Prevalence, sociodemographic determinants and self-reported reasons for hysterectomy in India

Chander Shekhar, Balram Paswan, Abhishek Singh, Chander Shekhar, Balram Paswan, Abhishek Singh

Abstract

Background: Evidence of hysterectomy in India is limited mainly due to lack of information in large-scale nationally representative health surveys. In 2015-16, the fourth National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) - a cross-sectional survey - collected for the first time direct information on hysterectomy and self-reported reasons for undergoing the procedure among women in the reproductive age group. This paper examines the prevalence and determinants of hysterectomy in India among women aged 30-49 years in 29 states and seven union territories (UTs) of India using the NFHS-4 dataset.

Methods: Percentage weighted by sampling weights was used for estimating the prevalence of hysterectomy. The paper used crosstabulations and percentage distributions to estimate the prevalence of hysterectomy across different socioeconomic backgrounds and reasons for undergoing hysterectomy respectively. A multivariate binary logistic regression model was also used to find statistically significant determinants of hysterectomy.

Results: In India as a whole, 6 % of women aged 30-49 years had undergone a hysterectomy. The percentage of women who had undergone the procedure was found to vary considerably across the states and the UTs (from a minimum of 2% in Lakshadweep to a maximum of 16% in Andhra Pradesh). A noticeable fact that emerged was that the majority of the hysterectomies were performed in the private sector except in the northeast region. Years of schooling, caste, religion, geographic region, place of residence, wealth quintiles, age, parity, age at first cohabitation, marital status, and body mass index of women were found to be the sociodemographic determinants statistically associated with hysterectomy in India. The reasons reported frequently for hysterectomy were excessive menstrual bleeding/pain (56%), followed by fibroids/cysts (20%).

Conclusion: The percentage and likelihood of undergoing hysterectomy are relatively high among women from older age groups (45-49), those who reside in rural areas, those without schooling, those who are obese, those having high parity, those with a low age at first marriage, and those who reside in the eastern and southern parts of India. The policy implication of these findings is that the reproductive health program managers should ensure regular screening and timely treatment of the problems resulting in hysterectomy.

Keywords: Determinants; Hysterectomy; India; Prevalence; Self-reported reasons; Sociodemographic.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no conflicts of interest as well as competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prevalence of hysterectomy by state/UTs in India
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Socioeconomic contrasts in median age of hysterectomy in India, NFHS (2015–16)

References

    1. Hysterectomy, . Accessed on 10 May 2019.
    1. Brett KM, Madans JH. Hysterectomy use: the correspondence between self-reports and hospital records. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(10):1653–1655. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.84.10.1653.
    1. Dharmalingam A, Pool I, Dickson J. Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(9):1455. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.9.1455.
    1. Govil D. An insight into reproductive ageing of India women (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2005.
    1. Desai S, Sinha T, Mahal A. Prevalence of hysterectomy among rural and urban women with and without health insurance in Gujarat, India. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19(37):42–51. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(11)37553-2.
    1. Desai S, Campbell OM, Sinha T, Mahal A, Cousens S. Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat. India Health Policy Plan. 2016;32(1):68–78. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw099.
    1. Huque S, Roberts I, Fawole B, Chaudhri R, Arulkumaran S, Shakur-Still H. Risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy among women with postpartum haemorrhage: analysis of data from the WOMAN trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:186. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1829-7.
    1. Prusty RK, Choithani C, Gupta SD. Predictor of hysterectomy among 15-49 years in India. Reprod Health. 2018;15(3). 10.1186/s12978-017-0445-8 Accessed 22 Feb 2019.
    1. Whiteman MK, Kuklina E, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, Posner SF, Marchbanks PA. Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1486–1492. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245445.36116.c6.
    1. Liu F, Pan Y, Liang Y, Zhang C, Deng Q, Li X, Ning T. The epidemiological profile of hysterectomy in rural Chinese women: a population-based study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e015351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015351.
    1. Singh A, Arora AK. Why hysterectomy rate are lower in India. Indian J Community. 2008;33(3):196. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.42065.
    1. Radha K, Devi GP, Chandrasekharan PA, Swathi P, Radha G. Epidemiology of hysterectomy-a cross sectional study among Piligrims of Tirumala. IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) 2015;1:14):1–14):5.
    1. Verma D, Verma ML. Trends of hysterectomy in the rural tertiary level teaching hospitals in northern India. Indian J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;3(3):212–215. doi: 10.5958/2394-2754.2016.00048.5.
    1. Pandey Deeksha, Sehgal Kriti, Saxena Aashish, Hebbar Shripad, Nambiar Jayaram, Bhat Rajeshwari G. An Audit of Indications, Complications, and Justification of Hysterectomies at a Teaching Hospital in India. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2014;2014:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2014/279273.
    1. Uikey P, Wankhede TM, Tajne MP. The route of hysterectomy: a comparative study between abdominal hysterectomy (AH), non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH), and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(10):4022–4028. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184123.
    1. McGivering J. The Indian women pushed into hysterectomies. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) 2013.
    1. Chaudhuri M. Women’s groups and fertility experts campaign to reduce prevalence of hysterectomy in India. BMJ. 2013;347:f7551. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7551.
    1. Acharya SK. Womb, womenhood and medical ethics: concern about rising hysterectomy cases in India. J FamPlannReprod Health Care. 2017;43(2):165–166.
    1. Xavier T, Vasan A, Vijayakumar S. Instilling fear makes good business sense: unwarranted hysterectomies in Karnataka. Indian J Med Ethics. 2017;2(1):49–55. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.010.
    1. Meulen J. van der. Increasing use of laproscopic hysterectomy: we need to talk about outcomes. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;126(6):803. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15643.
    1. Verma D, Singh P, Kulshrestha R. Analysis of histopathological examination of the hysterectomy specimens in a north Indian teaching institute. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(11):4753–4758. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20163761.
    1. Palmer JR, Rao RS, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Correlates of hysterectomy among African-American women. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(12):1309–1315. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009962.
    1. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF . National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017.
    1. Bachman GA. Psychosexual aspects of hysterectomy. Womens Health Issues. 1990;1(1):41–49. doi: 10.1016/S1049-3867(05)80015-5.
    1. Sahoo M, Som M, Pradhan J. Perceived barriers in accessing the reproductive health care services in Odisha. Indian J Community Health. 2017;29(3):229–238.
    1. Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;95(2):199–205.
    1. Butt JL, Jeffery ST, Van Der Spuy ZM. An audit of indications and complications associated with elective hysterectomy at a public service hospital in South Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;116(2):112–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.026.
    1. Leung PL, Tsang SW, Yuen PM. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(3):187–193.
    1. Qamar-Ur-Nisa HMF, Shaikh TA, Memon Z. Hysterectomies: an audit at a tertiary care hospital. The ProfMed J. 2011;18(1):46–50.
    1. Government of India . National Health Policy. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2017.
    1. Government of India. National Policy for women 2016: articulating a vision for empowering women (draft), Ministry of women and child development (MoWCD), 2016, Available at: . Accessed 10 May 2019.
    1. Understanding reasons for rising number of hysterectomies in India. National Consultation 12th August 2013. Health Watch, UNFPA, HRLN and Prayas. Available at . Accessed 22 May 2019.
    1. Dragisic KG, Milad MP. Sexual functioning and patient expectations of sexual functioning after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(5):1416–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.070.
    1. Madhvani K, Curnow T, Carpenter T. Route of hysterectomy: a retrospective, cohort study in English NHS Hospitals from 2011 to 2017. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018;126(6):795–802. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15539.
    1. National Health Authority 2019. . Accessed on 15 May 2019.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi