Sedentary behaviour and biomarkers for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in mid-life: the role of television-viewing and sitting at work

Snehal M Pinto Pereira, Myung Ki, Chris Power, Snehal M Pinto Pereira, Myung Ki, Chris Power

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of sedentary behaviour associations with health has relied mainly on television-viewing as a proxy and studies with other measures are less common. To clarify whether sedentary behaviour is associated with disease-risk, we examined associations for television-viewing and sitting at work.

Methods: Using the 1958 British birth cohort (n = 7660), we analysed cross-sectional associations between television-viewing and work sitting (four categories, 0-1 to ≥ 3 h/d) with total, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, hypertension and metabolic syndrome at 45 y. We adjusted for lifestyle and socio-demographic factors and assessed mediation of associations by body mass index (BMI) and diet. We also assessed whether the sedentary indicators are related similarly to factors linked to disease-risk.

Results: There was a general trend of adverse socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics with higher h/d television-viewing, but trends in the opposite direction for work sitting. Television-viewing was associated with most biomarkers and associations were mediated by BMI: e.g. for each category increase in television-viewing, HDL-cholesterol in men was lower by 2.3% (95% CI: 1.5%, 3.2%) and, in BMI and diet adjusted analyses, by 1.6% (0.8%, 2.4%); for women, by 2.0% (1.2%, 2.9%) and 0.9% (0.1%, 1.6%) respectively. Few, weaker associations for work sitting were found, in men only: e.g. corresponding values for HDL-cholesterol were 1.2% (0.5%, 1.9%) and 0.9% (0.3%, 1.5%). Odds for metabolic syndrome were elevated by 82% and 33% respectively for men watching television or work sitting for ≥ 3 vs. 0-1 h/d.

Conclusions: Associations with cardiovascular disease and diabetes biomarkers in mid-adulthood differed for television-viewing and work sitting. The role of sedentary behaviour may vary by leisure and work domains or the two indicators reflect differing associations with other disease-related influences.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Mean % change (95% CI)…
Figure 1. Mean % change (95% CI) in biomarker level, for women, per category increase in television-viewing (a) and sitting at work (b).
Footnote: SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; HbA1c = glycated haemoglobin; CRP = C-reactive protein. *Quarter % change in CRP level per category increase in sedentary behaviour. Corresponding values for a % change in CRP per category increase in (a) television-viewing: 21.72% (95% CI: 17.42%, 26.02%), 15.56% (11.21%, 19.90%) and 8.39% (4.49%, 12.28%) and (b) sitting at work: −2.33% (−5.54%, 0.88%), −1.33% (−4.58%, 1.92%) and 0.13 (−2.74%, 3.00%) for “unadjusted”, “adjusted” and “adjusted+BMI+Diet” respectively. N varies from 3,752 to 3,037 due to variation in missing data. Model “Adjusted” includes: moderate-vigorous leisure activity frequency, smoking, social class at birth and in adulthood, education level, birth-weight, longstanding illness limiting daily activity, menopausal status, HRT and OC use; for total, HDL and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c, fibrinogen and CRP additional adjustment for hypertension; for SBP, DBP, HbA1c,fibrinogen and CRP additional adjustment for total and HDL-cholesterol. Model “Adjusted+Diet+BMI” includes: all factors mentioned above plus consumption of chips, sweets/chocolates, alcohol, and BMI.
Figure 2. Mean % change (95% CI)…
Figure 2. Mean % change (95% CI) in biomarker level, for men, per category increase in television-viewing (a) and sitting at work (b).
Footnote: SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; HbA1c = glycated haemoglobin; CRP = C-reactive protein. *Quarter % change in CRP level per category increase in sedentary behaviour. Corresponding values for a % change in CRP per category increase in (a) television-viewing: 10.88% (95% CI: 7.2%, 14.57%), 5.73% (1.99%, 9.47%) and 1.83% (−1.72%, 5.37%) and (b) sitting at work: −1.01% (−3.80%, 1.78%), 1.47% (−1.57%, 4.51%) and −0.07% (−2.93%, 2.79%) for unadjusted”, “adjusted” and “adjusted+BMI+Diet” respectively. N varies from 3,861 to 3,024 due to variation in missing data. Model “Adjusted” includes: moderate-vigorous leisure activity frequency, smoking, social class at birth and in adulthood, education level, birth-weight and longstanding illness limiting daily activity; for total, HDL and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c,fibrinogen and CRP additional adjustment for hypertension; for SBP, DBP, HbA1c, fibrinogen and CRP additional adjustment for total and HDL-cholesterol. Model “Adjusted+Diet+BMI” includes: all factors mentioned above plus consumption of chips, sweets/chocolates, alcohol, and BMI.

References

    1. Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Dunstan DW. Screen-based entertainment time, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events: population-based study with ongoing mortality and hospital events follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:292–299.
    1. Wijndaele K, Brage S, Besson H, Khaw KT, Sharp SJ, et al. Television viewing time independently predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: the EPIC Norfolk study. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:150–159.
    1. Dunstan DW, Barr EL, Healy GN, Salmon J, Shaw JE, et al. Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation. 2010;121:384–391.
    1. Aadahl M, Kjaer M, Jorgensen T. Influence of time spent on TV viewing and vigorous intensity physical activity on cardiovascular biomarkers. The Inter 99 study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14:660–665.
    1. Parsons TJ, Power C, Manor O. Physical activity, television viewing and body mass index: a cross-sectional analysis from childhood to adulthood in the 1958 British cohort. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29:1212–1221.
    1. Jakes RW, Day NE, Khaw KT, Luben R, Oakes S, et al. Television viewing and low participation in vigorous recreation are independently associated with obesity and markers of cardiovascular disease risk: EPIC-Norfolk population-based study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57:1089–1096.
    1. Sisson SB, Camhi SM, Church TS, Martin CK, Tudor-Locke C, et al. Leisure time sedentary behavior, occupational/domestic physical activity, and metabolic syndrome in U.S. men and women. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7:529–536.
    1. Chang PC, Li TC, Wu MT, Liu CS, Li CI, et al. Association between television viewing and the risk of metabolic syndrome in a community-based population. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:193.
    1. Bertrais S, Beyeme-Ondoua JP, Czernichow S, Galan P, Hercberg S, et al. Sedentary behaviors, physical activity, and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged French subjects. Obes Res. 2005;13:936–944.
    1. Ford ES, Kohl HW, 3rd, Mokdad AH, Ajani UA. Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Obes Res. 2005;13:608–614.
    1. Hu FB, Leitzmann MF, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, et al. Physical activity and television watching in relation to risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus in men. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1542–1548.
    1. Pate RR, O'Neill JR, Lobelo F. The evolving definition of “sedentary”. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2008;36:173–178.
    1. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2008;167:875–881.
    1. The Nielsen Company. State of the Media TV Usage Trends: Q3 and Q4 2010. 2011. The Nielsen Company.
    1. Clark BK, Sugiyama T, Healy GN, Salmon J, Dunstan DW, et al. Validity and reliability of measures of television viewing time and other non-occupational sedentary behaviour of adults: a review. Obes Rev. 2009;10:7–16.
    1. Warren TY, Barry V, Hooker SP, Sui X, Church TS, et al. Sedentary behaviors increase risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:879–885.
    1. Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE. Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA. 2003;289:1785–1791.
    1. Zhang M, Xie X, Lee AH, Binns CW. Sedentary behaviours and epithelial ovarian cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:83–89.
    1. Inoue M, Iso H, Yamamoto S, Kurahashi N, Iwasaki M, et al. Daily total physical activity level and premature death in men and women: results from a large-scale population-based cohort study in Japan (JPHC study). Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18:522–530.
    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:998–1005.
    1. Blass EM, Anderson DR, Kirkorian HL, Pempek TA, Price I, et al. On the road to obesity: Television viewing increases intake of high-density foods. Physiol Behav. 2006;88:597–604.
    1. Hetherington MM, Anderson AS, Norton GN, Newson L. Situational effects on meal intake: A comparison of eating alone and eating with others. Physiol Behav. 2006;88:498–505.
    1. Bellisle F, Dalix AM, Slama G. Non food-related environmental stimuli induce increased meal intake in healthy women: comparison of television viewing versus listening to a recorded story in laboratory settings. Appetite. 2004;43:175–180.
    1. Stroebele N, de Castro JM. Television viewing is associated with an increase in meal frequency in humans. Appetite. 2004;42:111–113.
    1. Gore SA, Foster JA, DiLillo VG, Kirk K, Smith West D. Television viewing and snacking. Eat Behav. 2003;4:399–405.
    1. Charreire H, Kesse-Guyot E, Bertrais S, Simon C, Chaix B, et al. Associations between dietary patterns, physical activity (leisure-time and occupational) and television viewing in middle-aged French adults. British Journal of Nutrition. 2011;105:902–910.
    1. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996–2011. American journal of preventive medicine. 2011;41:207–215.
    1. Power C, Elliott J. Cohort profile: 1958 British birth cohort (National Child Development Study). Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:34–41.
    1. Atherton K, Fuller E, Shepherd P, Strachan DP, Power C. Loss and representativeness in a biomedical survey at age 45 years: 1958 British birth cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:216–223.
    1. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502.
    1. Wood AM, White I, Thompson SG, Lewington S, Danesh J. Regression dilution methods for meta-analysis: assessing long-term variability in plasma fibrinogen among 27,247 adults in 15 prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1570–1578.
    1. Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO, 3rd, et al. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2003;107:499–511.
    1. Chalmers J, MacMahon S, Mancia G, Whitworth J, Beilin L, et al. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension. Guidelines sub-committee of the World Health Organization. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1999;21:1009–1060.
    1. Power C, Atherton K, Thomas C. Maternal smoking in pregnancy, adult adiposity and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2010;211:643–648.
    1. Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Mitchell J, Hennings S, et al. Validity and repeatability of the EPIC-Norfolk Physical Activity Questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:168–174.
    1. Parsons TJ, Thomas C, Power C. Estimated activity patterns in British 45 year olds: cross-sectional findings from the 1958 British birth cohort. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:978–985.
    1. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption–II. Addiction. 1993;88:791–804.
    1. Cole TJ. Sympercents: symmetric percentage differences on the 100 log(e) scale simplify the presentation of log transformed data. Stat Med. 2000;19:3109–3125.
    1. Tobin MD, Sheehan NA, Scurrah KJ, Burton PR. Adjusting for treatment effects in studies of quantitative traits: antihypertensive therapy and systolic blood pressure. Stat Med. 2005;24:2911–2935.
    1. Ki M, Pouliou T, Li L, Power C. Physical (in)activity over 20 y in adulthood: Associations with adult lipid levels in the 1958 British birth cohort. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219:361–367.
    1. Bennett WL, Maruthur NM, Singh S, Segal JB, Wilson LM, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of medications for type 2 diabetes: an update including new drugs and 2-drug combinations. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:602–613.
    1. Zweers A, Yaron E, Groen JJ. A study of fasting and postprandial serum triglycerides in connection with epidemiological surveys. Clin Chim Acta. 1968;19:267–275.
    1. Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, Sigurdsson G, Wareham N, et al. Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10,158 incident cases among 262,525 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation. 2007;115:450–458.
    1. Warren JM, Ekelund U, Besson H, Mezzani A, Geladas N, et al. Assessment of physical activity - a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17:127–139.
    1. Healy GN, Clark BK, Winkler EA, Gardiner PA, Brown WJ, et al. Measurement of adults' sedentary time in population-based studies. American journal of preventive medicine. 2011;41:216–227.
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:S498–504.
    1. Wareham NJ. Epidemiological studies of physical activity and diabetes risk, and implications for diabetes prevention. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:778–782.
    1. Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Owen N, Armstrong T, Zimmet PZ, et al. Associations of TV viewing and physical activity with the metabolic syndrome in Australian adults. Diabetologia. 2005;48:2254–2261.
    1. Fung TT, Hu FB, Yu J, Chu N-F, Spiegelman D, et al. Leisure-Time Physical Activity, Television Watching, and Plasma Biomarkers of Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2000;152:1171–1178.
    1. Kronenberg F, Pereira MA, Schmitz MK, Arnett DK, Evenson KR, et al. Influence of leisure time physical activity and television watching on atherosclerosis risk factors in the NHLBI Family Heart Study. Atherosclerosis. 2000;153:433–443.
    1. Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56:2655–2667.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi