Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Once Weekly or Once Every Two Weeks Administration of High-Dose Sunitinib in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors

Maria Rovithi, Sophie L Gerritse, Richard J Honeywell, Albert J Ten Tije, Rita Ruijter, Godefridus J Peters, Jens Voortman, Mariette Labots, Henk M W Verheul, Maria Rovithi, Sophie L Gerritse, Richard J Honeywell, Albert J Ten Tije, Rita Ruijter, Godefridus J Peters, Jens Voortman, Mariette Labots, Henk M W Verheul

Abstract

Purpose: Dose and schedule optimization of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is of utmost importance. On the basis of preclinical data, a phase I clinical trial of once weekly or once every 2 weeks administration of high-dose sunitinib in patients with refractory solid malignancies was conducted.

Patients and methods: Patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard treatment were eligible. With use of a standard 3 + 3 phase I design, patients received escalating doses of sunitinib, in 100 mg increments, starting at 200 mg once weekly. In both the once weekly and once every 2 weeks cohorts, 10 more patients were included at the maximum tolerated dose level. Primary end points were safety and tolerability.

Results: Sixty-nine patients with advanced cancer, predominantly colorectal cancer (42%), were treated with this alternative dosing regimen. Maximum tolerated dose was established at 300 mg once weekly and 700 mg once every 2 weeks, resulting in nine- and 18-fold higher maximum plasma concentrations compared with standard dose, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with fatigue (81%), nausea (48%), and anorexia (33%) being the most frequent adverse events. The only grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event in 5% or more of patients was fatigue (6%). Sixty-three percent of patients had significant clinical benefit, with a 30% progression-free survival of 5 months or more.

Conclusion: Sunitinib administered once weekly at 300 mg or once every 2 weeks at 700 mg is feasible, with comparable tolerability as daily administration. Administration of 700 mg once every 2 weeks can be considered as the most optimal schedule because of the highest maximum plasma concentration being reached. The promising preliminary antitumor activity of this alternative schedule in heavily pretreated patients warrants further clinical evaluation and might ultimately indicate a class characteristic of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02058901.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Mean sunitinib plasma concentrations of all evaluable patients after intake of the drug once per week and once every 2 weeks. Mean sunitinib plasma concentrations of all evaluable patients after intake of the drug once per week (O1W) and once every 2 weeks (O2W).
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Progression-free survival (PFS) for all evaluable patients after once per week and once every 2 weeks administration of sunitinib.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Stable disease in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer during treatment. Computed tomography scans (A) before treatment and (B) at first evaluation (8 weeks). The on-treatment scan indicates tumor necrosis characterized by homogeneous hypo-attenuation and sharp tumor-liver interface (Data Supplement).

References

    1. Zhang J, Yang PL, Gray NS: Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 9:28-39, 2009
    1. Gotink KJ, Verheul HM: Anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors: What is their mechanism of action? Angiogenesis 13:1-14, 2010
    1. Mathijssen RH, Sparreboom A, Verweij J: Determining the optimal dose in the development of anticancer agents. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11:272-281, 2014
    1. Rovithi M, Verheul HMW: Pulsatile high-dose treatment with antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors improves clinical antitumor activity. Angiogenesis 20:287-289, 2017
    1. Adelaiye R, Ciamporcero E, Miles KM, et al. : Sunitinib dose escalation overcomes transient resistance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and is associated with epigenetic modifications. Mol Cancer Ther 14:513-522, 2015
    1. Houk BE, Bello CL, Kang D, et al. : A population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of sunitinib malate (SU11248) and its primary metabolite (SU12662) in healthy volunteers and oncology patients. Clin Cancer Res 15:2497-2506, 2009
    1. Faivre S, Demetri G, Sargent W, et al. : Molecular basis for sunitinib efficacy and future clinical development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6:734-745, 2007
    1. O’Farrell AM, Foran JM, Fiedler W, et al. : An innovative phase I clinical study demonstrates inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation by SU11248 in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Clin Cancer Res 9:5465-5476, 2003
    1. Rovithi M, de Haas RR, Honeywell RJ, et al. : Alternative scheduling of pulsatile, high dose sunitinib efficiently suppresses tumor growth. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 35:138, 2016
    1. Kuiper JL, Smit EF: High-dose, pulsatile erlotinib in two NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastases--one with a remarkable thoracic response as well. Lung Cancer 80:102-105, 2013
    1. Maki RG, Blay JY, Demetri GD, et al. : Key issues in the clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: An expert discussion. Oncologist 20:823-830, 2015
    1. Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, et al. : Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 368:1329-1338, 2006
    1. Gajiwala KS, Wu JC, Christensen J, et al. : KIT kinase mutants show unique mechanisms of drug resistance to imatinib and sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:1542-1547, 2009
    1. Blanke CD, Rankin C, Demetri GD, et al. : Phase III randomized, intergroup trial assessing imatinib mesylate at two dose levels in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing the kit receptor tyrosine kinase: S0033. J Clin Oncol 26:626-632, 2008
    1. Honeywell R, Yarzadah K, Giovannetti E, et al. : Simple and selective method for the determination of various tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the clinical setting by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 878:1059-1068, 2010
    1. Faivre S, Delbaldo C, Vera K, et al. : Safety, pharmacokinetic, and antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:25-35, 2006
    1. Chun YS, Vauthey JN, Boonsirikamchai P, et al. : Association of computed tomography morphologic criteria with pathologic response and survival in patients treated with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases. JAMA 302:2338-2344, 2009
    1. van der Veldt AA, Meijerink MR, van den Eertwegh AJ, et al. : Choi response criteria for early prediction of clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib. Br J Cancer 102:803-809, 2010
    1. Ebos JM: Prodding the beast: Assessing the impact of treatment-induced metastasis. Cancer Res 75:3427-3435, 2015
    1. Kummar S, Chen HX, Wright J, et al. : Utilizing targeted cancer therapeutic agents in combination: Novel approaches and urgent requirements. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:843-856, 2010
    1. Choueiri TK, Halabi S, Sanford BL, et al. : Cabozantinib versus sunitinib as initial targeted therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of poor or intermediate risk: The Alliance A031203 CABOSUN trial. J Clin Oncol 35:591-597, 2017
    1. Kalra S, Rini BI, Jonasch E: Alternate sunitinib schedules in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 26:1300-1304, 2015
    1. Pollom EL, Deng L, Pai RK, et al. : Gastrointestinal toxicities with combined antiangiogenic and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92:568-576, 2015
    1. Walraven M, Witteveen PO, Lolkema MP, et al. : Antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibition related gastrointestinal perforations: A case report and literature review. Angiogenesis 14:135-141, 2011
    1. Lee MO, Song SH, Jung S, et al. : Effect of ionizing radiation induced damage of endothelial progenitor cells in vascular regeneration. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32:343-352, 2012
    1. Chien AJ, Munster PN, Melisko ME, et al. : Phase I dose-escalation study of 5-day intermittent oral lapatinib therapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:1472-1479, 2014
    1. Saltz LB, Rosen LS, Marshall JL, et al. : Phase II trial of sunitinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard therapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4793-4799, 2007
    1. Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. : Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): An international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381:303-312, 2013

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi