The venous ulcer continues to be a clinical challenge: an update

Ting Xie, Junna Ye, Kittipan Rerkasem, Rajgopal Mani, Ting Xie, Junna Ye, Kittipan Rerkasem, Rajgopal Mani

Abstract

Venous ulcers are a common chronic problem in many countries especially in Northern Europe and USA. The overall prevalence of this condition is 1% rising to 3% in the over 65 years of age. Over the last 25 years, there have been many developments applicable to its diagnosis and treatment. These advances, notwithstanding healing response and recurrence, are variable, and the venous ulcer continues to be a clinical challenge. The pathogenesis of venous ulcers is unrelieved or ambulatory venous hypertension resulting mostly from deep venous thrombosis leading to venous incompetence, lipodermatosclerosis, leucocyte plugging of the capillaries, tissue hypoxia and microvascular dysfunction. It is not known what initiates venous ulcers. Triggers vary from trauma of the lower extremity to scratching to relieve itchy skin over the ankle region. Venous ulcers can be painful, and this condition presents an increasing burden of care. A systematic analysis of the role of technology used for diagnosis and management strongly supports the use of compression as a mainstay of standardised care. It further shows good evidence for the potential of some treatment procedures to accelerate healing. This article reviews the pathogenetic mechanisms, current diagnostic methods and standard care and its limitations.

Keywords: Lipodermatosclerosis; Microcirculatory dysfunction; Technology guidelines; Venous hypertension; Venous ulcer.

Conflict of interest statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this review and any accompanying images. Acopy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.RM has received educational grants from the industry to conduct studies and to present lectures. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prevalence of venous leg ulcers (VLUs) in different countries across the world. A darker colour is used to represent higher prevalence. (Prevalence was reported per 1000 individuals per year)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Typical appearance of patient with lipodermatosclerosis. The skin is flaky and there is a brownish discoloration. The skin can have a waxy feel to it. b A venous ulcer on the medial aspect of the leg
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a A plain X-ray film of a patient with a long-standing venous leg ulcer (VLU). Notice the extensive loss of bone due to infection (osteomyelitis). On account of recurrent episodes of sepsis, the patient received a leg amputation. b A long-standing VLU almost across the lower calf region. Notice the raised edges of the ulcer: a biopsy to exclude cancer proved to be a squamous cell carcinoma
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cartoon of the pathophysiology of venous leg ulcers (VLUs). a The effects of valve incompetence and b the effects on tissues that lead to lipodermatosclerosis, cell death and ulceration. (Figures a and b were reprinted with permission from Mani R. Chronic Wound Management—the Evidence for Change, Parthenon Press 2002; copyright 2002 by Mani)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A mixed arterio-venous leg ulcers (VLUs) with dry, pigmented skin surrounding the ulcer (on the left) and an uncomplicated venous ulcer with a sloughy base (on the right)

References

    1. Callam MJ, Ruckley CV, Harper DR, Dale JJ. Chronic ulceration of the leg: the extent of the problem and the provision of care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;290:1855–6.
    1. Rahman GA, Adigun IA, Fadeyi A. Epidemiology, etiology, and treatment of chronic leg ulcer: experience with sixty patients. Ann Afr Med. 2010;9(1):1–4. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.62615.
    1. Mekkes JR, Loots MA, Van Der Wal AC, Bos JD. Causes, investigation and treatment of leg ulceration. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(3):388–401. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05222.x.
    1. O'Brien JF, Grace PA, Perry IJ, Burke PE. Prevalence and aetiology of leg ulcers in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci. 2000;169(2):110–112. doi: 10.1007/BF03166911.
    1. Baker SR, Stacey MC. Epidemiology of chronic leg ulcers in Australia. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994;64(4):258–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02196.x.
    1. Shukla VK, Ansari MA, Gupta SK. Wound healing research: a perspective from India. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2005;4(1):7–8. doi: 10.1177/1534734604273660.
    1. Jiang Y, Huang S, Fu X, Liu H, Ran X, Lu S, et al. Epidemiology of chronic cutaneous wounds in China. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19(2):181–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00666.x.
    1. Jull A, Walker N, Parag V, Molan P, Rodgers A; Honey as Adjuvant Leg Ulcer Therapy (HALT) trial collaborators. Venous ulcer management in New Zealand: usual care versus guideline recommendations. N Z Med J. 2009;122(1295):9–18.
    1. Xiaofang S, Ni P, Wu M, Huang Y, Ye J, Xie T. A clinicoepidemiological profile of chronic wounds in the Wound Healing Department in Shanghai. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2017;16(1):36–44. doi: 10.1177/1534734617696730.
    1. Guest JF, Ayoub N, McIlwraith MC, Uchegbo I, Gerrish A, Weidlich D, et al. Health economic burden that wounds impose on the Nation Health Service in the UK. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009283.
    1. Mani R, Margolis D, Shukla V, Akita S, Lazarides M, Piaggesi A, et al. Optimising technology use for chronic lower extremity wound healing: a consensus document. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2016;15(2):102–119. doi: 10.1177/1534734616646261.
    1. Nelson EA, Bell-Syer SE. Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9(9):CD002303.
    1. Coleridge-Smith PJ, Thomas P, Scurr JH, Dormandy JA. Causes of venous ulceration: a new hypothesis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988;296:1726–1727. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6638.1726.
    1. Falanga V, Eaglestein WH. The trap hypothesis of venous ulceration. Lancet. 1993;17:1006–1008. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91085-Z.
    1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG, TASC II Working Group Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(Suppl S):S5–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037.
    1. Mosti G, De Maeseneer M, Cavezzi A, Parsi K, Morrison N, Nelzen O, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery and American Venous Forum Guidelines on the management of venous leg ulcers: the point of view of the International Union of Phlebology. Int Angiol. 2015;34(3):202–18.
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of chronic leg ulcers: a national clinical guideline. 2010. ISBN 97811905813667.
    1. Partsch H, Clark M, Mosti G, Steinlechner E, Schuren J, Abel M, et al. Classification of compression bandages: practical aspects. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:600–9.
    1. Mosti G, Caveeza A, Partsch H, Urso S, Campana F. Adjustable Velcro™ compression devices are more effective than inelastic in relieving oedema fluid in the initial treatment phase: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50:368–374. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.05.014.
    1. Gelfand JM, Hoffstadt OJ, Margolis DJ. Surrogate end points for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;119:1420–1425. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.19629.x.
    1. Kurd SK, Hoffstadt OJ, Biker WB, Margolis DJ. Evaluation of the use of prognostic information for care of individuals with venous leg ulcers or diabetic neuropathic ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:318–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00487.x.
    1. Cullum NA, Al-Kurdi D, Bell-Syer SE. Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;16(6):CD001180.
    1. Greer N, Forman NA, MacDonald R, Dorrian J, Fitzqerald P, Rutks I, et al. Advanced wound therapies for nonhealing diabetic, venous and arterial ulcers: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013:159.532–42.
    1. Regulski M, Jacobstein DA, Petranto RD, Migliori VJ, Nair G, Pfeiffer D. A retrospective analysis of a human cellular repair matrix for the treatment of chronic wounds. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2013;59(12):38–43.
    1. Barwell JR, Davies CE, Deacon J, Harvey K, Minor J, Sassano A, et al. Comparison of surgery and compression with compression alone in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9424):1854–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16353-8.
    1. Van Gent WB, Hop WC, Praag MC, Mackay AJ, Boer EM, Witten CH. Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:563–571. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053.
    1. Ye J, Mani R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of nutritional supplementation in chronic lower extremity wounds. Int J Low Extremity Wounds. 2016;15(4):296–302. doi: 10.1177/1534734616674624.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi