Early adoption of dabigatran and its dosing in US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation

Benjamin A Steinberg, Dajuanicia N Holmes, Jonathan P Piccini, Jack Ansell, Paul Chang, Gregg C Fonarow, Bernard Gersh, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Peter R Kowey, Michael D Ezekowitz, Daniel E Singer, Laine Thomas, Eric D Peterson, Elaine M Hylek, Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Investigators and Patients, Benjamin A Steinberg, Dajuanicia N Holmes, Jonathan P Piccini, Jack Ansell, Paul Chang, Gregg C Fonarow, Bernard Gersh, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Peter R Kowey, Michael D Ezekowitz, Daniel E Singer, Laine Thomas, Eric D Peterson, Elaine M Hylek, Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Investigators and Patients

Abstract

Background: Dabigatran is a novel oral anticoagulant approved for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Adoption patterns of this new agent in community practice are unknown.

Methods and results: We studied patterns of dabigatran use among patients enrolled in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Registry between June 2010 and August 2011 and followed for 12 months. Among 9974 atrial fibrillation patients included, 1217 (12%) were treated with dabigatran during the study. Overall, patients receiving dabigatran were younger (median age 72 versus 75 years, P<0.0001), more likely to be white (92% versus 89%, P=0.005), more likely to have private insurance (33% versus 25%, P<0.0001), and less likely to have prior cardiovascular disease (4% versus 33%, P<0.0001). They had more new-onset atrial fibrillation (8.8% versus 4.1%, P<0.0001), lower CHADS2 scores (estimated risk based on the presence of congestive heart failure, hypertension, aged ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack; mean 2.0 versus 2.3, P<0.0001), and lower Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation scores (mean 2.4 versus 2.8, P<0.0001). More than half (n=14/25, 56%) of patients with severe kidney disease were not prescribed reduced dosing, whereas 10% (n=91/920) with preserved renal function received lower dosing. Among patients not on dabigatran at baseline, 8% had dabigatran initiated during follow-up. Patient education was significantly associated with switching from warfarin to dabigatran (adjusted odds ratio for postgraduate 1.73, P=0.007), whereas antiarrhythmic drug use significantly correlated with de novo adoption of dabigatran (adjusted odds ratio 2.4, P<0.0001).

Conclusions: Patients receiving dabigatran were younger and at a lower risk of stroke and bleeding. Patients appeared to drive switching from warfarin, whereas clinical characteristics influenced de novo start of dabigatran. These data suggest cautious early uptake of dabigatran, and more careful attention to dosing adjustments is warranted.

Clinical trial registration url: Clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01165710.

Keywords: anticoagulant; atrial fibrillation; dabigatran; dosing; pharmacoepidemiology.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Timeline of ORBIT‐AF enrollment vs emergence of novel oral anticoagulants in the US. ORBIT‐AF indicates Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient inclusion and exclusion in the current analysis. ORBIT‐AF indicates Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Temporal adoption of dabigatran in ORBIT‐AF. OAC indicates oral anticoagulation; ORBIT‐AF, Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Distribution of dabigatran dosing overall and in high‐risk subgroups. Numbers may not sum to 100% due to reporting of other dosing regimens. *Excludes patients with CrCl 2. CrCl indicates creatinine clearance calculated by the Cockcroft‐Gault formula.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Factors significantly associated with adoption of dabigatran at follow‐up in patients receiving warfarin at baseline (A, c‐index=0.65) and in patients not using anticoagulation at baseline (B, c‐index=0.71). Reference groups: Race (vs white), AF type (vs long‐standing persistent), Education level (vs some school). AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; ECG, electrocardiogram; MI, myocardial infarction; OAC, oral anticoagulation.

References

    1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991; 22:983-988
    1. Ezekowitz MD, Levine JA. Preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 1999; 281:1830-1835
    1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1139-1151
    1. Beasley BN, Unger EF, Temple R. Anticoagulant options—why the FDA approved a higher but not a lower dose of dabigatran. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:1788-1790
    1. Huang C, Siu M, Vu L, Wong S, Shin J. Factors influencing doctors' selection of dabigatran in non‐valvular atrial fibrillation. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013; 19:938-943
    1. Kirley K, Qato DM, Kornfield R, Stafford RS, Alexander GC. National trends in oral anticoagulant use in the United States, 2007 to 2011. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5:615-621
    1. Kowey PR, Naccarelli GV. The food and drug administration decision not to approve the 110 mg dose of dabigatran: give us a way out. Am J Med. 2012; 125:732.
    1. Piccini JP, Fraulo ES, Ansell JE, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, Go AS, Hylek EM, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, Thomas LE, Kong MH, Lopes RD, Mills RM, Peterson ED. Outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of ORBIT‐AF. Am Heart J. 2011; 162:606-612
    1. Boehringer‐Ingelheim Dabigatran prescribing information 2010. Package insert; 2011
    1. Allison PD. Discrete‐time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociol Methodol. 1982; 13:61-98
    1. D'Agostino RB, Lee ML, Belanger AJ, Cupples LA, Anderson K, Kannel WB. Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: the Framingham Heart Study. Stat Med. 1990; 9:1501-1515
    1. Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, Briet E. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost. 1993; 69:236-239
    1. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976; 16:31-41
    1. Southworth MR, Reichman ME, Unger EF. Dabigatran and postmarketing reports of bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:1272-1274
    1. Agnelli G, Eriksson BI, Cohen AT, Bergqvist D, Dahl OE, Lassen MR, Mouret P, Rosencher N, Andersson M, Bylock A, Jensen E, Boberg B. Safety assessment of new antithrombotic agents: lessons from the EXTEND study on ximelagatran. Thromb Res. 2009; 123:488-497
    1. Albers GW, Diener HC, Frison L, Grind M, Nevinson M, Partridge S, Halperin JL, Horrow J, Olsson SB, Petersen P, Vahanian A. Ximelagatran vs warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005; 293:690-698
    1. Sorensen R, Gislason G, Torp‐Pedersen C, Olesen JB, Fosbol EL, Hvidtfeldt MW, Karasoy D, Lamberts M, Charlot M, Kober L, Weeke P, Lip GY, Hansen ML. Dabigatran use in Danish atrial fibrillation patients in 2011: a nationwide study. BMJ Open. 2013; 310.1136/bmjopen‐2013‐002758
    1. Larsen TB, Rasmussen LH, Skjoth F, Due KM, Callreus T, Rosenzweig M, Lip GY. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate and warfarin in “real‐world” patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective nationwide cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:2264-2273
    1. Hart RG, Diener HC, Yang S, Connolly SJ, Wallentin L, Reilly PA, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S. Intracranial hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation patients during anticoagulation with warfarin or dabigatran: the RE‐LY Trial. Stroke. 2012; 43:1511-1517
    1. Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y, Borowsky LH, Pomernacki NK, Udaltsova N, Singer DE. Thirty‐day mortality after ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation on and off anticoagulants. Stroke. 2012; 43:1795-1799
    1. Gage BF, Yan Y, Milligan PE, Waterman AD, Culverhouse R, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Clinical classification schemes for predicting hemorrhage: results from the national registry of atrial fibrillation (NRAF). Am Heart J. 2006; 151:713-719
    1. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor‐based approach: the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. Chest. 2010; 137:263-272
    1. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, Al‐Khalidi HR, Ansell J, Atar D, Avezum A, Bahit MC, Diaz R, Easton JD, Ezekowitz JA, Flaker G, Garcia D, Geraldes M, Gersh BJ, Golitsyn S, Goto S, Hermosillo AG, Hohnloser SH, Horowitz J, Mohan P, Jansky P, Lewis BS, Lopez‐Sendon JL, Pais P, Parkhomenko A, Verheugt FW, Zhu J, Wallentin L. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:981-992
    1. Squibb B‐M. Apixaban prescribing information 2012. Package insert; 2013

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi