An educational board game for learning and teaching burn care: A preliminary evaluation
Alexander M Whittam, Whitney Chow, Alexander M Whittam, Whitney Chow
Abstract
Timely and effective assessment, resuscitation and transfer of patients with severe burns has been demonstrated to improve outcome. A dedicated one-day course exists to equip all frontline emergency healthcare workers with the necessary knowledge and skills to manage severe burn injuries. More recently, a board game has been developed which aims to act as a learning and practice development tool for those managing burn injuries. We present the findings of our preliminary evaluation of this game. We played this game with a multidisciplinary group of staff including doctors, nurses and therapists. A proportion of these participants had previously completed the Emergency Management of Severe Burns (EMSB) course. We obtained subjective results from a questionnaire, using both Likert-type ratings and open-ended questions. The styling of the game and ease of instructions was rated from 'average' to 'excellent'. The relevance of questions was rated from 'good' to 'excellent'. The usefulness of the game to increase knowledge and stimulate discussion was rated between 'good' and 'excellent'. All participants stated that they would recommend the game to other healthcare professionals. This is the only burns and plastic surgery-related educational game in the literature. Educational games adhere to principles of adult learning but there is insufficient evidence in the literature to either confirm or refute their utility. Our preliminary evaluation of this game has shown that it achieves its main aims, namely to increase knowledge in burn care and to stimulate discussion. Further work is required to assess the board game.
Keywords: Burns; Emergency Management of Severe Burns (EMSB); board game; education; learning tool; multidisciplinary-team learning.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
- The Education Committee of the Australian and New Zealand Burn Association. Emergency management of severe burns (EMSB) course manual, 17th ed. February 2013. Australian and New Zealand Burn Association.
- Stone CA, Pape SA. Evolution of the emergency management of severe burns (EMSB) course in the UK. Burns 2009; 25: 262–264.
- British Burn Association, Birmingham City University. The burns game 2016. Focus Games. Board game.
- Fitzgerald K. Instructional methods: Selection, use, and evaluation In: Bastable S, editor. Nurse as Educator: Principles of Teaching and Learning. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1997: 261–286.
- Knowles MS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education; Andragogy Versus Pedagogy. New York, NY: Association Press, 1970.
- Akl EA, Pretorius RW, Sackett K, et al. The effect of educational games on medical students’ learning outcomes: a systematic review: BEME Guide No 14. Med Teach 2010; 32: 16–27.
- Blakely G, Skirton H, Cooper S, et al. Use of educational games in the health professions: a mixed-methods study of educators’ perspectives in the UK. Nurs Health Sc 2010; 12: 27–32.
- Ogershok P, Cottrell S. The pediatric board game. Medical Teacher 2004; 26: 514–517.
- Swiderska N, Thomason E, Hart A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of the use of an educational board game in neonatology. Medical Teacher 2013; 35: 413–415.
- Rose T. A board game to assist pharmacy students in learning metabolic pathways. Am J Pharm Educ 2011; 75: 183.
- Shawn Jones J, Tincher L, Odeng-Out E, et al. An educational board game to assist PharmD students in learning autonomic nervous system pharmacology. Am J Pharm Educ 2015; 79: 114.
- Aki EA, Sackett KM, Erdley WS, et al. Educational games for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (1): CD006411.
- Whittam AM, Chow W. An educational board game for learning and teaching burn care: A preliminary evaluation. Scars, Burns & Healing, Volume 3, 2017. DOI: 10.1177/205951311690012.
Source: PubMed