First-in-Human Phase I Study of Envafolimab, a Novel Subcutaneous Single-Domain Anti-PD-L1 Antibody, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Kyriakos P Papadopoulos, Wael Harb, Cody J Peer, Qiong Hua, Siying Xu, Haolan Lu, Ni Lu, Yue He, Ting Xu, Ruiping Dong, John Gong, David Liu, Kyriakos P Papadopoulos, Wael Harb, Cody J Peer, Qiong Hua, Siying Xu, Haolan Lu, Ni Lu, Yue He, Ting Xu, Ruiping Dong, John Gong, David Liu

Abstract

Lessons learned: Subcutaneous injection was an effective route of administration for envafolimab with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Subcutaneous envafolimab was well tolerated and had durable antitumor activity at a wide range of doses and schedules. Envafolimab has the potential to be a more convenient option than currently approved intravenous PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Background: Envafolimab is a novel fusion of a humanized single-domain PD-L1 antibody and human IgG1 Fc fragment formulated for subcutaneous injection. This study explored the safety and feasibility of subcutaneous administration of envafolimab as an alternative to intravenous administration of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced, refractory solid tumors.

Methods: This was a first-in-human, open-label phase I trial. In a dose-escalation phase, patients received subcutaneous envafolimab 0.01-10 mg/kg once weekly following a modified 3+3 design. In a dose-exploration phase, patients received subcutaneous envafolimab 300 mg once every 4 weeks.

Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled (dose escalation n = 18, dose exploration n = 10, median age 66 years; 71% male; ECOG performance score = 0 [21%] or 1 [79%]). No dose-limiting toxicities or injection-site reactions were reported. Envafolimab demonstrated dose-proportional increases in area under the time-concentration curve and maximum plasma concentration. Median time to maximum plasma concentration was 4-7 days. In the dose-exploration phase, terminal half-life was 14 days after dose 1 in cycle 1 and 23 days at steady state. Three patients experienced a confirmed partial response.

Conclusion: Subcutaneous envafolimab had a favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profile, with promising preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02827968.

Keywords: Advanced solid tumors; Anti-PD-L1; Envafolimab.

© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Waterfall plot of tumor reduction from baseline during the dose‐escalation and dose‐exploration phases (n = 18). Abbreviations: GI, gastrointestinal; IHBT, intrahepatic biliary tract; NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; Q4W, once every 4 weeks; QW, once weekly; SD, stable disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between natural log‐transformed dose and Cmax(A) and AUClast(B). Slopes were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis. Abbreviations: AUClast, area under the curve until the last measurement; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of subcutaneous injection site on first‐dose dose‐normalized Cmax(A) Or dose‐normalized AUClast(B). Abbreviations: AUClast, area under the curve until the last measurement; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Dose‐normalized steady‐state serum concentrations of envafolimab in patients without and with antidrug antibodies. Abbreviations: ADA, antidrug antibody; Cmin,ss, minimum serum concentration at steady state.

References

    1. Zhang F, Wei H, Wang X et al. Structural basis of a novel pd‐l1 nanobody for immune checkpoint blockade. Cell Discov 2017;3:17004.
    1. Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti‐PD‐1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2443–2454.
    1. Patnaik A, Kang SP, Rasco D et al. Phase I study of pembrolizumab (MK‐3475; anti‐PD‐1 monoclonal antibody) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:4286–4293.
    1. Shi Y, Su H, Song Y et al. Safety and activity of sintilimab in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (ORIENT‐1): A multicentre, single‐arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol 2019;6:e12–e19.
    1. Brahmer JR, Drake CG, Wollner I et al. Phase I study of single‐agent anti‐programmed death‐1 (MDX‐1106) in refractory solid tumors: Safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3167–3175.
    1. Heery CR, O'Sullivan‐Coyne G, Madan RA et al. Avelumab for metastatic or locally advanced previously treated solid tumours (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): A phase 1a, multicohort, dose‐escalation trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:587–598.
    1. Shen L, Li J, Deng Y, et al. 70MO ‐ efficacy and safety of envafolimab (KN035) in advanced tumours with mismatch‐repair deficiency. Ann Oncol 2020;31:S1270–S1272.
    1. Davda J, Declerck P, Hu‐Lieskovan S et al. Immunogenicity of immunomodulatory, antibody‐based, oncology therapeutics. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7:105.
    1. Renner A, Burotto M, Rojas C. Immune checkpoint inhibitor dosing: Can we go lower without compromising clinical efficacy? J Glob Oncol 2019;5:1–5.
    1. Johnson ML, Braiteh F, Grilley‐Olson JE et al. Assessment of subcutaneous vs intravenous administration of anti‐PD‐1 antibody PF‐06801591 in patients with advanced solid tumors: A phase 1 dose‐escalation trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:999–1007.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi