Visual biofeedback for paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM)

Rachelle Alyce LeBlanc, Daniel Aalto, Caroline C Jeffery, Rachelle Alyce LeBlanc, Daniel Aalto, Caroline C Jeffery

Abstract

Objectives: Paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM) is a common condition where the vocal folds inappropriately adduct during inspiration. This results in dyspnea and occasionally significant distress. The condition is thought to be primarily functional, with behavioural therapy considered mainstay in the non-acute setting. However, practice variations and limited access to speech language pathology (SLP) services can pose management challenges. We aimed to examine the efficacy of surgeon performed visual biofeedback as first-line treatment for PVFM.

Study design: Prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative clinical study.

Methods: Adult patients referred for possible PVFM and congruent laryngoscopy findings over a two-year period were included. Patients were excluded if they presented in acute distress, had alternate diagnosis to explain symptomology and/or coexisting untreated lower respiratory pathology. Patients underwent immediate surgeon-performed visual biofeedback on the same visit day. The primary outcome of interest was change in Dyspnea Index (DI) scores pre- and post-intervention 3 months follow-up. The secondary outcome measured was change in asthma medication use from baseline to follow-up.

Results: Of 34 patients presenting, 25 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 72% were female with an average age of 36.9 ± 14.1. Approximately 48% of patients had a diagnosis of well-controlled asthma at presentation and co-morbid psychiatric diagnoses were common (52%). Pre- and post-intervention analysis showed significant improvement in DI scores (p < 0.001) and reduction in bronchodilator use (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: This is a prospective study that evaluates the role of visual biofeedback in PVFM patients. Our data suggests that visual biofeedback effectively reduces short-term subjective symptoms and asthma medication use.

Level of evidence: 3.

Keywords: Biofeedback; Paradoxical vocal fold motion.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow Chart of patient recruitment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Dyspnea index paired sample t-test (n = 17) (t = − 6.02, p < 0.001)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bronchodilator use from baseline to follow-up (n = 13) (Z = − 2.934, p = 0.003)

References

    1. Halvorsen T, Walsted ES, Bucca C, et al. Inducible laryngeal obstruction: an official joint European Respiratory Society and European laryngological society statement. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(3):1602221. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02221-2016.
    1. Christensen PM, Heimdal JH, Christopher KL, Bucca C, Cantarella G, Friedrich G, Halvorsen T, Herth F, Jung H, Morris MJ, Remacle M, Rasmussen N, Wilson JA. ERS/ELS/ACCP task force on inducible laryngeal obstructions. ERS/ELS/ACCP 2013 international consensus conference nomenclature on inducible laryngeal obstructions. Eur Respir Rev. 2015;24(137):445–450. doi: 10.1183/16000617.00006513.
    1. Newman KB, Dubster SN. Vocal cord dysfunction: masquerader of asthma. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;15(2):161–167. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1006358.
    1. Hicks M, Brugman SM, Katial R. Vocal cord dysfunction/paradoxical vocal fold motion. Prim Care. 2008;35(1):81–vii. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2007.09.005.
    1. Patterson R, Schatz MM. Munchausen’s stridor: non-organic laryngeal obstruction. Clin Allergy. 1974;4(03):307–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1974.tb01390.x.
    1. George S, Suresh S. Vocal cord dysfunction: analysis of 27 cases and updated review of pathophysiology & management. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;23:125–130. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1661358.
    1. Denipah N, Dominquez CM, Kraii EP, Kraii TL, Leos P, Braude D. Acute management of paradoxical vocal fold motion (vocal cord dysfunction) Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69:18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.06.045.
    1. Newman KB, Mason UG. 3rd, Schmaling, K.B. clinical features of vocal cord dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:1382–1386. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.4.7551399.
    1. Martin RJ, Blager FB, Gay ML, Wood RP. Paradoxic vocal cord motion in presumed asthmatics. Semin Respir Med. 1987;8:332–337. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012672.
    1. Patel RR, Venediktov R, Schooling T, Wang B. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of speech-language pathology treatment for individuals with paradoxical vocal fold motion. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24:566–584. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0120.
    1. Morris MJ, Allan PF, Perkins PJ. Vocal cord dysfunction: etiologies and treatment. Clin Pulm Med. 2006;13:73–86. doi: 10.1097/01.cpm.0000203745.50250.3b.
    1. Reitz JR, Gorman S, Kegyes J. Behavioral management of paradoxical vocal fold motion. Perspect Voice Voice Disord. 2014;24:64–70. doi: 10.1044/vvd24.2.64.
    1. Blager FB, Gay ML, Wood RP. Voice therapy techniques adapted to treatment of habit cough: a pilot study. J Commun Disord. 1988;21:393–400. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(88)90024-X.
    1. Pitchenik AE. Functional laryngeal obstruction relieved by panting. Chest. 1991;100:1465–1467. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.5.1465.
    1. Baxter M, Ruane L, Phyland D, Leahy E, Heke E, Lau KK, Low K, Hamza K, MacDonald M, Bardin PG. Multidisciplinary team clinic for vocal cord dysfunction directs therapy and significantly reduces healthcare utilization. Respirology. 2019;24:758–764. doi: 10.1111/resp.13520.
    1. Morris MJ, Christopher KL. Diagnostic criteria for the classification of vocal cord dysfunction. Chest. 2010;138(5):1213–1223. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2944.
    1. Gartner-Schmidt JL, Shembel AC, Zullo TG, Rosen CA. Development and validation of the dyspnea index (DI): a severity index for upper airway-related dyspnea. J Voice. 2014;28(6):775–782. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.017.
    1. Kramer S, de Silva B, Forrest LA, Matrka L. Does treatment of paradoxical vocal fold movement disorder decrease asthma medication use? Laryngoscope. 2017;127(7):1531–1537. doi: 10.1002/lary.26416.
    1. deSilva B, Crenshaw D, Matrka L, Forrest LA. Vocal fold botulinum toxin injection for refractory paradoxical vocal fold motion disorder. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(4):808–811. doi: 10.1002/lary.27471.
    1. Marcinow AM, Thompson J, Forrest LA, de Silva BW. Irritant-induced paradoxical vocal fold motion disorder: diagnosis and management. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153:996–1000. doi: 10.1177/0194599815600144.
    1. Katz DH, Sella O, Golan H, Banai K, Van Swearingen J, Krisciunas GP, Abbott KV. Buteyko Breathing Technique for Exertion-Induced Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion (EI-PVFM) J Voice. 2019;S0892–1997(19):30190.
    1. Jack S, Rossiter HB, Pearson MG, Ward SA, Warburton CJ, Whipp BJ. Ventilatory responses to inhaled carbon dioxide, hypoxia, and exercise in idiopathic hyperventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(2):118–125. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200207-720OC.
    1. Cowie RL, Conley DP, Underwood MF, Reader PG. A randomised controlled trial of the Buteyko technique as an adjunct to conventional management of asthma. Respir Med. 2008;102(5):726–732. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.12.012.
    1. Cooper S, Oborne J, Newton S, Harrison V, Thompson Coon J, Lewis S, Tattersfield A. Effect of two breathing exercises (Buteyko and pranayama) in asthma: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2003;58(8):674–679. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.8.674.
    1. McHugh P, Aitcheson F, Duncan B, Houghton F. Buteyko Breathing Technique for asthma: an effective intervention. N Z Med J. 2003;116:1187.
    1. Prem V, Sahoo RC, Adhikari P. Comparison of the effects of Buteyko and pranayama breathing techniques on quality of life in patients with asthma - a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(2):133–141. doi: 10.1177/0269215512450521.
    1. Low K, Lau KK, Holmes P, Crossett M, Vallance N, Phyland D, Hamza K, Hamilton G, Bardin PG. Abnormal vocal cord function in difficult-to-treat asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:50–56. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201010-1604OC.
    1. Chiang T, Marcinow AM, de Silva BW, Ence BN, Lindsey SE, Forrest LA. Exercise-induced paradoxical vocal fold motion disorder: diagnosis and management. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(3):727–731. doi: 10.1002/lary.23654.
    1. Johnston KL, Bradford H, Hodges H, Moore CM, Nauman E, Olin JT. The Olin EILOBI breathing techniques: description and initial case series of novel respiratory retraining strategies for athletes with exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. J Voice. 2018;32(6):698–704. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.020.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi