Parenting approaches and digital technology use of preschool age children in a Chinese community

Cynthia Sau Ting Wu, Cathrine Fowler, Winsome Yuk Yin Lam, Ho Ting Wong, Charmaine Hei Man Wong, Alice Yuen Loke, Cynthia Sau Ting Wu, Cathrine Fowler, Winsome Yuk Yin Lam, Ho Ting Wong, Charmaine Hei Man Wong, Alice Yuen Loke

Abstract

Background: Young children are using digital technology (DT) devices anytime and anywhere, especially with the invention of smart phones and the replacement of desktop computers with digital tablets. Although research has shown that parents play an important role in fostering and supporting preschoolers' developing maturity and decisions about DT use, and in protecting them from potential risk due to excessive DT exposure, there have been limited studies conducted in Hong Kong focusing on parent-child DT use. This study had three objectives: 1) to explore parental use of DTs with their preschool children; 2) to identify the DT content that associated with child behavioral problems; and 3) to investigate the relationships between approaches adopted by parents to control children's DT use and related preschooler behavioral problems.

Methods: This exploratory quantitative study was conducted in Hong Kong with 202 parents or guardians of preschool children between the ages of 3 and 6 attending kindergarten. The questionnaire was focused on four aspects, including 1) participants' demographics; 2) pattern of DT use; 3) parenting approach to manage the child's DT use; and 4) child behavioral and health problems related to DT use. Multiple regression analysis was adopted as the main data analysis method for identifying the DT or parental approach-related predictors of the preschooler behavioral problems.

Results: In the multiple linear regression model, the 'restrictive approach score' was the only predictor among the three parental approaches (B:1.66, 95% CI: [0.21, 3.11], p < 0.05). Moreover, the viewing of antisocial behavior cartoons by children also significantly increased the tendency of children to have behavioral problem (B:3.84, 95% CI: [1.66, 6.02], p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Since preschool children's cognitive and functional abilities are still in the developmental stage, parents play a crucial role in fostering appropriate and safe DT use. It is suggested that parents practice a combination of restrictive, instructive and co-using approaches, rather than a predominately restrictive approach, to facilitate their child's growth and development. Further studies are needed to explore the parent-child relationship and parents' self-efficacy when managing the parent-child DT use, to develop strategies to guide children in healthy DT use.

References

    1. Strader TJ. In: Digital Product Management, Technology and Practice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Troy JS, editor. Hershey: Business Science Reference; 2011. Digital technology in the 21st century; pp. 235–262.
    1. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants: part 1. On the Horizon. 2001;9:1–6.
    1. Vandewater EA, Rideout VJ, Wartella EA, Huang X, Lee JH, Shim MS. Digital childhood: electronic media and technology use among infants, todders, and preschoolers. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e116–e1015.
    1. Vandewater E, Lee S. Measuring children’s media use in the digital age: issues and challenges. Am Behav Sci. 2009;52:1152–1176. doi: 10.1177/0002764209331539.
    1. Jackson LA, Eye A, Fitzgerald HE, Witt EA, Zhao Y. Internet use, videogame playing and cell phone use as predictors of children’s body mass index (BMI), body weight, academic performance, and social and overall self-esteem. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27:599–604. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.019.
    1. Li X, Atkins MS, Stanton B. Effects of home and school computer use on school readiness and cognitive development among head start children: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Merrill Palmer Quart. 2006;52:239–263. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2006.0010.
    1. Bremer J. The internet and children: advantages and disadvantages. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005;14:405–428. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2005.02.003.
    1. Subrahmanyam K, Kraut R, Greenfield PM, Gross EF. The impact of home computer use on children’s activities and development. Future Child. 2000;10:123–144. doi: 10.2307/1602692.
    1. Weems DM, Rogers C. America’s next top model: parent behaviors that promote reading. Childhood Educ. 2007;84:105–106. doi: 10.1080/00094056.2008.10522985.
    1. Berger EH, Riojas-Cortez MR. Parents as Partners in Education: Families and Schools Working Together. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2012.
    1. Van den Bulck J, Van den Bergh B. The influence of perceived parental guidance patterns on children’s media use: gender differences and media displacement. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2000;44:329–348. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4403_1.
    1. Livingstone S, Helsper EJ. Parental mediation of children’s internet use. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2008;52:581–599. doi: 10.1080/08838150802437396.
    1. Zhao S. Parental education and children’s online health information seeking: beyond the digital divide debate. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1501–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.039.
    1. Valcke M, Bonte S, De Wever B, Rots I. Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Comput Educ. 2010;55:454–464. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009.
    1. Nikken P, Jansz J. Parental mediation of children’s video game playing: a comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learn Media Technol. 2006;31:181–202. doi: 10.1080/17439880600756803.
    1. Turgut Y, Irgin P. Young learners’ language learning via computer games. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2009;1:760–764.
    1. Census and Statistics Department. Thematic Household Survey Report - Report No. 50. [ ]
    1. Johnson GM. Young children’s internet use at home and school: patterns and profiles. J Child Res. 2010;8:282–293. doi: 10.1177/1476718X10379783.
    1. Department of Health. Child Health Survey 2005-2006. [ ]
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement—media violence. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1495–1503.
    1. Strasburger VC, Jordan AB, Donnerstein E. Children, adolescents, and the media: health effects. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012;59:533–587. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2012.03.025.
    1. Lim SS, Soon C. The influence of social and cultural factors on mothers’ domestication of household ICTs- Experiences of Chinese and Korean women. Telematics Infomatics. 2010;27:205–216. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2009.07.001.
    1. Valcke M, Schellens T, Van Keer H, Gerarts M. Primary school children’s safe and unsafe use of the Internet at home and at school: an exploratory study. Comput Hum Behav. 2008;23:2838–285.
    1. Hong YY, Morris MW, Chiu CY, Benet-Martínez V. Multicultural minds. A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. Am Psychol. 2000;55:709–20.
    1. Phillipson S. Cultural variability in parent and child achievement attributions: a study from Hong Kong. Educ Psychol. 2006;26:625–642. doi: 10.1080/01443410500390772.
    1. Young KS. Parent-child internet addiction test. [ ]
    1. Sheridan MD. From Birth to Five Years Children’s Developmental Progress. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2008.
    1. Ciccarelli SK, White JN. Psychology. 2. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
    1. Jakobsson U. Statistical presentation and analysis of ordinal data in nursing research. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18:437–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00305.x.
    1. Rideout V. Zero to eight: children’s media use in America. [ ]
    1. Shonkoff J, Levitt P. Neuroscience and the future of early childhood policy: moving from why to what and how. Neuron. 2010;67:689–691. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.032.
    1. Plowman L, Stephen C. A “benign addition”? research on IVT and pre-school children. J Comput Assist Lear. 2003;19:149–164. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00016.x.
    1. Chan AC, Au TK. Getting children to do more academic work: foot-in-the-door versus door-in-the-face. Teach Teach Educ. 2011;27:982–985. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.007.
    1. Warren R. Parental mediation of preschool children’s television viewing. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2003;47:394–417. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4703_5.
    1. Lee SJ. Parental restrictive mediation of children’s internet use: Effective for what and for whom? New Media Soc. 2013;15:466–481. doi: 10.1177/1461444812452412.
    1. Nathanson AI. Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2001;45:201–220. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4502_1.
    1. Morrison GS. Early Childhood Education Today. 11. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall; 2008.
    1. Cook JL, Cook G. Child Development: Principles and Perspectives. 11. London: Pearson Allyn and Bacon; 2009.
    1. Browne K, Hamilton-Giachritsis C. The influence of violent media on children and adolescents: a public health approach. Lancet. 2005;365:702–710. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17952-5.
    1. Cankaya S, Odabsai HF. Parental controls on children’s computer and internet use. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2009;1:1105–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.199.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi