Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families

Sonya L Cameron, Rachael W Taylor, Anne-Louise M Heath, Sonya L Cameron, Rachael W Taylor, Anne-Louise M Heath

Abstract

Objective: To determine feeding practices and selected health-related behaviours in New Zealand families following a 'baby-led' or more traditional 'parent-led' method for introducing complementary foods.

Design, setting and participants: 199 mothers completed an online survey about introducing complementary foods to their infant. Participants were classified into one of four groups: 'adherent baby-led weaning (BLW)', the infant mostly or entirely fed themselves at 6-7 months; 'self-identified BLW', mothers reported following BLW at 6-7 months but were using spoon-feeding at least half the time; 'parent-led feeding', the mother reported not having tried BLW; and 'unclassified method', the mother reported they were not following BLW at 6-7 months but reported the infant mostly or entirely fed themselves at 6-7 months.

Results: 8% were following 'adherent BLW', 21% 'self-identified BLW' and 0% were following the 'unclassified method'. Compared with 'self-identified BLW' and 'parent-led feeding', a higher proportion of the 'adherent BLW' met the WHO recommendations to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months and to introduce complementary foods at 6 months. The 'adherent BLW' group was more likely to have family foods (p=0.018), and less likely (p=0.002) to have commercially prepared baby food. Both BLW groups were more likely to share meals with the family compared with 'parent-led feeding'. In contrast to 'self-identified BLW' and 'parent-led feeding', the 'adherent BLW' group did not offer iron-fortified cereal as a first food.

Conclusions: This study suggests that although many parents consider they follow BLW, a very few are following it strictly. The extent to which BLW was followed was associated with potential benefits (eg, sharing family meals) and risks (eg, low iron first foods) highlighting the importance for health professionals and researchers of accurately determining the extent of adherence to BLW.

Keywords: Baby-Led Weaning; Complementary feeding; NUTRITION & DIETETICS.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survey questions used to classify infant feeding method.

References

    1. Rapley G, Murkett T. Baby-led weaning: helping your child love good food. London, UK: Vermilion, 2008
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Ages and stages: switching to solid food. 2008. (accessed 6 Jun 2012)
    1. New Zealand Ministry of Health Food and nutrition guidelines for healthy infants and toddlers (aged 0-2): a background paper. 4th edn Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2008
    1. Brown A, Lee M. Maternal control of child feeding during the weaning period: differences between mothers following a baby-led or standard weaning approach. Matern Child Health J 2011;15:1265–71
    1. Brown A, Lee M. A descriptive study investigating the use and nature of baby-led weaning in a UK sample of mothers. Matern Child Nutr 2011;7:34–47
    1. Brown A, Lee M. An exploration of experiences of mothers following a baby-led weaning style: developmental readiness for complementary foods. Matern Child Nutr 2013;9:233–43
    1. Wright CM, Cameron K, Tsiaka M, et al. Is baby-led weaning feasible? When do babies first reach out for and eat finger foods? Matern Child Nutr 2011;7:27–33
    1. Cameron SL, Heath A-LM, Taylor RW. How feasible is baby-led weaning as an approach to infant feeding? A review of the evidence. Nutrients 2012;4:1575–609
    1. Townsend E, Pitchford NJ. Baby knows best? The impact of weaning style on food preferences and body mass index in early childhood in a case-controlled sample. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000298
    1. Cameron SL, Heath A-LM, Taylor RW. Healthcare professionals’, and mothers’, knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, baby-led weaning: a content analysis study. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001542
    1. Rowan H, Harris C. Baby-led weaning and the family diet. A pilot study. Appetite 2012;58:1046–9
    1. New Zealand Ministry of Health Baby-led weaning—ministry position statement. New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2010. (accessed 10 Oct 2012)
    1. Stratton SJ, Taves A, Lewis RJ, et al. Apparent life-threatening events in infants: high risk in the out-of-hospital environment. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:711–17
    1. Statistics New Zealand Statistical standard for ethnicity. Statistics New Zealand, 2005. (accessed 14 Jun 2013)
    1. New Zealand Ministry of Health Maternity snapshot 2010: provisional data. New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2010. (accessed 4 Jun 2012)
    1. OECD Education at a glance: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing, 2013. (accessed 25 Jul 2013)
    1. Statistics New Zealand Census snapshot: children. Statistics New Zealand, 2002. (accessed 1 Mar 2013)
    1. World Health Organization Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2009
    1. Byard RW, Gallard V, Johnson A, et al. Safe feeding practices for infants and young children. J Paediatr Child Health 1996;32:327–9
    1. Zigon G, Gregori D, Corradetti R, et al. Child mortality due to suffocation in Europe (1980–1995): a review of official data. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2006;26:154–61
    1. Tarrago SB. Prevention of choking, strangulation, and suffocation in childhood. WMJ 2000;99:43–6, 42
    1. Child and Youth Mortality Review Committee Special report: unintentional suffocation, foreign body inhalation and strangulation. Wellington, New Zealand: Health Quality and Safety Commission New Zealand, 2013
    1. Arvedson J, Brodsky L. Pediatric swallowing and feeding: assessment and management. 2nd edn New York, USA: Singular publishing group, 2002
    1. Rapley G. Can babies initiate and direct the weaning process? Kent: Canterbury Christ Church University College, 2003
    1. Rapley G. Baby-led weaning: transitioning to solid foods at the baby's own pace. Community Pract 2011;84:20–3
    1. Rapley G. Talking about weaning. Community Pract 2011;84:40–1
    1. Northstone K, Emmett P, Nethersole F. The effect of age of introduction to lumpy solids on foods eaten and reported feeding difficulties at 6 and 15 months. J Hum Nutr Diet 2001;14:43–54
    1. Naylor A, Morrow A. Developmental readiness of normal full term infants to progress from exclusive breastfeeding to the introduction of complementary foods: reviews of the relevant literature concerning infant immunologic, gastrointestinal, oral motor and maternal reproductive and lactational development. Washington, DC: Wellstart International, LINKAGES Project Academy for Educational Development, 2001
    1. Moore AP, Milligan P, Goff LM. An online survey of knowledge of the weaning guidelines, advice from health visitors and other factors that influence weaning timing in UK mothers. Matern Child Nutr 2012 [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Domellof M. Iron requirements in infancy. Ann Nutr Metab 2011;59:59–63
    1. Leong W-I, Lönnerdal B. Iron nutrition. In: Anderson G, McLaren G. eds. Iron physiology and pathophysiology in humans. New York, USA: Humana Press, 2012:81–99
    1. Kramer M, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002(1):CD003517.
    1. World Health Organization Guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2004
    1. Dube K, Schwartz J, Mueller MJ, et al. Iron intake and iron status in breastfed infants during the first year of life. Clin Nutr 2010;29:773–8
    1. Sen B. Frequency of family dinner and adolescent body weight status: evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997. Obesity 2006;14:2266–76
    1. Utter J, Denny S, Robinson E, et al. Family meals among New Zealand young people: relationships with eating behaviors and body mass index. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013;45:3–11
    1. Hammons AJ, Fiese BH. Is frequency of shared family meals related to the nutritional health of children and adolescents? Pediatrics 2011;127:e1565–74
    1. Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D. A perspective on family meals: do they matter? Nutr Today 2005;40:261–6
    1. Hetherington MM, Cecil JE, Jackson DM, et al. Feeding infants and young children. From guidelines to practice. Appetite 2011;57:791–5
    1. Skinner JD, Carruth BR, Bounds W, et al. Do food-related experiences in the first 2 years of life predict dietary variety in school-aged children? J Nutr Educ Behav 2002;34:310–15
    1. Harris G. Development of taste and food preferences in children. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2008;11:315–19
    1. Skafida V. The family meal panacea: exploring how different aspects of family meal occurrence, meal habits and meal enjoyment relate to young children's diets. Sociol Health Illn 2013;35:906–23
    1. Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, et al. Selection bias and information bias in clinical research. Nephron Clin Pract 2010;115:c94–9
    1. Ellenberg JH. Selection bias in observational and experimental studies. Stat Med 1994;13:557–67
    1. Bell A, Gibson A, Crothers C, et al. The internet in New Zealand 2011. Auckland, New Zealand Institute of Culture, Discourse & Communication, AUT University, 2011
    1. Statistics New Zealand QuickStats about education and training. Statistics New Zealand, 2006. (accessed 28 May 2013)
    1. Royal NZ Plunket Society Breastfeeding data. Analysis of 2004–2009 data. Wellington: Royal NZ Plunket Society, 2010

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi