Effectiveness of the advisory display SmartPilot® view in the assessment of anesthetic depth in low risk gynecological surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial

Hilde Strand, Ann Charlott Elshaug, Øyvind Bernersen, Randi Ballangrud, Hilde Strand, Ann Charlott Elshaug, Øyvind Bernersen, Randi Ballangrud

Abstract

Background: Assessment of appropriate anesthetic depth is crucial to prevent harm to patients. Unnecessary deep anesthesia can be harmful, potentially causing acute renal failure, myocardial injury, delirium, and an increased mortality rate. Conversely, too light anesthesia combined with muscle relaxants can result in intraoperative patient awareness and lead to serious psychological trauma. This trial aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of the advisory display SmartPilot® View (SPV), as a supplemental measure in the assessment of anesthetic depth in low risk gynecological surgery patients. The hypothesis was that the use of the SPV would increase the precision of assessment, and result in a higher mean arterial pressure.

Methods: This trial used a randomized, controlled, single-blind design with a homogeneous sample. Patients undergoing minor, low risk gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: a test group wherein current standards were supplemented with the advisory display SPV and a control group assessed using only the current standards. Female patients aged between 18 and 75 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System scores of 1-3 undergoing planned general anesthesia using the total intravenous anesthetic method, combining propofol and remifentanil, were included. The exclusion criteria included a body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2, a history of alcoholism, drug intake affecting propofol and remifentanil dynamics, and inability to consent. The independent sample t-test and chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used to assess the statistical significance of differences between the two groups.

Results: A total of 114 patients were included in the analysis (test group n = 58, control group n = 56). No significant differences in the mean arterial pressure, heart rate, bispectral index, extubation delay, or post-anesthesia care unit stay were found between groups.

Conclusions: The addition of the advisory display SmartPilot® View to current standards in the evaluation of anesthetic depth had no significant effect on the outcome.

Trial registration: The trial was registered on January 16th 2019 with ClinicalTrials.gov (ref: NCT03807271 ).

Keywords: Advisory display; Anesthetic depth; SmartPilot® View.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram. Flow diagram of the enrollment process: 132 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom four declined the invitation to participate; 128 patients were randomly assigned to the test or control groups, with 64 participants in each group. Six participants were excluded from the test group, due to technical issues, intake of potentiating drugs, pacemaker, and fever. Eight participants were excluded from the control group due to technical issues, intake of potentiating drugs, body mass index ≥35 kg/m2, and change in the anesthetic method. Data from 58 participants in the test group and 56 participants in the control group were included in the analysis.

References

    1. Pandit JJ, Andrade J, Bogod DG, Hitchman JM, Jonker WR, Lucas N, et al. 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:549–59. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu313.
    1. Walsh M, Kurz A, Thabane L. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:507–15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26.
    1. Maheshwari A, McCormick PJ, Sessler DI, Reich DL, You J, Mascha EJ, et al. Prolonged concurrent hypotension and low bispectral index (‘double low’) are associated with mortality, serious complications, and prolonged hospitalization after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:40–9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex095.
    1. Drummond JC. Blood pressure and the brain: how low can you go? Anesth Analg. 2019;128:759–71. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004034.
    1. Zorrilla-Vaca A, Healy RJ, Wu CL, Grant MC. Relation between bispectral index measurements of anesthetic depth and postoperative mortality: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Can J Anesth Can Anesth. 2017;64:597–607. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0872-6.
    1. Leslie K, Short TG. Anesthetic depth and long-term survival: an update Profondeur de l’anesthe´sie et survie a` long terme: une mise a` jour. Can J Anesth Can Anesth. 2015;63:233–40. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0490-0.
    1. Constant I, Sabourdin N. Monitoring depth of anesthesia: from consciousness to nociception. A window on subcortical brain activity. Pediatr Anesth. 2015;25:73–82. doi: 10.1111/pan.12586.
    1. Lobo FA, Schraag S. Limitations of anaesthesia depth monitoring. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:657–64. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834c7aba.
    1. Dahaba AA. Different conditions that could result in the bispectral index indicating an incorrect hypnotic state. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:765–73. doi: 10.1213/.
    1. Dräger Medical . User instruction manual for SmartPilot View (R) SW 3.1n for Zeus IE. 6. Lübeck: Drägerwerk AG & Co; 2016.
    1. van den Berg JP, Vereecke HEM, Proost JH, Eleveld DJ, Wietasch JKG, Absalom AR, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in anaesthesia. A review of current knowledge and how it can be used to optimize anaesthetic drug administration. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:44–57. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew312.
    1. Cirillo V, Marinosci GZ, Robertis ED, Romano GM, Desantis O, Piazza O, et al. Navigator® and SmartPilot® View are helpful in guiding anesthesia and reducing anesthetic drug dosing. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:1163–9.
    1. Leblanc D, Conte M, Masson G, Richard F, Jeanneteau A, Bouhours G. SmartPilotVR view-guided anaesthesia improves postoperative outcomes in hip fracture surgery: a randomized blinded controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:1022–9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex317.
    1. Battles JB, Keyes MA. Technology and patient safety: a two-edged sword. Biomed Instrum. 2002;36:84–8.
    1. Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013;4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:75–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
    1. ALNSF NAF. Norsk standard for anestesi. 2016. . Accessed 12 Mar 2021.
    1. Medtronic. Personalize anesthesia. Not too deep. Not too light. Just right. 2018. . Accessed 7 Apr 2021.
    1. Struys MMRF, Sahinovic M, Lichtenbelt BJ, Vereecke HEM, Absalom AR. Optimizing intravenous drug administration by applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:38–47. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer108.
    1. Drews FA, Syroid N, Agutter J, Strayer DL, Westenskow DR. Drug delivery as control task: improving performance in a common anesthetic task. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 2006;48:85–94. doi: 10.1518/001872006776412216.
    1. Syroid ND, Agutter J, Drews FA, Westenskow DR, Albert RW, Bermudez JC, et al. Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:565–75. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00010.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi