European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness

D Kondziella, A Bender, K Diserens, W van Erp, A Estraneo, R Formisano, S Laureys, L Naccache, S Ozturk, B Rohaut, J D Sitt, J Stender, M Tiainen, A O Rossetti, O Gosseries, C Chatelle, EAN Panel on Coma, Disorders of Consciousness, D Kondziella, A Bender, K Diserens, W van Erp, A Estraneo, R Formisano, S Laureys, L Naccache, S Ozturk, B Rohaut, J D Sitt, J Stender, M Tiainen, A O Rossetti, O Gosseries, C Chatelle, EAN Panel on Coma, Disorders of Consciousness

Abstract

Background and purpose: Patients with acquired brain injury and acute or prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC) are challenging. Evidence to support diagnostic decisions on coma and other DoC is limited but accumulating. This guideline provides the state-of-the-art evidence regarding the diagnosis of DoC, summarizing data from bedside examination techniques, functional neuroimaging and electroencephalography (EEG).

Methods: Sixteen members of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Scientific Panel on Coma and Chronic Disorders of Consciousness, representing 10 European countries, reviewed the scientific evidence for the evaluation of coma and other DoC using standard bibliographic measures. Recommendations followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The guideline was endorsed by the EAN.

Results: Besides a comprehensive neurological examination, the following suggestions are made: probe for voluntary eye movements using a mirror; repeat clinical assessments in the subacute and chronic setting, using the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised; use the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score instead of the Glasgow Coma Scale in the acute setting; obtain clinical standard EEG; search for sleep patterns on EEG, particularly rapid eye movement sleep and slow-wave sleep; and, whenever feasible, consider positron emission tomography, resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), active fMRI or EEG paradigms and quantitative analysis of high-density EEG to complement behavioral assessment in patients without command following at the bedside.

Conclusions: Standardized clinical evaluation, EEG-based techniques and functional neuroimaging should be integrated for multimodal evaluation of patients with DoC. The state of consciousness should be classified according to the highest level revealed by any of these three approaches.

Keywords: electroencephalography; evoked potentials; functional magnetic resonance imaging; minimally conscious state; positron emission tomography; resting state fMRI; transcranial magnetic stimulation; traumatic brain injury; unresponsive wakefulness syndrome; vegetative state.

© 2020 European Academy of Neurology.

References

    1. Kondziella D, Friberg CK, Frokjaer VG, et al. Preserved consciousness in vegetative and minimal conscious states: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87: 485-92.
    1. Cortese MD, Riganello F, Arcuri F, et al. Coma Recovery Scale - R: variability in the disorder of consciousness. BMC Neurol 2015; 15: 186.
    1. Candelieri A, Cortese MD, Dolce G, et al. Visual pursuit: within-day variability in the severe disorder of consciousness. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28: 2013-2017.
    1. Wannez S, Heine L, Thonnard M, et al. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2017; 81: 883-889.
    1. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 2009; 9: 35. .
    1. van Erp WS, Lavrijsen JCM, Vos PE, et al. The vegetative state: prevalence, misdiagnosis, and treatment limitations. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16: 85.e9-85.e14.
    1. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58: 349-53.
    1. Schnakers C, Perrin F, Schabus M, et al. Detecting consciousness in a total locked-in syndrome: an active event-related paradigm. Neurocase 2009; 15: 271-7.
    1. Thonnard M, Wannez S, Keen S, et al. (2014) Detection of visual pursuit in patients in minimally conscious state: a matter of stimuli and visual plane? Brain Inj 28:1164-1170.
    1. Wannez S, Hoyoux T, Langohr T, et al. Objective assessment of visual pursuit in patients with disorders of consciousness: an exploratory study. J Neurol 2017; 264: 928-937.
    1. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, Bredart S, Laureys S. Assessment of visual pursuit in post-comatose states: use a mirror. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 223-223.
    1. Trojano L, Moretta P, Loreto V, et al. Affective saliency modifies visual tracking behavior in disorders of consciousness: a quantitative analysis. J Neurol 2013; 260: 306-8.
    1. Sattin D, Giovannetti AM, Ciaraffa F, et al. Assessment of patients with disorder of consciousness: do different Coma Recovery Scale scoring correlate with different settings? J Neurol 2014; 261: 2378-2386.
    1. Formisano R, D'Ippolito M, Risetti M, et al. Vegetative state, minimally conscious state, akinetic mutism and Parkinsonism as a continuum of recovery from disorders of consciousness: an exploratory and preliminary study. Funct Neurol 2011; 26: 15-24.
    1. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, et al. Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology 2010; 75: 239-245. .
    1. Formisano R, D'Ippolito M, Catani S. Functional locked-in syndrome as recovery phase of vegetative state. Brain Inj 2013; 27: 1332-1332. .
    1. Luaute J, Maucort-Boulch D, Tell L, et al. Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states. Neurology 2010; 75: 246-252.
    1. Hammond FM, Giacino JT, Nakase Richardson R, et al. Disorders of consciousness due to traumatic brain injury: functional status ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36: 1136-1146.
    1. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 2010; 8: 68.
    1. Stender J, Gosseries O, Bruno MA, et al. Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study. Lancet 2014; 384: 514-522.
    1. Demertzi A, Jox RJ, Racine E, Laureys S. A European survey on attitudes towards pain and end-of-life issues in locked-in syndrome. Brain Inj 2014; 28: 1209-1215.
    1. Kondziella D, Cheung MC, Dutta A. Public perception of the vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a crowdsourced study. PeerJ 2019; 7: e6575.
    1. Gipson J, Kahane G, Savulescu J. Attitudes of lay people to withdrawal of treatment in brain damaged patients. Neuroethics 2014; 7: 1-9.
    1. Demertzi A, Ledoux D, Bruno M-A, et al. Attitudes towards end-of-life issues in disorders of consciousness: a European survey. J Neurol 2011; 258: 1058-1065.
    1. Harvey D, Butler J, Groves J, et al. Management of perceived devastating brain injury after hospital admission: a consensus statement from stakeholder professional organizations. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120: 138-145.
    1. Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Simard J-F, et al. Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ 2011; 183: 1581-8.
    1. Ong CJ, Dhand A, Diringer MN. Early withdrawal decision-making in patients with coma after cardiac arrest: a qualitative study of intensive care clinicians. Neurocrit Care 2016; 25: 258-265.
    1. Hermann B, Goudard G, Courcoux K, et al. Wisdom of the caregivers: pooling individual subjective reports to diagnose states of consciousness in brain-injured patients, a monocentric prospective study. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e026211.
    1. van Erp WS, Lavrijsen JCM, van de Laar FA, et al. The vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Eur J Neurol 2014; 21: 1361-1368.
    1. Rohaut B, Eliseyev A, Claassen J. Uncovering consciousness in unresponsive ICU patients: technical, medical and ethical considerations. Crit Care 2019; 23: 78.
    1. Laureys S, Pellas F, Van Eeckhout P, et al. The locked-in syndrome: what is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Prog Brain Res 2005; 150: 495-511.
    1. Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, et al. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 2006; 313: 1402.
    1. Marino S, Bonanno L, Giorgio A. Functional connectivity in disorders of consciousness: methodological aspects and clinical relevance. Brain Imaging Behav 2016; 10: 604-608.
    1. Gosseries O, Di H, Laureys S, Boly M. Measuring consciousness in severely damaged brains. Annu Rev Neurosci 2014; 37: 457-78.
    1. Bekinschtein TA, Dehaene S, Rohaut B, et al. Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 1672-7.
    1. Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR, et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 579-589.
    1. Faugeras F, Rohaut B, Weiss N, et al. Probing consciousness with event-related potentials in the vegetative state. Neurology 2011; 77: 264-8.
    1. Cruse D, Chennu S, Chatelle C, et al. Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study. Lancet 2011; 378: 2088-94.
    1. Lulé D, Noirhomme Q, Kleih SC, et al. Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain-computer interface. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 124: 101-6.
    1. Di HB, Yu SM, Weng XC, et al. Cerebral response to patient's own name in the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Neurology 2007; 68: 895-9.
    1. Chennu S, Annen J, Wannez S, et al. Brain networks predict metabolism, diagnosis and prognosis at the bedside in disorders of consciousness. Brain 2017; 140: 2120-2132.
    1. Demertzi A, Antonopoulos G, Heine L, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients. Brain 2015; 138: 2619-31.
    1. Sitt JD, King J-RR, El Karoui I, et al. Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Brain 2014; 137: 2258-2270.
    1. Demertzi A, Tagliazucchi E, Dehaene S, et al. Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination. Sci Adv 2019; 5: eaat7603.
    1. Engemann DA, Raimondo F, King J-R, et al. Robust EEG-based cross-site and cross-protocol classification of states of consciousness. Brain 2018; 141: 3179-3192.
    1. Tzovara A, Simonin A, Oddo M, et al. Neural detection of complex sound sequences in the absence of consciousness. Brain 2015; 138: 1160-1166.
    1. Schiff ND. Cognitive motor dissociation following severe brain injuries. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72: 1413.
    1. Edlow BL, Chatelle C, Spencer CA, et al. Early detection of consciousness in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury. Brain 2017; 140: 2399-2414.
    1. Posner J, Plum F, Saper C. Plum and Posner's Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 2007.
    1. Naccache L. Minimally conscious state or cortically mediated state? Brain 2018; 141: 949-960.
    1. Kotchoubey B, Vogel D, Lang S, Müller F. What kind of consciousness is minimal? Brain Inj 2014; 28: 1156-63.
    1. Bruno M-A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, et al. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. J Neurol 2011; 258: 1373-84.
    1. Gosseries O, Zasler ND, Laureys S. Recent advances in disorders of consciousness: focus on the diagnosis. Brain Inj 2014; 28: 1141-1150.
    1. Bodart O, Gosseries O, Wannez S, et al. Measures of metabolism and complexity in the brain of patients with disorders of consciousness. NeuroImage Clin 2017; 14: 354-362.
    1. Bruno MA, Fernández-Espejo D, Lehembre R, et al. Multimodal neuroimaging in patients with disorders of consciousness showing ‘functional hemispherectomy’. Prog Brain Res 2011; 193: 323-33.
    1. Leone MA, Keindl M, Schapira AH, et al. Practical recommendations for the process of proposing, planning and writing a neurological management guideline by EAN task forces. Eur J Neurol 2015; 22: 1505-1510.
    1. Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, et al. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14: 579.
    1. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale - Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 2020-2029.
    1. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 401-406.
    1. Estraneo A, Moretta P, De Tanti A, et al. An Italian multicentre validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 51: 627-34.
    1. Iazeva EG, Legostaeva LA, Zimin AA, et al. A Russian validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj 2018; 33: 1-8.
    1. Bruno M-A, Ledoux D, Lambermont B, et al. Comparison of the full outline of UnResponsiveness and Glasgow Liege Scale/Glasgow Coma Scale in an intensive care unit population. Neurocrit Care 2011; 15: 447-453. .
    1. Schnakers C, Majerus S, Giacino J, et al. A French validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj 2008; 22: 786-792.
    1. Wannez S, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Laureys S, Brédart S. Mirror efficiency in the assessment of visual pursuit in patients in minimally conscious state. Brain Inj 2017; 31: 1429-1435. .
    1. Tamashiro M, Rivas ME, Ron M, et al. A Spanish validation of the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj 2014; 28: 1744-1747.
    1. Smith E, Delargy M. Locked-in syndrome. BMJ 2005; 330: 406-409.
    1. Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, et al. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol 2005; 58: 585-593.
    1. van Ommen HJ, Thibaut A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Resistance to eye opening in patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neurol 2018;265: 1376-1380.
    1. Chatelle C, Bodien YG, Carlowicz C, et al. Detection and interpretation of impossible and improbable Coma Recovery Scale - Revised scores. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 1295-1300.e4.
    1. Pincherle A, Jöhr J, Chatelle C, et al. Motor behavior unmasks residual cognition in disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2019; 85: 443-447.
    1. Formisano R, Bivona U, Penta F, et al. Early clinical predictive factors during coma recovery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005; 93: 201-5.
    1. Pignat J-M, Mauron E, Johr J, et al. Outcome prediction of consciousness disorders in the acute stage based on a complementary motor behavioural tool. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0156882.
    1. Schnakers C, Ledoux D, Majerus S, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic use of bispectral index in coma, vegetative state and related disorders. Brain Inj 2008; 22: 926-31.
    1. Lovstad M, Froslie K, Giacino J, et al. Reliability and diagnostic characteristics of the JFK Coma Recovery Scale - Revised: exploring the influence of raters level of experience. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010; 25: 349-356.
    1. Seel RT, Sherer M, Whyte J, et al. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 1795-1813.
    1. Sattin D, Minati L, Rossi D, et al. The Coma Recovery Scale Modified Score: a new scoring system for the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised for assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. Int J Rehabil Res 2015; 38: 350-356.
    1. Bodien YG, Carlowicz CA, Chatelle C, Giacino JT. Sensitivity and specificity of the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised total score in detection of conscious awareness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 490-492.e1.
    1. Schnakers C, Bessou H, Rubi-Fessen I, et al. Impact of aphasia on consciousness assessment: a cross-sectional study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 41-7.
    1. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81-84.
    1. Chatelle C, De Val M-D, Catano A, et al. Is the Nociception Coma Scale - Revised a useful clinical tool for managing pain in patients with disorders of consciousness? Clin J Pain 2016; 32: 321-326.
    1. Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. The Nociception Coma Scale: a new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain 2010; 148: 215-219.
    1. Chatelle C, Majerus S, Whyte J, et al. A sensitive scale to assess nociceptive pain in patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012; 83: 1233-1237.
    1. Riganello F, Cortese MD, Arcuri F, et al. A study of the reliability of the Nociception Coma Scale. Clin Rehabil 2014; 29: 388-393.
    1. Chatelle C, Hauger SL, Martial C, et al. Assessment of nociception and pain in participants in an unresponsive or minimally conscious state after acquired brain injury: the relation between the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised and the Nociception Coma Scale - Revised. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99: .
    1. Vink P, Eskes AM, Lindeboom R, et al. Nurses assessing pain with the Nociception Coma Scale: interrater reliability and validity. Pain Manag Nurs 2014; 15: 881-887.
    1. Vink P, Lucas C, Maaskant JM, et al. Clinimetric properties of the Nociception Coma Scale (- Revised): a systematic review. Eur J Pain 2017; 21: 1463-1474.
    1. Formisano R, Contrada M, Aloisi M, et al. Nociception Coma Scale with personalized painful stimulation versus standard stimulus in non-communicative patients with disorders of consciousness. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2019; 1-12: .
    1. Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Sant'Angelo A, , et al. Pain assessment with the revised Nociception Coma Scale and outcomes of patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: results from a pilot study. Neurol Sci 2018; 39: 1073-1077.
    1. Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, et al. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1370-1379.
    1. Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, et al. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 859-64.
    1. Sherer M, Nakase-Thompson R, Yablon SA, Gontkovsky ST. Multidimensional assessment of acute confusion after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 896-904.
    1. Larsen LK, Frokjaer VG, Nielsen JS, et al. Delirium assessment in neuro-critically ill patients: a validation study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2019; 63: 352-359.
    1. Annen J, Blandiaux S, Lejeune N, et al. BCI performance and brain metabolism profile in severely brain-injured patients without response to command at bedside. Front Neurosci 2018; 12: 370.
    1. Stender J, Mortensen KN, Thibaut A, et al. The minimal energetic requirement of sustained awareness after brain injury. Curr Biol 2016; 26: 1494-1499.
    1. Demertzi A, Gómez F, Crone JS, et al. Multiple fMRI system-level baseline connectivity is disrupted in patients with consciousness alterations. Cortex 2014; 52: 35-46.
    1. Kondziella D, Fisher PM, Larsen VA, et al. Functional MRI for assessment of the default mode network in acute brain injury. Neurocrit Care 2017; 27: 401-406.
    1. Soddu A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bahri MA, et al. Identifying the default-mode component in spatial IC analyses of patients with disorders of consciousness. Hum Brain Mapp 2012; 33: 778-96.
    1. Crone JS, Schurz M, Höller Y, et al. Impaired consciousness is linked to changes in effective connectivity of the posterior cingulate cortex within the default mode network. NeuroImage 2015; 110: 101-109.
    1. Rosazza C, Andronache A, Sattin D, et al. Multimodal study of default-mode network integrity in disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2016; 79: 841-853.
    1. Crone JS, Ladurner G, Höller Y, et al. Deactivation of the default mode network as a marker of impaired consciousness: an fMRI study. PLoS One 2011; 6: e26373.
    1. Bekinschtein TA, Manes FF, Villarreal M, et al. Functional imaging reveals movement preparatory activity in the vegetative state. Front Hum Neurosci 2011; 5: 5.
    1. Coleman MR, Rodd JM, Davis MH, et al. Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI. Brain 2007; 130: 2494-2507.
    1. Coleman MR, Davis MH, Rodd JM, et al. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain 2009; 132: 2541-52.
    1. Fernandez-Espejo D, Junque C, Vendrell P, et al. Cerebral response to speech in vegetative and minimally conscious states after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2008; 22: 882-890.
    1. Heelmann V, Lippert-Grüner M, Rommel T, Wedekind C. Abnormal functional MRI BOLD contrast in the vegetative state after severe traumatic brain injury. Int J Rehabil Res 2010; 33: 151-7.
    1. Kremer S, Nicolas-Ong C, Schunck T, et al. Usefulness of functional MRI associated with PET scan and evoked potentials in the evaluation of brain functions after severe brain injury: preliminary results. J Neuroradiol 2010; 37: 159-66.
    1. Li L, Jiang W, Xiong L, et al. Brain response to thermal stimulation predicts outcome of patients with chronic disorders of consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 126: 1539-1547.
    1. Nigri A, Nava S, Sattin D, et al. Central olfactory processing in patients with disorders of consciousness. Eur J Neurol 2015; 23: 605-612.
    1. Nigri A, Catricalà E, Ferraro S, et al. The neural correlates of lexical processing in disorders of consciousness. Brain Imaging Behav 2017; 11: 1526-1537.
    1. Okumura Y, Asano Y, Takenaka S, et al. Brain activation by music in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state following diffuse brain injury. Brain Inj 2014; 9052: 1-7.
    1. Qin P, Di H, Liu Y, et al. Anterior cingulate activity and the self in disorders of consciousness. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31: 1993-2002. .
    1. Sharon H, Hassin D, Giladi N, et al. Emotional processing of personally familiar faces in the vegetative state. PLoS One 2013; 8: e74711.
    1. Wang F, Huang W, Nie Y, et al. Cerebral response to subject's own name showed high prognostic value in traumatic vegetative state. BMC Med 2015; 13: 1-13.
    1. Bardin JC, Schiff ND, Voss HU. Pattern classification of volitional functional magnetic resonance imaging responses in patients with severe brain injury. Arch Neurol 2012; 69: 176-181.
    1. Bardin JC, Fins JJ, Katz DI, et al. (2011) Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations. Brain 134:769-82.
    1. Bick AS, Leker RR, Ben-Hur T, Levin N. Implementing novel imaging methods for improved diagnosis of disorder of consciousness patients. J Neurol Sci 2013; 334: 130-138.
    1. Braiman C, Conte MM, Schiff ND, et al. Cortical response to the natural speech envelope correlates with neuroimaging evidence of cognition in severe brain injury. Curr Biol 2018; 28: 3833-3839.e3.
    1. Chennu S, Finoia P, Kamau E, et al. Dissociable endogenous and exogenous attention in disorders of consciousness. NeuroImage Clin 2013; 3: 450-61.
    1. Forgacs PB, Conte MM, Fridman EA, et al. Preservation of electroencephalographic organization in patients with impaired consciousness and imaging-based evidence of command-following. Ann Neurol 2014; 76: 869-79.
    1. Gibson RM, Gonzalez-Lara LE, Fernández-Espejo D, et al. Multiple tasks and neuroimaging modalities increase the likelihood of detecting covert awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 1-9.
    1. Gibson RM, Chennu S, Fernández-Espejo D, et al. Somatosensory attention identifies both overt and covert awareness in disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2016; 80: 412-423.
    1. Haugg A, Cusack R, Gonzalez-Lara LE, et al. Do patients thought to lack consciousness retain the capacity for internal as well as external awareness? Front Neurol 2018; 9: 1-13.
    1. Monti MM, Rosenberg M, Finoia P, et al. Thalamo-frontal connectivity mediates top-down cognitive functions in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2015; 84: 167-73.
    1. Rodriguez Moreno D, Schiff ND, Giacino J, et al. A network approach to assessing cognition in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2010; 75: 1871-8.
    1. Vogel D, Markl A, Yu T, et al. Can mental imagery functional magnetic resonance imaging predict recovery in patients with disorders of consciousness? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 1891-1898.
    1. Huang Z, Dai R, Wu X, et al. The self and its resting state in consciousness: an investigation of the vegetative state. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35: 1997-2008.
    1. Curley WH, Forgacs PB, Voss HU, et al. Characterization of EEG signals revealing covert cognition in the injured brain. Brain 2018; 141: 1404-1421.
    1. Golkowski D, Merz K, Mlynarcik C, et al. Simultaneous EEG-PET-fMRI measurements in disorders of consciousness: an exploratory study on diagnosis and prognosis. J Neurol 2017; 264: 1986-1995.
    1. Kirsch M, Guldenmund P, Ali Bahri M, et al. Sedation of patients with disorders of consciousness during neuroimaging: Effects on resting state functional brain connectivity. Anesth Analg 2017; 124(2): 588-598.
    1. Estraneo A, Loreto V, Guarino I, et al. Standard EEG in diagnostic process of prolonged disorders of consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127: 2379-2385.
    1. Cologan V, Drouot X, Parapatics S, et al. Sleep in the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state. J Neurotrauma 2013; 30: 339-46.
    1. de Biase S, Gigli GL, Lorenzut S, et al. The importance of polysomnography in the evaluation of prolonged disorders of consciousness: sleep recordings more adequately correlate than stimulus-related evoked potentials with patients' clinical status. Sleep Med 2014; 15: 393-400.
    1. Landsness E, Bruno M-A, Noirhomme Q, et al. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioural changes in vigilance in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Brain 2011; 134: 2222-2232.
    1. Malinowska U, Chatelle C, Bruno M-A, et al. Electroencephalographic profiles for differentiation of disorders of consciousness. Biomed Eng Online 2013; 12: 109.
    1. Cruse D, Chennu S, Chatelle C, et al. Relationship between etiology and covert cognition in the minimally conscious state. Neurology 2012; 78: 816-22.
    1. Boly M, Garrido MI, Gosseries O, et al. Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. Science 2011; 332: 858-62.
    1. de Tommaso M, Navarro J, Ricci K, et al. Pain in prolonged disorders of consciousness: laser evoked potentials findings in patients with vegetative and minimally conscious states. Brain Inj 2013; 27: 962-72.
    1. Faugeras F, Rohaut B, Weiss N, et al. Event related potentials elicited by violations of auditory regularities in patients with impaired consciousness. Neuropsychologia 2012; 50: 403-18.
    1. Fischer C, Luaute J, Morlet D. Event-related potentials (MMN and novelty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 1032-1042.
    1. Perrin F, Schnakers C, Schabus M, et al. Brain response to one's own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. Arch Neurol 2006; 63: 562-569.
    1. Risetti M, Formisano R, Toppi J, et al. On ERPs detection in disorders of consciousness rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 775.
    1. Rohaut B, Faugeras F, Chausson N, et al. Probing ERP correlates of verbal semantic processing in patients with impaired consciousness. Neuropsychologia 2015; 66: 279-292.
    1. Schnakers C, Perrin F, Schabus M, et al. Voluntary brain processing in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2008; 71: 1614-20.
    1. Kotchoubey B, Lang S, Mezger G, et al. Information processing in severe disorders of consciousness: vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116: 2441-2453.
    1. Sergent C, Faugeras F, Rohaut B, et al. Multidimensional cognitive evaluation of patients with disorders of consciousness using EEG: a proof of concept study. NeuroImage Clin 2017; 13: 455-469.
    1. King JR, Faugeras F, Gramfort A, et al. Single-trial decoding of auditory novelty responses facilitates the detection of residual consciousness. NeuroImage 2013; 83: 726-38.
    1. Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, et al. A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5: 198ra105.
    1. Casarotto S, Comanducci A, Rosanova M, et al. Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity. Ann Neurol 2016; 80: 718-729.
    1. Rosanova M, Gosseries O, Casarotto S, et al. Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients. Brain 2012; 135: 1308-20.
    1. Ragazzoni A, Pirulli C, Veniero D, et al. Vegetative versus minimally conscious states: a study using TMS-EEG, sensory and event-related potentials. PLoS One 2013; 8: e57069.
    1. Bodart O, Fecchio M, Massimini M, et al. Meditation-induced modulation of brain response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimul 2018; 11: 1397-1400.
    1. Azabou E, Navarro V, Kubis N, et al. Value and mechanisms of EEG reactivity in the prognosis of patients with impaired consciousness: a systematic review. Crit Care 2018; 22: 184.
    1. Pavlov YG, Gais S, Müller F, et al. Night sleep in patients with vegetative state. J Sleep Res 2017; 26: 629-640.
    1. Wielek T, Lechinger J, Wislowska M, et al. Sleep in patients with disorders of consciousness characterized by means of machine learning. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0190458.
    1. Claassen J, Doyle K, Matory A, et al. Detection of brain activation in unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 2497-2505.
    1. King JR, Sitt JD, Faugeras F, et al. Information sharing in the brain indexes consciousness in noncommunicative patients. Curr Biol 2013; 23: 1914-1919.
    1. Goldfine AM, Bardin JC, Noirhomme Q, et al. Reanalysis of ‘Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study'. Lancet 2013; 381: 289-91.
    1. Cruse D, Chennu S, Chatelle C, et al. Reanalysis of ‘Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study' - authors' reply. Lancet 2013; 381: 291-292.
    1. Steppacher I, Eickhoff S, Jordanov T, et al. N400 predicts recovery from disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2013; 73: 594-602.
    1. Stoll J, Chatelle C, Carter O, et al. Pupil responses allow communication in locked-in syndrome patients. Curr Biol 2013; 23: R647-R648.
    1. Vassilieva A, Olsen MH, Peinkhofer C, et al. Automated pupillometry to detect command following in neurological patients: a proof-of-concept study. PeerJ 2019; 7: e6929.
    1. Trojano L, Moretta P, Masotta O, et al. Visual pursuit of one's own face in disorders of consciousness: a quantitative analysis. Brain Inj 2018; 32: 1549-1555.
    1. Mélotte E, Maudoux A, Delhalle S, et al. Is oral feeding compatible with an unresponsive wakefulness syndrome? J Neurol 2018; 265: 954-961.
    1. Blume C, Lechinger J, Santhi N, et al. Significance of circadian rhythms in severely brain-injured patients. Neurology 2017; 88: 1933-1941.
    1. Wilhelm B, Jordan M, Birbaumer N. Communication in locked-in syndrome: effects of imagery on salivary pH. Neurology 2006; 67: 534-5.
    1. Raimondo F, Rohaut B, Demertzi A, et al. Brain-heart interactions reveal consciousness in noncommunicating patients. Ann Neurol 2017; 82: 578-591.
    1. Riganello F, Larroque SK, Bahri MA, et al. A heartbeat away from consciousness: heart rate variability entropy can discriminate disorders of consciousness and is correlated with resting-state fMRI brain connectivity of the central autonomic network. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 1-18.
    1. Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2018; 91: 450-460.
    1. Formisano R, Giustini M, Aloisi M, et al. An international survey on diagnostic and prognostic protocols in patients with disorder of consciousness. Brain Inj 2019; 33: 974-984.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi