The Healthy Primary School of the Future: A Contextual Action-Oriented Research Approach

Nina H M Bartelink, Patricia Van Assema, Maria W J Jansen, Hans H C M Savelberg, Maartje Willeboordse, Stef P J Kremers, Nina H M Bartelink, Patricia Van Assema, Maria W J Jansen, Hans H C M Savelberg, Maartje Willeboordse, Stef P J Kremers

Abstract

Background: Schools can play an important role in promoting children's health behaviours. A Dutch initiative, 'The Healthy Primary School of the Future', aims to integrate health and well-being into the school system. We use a contextual action-oriented research approach (CARA) to study the implementation process. Properties of CARA are its focus on contextual differences and the use of monitoring and feedback to support and evaluate the process of change. The aim of this article is to describe the use of the approach. Methods: Four schools (each with 200⁻300 children, aged 4⁻12 years) were included; all located in low socio-economic status areas in the south of the Netherlands. Data collection methods include interviews, observations, questionnaires, and health and behavioural measurements. Research contributions include giving feedback and providing schools with a range of possibilities for additional changes. The contextual data we examine include schools' health promoting elements, practices of teachers and parents, dominating organisational issues, and characteristics of the student population; process data include the presence of potential barriers to changes. Discussion: CARA is an adaptive research approach that generates knowledge and experiences on how to deal with health promotion in complex systems. We think this approach can set an example for research efforts in comparable initiatives.

Keywords: action research; complex systems; context; health and well-being; health-promoting school; monitoring and evaluation; primary school intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Arcaya M.C., Arcaya A.L., Subramanian S. Inequalities in health: Definitions, concepts, and theories. Glob. Health Action. 2015;8:27106. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.27106.
    1. Marmot M., Allen J., Bell R., Bloomer E., Goldblatt P. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet. 2012;380:1011–1029. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61228-8.
    1. Ogden C.L., Carroll M.D., Flegal K.M. Epidemiologic trends in overweight and obesity. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. 2003;32:741–760. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8529(03)00074-4.
    1. Suhrcke M., de Paz Nieves C. The Impact of Health and Health Behaviours on Educational Outcomes in High-Income Countries: A Review of the Evidence. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2011.
    1. Verrotti A., Penta L., Zenzeri L., Agostinelli S., De Feo P. Childhood obesity: Prevention and strategies of intervention. A systematic review of school-based interventions in primary schools. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2014;37:1155–1164. doi: 10.1007/s40618-014-0153-y.
    1. Lohrmann D.K. A complementary ecological model of the coordinated school health program. Public Health Rep. 2008;123:695–703. doi: 10.1177/003335490812300605.
    1. Gubbels J.S., Van Kann D.H., de Vries N.K., Thijs C., Kremers S.P. The next step in health behavior research: The need for ecological moderation analyses-an application to diet and physical activity at childcare. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014;11:52. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-52.
    1. Leurs M.T., Schaalma H.P., Jansen M.W., Mur-Veeman I.M., Leger L.H.S., De Vries N. Development of a collaborative model to improve school health promotion in the Netherlands. Health Promot. Int. 2005;20:296–305. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai004.
    1. Lytle L.A., Seifert S., Greenstein J., McGovern P. How do children’s eating patterns and food choices change over time? Results from a cohort study. Am. J. Health Promot. 2000;14:222–228. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-14.4.222.
    1. Bonell C., Humphrey N., Fletcher A., Moore L., Anderson R., Campbell R. Why schools should promote students’ health and wellbeing. BMJ. 2014;348:g3078. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3078.
    1. Brown T., Summerbell C. Systematic review of school-based interventions that focus on changing dietary intake and physical activity levels to prevent childhood obesity: An update to the obesity guidance produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Obes. Rev. 2009;10:110–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00515.x.
    1. Patton M.Q. Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. Guilford Press; New York, NY, USA: 2011.
    1. Moore G.F., Audrey S., Barker M., Bond L., Bonell C., Hardeman W., Moore L., O’Cathain A., Tinati T., Wight D., et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
    1. Pawson R., Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Sage; London, UK: 1997.
    1. Darlington E.J., Simar C., Jourdan D. Implementation of a health promotion programme: A ten-year retrospective study. Health Education. 2017;117:252–279. doi: 10.1108/HE-09-2016-0038.
    1. Jansen M., Kuppens E. Op Zoek Naar de Limburg-Factor [Finding the Limburg Factor] GGD Zuid Limburg; Geleen, The Netherlands: 2015.
    1. Steenbakkers M., Vermeer A.J.M., Janssen-Goffin M.J.H., Hajema K.J. Een Nieuwe Kijk op Gezondheid in Zuid-Limburg. Regionaal Rapport Volksgezondheid Toekomstverkenning 2014. [A New Look at Health in Southern Limburg. Public Health Status and Forecasts 2014] GGD Zuid-Limburg [Regional Public Health Services Southern Limburg]; Geleen, The Netherlands: 2014.
    1. Willeboordse M., Jansen M., van den Heijkant S., Simons A., Winkens B., de Groot R., Bartelink N., Kremers S.P., van Assema P., Savelberg H.H., et al. The Healthy Primary School of the Future: Study protocol of a quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:639. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3301-9.
    1. Vermeer A.J.M.B.N., Hesdahl M.H., Janssen-Goffin M.J.H., Linssen E.C.A.J., Rutten N., Hajema K.J. Lokale Rapporten Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning: Een Nieuwe kijk op Gezondheid in Heerlen, Kerkrade, Landgraaf en Brunssum; [Local Reports on Public Health Development: A New Perspective on Health in Heerlen, Kerkrade, Landgraaf and Brunssum] GGD Zuid Limburg; Geleen, The Netherlands: 2014.
    1. Jungbluth P. De Opbrengst van Basisscholen in Zuid-Limburg in 2009 en 2010. [The Proceeds of Primary Schools in South Limburg in 2009 and 2010] Maastricht University; Maastricht, The Netherlands: 2011.
    1. Schils T. Leerlingen in Het Voortgezet Onderwijs: Wie Zitten Daar? Hoe Zitten ze in Hun vel? Hoe Slim zijn ze? [Pupils in Secondary Education: Who Are They? What is Their Sense of Self-Worth? How Smart Are They?] Kaans/Maastricht University School of Business and Economics; Maastricht, The Netherlands: 2011. Kaans Reports K04201102-K04201104.
    1. Lee A. Health-promoting schools. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy. 2009;7:11–17. doi: 10.1007/BF03256138.
    1. Boot N.M., van Assema P., Hesdahl B., Leurs M., de Vries N.K. Gezondheidsbevordering en voortgezet onderwijs: Verstandshuwelijk of echte liefde? [Health promotion and secondary education: Marriage of convenience or true love?] Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen. 2010;88:127–135. doi: 10.1007/s12508-010-0057-y.
    1. Mertler C.A. Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators. Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2016.
    1. Boot N., van Assema P., Hesdahl B., de Vries N. Professional assistance in implementing school health policies. Health Educ. 2010;110:294–308. doi: 10.1108/09654281011052646.
    1. Rutter H., Savona N., Glonti K., Bibby J., Cummins S., Finegood D.T., Greaves F., Harper L., Hawe P., Moore L., et al. The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. Lancet. 2017 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31267-9.
    1. Hawe P., Shiell A., Riley T. Complex interventions: How “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ. 2004;328:1561. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561.
    1. Poland B., Krupa G., McCall D. Settings for health promotion: An analytic framework to guide intervention design and implementation. Health Promot. Pract. 2009;10:505–516. doi: 10.1177/1524839909341025.
    1. Michie S., van Stralen M.M., West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 2011;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    1. Van Kann D.H., Jansen M., de Vries S., de Vries N., Kremers S. Active Living: Development and quasi-experimental evaluation of a school-centered physical activity intervention for primary school children. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1315. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2633-1.
    1. Fleuren M.A., Paulussen T.G., Van Dommelen P., Van Buuren S. Towards a measurement instrument for determinants of innovations. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2014;26:501–510. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu060.
    1. Nielsen G., Mygind E., Bølling M., Otte C.R., Schneller M.B., Schipperijn J., Ejbye-Ernst N., Bentsen P. A quasi-experimental cross-disciplinary evaluation of the impacts of education outside the classroom on pupils’ physical activity, well-being and learning: The TEACHOUT study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3780-8.
    1. Reiser B.J., Spillane J.P., Steinmuler F., Sorsa D., Carney K., Kyza E., editors. Investigating the mutual adaptation process in teachers’ design of technology-infused curricula; Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences; Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 14–17 June 2000; Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum; 2000.
    1. Laverack G., Labonte R. A planning framework for community empowerment goals within health promotion. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15:255–262. doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.3.255.
    1. Waterman H., Tillen D., Dickson R., De Koning K. Action Research: A Systematic Review and Guidance for Assessment. Volume 5 Health Technology Assessment; Winchester, UK: 2000.
    1. Green L., Kreuter M. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational Approach. 3rd ed. Mayfield Publishing Company; Mountain View, CA, USA: 1999. The Precede–Proceed model; pp. 32–43.
    1. Konijnendijk A.A., Boere-Boonekamp M.M., Fleuren M.A., Haasnoot M.E., Need A. What factors increase Dutch child health care professionals’ adherence to a national guideline on preventing child abuse and neglect? Child Abus. Neglect. 2016;53:118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.11.006.
    1. Verberne L.M., Kars M.C., Schepers S.A., Schouten-van Meeteren A.Y., Grootenhuis M.A., van Delden J.J. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a paediatric palliative care team. BMC Palliat. Care. 2018;17:23. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0274-8.
    1. Gevers D.W. Parental Influences on Child Snacking: Advancing Research. Maastricht University; Maastricht, The Netherlands: 2016.
    1. O’Connor T.M., Cerin E., Hughes S.O., Robles J., Thompson D.I., Mendoza J.A., Baranowski T., Lee R.E. Psychometrics of the preschooler physical activity parenting practices instrument among a Latino sample. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014;11:3. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-3.
    1. Gevers D.W., Kremers S.P., de Vries N.K., van Assema P. Patterns of food parenting practices and children’s intake of energy-dense snack foods. Nutrients. 2015;7:4093–4106. doi: 10.3390/nu7064093.
    1. Gubbels J.S., Sleddens E.F., Raaijmakers L.C., Gies J.M., Kremers S.P. The Child-care Food and Activity Practices Questionnaire (CFAPQ): Development and first validation steps. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:1964–1975. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015003444.
    1. Kremers S.P., de Bruijn G.-J., Droomers M., van Lenthe F., Brug J. Moderators of environmental intervention effects on diet and activity in youth. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2007;32:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.006.
    1. Green J., Tones K. For debate. Towards a secure evidence base for health promotion. J. Public Health. 1999;21:133–139. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/21.2.133.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi