Incidence of dengue illness in Mexican people aged 6 months to 50 years old: A prospective cohort study conducted in Jalisco

Rodrigo DeAntonio, Gerardo Amaya-Tapia, Gabriela Ibarra-Nieto, Gloria Huerta, Silvia Damaso, Adrienne Guignard, Melanie de Boer, Rodrigo DeAntonio, Gerardo Amaya-Tapia, Gabriela Ibarra-Nieto, Gloria Huerta, Silvia Damaso, Adrienne Guignard, Melanie de Boer

Abstract

Background and objectives: The burden of dengue virus (DENV), a mosquito-borne pathogen, remains difficult to assess due to misdiagnosis and underreporting. Moreover, the large proportion of asymptomatic dengue cases impairs comprehensive assessment of its epidemiology even where effective surveillance systems are in place. We conducted a prospective community-based study to assess the incidence of symptomatic dengue cases in Zapopan and neighboring municipalities in the state of Jalisco, Mexico.

Methods: Healthy subjects aged 6 months to 50 years living in households located in the Zapopan and neighboring municipalities were enrolled for a 24-month follow-up study (NCT02766088). Serostatus was determined at enrolment and weekly contacts were conducted via phone calls and home visits. Participants had to report any febrile episode lasting for at least two days. Suspected dengue cases were tested by reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), detection of non-structural protein 1 (NS1), anti-DENV immunoglobulin G and M (IgG and IgM) assays.

Results: A total of 350 individuals from 87 households were enrolled. The overall seroprevalence of anti-DENV IgG at enrolment was 19.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.5-25.6) with the highest seroprevalence rate observed in the adult group. Over the 27-month study period from July 2016 to September 2018, a total of 18 suspected dengue cases were reported. Four cases were confirmed by RT-qPCR and serotyped as DENV-1. A fifth case was confirmed by the NS1 assay. The 13 remaining suspected cases were tested negative by these assays. Based on the 5 virologically confirmed cases, symptomatic dengue incidence proportion of 1.4% (95%CI 0.5-3.8) was estimated. No severe cases or hospitalizations occurred during the study.

Conclusion: Community-based active surveillance was shown as efficient to detect symptomatic dengue cases.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02766088.

Conflict of interest statement

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (GSK) funded this study and covered all costs associated with the development and publication of this manuscript. GH, SD, MDB and AG are employees of the GSK group of companies. SD and AG hold shares in the GSK group of companies. RD was an employee of the GSK group of companies at the time of the study. GAT received payments from the GSK group of companies, as part of the multi-center study. GH, SD, MDB, AG and GAT declare no other financial and nonfinancial relationships and activities. GIN declare no financial and non-financial relationships and activities and no conflicts of interest. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, but please note that the anonymized data is only available upon request due to privacy reasons regarding patient’s privacy and sensitive data.

Figures

Fig 1. Study design.
Fig 1. Study design.
SAE, serious adverse event related to blood drawn. Virologically confirmed dengue case: confirmed by reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction or detection of non-structural protein 1 antigen.
Fig 2. Plain language summary.
Fig 2. Plain language summary.

References

    1. Holmes EC, Twiddy SS. The origin, emergence and evolutionary genetics of dengue virus. Infect Genet Evol. 2003;3(1):19–28. 10.1016/s1567-1348(03)00004-2
    1. Guzman MG, Gubler DJ, Izquierdo A, Martinez E, Halstead SB. Dengue infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2(1):16055. 10.1038/nrdp.2016.55
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Gubler DJ, Weaver SC, Monath TP, Heymann DL, Scott TW. Epidemic arboviral diseases: priorities for research and public health. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(3):e101–e6. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30518-7
    1. Kraemer MU, Sinka ME, Duda KA, Mylne AQ, Shearer FM, Barker CM, et al.. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Elife. 2015;4:e08347. 10.7554/eLife.08347
    1. Simmons CP, Farrar JJ, van Vinh Chau N, Wills B. Dengue. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(15):1423–32. 10.1056/NEJMra1110265
    1. World Health Organization. Dengue: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control. 2009. [accessed 08 April 2020].
    1. World Health Organization. Dengue and severe dengue. [accessed 08 April 2020].
    1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al.. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504–7. 10.1038/nature12060
    1. Brady OJ, Gething PW, Bhatt S, Messina JP, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, et al.. Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(8):e1760. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001760
    1. Kraemer MUG, Reiner RC Jr., Brady OJ, Messina JP, Gilbert M, Pigott DM, et al.. Past and future spread of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4(5):854–63. 10.1038/s41564-019-0376-y
    1. Brathwaite Dick O, San Martín JL, Montoya RH, del Diego J, Zambrano B, Dayan GH. The history of dengue outbreaks in the Americas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;87(4):584–93. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0770
    1. Pan American Health Organization. Dengue. [accessed 08 April 2020].
    1. Gobierno de México. Panorama Epidemiológico de Dengue, 2019. [accessed 08 April 2020].
    1. Undurraga EA, Betancourt-Cravioto M, Ramos-Castañeda J, Martínez-Vega R, Méndez-Galván J, Gubler DJ, et al.. Economic and Disease Burden of Dengue in Mexico. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(3):e0003547. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003547
    1. Gobierno de México. Panorama Epidemiológico de Dengue, 2017. [accessed 08 April 2020].
    1. Gobierno de México. Panorama Epidemiológico de Dengue, 2016. [accessed 08 April 2020].
    1. Sarti E, L’Azou M, Mercado M, Kuri P, Siqueira JB Jr., Solis E, et al.. A comparative study on active and passive epidemiological surveillance for dengue in five countries of Latin America. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;44:44–9. 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.01.015
    1. Waggoner JJ, Gresh L, Vargas MJ, Ballesteros G, Tellez Y, Soda KJ, et al.. Viremia and Clinical Presentation in Nicaraguan Patients Infected With Zika Virus, Chikungunya Virus, and Dengue Virus. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2016;63(12):1584–90. 10.1093/cid/ciw589
    1. Gupta BP, Singh S, Kurmi R, Malla R, Sreekumar E, Manandhar KD. Re-emergence of dengue virus serotype 2 strains in the 2013 outbreak in Nepal. Indian J Med Res. 2015;142 Suppl:S1–6.
    1. Cucunawangsih Lugito NPH. Trends of Dengue Disease Epidemiology. Virology: research and treatment. 2017;8:1178122X17695836-1178122X. 10.1177/1178122X17695836
    1. Gupta B, Reddy BPN. Fight against dengue in India: progresses and challenges. Parasitol Res. 2013;112(4):1367–78. 10.1007/s00436-013-3342-2
    1. World Health Organization. Dengue vaccine: WHO position paper, September 2018 –Recommendations. Vaccine. 2019;37(35):4848–9. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.063
    1. Blacksell SD, Jarman RG, Gibbons RV, Tanganuchitcharnchai A, Mammen MP Jr., Nisalak A, et al.. Comparison of seven commercial antigen and antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of acute dengue infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19(5):804–10. 10.1128/CVI.05717-11
    1. Sasmono RT, Aryati A, Wardhani P, Yohan B, Trimarsanto H, Fahri S, et al.. Performance of Simplexa dengue molecular assay compared to conventional and SYBR green RT-PCR for detection of dengue infection in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e103815–e. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103815
    1. Kikuti M, Cruz JS, Rodrigues MS, Tavares AS, Paploski IAD, Silva MMO, et al.. Accuracy of the SD BIOLINE Dengue Duo for rapid point-of-care diagnosis of dengue. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213301–e. 10.1371/journal.pone.0213301
    1. Dussart P, Labeau B, Lagathu G, Louis P, Nunes MR, Rodrigues SG, et al.. Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of dengue virus NS1 antigen in human serum. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006;13(11):1185–9. 10.1128/CVI.00229-06
    1. Amaya-Larios IY, Rojas-Russell M, López-Cervantes M, Castro-Porras L, Castro-Borbonio MV, Sarti E, et al.. Seroprevalence of dengue in school children in Mexico ages 6–17 years, 2016. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018;112(5):223–9. 10.1093/trstmh/try046
    1. Guzman Holst A, Gilberto Gomez L, Yolanda Cervantes Apolinar M, Huerta G. 1667. Influenza A and B Co-Circulation and Burden: A 2018–2019 Influenza Season Analysis Using the National Active Surveillance Database in Mexico. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2019;6(Supplement_2):S609–S10.
    1. Chatchen S, Sabchareon A, Sirivichayakul C. Serodiagnosis of asymptomatic dengue infection. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2017;10(1):11–4. 10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.12.002
    1. Nimmagadda SS, Mahabala C, Boloor A, Raghuram PM, Nayak UA. Atypical Manifestations of Dengue Fever (DF)—Where Do We Stand Today? J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(1):71–3. 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6885.3960
    1. Pothapregada S. Clinical Profile of Atypical Manifestations of Dengue Fever: Author’s Reply. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83(10):1211. 10.1007/s12098-016-2075-5

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi