Validity of pervasive computing based continuous physical activity assessment in community-dwelling old and oldest-old

Narayan Schütz, Hugo Saner, Beatrice Rudin, Angela Botros, Bruno Pais, Valérie Santschi, Philipp Buluschek, Daniel Gatica-Perez, Prabitha Urwyler, Laura Marchal-Crespo, René M Müri, Tobias Nef, Narayan Schütz, Hugo Saner, Beatrice Rudin, Angela Botros, Bruno Pais, Valérie Santschi, Philipp Buluschek, Daniel Gatica-Perez, Prabitha Urwyler, Laura Marchal-Crespo, René M Müri, Tobias Nef

Abstract

In older adults, physical activity is crucial for healthy aging and associated with numerous health indicators and outcomes. Regular assessments of physical activity can help detect early health-related changes and manage physical activity targeted interventions. The quantification of physical activity, however, is difficult as commonly used self-reported measures are biased and rather unprecise point in time measurements. Modern alternatives are commonly based on wearable technologies which are accurate but suffer from usability and compliance issues. In this study, we assessed the potential of an unobtrusive ambient-sensor based system for continuous, long-term physical activity quantification. Towards this goal, we analysed one year of longitudinal sensor- and medical-records stemming from thirteen community-dwelling old and oldest old subjects. Based on the sensor data the daily number of room-transitions as well as the raw sensor activity were calculated. We did find the number of room-transitions, and to some degree also the raw sensor activity, to capture numerous known associations of physical activity with cognitive, well-being and motor health indicators and outcomes. The results of this study indicate that such low-cost unobtrusive ambient-sensor systems can provide an adequate approximation of older adults' overall physical activity, sufficient to capture relevant associations with health indicators and outcomes.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Philipp Buluschek is employed by DomoSafety S.A., which is the manufacturer of the displayed sensor system. The remaining authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Visual Correlation Matrix of the four sensor-derived physical activity metrics and the clinical assessments). Shown is a visual representationh of the respective correlations as measured by the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (ρ) based on an α = 0.05i. The sensor-derived physical activity metrics (rows) represent the mean and the coefficient of variation (CV) of the daily measurements over the whole monitoring duration. The size as well as colour-intensity signal the correlation strength, where red means a strong positive and blue a strong negative correlation. aTimed Up & Go (TUG) (Counting = while additionally counting backwards from 100; Cup = while holding a full cup of water). bGeriatric Depression Scale (GDS). cTinetti Performance-oriented mobility assessment (POMA). dMontreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). eKnee extensor strength (Knee). fHip flexor strength (Hip). gVisual analogue scale: measuring perceived health based on the EQ-5D-3L system (EQ-VAS). hcreated using the R package “corrplot” i*<0.05; **<0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Room-transition heatmaps: comparison between healthy subject and subject with health issues. Shows two heatmaps comparing five months of physical activity measured by the number of room-transitions. One example of a healthy participant (participant 9) with a rather active lifestyle (upper) and the other one of a subject (participant 11) which developed severe and eventually fatal health issues (lower). Note the increased number of transitions throughout the second last week of the subject with health issues, distinctly showing the influence of visits from nurses, family and friends. (more intense colour signifies more room-transitions).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of first and last measurements of multiple assessments in a healthy subject and one with rapidly declining health. Shows a case of rapid declining health (participant 11) and compares it with data from a healthy reference subject (participant 9). As such, the average in room-transitions of the first and last recorded month is displayed (left). In a similar manner, the handgrip strength (middle) and timed up and go (TUG) times (right) of the first and last assessments are shown. In all cases, for the subject with health issues there was a decrease in metrics (less room-transitions, less handgrip-strength, longer TUG times), while the healthy subject did not exhibit negative changes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Exemplary apartment layout and PIR-sensor placement. Gives a broad idea of the kind of apartments we monitored and where the sensors where placed.

References

    1. Powell KE, Paluch AE, Blair SN. Physical activity for health: What kind? How much? How intense? On top of what? Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2011;32:349–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101151.
    1. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2018).
    1. Yates LB, Djoussé L, Kurth T, Buring JE, Gaziano JM. Exceptional Longevity in Men. Arch. Intern. Med. 2008;168:284. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.77.
    1. Buchman AS, et al. Total daily physical activity and the risk of AD and cognitive decline in older adults. Neurology. 2012;78:1323–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182535d35.
    1. Touvier M, et al. Changes in leisure-time physical activity and sedentary behaviour at retirement: a prospective study in middle-aged French subjects. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010;7:14. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-14.
    1. Jackson AS, Sui X, Hébert JR, Church TS, Blair SN. Role of Lifestyle and Aging on the Longitudinal Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009;169:1781–1787. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.312.
    1. Jonkman NH, van Schooten KS, Maier AB, Pijnappels M. eHealth interventions to promote objectively measured physical activity in community-dwelling older people. Maturitas. 2018;113:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.04.010.
    1. Wild KV, Mattek N, Austin D, Kaye JA. “Are You Sure?”. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2016;35:627–641. doi: 10.1177/0733464815570667.
    1. Lyons BE, et al. Pervasive Computing Technologies to Continuously Assess Alzheimer’s Disease Progression and Intervention Efficacy. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:102.
    1. Murphy SL. Review of physical activity measurement using accelerometers in older adults: Considerations for research design and conduct. Prev. Med. (Baltim). 2009;48:108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.12.001.
    1. Saha D, Mukherjee A. Pervasive computing: a paradigm for the 21st century. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif). 2003;36:25–31.
    1. Rantz MJ, et al. Sensor technology to support Aging in Place. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2013;14:386–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.018.
    1. Scanaill CN, et al. A Review of Approaches to Mobility Telemonitoring of the Elderly in Their Living Environment. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2006;34:547–563. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-9068-2.
    1. Zhang, Y. & Wu, M. Design of Wireless Remote module in X-10 Intelligent Home. In IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology 1349–1353 (IEEE), 10.1109/ICIT.2005.1600845 (2005).
    1. DomoSafety S. A. Available at, . (Accessed: 16th September 2018).
    1. Song, B., Choi, H. & Lee, H. S. Surveillance Tracking System Using Passive Infrared Motion Sensors in Wireless Sensor Network. In 2008 International Conference on Information Networking 1–5, 10.1109/ICOIN.2008.4472790 (IEEE 2008).
    1. Srinivasan, S., Han, J., Lal, D. & Gacic, A. Towards automatic detection of falls using wireless sensors. In 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1379–1382, 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352555 (IEEE 2007).
    1. Popescu, M., Hotrabhavananda, B., Moore, M. & Skubic, M. VAMPIR - An Automatic Fall Detection System Using a Vertical PIR Sensor Array. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248759 (IEEE 2012).
    1. Moshtaghi Masud, Zukerman Ingrid, Albrecht David, Russell R. Andrew. User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. Monitoring Personal Safety by Unobtrusively Detecting Unusual Periods of Inactivity; pp. 139–151.
    1. Aran Oya, Sanchez-Cortes Dairazalia, Do Minh-Tri, Gatica-Perez Daniel. Human Behavior Understanding. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. Anomaly Detection in Elderly Daily Behavior in Ambient Sensing Environments; pp. 51–67.
    1. Galambos C, Skubic M, Wang S, Rantz M. Management of Dementia and Depression Utilizing In- Home Passive Sensor Data. Gerontechnology. 2013;11:457–468. doi: 10.4017/gt.2013.11.3.004.00.
    1. Hayes TL, et al. Unobtrusive assessment of activity patterns associated with mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers. Dement. 2008;4:395–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.004.
    1. Urwyler P, et al. Cognitive impairment categorized in community-dwelling older adults with and without dementia using in-home sensors that recognise activities of daily living. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42084. doi: 10.1038/srep42084.
    1. Nasreddine ZS, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005;53:695–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
    1. Yesavage JA, Sheikh JI. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin. Gerontol. 1986;5:165–173. doi: 10.1300/J018v05n01_09.
    1. EuroQol. EQ-5D-3L – EQ-5D. Available at: . (Accessed: 30th September 2018).
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed “Up &amp; Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1991;39:142–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
    1. Tinetti ME. Performance-Oriented Assessment of Mobility Problems in Elderly Patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1986;34:119–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x.
    1. Teychenne M, Ball K, Salmon J. Physical activity and likelihood of depression in adults: A review. Prev. Med. (Baltim). 2008;46:397–411. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.009.
    1. Halaweh H, Willen C, Grimby-Ekman A, Svantesson U. Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Community Dwelling Elderly. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2015;7:845–52. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2307w.
    1. Acree LS, et al. Physical activity is related to quality of life in older adults. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2006;4:37. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-37.
    1. Campbell, I. H. et al. Measuring changes in activity patterns during a norovirus epidemic at a retirement community. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 6793–6796, 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091675 (IEEE 2011).
    1. Rantz, M. J. et al. Using sensor networks to detect urinary tract infections in older adults. In 2011 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services 142–149, 10.1109/HEALTH.2011.6026731 (IEEE 2011).
    1. Taiyun, W. & Viliam, S. R package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.84) (2017).

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi