Sep;124(3):280-4
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977 Jun;115(6):1015-26
    1. Chest. 1981 Apr;79(4 Suppl):108S-113S
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974;221:59-63
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Jun;129(6):964-73
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Aug;101(2):157-63
    1. Br J Ind Med. 1962 Jan;19:19-32
    1. J Occup Med. 1973 Mar;15(3):222-30
    1. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1976 Jan;37(1):22-31
    1. Clin Chest Med. 1983 Jan;4(1):63-70

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi