Sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in intensive care unit: a network meta-analysis

Zhongheng Zhang, Kun Chen, Hongying Ni, Xiaoling Zhang, Haozhe Fan, Zhongheng Zhang, Kun Chen, Hongying Ni, Xiaoling Zhang, Haozhe Fan

Abstract

Sedatives are commonly used for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICU). However, a variety of sedatives are available and their efficacy and safety have been compared in numerous trials with inconsistent results. To resolve uncertainties regarding usefulness of these sedatives, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials comparing sedatives in mechanically ventilated ICU patients were included. Graph-theoretical methods were employed for network meta-analysis. A total of 51 citations comprising 52 RCTs were included in our analysis. Dexmedetomidine showed shorter MV duration than lorazepam (mean difference (MD): 68.7; 95% CI: 18.2-119.3 hours), midazolam (MD: 10.2; 95% CI: 7.7-12.7 hours) and propofol (MD: 3.4; 95% CI: 0.9-5.9 hours). Compared with dexmedetomidine, midazolam was associated with significantly increased risk of delirium (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.17-5.19). Our study shows that dexmedetomidine has potential benefits in reducing duration of MV and lowering the risk of delirium.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for study…
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for study inclusion.
Figure 2. Summary of risk of bias…
Figure 2. Summary of risk of bias for included trials.
Figure 3. Network of comparators.
Figure 3. Network of comparators.
The nodes in the graph correspond to sedatives and edges display the observed treatment comparisons. The thickness of the edge is proportional to inverse standard error of random effects model comparing two treatments. For example, the dex-propofol comparison appears to be thick, indicating a small standard error for the effect size. Multi-arm studies were highlighted with blue color. For example, there is a study with three arms comprising midazolam, propofol and placebo. The triangle involving these three alternative treatments is filled with blue color.
Figure 4. Difference in duration of mechanical…
Figure 4. Difference in duration of mechanical ventilation between comparators.
Dexmedetomidine was used as the reference.
Figure 5. Net heat plot highlights the…
Figure 5. Net heat plot highlights the inconsistency between specific direct and indirect evidence in the whole network.
The effect estimates in the row represents pooled effect of direct and indirect effects, and the effects in the column corresponds to the direct effect. There are gray squares in some cells, and the area size is proportional to the contribution of one design in a column that is estimated from direct comparison to an overall network estimate in a row. Also note there are different colors in the cells. After detaching the effect of column design, there will be a change in the inconsistency between direct and indirect estimates. Blue colors indicate an increase in the inconsistency between direct and indirect estimates, and warm colors indicate the opposite (the intensity of the color is proportional to the magnitude of change). The pairwise contrasts corresponding to designs of three-arm studies are marked by the symbol ‘_’ following the treatments of the design.
Figure 6. Odds of delirium in each…
Figure 6. Odds of delirium in each sedative, as compared to that in dexmedetomidine group.

References

    1. Czaplik M. et al.. Psychoacoustic analysis of noise and the application of earplugs in an ICU: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 33, 14–21 (2016).
    1. Van Rompaey B., Elseviers M. M., Van Drom W., Fromont V. & Jorens P. G. The effect of earplugs during the night on the onset of delirium and sleep perception: a randomized controlled trial in intensive care patients. Crit Care 16, R73 (2012).
    1. Hu R.-F., Jiang X.-Y., Hegadoren K. M. & Zhang Y.-H. Effects of earplugs and eye masks combined with relaxing music on sleep, melatonin and cortisol levels in ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 19, 115 (2015).
    1. Sneyers B., Laterre P.-F., Perreault M. M., Wouters D. & Spinewine A. Current practices and barriers impairing physicians‘ and nurses’ adherence to analgo-sedation recommendations in the intensive care unit--a national survey. Crit Care 18, 655 (2014).
    1. Prime D. et al.. Patient experiences during awake mechanical ventilation. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 6, 30426 (2016).
    1. Fink R. M., Makic M. B. F., Poteet A. W. & Oman K. S. The Ventilated Patient’s Experience. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 34, 301–308 (2015).
    1. Mehta S. et al.. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of delirium in mechanically ventilated adults. Critical Care Medicine 43, 557–566 (2015).
    1. Shehabi Y., Bellomo R., Mehta S., Riker R. & Takala J. Intensive care sedation: the past, present and the future. Crit Care 17, 322 (2013).
    1. Hozo S. P., Djulbegovic B. & Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5, 13 (2005).
    1. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 1–649 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, doi: 10.1002/9780470712184 (2008).
    1. Rücker G. Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory. Res Synth Methods 3, 312–324 (2012).
    1. Krahn U., Binder H. & König J. A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol 13, 35 (2013).
    1. Neupane B., Richer D., Bonner A. J., Kibret T. & Beyene J. Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages. PLoS ONE 9, e115065 (2014).
    1. Abd Aziz N. et al.. Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus morphine in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. Int J Clin Pharm 33, 150–154 (2011).
    1. Aghdaii N., Yazdanian F. & Faritus S. Z. Sedative Efficacy of Propofol in Patients Intubated/Ventilated after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Anesth Pain Med 3 (2014).
    1. Aitkenhead A. R. et al.. Comparison of propofol and midazolam for sedation in critically ill patients. Lancet 2, 704–709 (1989).
    1. Aydogan M. S. et al.. Pain, fentanyl consumption, and delirium in adolescents after scoliosis surgery: dexmedetomidine vs midazolam. Paediatr Anaesth 23, 446–452 (2013).
    1. Balkanay O. O., Goksedef D., Omeroglu S. N. & Ipek G. The dose-related effects of Dexmedetomidine on renal functions and serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin values after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 20, 209–214 (2015).
    1. Barrientos-Vega R. et al.. Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: impact on weaning and costs. Critical Care Medicine 25, 33–40 (1997).
    1. Carrasco G. et al.. Synergistic sedation with propofol and midazolam in intensive care patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Critical Care Medicine 26, 844–851 (1998).
    1. Carson S. S. et al.. A randomized trial of intermittent lorazepam versus propofol with daily interruption in mechanically ventilated patients*. Critical Care Medicine 34, 1326–1332 (2006).
    1. Cernaianu A. C. et al.. Lorazepam and midazolam in the intensive care unit: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study of hemodynamics, oxygen transport, efficacy, and cost. Critical Care Medicine 24, 222–228 (1996).
    1. Chamorro C. et al.. Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Critical Care Medicine 24, 932–939 (1996).
    1. Corbett S. M. et al.. Dexmedetomidine does not improve patient satisfaction when compared with propofol during mechanical ventilation. Critical Care Medicine 33, 940–945 (2005).
    1. Djaiani G. et al.. Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol Sedation Reduces Delirium after Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology 124, 362–368 (2016).
    1. Abdulatif M. A comparative study of the use of dexmedetomidine and propofol as sedatives for mechanically ventilated patients in ICU. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia 20, 437–442 (2004).
    1. Elbaradie S., Mahalawy El, F. H. & Solyman A. H. Dexmedetomidine vs. propofol for short-term sedation of postoperative mechanically ventilated patients. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 16, 153–158 (2004).
    1. Eremenko A. [Comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol for short-term sedation in early postoperative period after cardiac surgery]. Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia 37–41 (2014).
    1. Esmaoglu A., Ulgey A., Akin A. & Boyaci A. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation of eclampsia patients in the intensive care unit. Journal of Critical Care 24, 551–555 (2009).
    1. Gupta S., Singh D., Sood D. & Kathuria S. Role of dexmedetomidine in early extubation of the intensive care unit patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 31, 92–98 (2015).
    1. Hall R. I. et al.. Propofol vs midazolam for ICU sedation: a Canadian multicenter randomized trial. Chest 119, 1151–1159 (2001).
    1. Hellström J., Öwall A. & Sackey P. V. Wake-up times following sedation with sevoflurane versus propofol after cardiac surgery. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 46, 262–268 (2012).
    1. Herr D. L., Sum-Ping S. T. J. & England M. ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 17, 576–584 (2003).
    1. Higgins T. L. et al.. Propofol versus midazolam for intensive care unit sedation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Critical Care Medicine 22, 1415–1423 (1994).
    1. Hu Z. The use of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol in mechanically ventilated patients. Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army 40, 479–483 (2015).
    1. Huang Z., Chen Y.-S., Yang Z.-L. & Liu J.-Y. Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for the Sedation of Patients with Non-invasive Ventilation Failure. Intern. Med. 51, 2299–2305 (2012).
    1. Huang F. Sedative effects of dexmedetomidine in post-operative elder patients on mechanical ventilation. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi 94, 3211–3215 (2014).
    1. Jakob S. M. et al.. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA 307, 1151–1160 (2012).
    1. Jalonen J. et al.. Dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjunct in coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology 86, 331–345 (1997).
    1. Kim H.-J. et al.. A comparison among infusion of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine alone and in combination in subjects undergoing coronary artery bypass graft: a randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials 39, 303–309 (2014).
    1. MacLaren R. et al.. A Randomized, Double-Blind Pilot Study of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Intensive Care Unit Sedation: Patient Recall of Their Experiences and Short-Term Psychological Outcomes. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 30, 167–175 (2015).
    1. Maldonado J. R. et al.. Dexmedetomidine and the reduction of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. Psychosomatics 50, 206–217 (2009).
    1. Memiş D., Kargi M. & Sut N. Effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine on indocyanine green elimination assessed with LİMON to patients with early septic shock: A pilot study. Journal of Critical Care 24, 603–608 (2009).
    1. Pandharipande P. P. et al.. Effect of Sedation With Dexmedetomidine vs Lorazepam on Acute Brain Dysfunction in Mechanically Ventilated Patients. JAMA 298, 2644–2653 (2007).
    1. Reade M. C. et al.. Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial. Crit Care 13, R75 (2009).
    1. Reade M. C. et al.. Effect of Dexmedetomidine Added to Standard Care on Ventilator-Free Time in Patients With Agitated Delirium: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 315, 1460–1468 (2016).
    1. Ren J. et al.. Protective effect of dexmedetomidine in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Exp Ther Med 6, 497–502 (2013).
    1. Riker R. R. Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients <subtitle> A Randomized Trial </subtitle>. JAMA 301, 489–499 (2009).
    1. Roekaerts P. M., Huygen F. J. & de Lange S. Infusion of propofol versus midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit following coronary artery surgery. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 7, 142–147 (1993).
    1. Rubino A. S. et al.. Impact of clonidine administration on delirium and related respiratory weaning after surgical correction of acute type-A aortic dissection: results of a pilot study. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 10, 58–62 (2010).
    1. Sakarya M. Propofol or midazolam infusion for sedation following myocardial revascularization | Miyokard revaskularizasyonu sonrasi propofol ve midazolam ile sedasyon. Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon 27, 171–176 (1999).
    1. Shah P. et al.. Comparison of post-operative ICU sedation between dexmedetomidine and propofol in Indian population. Indian J Crit Care Med 18, 291 (2014).
    1. Shehabi Y. et al.. Early Goal-Directed Sedation Versus Standard Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients. Critical Care Medicine 41, 1983–1991 (2013).
    1. Shehabi Y. et al.. Prevalence of delirium with dexmedetomidine compared with morphine based therapy after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial (DEXmedetomidine COmpared to Morphine-DEXCOM Study). Anesthesiology 111, 1075–1084 (2009).
    1. Song R. A study of using dexmedetomidine in ventilator bundle treatment in an ICU. Chinese Critical Care Medicine 27, 836–840 (2015).
    1. Soro M. et al.. Cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane and propofol during anaesthesia and the postoperative period in coronary bypass graft surgery: a double-blind randomised study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 29, 561–569 (2012).
    1. Srivastava U. et al.. Comparison of clonidine and dexmedetomidine for short-term sedation of intensive care unit patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 18, 431–436 (2014).
    1. Tasdogan M., Memiş D., Sut N. & Yuksel M. Results of a pilot study on the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine on inflammatory responses and intraabdominal pressure in severe sepsis. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 21, 394–400 (2009).
    1. Venn R. M. & Grounds R. M. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit: patient and clinician perceptions. Br J Anaesth 87, 684–690 (2001).
    1. Wan L. Comparison of sedative effect of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for post-operative patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in surgical intensive care unit. Chinese Critical Care Medicine 23, 543–546 (2011).
    1. Weinbroum A. A. et al.. Midazolam versus propofol for long-term sedation in the ICU: a randomized prospective comparison. Intensive Care Medicine 23, 1258–1263 (1997).
    1. Yapici N. et al.. Dexmedetomidine in cardiac surgery patients who fail extubation and present with a delirium state. The Heart Surgery Forum 14, E93–8 (2011).
    1. Zhang C. Clinical study of different types of sedation and analgesia in patients with mechanical ventilation in icu. Medical Journal of Wuhan University 37, 322–326 (2016).
    1. Ruokonen E. et al.. Dexmedetomidine versus propofol/midazolam for long-term sedation during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Medicine 35, 282–290 (2009).
    1. Fraser G. L. et al.. Benzodiazepine versus nonbenzodiazepine-based sedation for mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Critical Care Medicine 41, S30–8 (2013).
    1. Chen K. et al.. Alpha-2 agonists for long-term sedation during mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1, CD010269 (2015).
    1. Cruickshank M. et al.. Alpha-2 agonists for sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in intensive care units: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 20, 1–118 (2016).
    1. Zhang Z., Xu X. & Ni H. Small studies may overestimate the effect sizes in critical care meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study. Crit Care 17, R2 (2013).

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi