Tablet-Aided BehavioraL intervention EffecT on Self-management skills (TABLETS) for Diabetes

Cheryl P Lynch, Joni S Williams, Kenneth J Ruggiero, Rebecca G Knapp, Leonard E Egede, Cheryl P Lynch, Joni S Williams, Kenneth J Ruggiero, Rebecca G Knapp, Leonard E Egede

Abstract

Background: Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that behavioral lifestyle interventions are effective in improving diabetes management and that comprehensive risk factor management improves cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. The role of technology has been gaining strong support as evidence builds of its potential to improve diabetes management; however, evaluation of its impact in minority populations is limited. This study intends to provide early evidence of a theory-driven intervention, Tablet-Aided BehavioraL intervention EffecT on Self-management skills (TABLETS), using real-time videoconferencing for education and skills training. We examine the potential for TABLETS to improve health risk behaviors and reduce CVD risk outcomes among a low-income African American (AA) population with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Methods: The study is a two-arm, pilot controlled trial that randomizes 30 participants to the TABLETS intervention and 30 participants to a usual care group. Blinded outcome assessments will be completed at baseline, 2.5 months (immediate post-intervention), and 6.5 months (follow-up). The TABLETS intervention consists of culturally tailored telephone-delivered diabetes education and skills training delivered via videoconferencing on tablet devices, with two booster sessions delivered via tablet-based videoconferencing at 3 months and 5 months to stimulate ongoing use of the tablet device with access to intervention materials via videoconferencing slides and a manual of supplementary materials. The primary outcomes are physical activity, diet, medication adherence, and self-monitoring behavior, whereas the secondary outcomes are HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), BP, CVD risk, and quality of life.

Discussion: This study provides a unique opportunity to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a theory-driven, tablet-aided behavioral intervention that utilizes real-time videoconferencing technology for education and skills training on self-management behaviors and quality of life among a high-risk, low-income AA population with an uncontrolled dyad or triad of CVD risk factors (diabetes with or without hypertension or hyperlipidemia). The intervention leverages the use of novel technology for education and skill-building to foster improved diabetes self-management. The findings of this study will inform the process of disseminating the intervention to a broader and larger sample of people and can potentially be refined to align with clinical workflows that target a subsample of patients with poor diabetes self-management.

Trial registration: The trial was registered in April 2014 with the United States National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02128854), available online at: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02128854 .

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Technology Package of Biometric Measurement Devices with Associated Cellular Modem
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Study design and flow

References

    1. Barker LE, Kirtland KA, Gregg EW, Geiss LS, Thompson TJ. Geographic distribution of diagnosed diabetes in the U.S.: A diabetes belt. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(4):434–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.019.
    1. Liao Y, Greenlund KJ, Croft JB, Keenan NL, Giles WH. Factors explaining excess stroke prevalence in the US Stroke Belt. Stroke. 2009;40(10):3336–41. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.561688.
    1. Office of Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Evaluation. State of the Heart for Blacks: Heart disease in South Carolina (Fact sheet). South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. 2009.
    1. Kurian AK, Cardarelli KM. Racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review. Ethn Dis. 2007;17(1):143–52.
    1. Egede LE, Gebregziabher M, Lynch CP, Gilbert GE, Echols C. Longitudinal ethnic differences in multiple cardiovascular risk factor control in a cohort of US adults with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94(3):385–94. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.08.003.
    1. Dabney B, Gosschalk A. Diabetes in rural areas: a literature review. Rural Healthy People 2010: A companion document to Healthy People 2010. Volume 2. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univ. System Health Science Center, School of Rural Public Health, Southwest Rural Health Research Center; 2003.
    1. Massey CN, Appel SJ, Buchanan KL, Cherrington AL. Improving diabetes care in rural communities: an overview of current initiatives and a call for renewed efforts. Clin Diab. 2010;28(1):20–7. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.28.1.20.
    1. Pleis JR, Lethbridge-Çejku M. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2007:10(235)
    1. Bennett KJ, Olatosi B, Probst JC. Health disparities: a rural-urban chartbook. South Carolina Rural Health Research Center. 2008.
    1. Spanakis EK, Golden SH. Race/ethnic difference in diabetes and diabetic complications. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(6):814–23. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0421-9.
    1. Smith SC, Jr, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2011;124(22):2458–73. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318235eb4d.
    1. Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(4):537–44. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.537.
    1. Ketola E, Sipila R, Makela M. Effectiveness of individual lifestyle interventions in reducing cardiovascular disease and risk factors. Ann Med. 2000;32(4):239–51. doi: 10.3109/07853890009011767.
    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393–403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.
    1. Becker DM, Yanek LR, Johnson WR, Jr, et al. Impact of a community-based multiple risk factor intervention on cardiovascular risk in black families with a history of premature coronary disease. Circulation. 2005;111(10):1298–304. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157734.97351.B2.
    1. Pi-Sunyer X, Blackburn G, Brancati FL, et al. Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the Look AHEAD trial. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1374–83. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0048.
    1. Rajpathak SN, Aggarwal V, Hu FB. Multifactorial intervention to reduce cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2010;10(1):16–23. doi: 10.1007/s11892-009-0084-8.
    1. Lynch CP, Egede LE. Optimizing diabetes self-care in low literacy and minority populations–problem-solving, empowerment, peer support and technology-based approaches. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(9):953–5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1759-9.
    1. Piette JD, Kerr EA. The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(3):725–31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.03.06.dc05-2078.
    1. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(8):507–15. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007.
    1. Grey M, Berry D. Coping skills training and problem solving in diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2004;4(2):126–31. doi: 10.1007/s11892-004-0068-7.
    1. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2469.
    1. Tuerk PW, Mueller M, Egede LE. Estimating physician effects on glycemic control in the treatment of diabetes: methods, effects sizes, and implications for treatment policy. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(5):869–73. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1662.
    1. Krein SL, Hayward RA, Pogach L, BootsMiller BJ. Department of Veterans Affairs’ Quality Enhancement Research Initiative for Diabetes Mellitus. Med Care. 2000;38(6 Suppl 1):I38–48.
    1. Baig AA, Wilkes AE, Davis AM, Peek ME, Huang ES, Bell DS, et al. The use of quality improvement and health information technology approaches to improve diabetes outcomes in African American and Hispanic patients. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67(5 Suppl):163S–97. doi: 10.1177/1077558710374621.
    1. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, et al. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011;28(4):455–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03180.x.
    1. Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML, Barr EA, Ballew SH, Gruber-Baldini AL. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(9):1934–42. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0366.
    1. Boren SA, Gunlock TL, Krishna S, Kramer TC. Computer-Aided Diabetes Education: A Synthesis of Randomized Controlled Trials. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2006;2006:51-55.
    1. Izquierdo RE, Knudson PE, Meyer S, Kearns J, Ploutz-Snyder R, Weinstock RS. A comparison of diabetes education administered through telemedicine versus in person. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(4):1002–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1002.
    1. Quinones AR, O’Neil M, Saha S, Freeman M, Henry SR, Kansagara D. Interventions to improve minority health care and reduce racial and ethnic disparities. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs; 2011, Sep.
    1. Russell-Minda E, Jutai J, Speechley M, Bradley K, Chudyk A, Petrella R. Health technologies for monitoring and managing diabetes: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(6):1460–71. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300628.
    1. Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, Grubber JM, et al. Two self-management interventions to improve hypertension control: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):687–95. doi: 10.7326/0000605-200911170-00148.
    1. Davis RM, Hitch AD, Salaam MM, Herman WH, Zimmer-Galler IE, Mayer-Davis EJ. TeleHealth improves diabetes self-management in an underserved community: diabetes TeleCare. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(8):1712–7. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1919.
    1. Ciemins E, Coon P, Peck R, Holloway B, Min SJ. Using telehealth to provide diabetes care to patients in rural Montana: findings from the Promoting Realistic Individual Self-Management Program. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(8):596–602. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0028.
    1. Probst JC, Moore CG, Glover SH, Samuels ME. Person and place: the compounding effects of race/ethnicity and rurality on health. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1695–703. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.10.1695.
    1. Kaufman N. Internet and information technology use in treatment of diabetes. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2010;166:41–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02277.x.
    1. Meyers K. Issue brief: Racial and ethnic health disparities: Kaiser Permanente Institute for Public Policy. 2007. . Accessed 5 Feb 2008.
    1. Piette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(2):202–8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.202.
    1. Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A. The mini-cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(11):1021–7. doi: 10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11<1021::AID-GPS234>;2-6.
    1. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(8):663–94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012.
    1. Egede LE, Strom JL, Durkalski VL, Mauldin PD, Moran WP. Rationale and design: telephone-delivered behavioral skills interventions for Blacks with Type 2 diabetes. Trials. 2010;11:35. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-35.
    1. Maine Heart Center of Maine Health. Cardiovascular Health Patient Education Materials. Adapted from: . Accessed 6 Mar 2016.
    1. Booth FW, Vyas DR. Genes, environment, and exercise. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001;502:13–20. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3401-0_3.
    1. Merchant J, Coussens C, Gilbert D, editors. Rebuilding the unity of health and the environment in rural America: Workshop summary. Roundtable on Environmental Health Sciences, Research, and Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006
    1. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97(18):1837–47. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.18.1837.
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes–2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(Suppl 1):S11–63.
    1. Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Brands M, et al. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation. 2006;114(1):82–96. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.176158.
    1. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1423–34. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
    1. Kraemer HC, Mintz J, Noda A, Tinklenberg J, Yesavage JA. Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(5):484–9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.484.
    1. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
    1. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. Longitudinal data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
    1. Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol. 2004;23(5):443–51. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443.
    1. Blair SN, Haskell WL, Ho P, et al. Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122(5):794–804.
    1. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.
    1. Dixon-Fyle S, Gandhi S, Pellathy T, Spatharou A. Changing patient behavior: the next frontier in healthcare value. Heart Int. 2012;12:64–73.
    1. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, et al. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121(1):91–106.
    1. Segal-Isaacson CJ, Wylie-Rosett J, Gans KM. Validation of a short dietary assessment questionnaire: the Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Participants Short Version (REAP-S) Diabetes Educ. 2004;30(5):774–81. doi: 10.1177/014572170403000512.
    1. Krousel-Wood M, Islam T, Webber LS, et al. New medication adherence scale versus pharmacy fill rates in seniors with hypertension. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(1):59–66.
    1. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(7):943–50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.
    1. Homko CJ, Santamore WP, Zamora L, et al. Cardiovascular disease knowledge and risk perception among underserved individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;23(4):332–7. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000317432.44586.aa.
    1. Plant RW, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: an investigation of internally-controlling styles. J Pers. 1985;53:435–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00375.x.
    1. Sullivan MD, LaCroix AZ, Russo J, Katon WJ. Self-efficacy and self-reported functional status in coronary heart disease: a six-month prospective study. Psychosom Med. 1998;60(4):473–8. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199807000-00014.
    1. Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In: Schwarzer R, editor. Self-efficacy: thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992. pp. 195–213.
    1. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Fitzgerald JT, Marrero DG. The Diabetes Empowerment Scale: a measure of psychosocial self-efficacy. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(6):739–43. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.6.739.
    1. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Gruppen LD, Funnell MM, Oh MS. The Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form (DES-SF) Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1641–2. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1641-a.
    1. Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008;24(6):574–94. doi: 10.1080/10447310802205776.
    1. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Survey Questionnaire, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2010. Available at: . Accessed 6 Mar 2016.
    1. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705–14. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B.
    1. Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nurss J. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;38(1):33–42. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00116-5.
    1. Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ. Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med Sep. 2004;36(8):588–94.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi