Retrospective examination of lipid-lowering treatment patterns in a real-world high-risk cohort in the UK in 2014: comparison with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2014 lipid modification guidelines

Dylan L Steen, Irfan Khan, David Ansell, Robert J Sanchez, Kausik K Ray, Dylan L Steen, Irfan Khan, David Ansell, Robert J Sanchez, Kausik K Ray

Abstract

Background: In 2014, guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) provided updated recommendations on lipid-modifying therapy (LMT). We assessed clinical practice contemporaneous to release of these guidelines in a UK general practice setting for secondary and high-risk primary-prevention populations, and extrapolated the findings to UK nation level.

Methods: Patients from The Health Improvement Network database with the following criteria were included: lipid profile in 2014 (index date); ≥20 years of age; ≥2 years representation in database prior to index; ≥1 statin indication either for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or the non-ASCVD conditions high-risk diabetes mellitus and/or chronic kidney disease.

Results: Overall, 183 565 patients met the inclusion criteria (n=91 479 for ASCVD, 92 086 for non-ASCVD). In those with ASCVD, 79% received statin treatment and 31% received high-intensity statin. In the non-ASCVD group, 62% were on a statin and 57% received medium-intensity or high-intensity statin. In the ASCVD and non-ASCVD cohorts, 6% and 15%, respectively, were already treated according to dosing recommendations as per updated NICE guidelines. Extrapolation to the 2014 UK population indicated that, of the 3.3 million individuals with ASCVD, 2.4 million would require statin uptitration and 680 000 would require statin initiation (31% de novo initiation, 60% reinitiation, 9% addition to non-statin LMT) to achieve full concordance with updated guidelines. Of the 3.5 million high-risk non-ASCVD individuals, 1.6 million would require statin uptitration and 1.4 million would require statin initiation (59% de novo initiation, 36% reinitiation, 5% addition to non-statin LMT).

Conclusions: A large proportion of UK individuals with ASCVD and high-risk non-ASCVD received statin treatment (79% and 62%, respectively) during the year of NICE 2014 guidelines release. Up to 94% of patients with ASCVD and 85% of high-risk non-ASCVD individuals, representing ∼3 million individuals in each group, would require statin uptitration or initiation to achieve full concordance with updated guidelines.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; guidelines; lipids; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); statins.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: DS receives modest consulting fees from Sanofi and Regeneron. IK is a stockholder and employee of Sanofi. DA is an employee of IMS Health. RJS is a stockholder and employee of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. KKR has received honoraria for advisory boards, lectures or for serving on the steering committee for clinical trials from Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Aegerion, Kowa, IONIS Pharma, MedCo, Cerenis and Resverlogix, and has received research support by grants to his institution from Pfizer, MSD, Amgen, Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Determination of treatment status as of the index date. Blue bars representing scenarios A and B (medication supply via recorded prescription (Rx) on or within 30 days prior to the index date) define the patient as being treated as of the index date. The red bar representing scenario C (medication supply via recorded Rx more than 30 days prior to the index date) defines the patient as not being treated as of the index date.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart of the cohort selection for the study. *ASCVD includes acute coronary syndrome, other coronary heart disease, ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack and peripheral arterial disease. †Includes type 2 diabetes mellitus with QRISK2 ≥10%, type 1 diabetes mellitus with age >40 years and chronic kidney disease not meeting the previous diabetes mellitus criteria. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CV, cardiovascular disease; THIN, The Health Improvement Network.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Health statistics and information systems: estimated deaths (‘000) by cause, sex and WHO member state, 2012. (accessed 14 Jan 2016).
    1. Institution for health metrics and evaluation. Global burden of disease calculator: United Kingdom, 2013. . (accessed 14 Jan 2016).
    1. Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Blackwell L et al. . Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: Meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;380:581–90. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5
    1. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J et al. , Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010;376:1670–81. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5
    1. Kashani A, Phillips CO, Foody JM et al. . Risks associated with statin therapy: a systematic overview of randomised clinical trials. Circulation 2006;114:2788–97. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.624890
    1. Halcox JP, Tubach F, Lopez-Garcia E et al. . Low rates of both lipid-lowering therapy use and achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets in individuals at high-risk for cardiovascular disease across Europe. PLoS One 2015;10:e0115270 10.1371/journal.pone.0115270
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Lipid modification: Cardiovascular risk assessment and the modification of blood lipids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clinical guideline CG181. July 2014. (accessed 7 Feb 2015).
    1. Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G et al. , European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) 2008-2010 and 2010-2012 Committees. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J 2011;32:1769–818. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr158
    1. Blak BT, Thompson M, Dattani H et al. . Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates. Inform Prim Care 2011;19:251–5.
    1. Lewis JD, Schinnar R, Bilker WB et al. . Validation studies of the health improvement network (THIN) database for pharmacoepidemiology research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:393–401. 10.1002/pds.1335
    1. Hammad TA, McAdams MA, Feight A et al. . Determining the predictive value of Read/OXMIS codes to identify incident acute myocardial infarction in the General Practice Research Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2008;17:1197–201. 10.1002/pds.1672
    1. Khan NF, Harrison SE, Rose PW. Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:e128–136. 10.3399/bjgp10X483562
    1. Shephard E, Stapley S, Hamilton W. The use of electronic databases in primary care research. Fam Pract 2011;28:352–4. 10.1093/fampra/cmr039
    1. Collins GS, Altman DG. Predicting the 10 year risk of cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom: independent and external validation of an updated version of QRISK2. BMJ 2012;344:e4181 10.1136/bmj.e4181
    1. National Health Services (NHS) Employers, NHS England, and British Medical Association General Practitioners Committee. 2014/15 General medical services (GMS) contract quality and outcomes framework (QOF): Guidance for GMS contract 2014/15. March 2014. NHS England Gateway reference 01264. (accessed 22 Mar 2016).
    1. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP et al. , IMPROVE-IT Investigators. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2387–97. 10.1056/NEJMoa1410489
    1. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Bacquer D et al. , EUROASPIRE Investigators. EUROASPIRE IV: A European Society of Cardiology survey on the lifestyle, risk factor and therapeutic management of coronary patients from 24 European countries. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016;23:636–48. 10.1177/2047487315569401
    1. Hawkins NM, Scholes S, Bajekal M et al. . The UK National Health Service: delivering equitable treatment across the spectrum of coronary disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013;6:208–16. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000058
    1. Raine R, Wong W, Ambler G et al. . Sociodemographic variations in the contribution of secondary drug prevention to stroke survival at middle and older ages: cohort study. BMJ 2009;338:b1279 10.1136/bmj.b1279
    1. Jones NR, Fischbacher CM, Guthrie B et al. , Scottish Diabetes Research Network Epidemiology Group. Factors associated with statin treatment for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people within 2 years following diagnosis of diabetes in Scotland, 2006-2008. Diabet Med 2014;31:640–6. 10.1111/dme.12409
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Lipid modification: cardiovascular risk assessment and the modification of blood lipids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. NICE Clinical Guideline 67. May 2008. (accessed 22 Mar 2016).
    1. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A III et al. . Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Investigators. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2006;355:549–59. 10.1056/NEJMoa061894
    1. Millett C, Gray J, Wall M et al. . Ethnic disparities in coronary heart disease management and pay for performance in the UK. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:8–13. 10.1007/s11606-008-0832-5
    1. Carey IM, DeWilde S, Shah SM et al. . Statin use after first myocardial infarction in UK men and women from 1997 to 2006: Who started and who continued treatment? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2012;22:400–8. 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.09.010

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi