Effects of a workplace prevention programme for problem gambling: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Jonas Rafi, Ekaterina Ivanova, Alexander Rozental, Per Carlbring, Jonas Rafi, Ekaterina Ivanova, Alexander Rozental, Per Carlbring

Abstract

Introduction: Despite being considered a public health problem, no prevention programme for problem gambling in workplace settings has been scientifically evaluated. This study aims to fill a critical gap in the field of problem gambling by implementing and evaluating a large-scale prevention programme in organisations.

Methods and analysis: Ten organisations, with a total of n=549 managers and n=8572 employees, will be randomised to either receiving a prevention programme or to a waitlist control condition. Measurements will be collected at the baseline and 3, 12 and 24 months after intervention. The primary outcome of interest is the managers' inclination to act when worried or suspicious about an employee's problem gambling or other harmful use. Additional outcomes of interest include the Problem Gambling Severity Index and gambling habits in both managers and employees. Furthermore, qualitative analyses of the responses from semistructured interviews with managers will be performed.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the regional ethics board of Stockholm, Sweden, and it will contribute to the body of knowledge concerning prevention of problem gambling. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed, open-access journals.

Trial registration number: NCT02925286; Pre-results.

Keywords: Problem gambling; prevention; workplace policy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study procedure flowchart and timeline. * indicates managerial event only.

References

    1. Neal P, Delfabbro P, O’Neil M. Problem gambling and harm: towards a national definition. 2005.
    1. Morasco BJ, Vom Eigen KA, Petry NM. Severity of gambling is associated with physical and emotional health in urban primary care patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2006;28(2):94–100. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.09.004
    1. Grant JE, Derbyshire K, Leppink E, et al. . Suicidality in non-treatment seeking young adults with subsyndromal gambling disorder. Psychiatr Q 2014;85:513–22. 10.1007/s11126-014-9312-8
    1. Stein GN, Pretorius A, Stein DJ, et al. . The association between pathological gambling and suicidality in treatment-seeking pathological gamblers in South Africa. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2016;28:43–50.
    1. Lorains FK, Cowlishaw S, Thomas SA. Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. Addiction 2011;106:490–8. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03300.x
    1. Abbott MW, Romild U, Volberg RA. Gambling and problem gambling in Sweden: changes between 1998 and 2009. J Gambl Stud 2014;30:985–99. 10.1007/s10899-013-9396-3
    1. Cowlishaw S, Merkouris S, Dowling N, et al. . Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD008937 10.1002/14651858.CD008937.pub2
    1. Yakovenko I, Quigley L, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. . The efficacy of motivational interviewing for disordered gambling: systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Behav 2015;43:72–82. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.12.011
    1. Folkhälsoinstitut S. Att förebygga spelproblem [Preventing problem gambling]. 2010.
    1. Yakovenko I, Hodgins DC. Latest developments in treatment for disordered gambling: review and critical evaluation of outcome studies. Curr Addict Rep 2016;3:299–306. 10.1007/s40429-016-0110-2
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, et al. . Guided internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry 2014;13:288–95. 10.1002/wps.20151
    1. Svensson J, Romild U, Shepherdson E. The concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in a national representative sample in Sweden—a 1 year follow-up study. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1087 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1087
    1. Statens folkhälsoinstitut. Spel: Kunskapsunderlag För Folkhälsopolitisk Rapport 2010. Östersund: Statens folkhälsoinstitut; 2011, Rapport nr: R 2011:19.
    1. Ariyabuddhiphongs V. Problem gambling prevention: before, during, and after measures. Int J Ment Health Addict 2013;11:568–82. 10.1007/s11469-013-9429-2
    1. Rodgers B, Suomi A, Davidson T. Preventive interventions for gambling: a public health perspective. 2015.
    1. Donati MA, Primi C, Chiesi F. Prevention of problematic gambling behavior among adolescents: testing the efficacy of an integrative intervention. J Gambl Stud 2014;30:803–18. 10.1007/s10899-013-9398-1
    1. Williams RJ, Wood RT, Currie SR. Stacked Deck: an effective, school-based program for the prevention of problem gambling. J Prim Prev 2010;31:109–25. 10.1007/s10935-010-0212-x
    1. Pidd K, Kostadinov V, Roche A. Do workplace policies work? An examination of the relationship between alcohol and other drug policies and workers’ substance use. Int J Drug Policy 2016;28:48–54. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.08.017
    1. Binde P. Preventing and responding to gambling-related harm and crime in the workplace. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2016;33:247–65. 10.1515/nsad-2016-0020
    1. Carlbring P, Brunt S, Bohman S, et al. . Internet vs. paper and pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research. Comput Human Behav 2007;23:1421–34. 10.1016/j.chb.2005.05.002
    1. Alna. Spelförebyggande insatser för arbetslivet: fokus på unga vuxna [Gambling prevention in the workplace, targeting young adults]. Stockholm: Alna & Rodeo, 2015.
    1. Alna. Mall för arbete med spel och spelproblem på arbetsplatsen [Template for working with gambling and problem gambling in the workplace]. 2015.
    1. Nyqvist M. Checklista för chefer vid spelproblem [Problem gambling checklist for managers]. 2015.
    1. Wynne H, Ferris J. The Canadian problem gambling index: final report. 2001.
    1. Holtgraves T. Evaluating the problem gambling severity index. J Gambl Stud 2009;25:105–20. 10.1007/s10899-008-9107-7
    1. Romild U, Volberg R, Abbott M. The Swedish Longitudinal Gambling Study (Swelogs): design and methods of the epidemiological (EP-) track. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2014;23:372–86. 10.1002/mpr.1449
    1. Statens Folkhälsoinstitut. Spel om pengar och spelproblem i Sverige 2009/2010 [Gambling and problem gambling in Sweden 2009/2010]. 2012.
    1. Vlaescu G, Alasjö A, Miloff A, et al. . Features and functionality of the Iterapi platform for internet-based psychological treatment. Internet Interv 2016;6:107–14. 10.1016/j.invent.2016.09.006
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Snijders TAB. Multilevel analysis : Lovric M, International encyclopedia of statistical science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011:879–82.
    1. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319:670–4. 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670
    1. Baruch Y, Holtom BC. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations 2008;61:1139–60. 10.1177/0018726708094863
    1. Brick JM, Kalton G. Handling missing data in survey research. Stat Methods Med Res 1996;5:215–38. 10.1177/096228029600500302
    1. Graham JW. Missing data—analysis and design. 2007.
    1. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. . Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 2009;338:b2393 10.1136/bmj.b2393
    1. Eekhout I, Enders CK, Twisk JW, et al. . Including auxiliary item information in longitudinal data analyses improved handling missing questionnaire outcome data. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:637–45. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.012
    1. Hesser H. Modeling individual differences in randomized experiments using growth models: recommendations for design, statistical analysis and reporting of results of internet interventions. Internet Interv 2015;2:110–20. 10.1016/j.invent.2015.02.003
    1. Heo M, Leon AC. Sample size requirements to detect an intervention by time interaction in longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials Moonseong. 2009;28:1017–27.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine. University Press: Oxford, 1992.
    1. Canale N, Vieno A, Griffiths MD. the extent and distribution of gambling-related harms and the prevention paradox in a British population survey. J Behav Addict 2016;5:204–12. 10.1556/2006.5.2016.023

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi