Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of hippotherapy and related equine-assisted therapies on motor capabilities in children with cerebral palsy
Martin Häusler, Nicole Heussen, Martin Häusler, Nicole Heussen
Abstract
Background: Equine-assisted treatments of the motor system appear to have an effect on the neuromuscular system and aim to improve the pathological condition of children with cerebral palsy. Hippotherapy is a distinct form of equine-assisted therapy where certified physiotherapists use the horse as a dynamic tool in a medical treatment setting. The objective of the proposed review is to summarize and critically appraise the evidence on the effect of equine-assisted treatments on motor capabilities of children with cerebral palsy.
Methods: We will identify trials through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Quality assessment of retrieved articles will be conducted using the criteria outlined in the revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2.0) or the ROBINS-I tool (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of interventions), respectively. Quantitative data synthesis will be performed if treatments, participants, and the underlying clinical question are homogenous and provide adequate outcome data for meta-analysis. Otherwise, data will be synthesized, using the narrative synthesis approach.
Conclusion: This review will provide a critical summary of the evidence regarding the impact of equine-assisted treatments on motor capabilities of children with cerebral palsy. The result from this review will help to inform healthcare practitioners and policymakers on the additional effect of equine-assisted treatments on reducing the burden of cerebral palsy among children.
Systematic review registration: This systematic review protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Registration number: CRD42018096403. This protocol was prepared using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols checklist (PRISMA-P).
Keywords: Cerebral palsy; Equine-assisted therapy; GMFM; Hippotheraphy; Motor capability; Quality of life.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- Stavsky M, Mor O, Mastrolia S, Greenbaum S, Than N, Erez O. Cerebral palsy-trends in epidemiology and recent development in prenatal mechanisms of disease, treatment, and prevention. Front Pediatr. 2017;13(5):21.
- Kuczyński M, Słonka K. Influence of artificial saddle riding on postural stability in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 1999;10(2):154–60. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00028-4.
- Martín-Valero R, Vega-Ballón J, Perez-Cabezas V. Benefits of hippotherapy in children with cerebral palsy: a narrative review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018;Epub ahead of print:30017618.
- Deutz U, Heussen N, Weigt-Usinger K, Leiz S, Raabe C, Polster T, Daniela S, Moll C, Lücke T, Krägeloh-Mann I, Hollmann H, Häusler M. Impact of hippotherapy on gross motor function and quality of life in children with bilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized open-label crossover study. Neuropediatrics. 2018;49(3):185–92. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1635121.
- Lee D, Lee N, Cha H, Yun Sung O, You S, Oh J, Bang H. The effect of robo-horseback riding therapy on spinal alignment and associated muscle size in mri for a child with neuromuscular scoliosis: an experimenter-blind study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(1):23–7. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0673.
- Mutoh T, Mutoh T, Tsubone H, Takada M, Doumura M, Ihara M, Shimomura H, Taki Y, Ihara M. Impact of serial gait analyses on long-term outcome of hippotherapy in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;30:19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.11.003.
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Group T. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
- Guyatt G, Oxman A, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Grade guidelines. 11: Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:151–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006.
Source: PubMed