Open-label bendamustine monotherapy for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia: efficacy and tolerability

Chris Fraser, Patrick Brown, Gail Megason, Hyo Seop Ahn, Bin Cho, Ivan Kirov, Lawrence Frankel, Richard Aplenc, Debra Bensen-Kennedy, Mihaela Munteanu, Jennifer Weaver, Paul Harker-Murray, Chris Fraser, Patrick Brown, Gail Megason, Hyo Seop Ahn, Bin Cho, Ivan Kirov, Lawrence Frankel, Richard Aplenc, Debra Bensen-Kennedy, Mihaela Munteanu, Jennifer Weaver, Paul Harker-Murray

Abstract

This open-label, single-arm, phase I/II, dose-escalation study was designed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and efficacy of bendamustine in pediatric patients (age ranging from 1 to 20 y) with histologically proven relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients (27 with ALL, 16 with AML) received intravenous bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each treatment cycle. Phase I involved planned dose escalation of bendamustine to establish the RP2D for phase II. Objectives included overall response rate, duration of response, and tolerability. Eleven patients were treated in phase I, and the RP2D was 120 mg/m. In phase II, 32 patients received bendamustine 120 mg/m. Two patients with ALL (bendamustine 90 mg/m) experienced complete response (CR). Among patients who received bendamustine 120 mg/m, 2 experienced partial response (PR); 7 had stable disease. The overall response rate (CR+CR without platelet recovery [CRp]) was 4.7% and biological activity rate (CR+CRp+PR) was 9.3%. No AML patients responded. The most common adverse events were anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, pyrexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Bendamustine monotherapy has acceptable tolerability in heavily pretreated children with relapsed/refractory ALL or AML and appears to have some activity in ALL, warranting further studies in combination trials.

Conflict of interest statement

L.F. is employed by PPD-PharmacoVigilance (contractual relationship with Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D Inc.). D.B.K., M.M., and J.W. were employed by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D Inc. at the time the study was conducted. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Treatment and evaluation plan. *All subsequent cycles require clinical determination of patient benefit. †Count recovery for induction defined as neutrophil count ≥1.0×109/L and platelet count ≥100×109/L. ‡Disease evaluation may include peripheral laboratory testing and/or bone marrow evaluation at the discretion of the treating physician. Count recovery for subsequent cycles defined as platelet count not requiring transfusion and neutrophil count ≥500. §Clinical discretion for additional cycles of therapy is required based on patient’s clinical need; maximum of 35 days for recovery, minimum neutrophil count is 500, and platelet count may be supported with transfusion. CR indicates complete response; CRp, complete response without platelet recovery; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Patient disposition.

References

    1. Bhatia U, Danishefsky K, Traganos F, et al. Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle-specific change in expression of p53 in normal lymphocytes and MOLT-4 leukemic cells by nitrogen mustard.Clin Cancer Res. 1995;1:873–880
    1. Strumberg D, Harstrick A, Doll K, et al. Bendamustine hydrochloride activity against doxorubicin-resistant human breast carcinoma cell lines.Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:415–421
    1. Leoni LM, Bailey B, Reifert J, et al. Bendamustine (Treanda) displays a distinct pattern of cytotoxicity and unique mechanistic features compared with other alkylating agents.Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:309–317
    1. Knauf WU, Lissichkov T, Aldaoud A, et al. Phase III randomized study of bendamustine compared with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4378–4384
    1. Friedberg JW, Cohen P, Chen L, et al. Bendamustine in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent and transformed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results from a phase II multicenter, single-agent study.J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:204–210
    1. Konstantinov SM, Kostovski A, Topashka-Ancheva M, et al. Cytotoxic efficacy of bendamustine in human leukemia and breast cancer cell lines.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2002;128:271–278
    1. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia.J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4642–4649
    1. Owen JS, Melhem M, Passarell JA, et al. Bendamustine pharmacokinetic profile and exposure-response relationships in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;66:1039–1049
    1. National Institutes of Health Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. NIH Publication No. 09-5410. 2009Bethesda, MD:National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
    1. Klumper E, Pieters R, Veerman AJ, et al. In vitro cellular drug resistance in children with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood. 1995;86:3861–3868
    1. Strupp C, Knipp S, Hartmann J, et al. A pilot study of bendamustine in elderly patients with high-risk MDS and AML.Leuk Lymphoma. 2007;48:1161–1166
    1. Treanda [package insert] 2012Frazer, PA:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
    1. Fowler N, Kahl BS, Lee P, et al. Bortezomib, bendamustine, and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: the phase II VERTICAL study.J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3389–3395
    1. Weide R, Hess G, Köppler H, et al. High anti-lymphoma activity of bendamustine/mitoxantrone/rituximab in rituximab pretreated relapsed or refractory indolent lymphomas and mantle cell lymphomas. A multicenter phase II study of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG).Leuk Lymphoma. 2007;48:1299–1306

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi