Management of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review & national practice survey

Ruwan J Fernando, Abdul H Sultan, Simon Radley, Peter W Jones, Richard B Johanson, Ruwan J Fernando, Abdul H Sultan, Simon Radley, Peter W Jones, Richard B Johanson

Abstract

Background: We aim to establish the evidence base for the recognition and management of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and to compare this with current practice amongst UK obstetricians and coloproctologists.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature and a postal questionnaire survey of consultant obstetricians, trainee obstetricians and consultant coloproctologists was carried out.

Results: We found a wide variation in experience of repairing acute anal sphincter injury. The group with largest experience were consultant obstetricians (46.5% undertaking > or = 5 repairs/year), whilst only 10% of responding colorectal surgeons had similar levels of experience (p < 0.001). There was extensive misunderstanding in terms of the definition of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Overall, trainees had a greater knowledge of the correct classification (p < 0.01). Observational studies suggest that a new 'overlap' repair using PDS sutures with antibiotic cover gives better functional results. However, our literature search found only one randomised controlled trial (RCT) on the technique of repair of OASI, which showed no difference in incidence of anal incontinence at three months. Despite this, there was a wide variation in practice, with 337(50%) consultants, 82 (55%) trainees and 80 (89%) coloproctologists already using the 'overlap' method for repair of a torn EAS (p < 0.001). Although over 50% of colorectal surgeons would undertake long-term follow-up of their patients, this was the practice of less than 10% of obstetricians (p < 0.001). Whilst over 70% of coloproctologists would recommend an elective caesarean section in a subsequent pregnancy, only 22% of obstetric consultants and 14% of trainees (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: An agreed classification of OASI, development of national guidelines, formalised training, multidisciplinary management and further definitive research is strongly recommended.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regional variation of the definition of anal sphincter injury

References

    1. Department of Health Good practice in continence services. London, Department of Health. 2000.
    1. Troop P, Goldacre M, Mason A, Cleary R, editor. Report of a working group to the Department of Health. Oxford, National Centre for Health Outcomes Development.; 1999. Health outcome indicators: normal pregnancy and childbirth.
    1. Sultan AH. Clinical Focus:ric perineal injury and faecal incontinence after childbirth – Editorial: Obstetrical perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clinical Risk. 1999;5:193–196.
    1. Assassa R, Williams K, et al. Evaluation of services for urinary dysfunction. MRC Clinical Trials Directory. 2000. p. 74.
    1. Macarthur C, Lewis M, Knox EG. Health after childbirth: an investigation of long term health problems beginning after childbirth in 11701 women. London: HMSO, 1991. pp. 83–103.
    1. Glazener CMA, Abdalla M, Stroud P, Naji S, Templeton A, Russell IT. Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:282–287.
    1. Glazener CMA. Sexual function after childbirth: women's experiences, persistent morbidity and lack of professional recognition. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:330–335.
    1. Glazener CMA, Lang G, Wilson PD, Herbison GP, Macarthur C, Gee H. Postnatal incontinence: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of conservative treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:47.
    1. Clarkson J, Newton C, Bick D, Gyte G, Kettle C, Newburn M, et al. Achieving sustainable quality in maternity services – using audit of incontinence and dyspareunia to identify shortfalls in meeting standards. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2001;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-1-4.
    1. Leigh RJ, Turnberg LA. Fecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptoms. Lancet. 1982;1:1349–1351. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92413-8.
    1. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1996;91:33–6.
    1. The Continence Foundation Incontinence: a challenge and an opportunity for primary care. London, The Continence Foundation. 2000.
    1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:979–982.
    1. Schofield PF, Grace R. Faecal Incontinence after childbirth. Clinical Risk. 1999;5:201–204.
    1. Mellgren A, Jenson RN, Zetterstrom JP, Hofmeister JH, Wong WD, Lowry AC. Long term cost of faecal incontinence secondary to obstetric injuries. DIS Colon Rectum. 1998;41:A54–A55.
    1. Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery. The Lancet. 1996;347:544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91176-9.
    1. Johanson RB, El-Timini S, Rigby C, Young PF, Jones PW. Caesarean section by choice could fulfil the inverse care law. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2001;97:20–22. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00424-9.
    1. Jarvis GJ. Perineal damage following childbirth. AVMA Medical & Legal Journal. 1999. pp. 181–185.
    1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ. 1994;308:887–891.
    1. Tetzschner T, Sorenson M, Lose G, Christiansen J. Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:1040.
    1. Snooks SJ, Setchell M, Swash M, Henry MM. Injury to the innervation of the pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet. 1984;1:546–550. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90766-9.
    1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI, Chir M. Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. 1993;329:1905–1911. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312233292601.
    1. Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:955–961. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00255-5.
    1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN. Obstetric perineal trauma: an audit of training. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1995;15:19–23.
    1. Fitzpatrick M, Fynes M, Cassidy M, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herilhy C. Prospective study of the influence of parity and operative technique on the outcome of primary anal sphincter repair following obstetrical injury. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2000;89:159–163. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00200-6.
    1. Goffeng AR, Andersch B, Andersson M, Berndtsson I, Hulten L, Oresland T. Objective methods cannot predict anal incontinence after primary repair of extensive anal tears. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:439–443. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770415.x.
    1. Sultan AH, Thakar R. Lower genital tract and anal sphincter trauma. Bailliere's Best Practice & Research – Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
    1. Walsh CJ, Mooney EF, Upton GJ, Motson RW. Incidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair. Br J Surg. 1996;83:218–221. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1996.02043.x.
    1. Cook TA, Mortenson NJMC. Management of faecal incontinence following obstetric injury. Br J Surg. 1998;85:293–299. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00693.x.
    1. Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury [Protocol] The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001. Oxford: Update Software. Oxford: Update Software, 2000.
    1. Kettle C, Johanson RB. RCOG Green Top Guidelines: Materials and methods used in perineal repair. RCOG. 2000.
    1. Adams EJ, Fernando RJ. RCOG Green Top Guidelines: Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears following vaginal delivery. 2001 en Top Guidelines. 2001.
    1. Keighley MRB, Radley S, Johanson R. Consensus on prevention and management of post-obstetric bowel incontinence and third degree tear. Clinical Risk. 2000;6:231–237.
    1. Fulsher RW, Fearl CL. The third degree lacerations in modern obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1955;69:786–793.
    1. Blaisdell PC. Repair of the incontinent sphincter ani. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1940;70:692–697.
    1. Parks AC, McPartlin JF. Late repair of injuries of the anal sphincter. Proceedings of The Royal Society of Medicine. 1971;64:1187–1189.
    1. Sultan AH, Monga AK, Kumar D, Stanton SL. Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:318–323.
    1. Fitzpatrick M, Fynes M, Cassidy M, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. A randomised controlled trial of primary repair of third degree perineal tears, comparing overlap and approximation techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1220–1224. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108880.
    1. Kettle C, Johanson RB. Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, Oxford: Update Software. 2001.
    1. Venkatesh KS, Ramanujam PS, Larson DH, Haywood NA. Anorectal complications of vaginal delivery. DIS Colon Rectum. 1989;32:1039–1041.
    1. Keighley MRB, Williams NS. Sepsis and the use of antibiotic cover in colorectal surgery. In: Keighley MRB, Williams NS, editor. Surgery of the colon rectum and anus. London: Harcourt Brace & Co; 1999. pp. 105–135.
    1. Nessim A, Wexner SD, Agachan F, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, et al. Is bowel confinement necessary after anorectal reconstructive surgery? DIS Colon Rectum. 1999;42:16–23.
    1. Cook TA, Deane D, Mortenson NJMcC. Is there a role for a colorectal team in the management of severe third degree vaginal tears. Colorectal Disease. 1999;1:263–266. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.1999.00083.x.
    1. Hasegawa H, Yoshioka K, Keighley MRB. Randomised trial of faecal diversion for sphincter repair. DIS Colon Rectum. 2000;43:961–965.
    1. Sultan AH, Stanton SL. Preserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth – elective caesarean section? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:731–734.
    1. Fynes M, Donnelly V, Bohan M, O'Connoll PR, O'Herlihy C. Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study. The Lancet. 1999;354:983–986. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11205-9.
    1. Lal M, Mann C, Callender R, Radley S. Patterns of faecal incontinence following normal vaginal delivery, elective and emergency caesarean section. Colorectal Disease. 2000;2:178–178. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2000.00160.x.
    1. Macarthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MRB. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:46–50.
    1. Donald I. Practical Obstetric Problems. Practical Obstetric Problems London: Lloyd Luke. 1979. p. 811.
    1. Groom KM, Paterson-Brown S. Third degree tears: are they clinically underdiagnosed? Gastroenterology International. 2000;13:76–76.
    1. Johanson RB, Fernando RJ, Kettle C, Sultan A, Radley S, Lucking L, et al. The 'Repair' Survey of the incidence of 3rd degree perineal tears in UK hospitals. Proceedings of 29th British Congress of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Birmingham. 2001.
    1. Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Dekker GA, Deville W, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventative role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:563–566.
    1. Sultan AH. Primary and secondary anal sphincter repairs. In: Stanton SL and Zimmer PE, editor. In, Female pelvic reconstructive surgery. Springer: London; 2001.
    1. Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. The Lancet. 2000;355:260–265. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05218-6.
    1. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet. 2000;355:2037–2040. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02351-5.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi