Smartphone Otoscopy Sans Attachment: A Paradigm Shift in Diagnosing Ear Pathologies

Kranti Bhavana, Majaz Ahmad, Piyush Sharma, Kranti Bhavana, Majaz Ahmad, Piyush Sharma

Abstract

Objective: To study the validity of smartphone otoscopy.

Setting: Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital in eastern India.

Study design: Experimental study design to compare the efficacy of smartphone otoscopy with otoendoscopes.

Subjects and methods: One hundred tympanic membranes (TMs) of 50 patients were examined and photographed by third-year senior residents (6 years of ENT training) using a zero-degree otoendoscope. The same 100 ears were then examined using a smartphone. Assistive light of the phone was used to illuminate the ear canal. The camera of the phone was focused to visualize and photograph the TM.

Results: Compared with the gold-standard otoendoscopes, smartphones could correctly diagnose 75% of the cases. Sensitivity and specificity of smartphone otoscopy were 87.8% and 80%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 90.6%, whereas negative predictive value was 75%. Smartphone otoscopy could correctly diagnose 88.57% of normal TMs, 86.36% of retracted TMs, and 82.85% of perforated TMs.

Conclusion: This modality of "smart otoscopy" has no added cost and can be used by most doctors after minimal training. It is an excellent teaching tool and can be used universally even in resource-limited settings.

Keywords: cellscopes; otoendoscopes; smartphone otoscopy; teleoto-laryngology.

© The Authors 2018.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The actual procedure used to perform smartphone otoscopy without any attachment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Otoendoscopic picture showing normal tympanic membrane.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Otoendoscopic picture showing central perforation.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Same tympanic membrane as seen on smartphone otoscopy without any attachment.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Same ear as seen on smartphone otoscopy (ear speculum has been used to improve visibility).

References

    1. Mudry A. References in the history of otology: the importance of being earnest. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:135-140.
    1. Moshtaghi O, Sahyouni R, Haidar YM, et al. Smartphone-enabled otoscopy in neurotology/otology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156:554-558.
    1. Jones WS. Video otoscopy: bringing otoscopy out of the “black box.” Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70:1875-1883.
    1. Ephraim RK, Duah E, Cybulski JS, et al. Diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium infection with a mobile phone-mounted Foldscope and a reversed-lens CellScope in Ghana. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:1253-1256.
    1. Chang J, Arbeláez P, Switz N, et al. Automated tuberculosis diagnosis using fluorescence images from a mobile microscope. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15:345-352.
    1. Coulibaly JT, Ouattara M, D’Ambrosio MV, et al. Accuracy of mobile phone and handheld light microscopy for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis and intestinal protozoa infections in Côte d’Ivoire. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004768.
    1. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ. 2000;320:1517-1520.
    1. Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. CMAJ. 2001;165:765-771.
    1. Sahyouni R, Moshtaghi O, Rajaii R, et al. Evaluation of an iPhone otoscope in a neurotrauma clinic and as an adjunct to neurosurgical education. Insights Neurosurg. 2016;1:4.
    1. Morris E, Kesser BW, Peirce-Cottler S, Keeley M. Development and validation of a novel ear simulator to teach pneumatic otoscopy. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:22-26.
    1. Chen J, Lieffers J, Bauman A, Hanning R, Allman-Farinelli M. The use of smartphone health apps and other mobile health (mHealth) technologies in dietetic practice: a three country study. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017;30:439-452.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi