Comparative safety of intravenous Ferumoxytol versus Ferric Carboxymaltose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia: rationale and study design of a randomized double-blind study with a focus on acute hypersensitivity reactions

N Franklin Adkinson, William E Strauss, Kristine Bernard, Robert F Kaper, Iain C Macdougall, Julie S Krop, N Franklin Adkinson, William E Strauss, Kristine Bernard, Robert F Kaper, Iain C Macdougall, Julie S Krop

Abstract

Background: Intravenous (IV) iron is often used to treat iron deficiency anemia in patients who are unable to tolerate or are inadequately managed with oral iron. However, IV iron treatment has been associated with acute hypersensitivity reactions. The comparative risk of adverse events (AEs) with IV iron preparations has been assessed by a few randomized controlled trials, which are most often limited by small patient numbers, which lack statistical power to identify differences in low-frequency AE such as hypersensitivity reactions.

Materials and methods: Ferumoxytol versus Ferric Carboxymaltose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (FIRM) is a randomized, double-blind, international, multicenter, Phase III study designed to compare the safety of ferumoxytol and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). The study includes adults with hemoglobin <12.0 g/dL (females) or <14.0 g/dL (males), transferrin saturation ≤20% or ferritin ≤100 ng/mL within 60 days of dosing, and a history of unsatisfactory or nontolerated oral iron therapy or in whom oral iron therapy is inappropriate. Patients are randomized (1:1) to ferumoxytol 510 mg or FCM 750 mg, each given intravenously on days 1 and 8. Primary end points are the incidence of moderate-to-severe hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, and moderate-to-severe hypotension. All potential hypersensitivity and hypotensive reactions will be adjudicated by a blinded, independent Clinical Events Committee. A secondary safety end point is the composite frequency of moderate-to-severe hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, serious cardiovascular events, and death. Secondary efficacy end points include mean change in hemoglobin and mean change in hemoglobin per milligram of iron administered from baseline to week 5. Urinary excretion of phosphorus and the occurrence of hypophosphatemia after IV iron administration will be examined as well as the mechanisms of such hypophosphatemia in a substudy.

Conclusion: FIRM will provide data on the comparative safety of ferumoxytol and FCM, two IV iron preparations with similar dosing schedules, focusing on moderate-to-severe hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, and moderate-to-severe hypotension. The study plans to enroll 2000 patients and is expected to complete in 2017.

Keywords: anaphylaxis; ferric carboxymaltose; ferumoxytol; hypersensitivity; hypotension; iron deficiency anemia.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure NFA is a paid consultant for AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. WES, KB, RK, and JK are employees of AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ICM has received speakers fees, honoraria, and consultancy fees from several IV iron manufacturers, including AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pharmacosmos, Roche, Takeda, and Vifor Pharma. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. Abbreviations: FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; Hb, hemoglobin; IV, intravenous; TSAT, transferrin saturation.

References

    1. WHO/CDC . Worldwide Prevalence of Anemia 1993–2005: WHO Global Database on Anemia. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2008.
    1. Miller JL. Iron deficiency anemia: a common and curable disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3(7):a011866.
    1. Ford DC, Dahl NV, Strauss WE, et al. Ferumoxytol versus placebo in iron deficiency anemia: efficacy, safety, and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2016;9:151–162.
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) KDIGO clinical practice guideline for anemia in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(4):280–335.
    1. Macdougall IC, Bircher AJ, Eckardt KU, et al. Iron management in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int. 2016;89(1):28–39.
    1. Macdougall IC, Vernon K. Complement activation-related pseudo-allergy: a fresh look at hypersensitivity reactions to intravenous iron. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(1):60–62.
    1. Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report – Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network Symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117(2):391–397.
    1. Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(5):832–836.
    1. Lieberman P, Kemp SF, Oppenheimer J, Lang DM, Bernstein IL, Nicklas RA. The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis: an updated practice parameter. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(3 suppl 2):S483–S523.
    1. Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Randolph C, et al. Anaphylaxis – a practice parameter update 2015. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;115(5):341–384.
    1. Hempel JC, Poppelaars F, Gaya da Costa M, et al. Distinct in vitro complement activation by various intravenous iron preparations. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(1):49–59.
    1. Szebeni J. Complement activation-related pseudoallergy: a new class of drug-induced acute immune toxicity. Toxicology. 2005;216(2–3):106–121.
    1. Bircher AJ, Auerbach M. Hypersensitivity from intravenous iron products. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34(3):707–723.
    1. Blazevic A, Hunze J, Boots JM. Severe hypophosphataemia after intravenous iron administration. Neth J Med. 2014;72(1):49–53.
    1. Mani LY, Nseir G, Venetz JP, Pascual M. Severe hypophosphatemia after intravenous administration of iron carboxymaltose in a stable renal transplant recipient. Transplantation. 2010;90(7):804–805.
    1. Sato K, Nohtomi K, Demura H, et al. Saccharated ferric oxide (SFO)-induced osteomalacia: in vitro inhibition by SFO of bone formation and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D production in renal tubules. Bone. 1997;21(1):57–64.
    1. Sato K, Shiraki M. Saccharated ferric oxide-induced osteomalacia in Japan: iron-induced osteopathy due to nephropathy. Endocr J. 1998;45(4):431–439.
    1. Schouten BJ, Doogue MP, Soule SG, Hunt PJ. Iron polymaltose-induced FGF23 elevation complicated by hypophosphataemic osteomalacia. Ann Clin Biochem. 2009;46(pt 2):167–169.
    1. Van Wyck DB, Mangione A, Morrison J, Hadley PE, Jehle JA, Good-nough LT. Large-dose intravenous ferric carboxymaltose injection for iron deficiency anemia in heavy uterine bleeding: a randomized, controlled trial. Transfusion. 2009;49(12):2719–2728.
    1. Onken JE, Bregman DB, Harrington RA, et al. A multicenter, randomized, active-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with iron deficiency anemia. Transfusion. 2014;54(2):306–315.
    1. Schaefer B, Wurtinger P, Finkenstedt A, et al. Choice of high-dose intravenous iron preparation determines hypophosphatemia risk. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167146.
    1. Mannheim J [webpage on the Internet] Hypophosphatemia. 2014. [Accessed March 11, 2017]. Available from: .
    1. Anand G, Schmid C. Severe hypophosphataemia after intravenous iron administration. BMJ Case Rep. 2017:2017.
    1. Schouten BJ, Hunt PJ, Livesey JH, Frampton CM, Soule SG. FGF23 elevation and hypophosphatemia after intravenous iron polymaltose: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(7):2332–2337.
    1. Wolf M, Koch TA, Bregman DB. Effects of iron deficiency anemia and its treatment on fibroblast growth factor 23 and phosphate homeostasis in women. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(8):1793–1803.
    1. Ganguli A, Kohli HS, Jha V, Gupta KL, Sakhuja V. The comparative safety of various intravenous iron preparations in chronic kidney disease patients. Ren Fail. 2008;30(6):629–638.
    1. Hetzel D, Strauss W, Bernard K, Li Z, Urboniene A, Allen LF. A phase III, randomized, open-label trial of ferumoxytol compared with iron sucrose for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(6):646–650.
    1. Kosch M, Bahner U, Bettger H, Matzkies F, Teschner M, Schaefer RM. A randomized, controlled parallel-group trial on efficacy and safety of iron sucrose (Venofer) vs iron gluconate (Ferrlecit) in haemodialysis patients treated with rHuEpo. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(6):1239–1244.
    1. Macdougall IC, Strauss WE, McLaughlin J, Li Z, Dellanna F, Hertel J. A randomized comparison of ferumoxytol and iron sucrose for treating iron deficiency anemia in patients with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(4):705–712.
    1. Sav T, Tokgoz B, Sipahioglu MH, et al. Is there a difference between the allergic potencies of the iron sucrose and low molecular weight iron dextran? Ren Fail. 2007;29(4):423–426.
    1. Sheashaa H, El-Husseini A, Sabry A, et al. Parenteral iron therapy in treatment of anemia in end-stage renal disease patients: a comparative study between iron saccharate and gluconate. Nephron Clin Pract. 2005;99(4):c97–c101.
    1. Airy M, Mandayam S, Mitani AA, et al. Comparative outcomes of predominant facility-level use of ferumoxytol versus other intravenous iron formulations in incident hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(12):2068–2075.
    1. Wang C, Graham DJ, Kane RC, et al. Comparative risk of anaphylactic reactions associated with intravenous iron products. JAMA. 2015;314(19):2062–2068.
    1. Wetmore JB, Weinhandl ED, Zhou J, Gilbertson DT. Relative incidence of acute adverse events with ferumoxytol compared to other intravenous iron compounds: a matched cohort study. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0171098.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi