The C57BL/6J mouse exhibits sporadic congenital portosystemic shunts

Cristina Cudalbu, Valérie A McLin, Hongxia Lei, Joao M N Duarte, Anne-Laure Rougemont, Graziano Oldani, Sylvain Terraz, Christian Toso, Rolf Gruetter, Cristina Cudalbu, Valérie A McLin, Hongxia Lei, Joao M N Duarte, Anne-Laure Rougemont, Graziano Oldani, Sylvain Terraz, Christian Toso, Rolf Gruetter

Abstract

C57BL/6 mice are the most widely used strain of laboratory mice. Using in vivo proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ((1)H MRS), we have repeatedly observed an abnormal neurochemical profile in the brains of both wild-type and genetically modified mice derived from the C57BL/6J strain, consisting of a several fold increase in cerebral glutamine and two fold decrease in myo-inositol. This strikingly abnormal neurochemical "phenotype" resembles that observed in chronic liver disease or portosystemic shunting and appeared to be independent of transgene, origin or chow and was not associated with liver failure. As many as 25% of animals displayed the abnormal neurochemical profile, questioning the reliability of this model for neurobiology. We conducted an independent study to determine if this neurochemical profile was associated with portosystemic shunting. Our results showed that 100% of the mice with high brain glutamine displayed portosystemic shunting by concomitant portal angiography while all mice with normal brain glutamine did not. Since portosystemic shunting is known to cause alterations in gene expression in many organs including the brain, we conclude that portosystemic shunting may be the most significant problem associated with C57BL/6J inbreeding both for its effect on the central nervous system and for its systemic repercussions.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Representative in vivo spectra acquired…
Figure 1. Representative in vivo spectra acquired at 14.1T in the cortex (VOI = 0.8×4×1.2 mm3) of “High Gln” (A) and “Normal Gln” (B) C57BL/6J mice.
The increase of Gln and decrease of Ins in the cortex of the “High Gln” mouse is visually apparent. Only those metabolites displaying a concentration change are labeled (i.e. Gln and Ins) for the “High Gln” spectrum.
Figure 2. In vivo 1 H MRS…
Figure 2. In vivo 1H MRS results obtained in the brain of “High Gln” and “Normal Gln” C57BL/6J mice.
A) Evolution of brain metabolite concentrations during mouse development at P 10, 20, 30, 60 and 90; open squares indicate “Normal Gln” mice and triangles indicate “High Gln” mice; and B) metabolite concentrations in the striatum (str), hippocampus (hip) and cortex (ctx) of “High Gln” and “Normal Gln” C57BL/6 mice at 4 and 12 months of age. Two-way ANOVA was performed at 5 developmental time-points (ages P10 to P90) comparing the “High Gln” mice to “Normal Gln” mice for each metabolite. Statistically significant differences for Gln, Tau and Ins between “High Gln” and “Normal Gln” mice (df = 1, F value between 23.6 and 625) are marked *(p

Figure 3. Representative angiographies obtained in a…

Figure 3. Representative angiographies obtained in a “High Gln” mouse (A) and in a “Normal…

Figure 3. Representative angiographies obtained in a “High Gln” mouse (A) and in a “Normal Gln” (B) C57BL/6J mouse.
Normal filling of the portal tree is visible in B. In A, injection in the superior mesenteric vein leads to immediate filling of the inferior vena cava. Inferior vena cava (IVC), portal vein (PV), shunt (Sh).

Figure 4. Representative immunohistochemistry findings in a…

Figure 4. Representative immunohistochemistry findings in a “High Gln” mouse (A, B) and in a…

Figure 4. Representative immunohistochemistry findings in a “High Gln” mouse (A, B) and in a “Normal Gln” mouse (C, D).
Original magnification 100x. A and C: CD31 immunostaining highlights endothelial cells. In the “High Gln” mouse (A), the hepatic artery branch is of normal size, similar to that of the interlobular bile duct; the portal vein is small and hypoplastic, and the inlet venules are dilated. In the “Normal Gln” mouse (C), the portal vein is large, with a normal size ratio to the interlobular bile duct (the hepatic artery branch is not seen in this section). The inlet venule is thin. B and D: D2–40 expression confirms the lymphatic nature of the dilated channels at the periphery of the portal tracts in the “High Gln” mouse (B), being selectively reactive in lymphatic endothelial cells, contrary to arterial and venous endothelial cells. Of note, D2–40 (podoplanin) reactivity is also seen in bile duct epithelium. Abbreviations: A = hepatic artery; B = interlobular bile duct; CLV = centrilobular vein; IV = inlet venule; L = lymphatic vessel; V = portal vein.
Figure 3. Representative angiographies obtained in a…
Figure 3. Representative angiographies obtained in a “High Gln” mouse (A) and in a “Normal Gln” (B) C57BL/6J mouse.
Normal filling of the portal tree is visible in B. In A, injection in the superior mesenteric vein leads to immediate filling of the inferior vena cava. Inferior vena cava (IVC), portal vein (PV), shunt (Sh).
Figure 4. Representative immunohistochemistry findings in a…
Figure 4. Representative immunohistochemistry findings in a “High Gln” mouse (A, B) and in a “Normal Gln” mouse (C, D).
Original magnification 100x. A and C: CD31 immunostaining highlights endothelial cells. In the “High Gln” mouse (A), the hepatic artery branch is of normal size, similar to that of the interlobular bile duct; the portal vein is small and hypoplastic, and the inlet venules are dilated. In the “Normal Gln” mouse (C), the portal vein is large, with a normal size ratio to the interlobular bile duct (the hepatic artery branch is not seen in this section). The inlet venule is thin. B and D: D2–40 expression confirms the lymphatic nature of the dilated channels at the periphery of the portal tracts in the “High Gln” mouse (B), being selectively reactive in lymphatic endothelial cells, contrary to arterial and venous endothelial cells. Of note, D2–40 (podoplanin) reactivity is also seen in bile duct epithelium. Abbreviations: A = hepatic artery; B = interlobular bile duct; CLV = centrilobular vein; IV = inlet venule; L = lymphatic vessel; V = portal vein.

References

    1. Zurita E, Chagoyen M, Cantero M, Alonso R, Gonzalez-Neira A, et al. (2011) Genetic polymorphisms among C57BL/6 mouse inbred strains. Transgenic Res 20: 481–489.
    1. Matsuo N, Takao K, Nakanishi K, Yamasaki N, Tanda K, et al. (2010) Behavioral profiles of three C57BL/6 substrains. Front Behav Neurosci 4: 29.
    1. Kiselycznyk C, Holmes A (2011) All (C57BL/6) Mice are not Created Equal. Front Neurosci 5: 10.
    1. Bryant CD (2011) The blessings and curses of C57BL/6 substrains in mouse genetic studies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1245: 31–33.
    1. Bryant CD, Zhang NN, Sokoloff G, Fanselow MS, Ennes HS, et al. (2008) Behavioral differences among C57BL/6 substrains: implications for transgenic and knockout studies. J Neurogenet 22: 315–331.
    1. Kalter H (1968) Sporadic congenital malformations of newborn inbred mice. Teratology 1: 193–199.
    1. Dagg CP (1966) Teratogenesis, in Biology of the laboratory mouse; EL G, editor. New-York: McGraw-Hill.
    1. Spahr L, Burkhard PR, Grotzsch H, Hadengue A (2002) Clinical significance of basal ganglia alterations at brain MRI and 1H MRS in cirrhosis and role in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy. Metabolic brain disease 17: 399–413.
    1. Rovira A, Alonso J, Cordoba J (2008) MR imaging findings in hepatic encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29: 1612–1621.
    1. Butterworth RF (2003) Pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy: new insights from neuroimaging and molecular studies. Journal of hepatology 39: 278–285.
    1. Minguez B, Garcia-Pagan JC, Bosch J, Turnes J, Alonso J, et al. (2006) Noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis exhibits neuropsychological and MR changes consistent with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology 43: 707–714.
    1. Kostler H (1998) Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in portal-systemic encephalopathy. Metabolic brain disease 13: 291–301.
    1. Srivastava A, Yadav SK, Lal R, Yachha SK, Thomas MA, et al. (2010) Effect of surgical portosystemic shunt on prevalence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in children with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction: assessment by magnetic resonance imaging and psychometry. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 51: 766–772.
    1. Cordoba J, Gottstein J, Blei AT (1996) Glutamine, myo-inositol, and organic brain osmolytes after portocaval anastomosis in the rat: implications for ammonia-induced brain edema. Hepatology 24: 919–923.
    1. Braissant O, McLin VA, Cudalbu C (2012) Ammonia toxicity to the brain. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease in press.
    1. Tivers M, Lipscomb V (2011) Congenital portosystemic shunts in cats: investigation, diagnosis and stabilisation. J Feline Med Surg 13: 173–184.
    1. Tivers MS, Upjohn MM, House AK, Brockman DJ, Lipscomb VJ (2012) Treatment of extrahepatic congenital portosystemic shunts in dogs - what is the evidence base? J Small Anim Pract 53: 3–11.
    1. Berent AC, Tobias KM (2009) Portosystemic vascular anomalies. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 39: 513–541.
    1. van Steenbeek FG, van den Bossche L, Leegwater PA, Rothuizen J (2012) Inherited liver shunts in dogs elucidate pathways regulating embryonic development and clinical disorders of the portal vein. Mamm Genome 23: 76–84.
    1. Mlynarik V, Cudalbu C, Xin L, Gruetter R (2008) (1)H NMR spectroscopy of rat brain in vivo at 14.1Tesla: Improvements in quantification of the neurochemical profile. J Magn Reson.
    1. Gruetter R, Tkac I (2000) Field mapping without reference scan using asymmetric echo-planar techniques. Magn Reson Med 43: 319–323.
    1. Cudalbu C, Mlynarik V, Xin L, Gruetter R (2009) Quantification of in vivo short echo-time proton magnetic resonance spectra at 14.1 T using two different approaches of modelling the macromolecule spectrum. Measurement Science & Technology 20: 104034.
    1. Cudalbu C, Mlynarik V, Gruetter R (2012) Handling macromolecule signals in the quantification of the neurochemical profile. J Alzheimers Dis 31 Suppl 3S101–115.
    1. Cudalbu C, Lanz B, Duarte JM, Morgenthaler FD, Pilloud Y, et al. (2012) Cerebral glutamine metabolism under hyperammonemia determined in vivo by localized (1)H and (15)N NMR spectroscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32: 696–708.
    1. Kulak A, Duarte JM, Do KQ, Gruetter R (2010) Neurochemical profile of the developing mouse cortex determined by in vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy at 14.1 T and the effect of recurrent anaesthesia. J Neurochem 115: 1466–1477.
    1. Tkac I, Henry PG, Andersen P, Keene CD, Low WC, et al. (2004) Highly resolved in vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of the mouse brain at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med 52: 478–484.
    1. Lisovsky M, Konstas AA, Misdraji J (2011) Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (Abernethy malformation): a histopathologic evaluation. Am J Surg Pathol 35: 1381–1390.
    1. Brusilow SW, Koehler RC, Traystman RJ, Cooper AJ (2010) Astrocyte glutamine synthetase: importance in hyperammonemic syndromes and potential target for therapy. Neurotherapeutics 7: 452–470.
    1. Cooper AJ, Plum F (1987) Biochemistry and physiology of brain ammonia. Physiol Rev 67: 440–519.
    1. Lautz TB, Tantemsapya N, Rowell E, Superina RA (2011) Management and classification of type II congenital portosystemic shunts. J Pediatr Surg 46: 308–314.
    1. Mack CL, Superina RA, Whitington PF (2003) Surgical restoration of portal flow corrects procoagulant and anticoagulant deficiencies associated with extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis. J Pediatr 142: 197–199.
    1. Franchi-Abella S, Branchereau S, Lambert V, Fabre M, Steimberg C, et al. (2010) Complications of congenital portosystemic shunts in children: therapeutic options and outcomes. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 51: 322–330.
    1. Lahvis GP, Lindell SL, Thomas RS, McCuskey RS, Murphy C, et al. (2000) Portosystemic shunting and persistent fetal vascular structures in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-deficient mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97: 10442–10447.
    1. Waterland RA (2006) Epigenetic mechanisms and gastrointestinal development. J Pediatr 149: S137–142.
    1. Waterland RA, Michels KB (2007) Epigenetic epidemiology of the developmental origins hypothesis. Annu Rev Nutr 27: 363–388.
    1. Kellermayer R (2010) Genetic drift. “Omics” as the filtering gateway between environment and phenotype: The inflammatory bowel diseases example. Am J Med Genet A 152A: 3022–3025.
    1. Tkac I, Zacharoff L, Dubinsky JM (2011) Longitudinal study of neurochemical changes in Q140 mouse model of Huntington’s disease. 2288.
    1. Song GQ, Dhodda VK, Blei AT, Dempsey RJ, Rao VLR (2002) GeneChip((R)) analysis shows altered mRNA expression of transcripts of neurotransmitter and signal transduction pathways in the cerebral cortex of portacaval shunted rats. Journal of Neuroscience Research 68: 730–737.
    1. Garcia C, Gine E, Aller MA, Revuelta E, Arias JL, et al. (2011) Multiple organ inflammatory response to portosystemic shunt in the rat. Cytokine 56: 680–687.
    1. Desjardins P, Rao KV, Michalak A, Rose C, Butterworth RF (1999) Effect of portacaval anastomosis on glutamine synthetase protein and gene expression in brain, liver and skeletal muscle. Metabolic brain disease 14: 273–280.
    1. Desjardins P, Bandeira P, Rao VL, Butterworth RF (1999) Portacaval anastomosis causes selective alterations of peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor expression in rat brain and peripheral tissues. Neurochemistry international 35: 293–299.
    1. Rao VL, Audet RM, Butterworth RF (1997) Increased neuronal nitric oxide synthase expression in brain following portacaval anastomosis. Brain research 765: 169–172.
    1. Gandhi CR, Murase N, Subbotin VM, Uemura T, Nalesnik M, et al. (2002) Portacaval shunt causes apoptosis and liver atrophy in rats despite increases in endogenous levels of major hepatic growth factors. Journal of hepatology 37: 340–348.
    1. Agusti A, Cauli O, Rodrigo R, Llansola M, Hernandez-Rabaza V, et al. (2011) p38 MAP kinase is a therapeutic target for hepatic encephalopathy in rats with portacaval shunts. Gut 60: 1572–1579.
    1. Nylander AG, vonFriesen CP, Monstein HJ, Yamada H, Chen D, et al. (1997) Increased expression of cholecystokinin-a receptor mRNA in pancreas and cholecystokinin-B receptor mRNA in oxyntic mucosa after porta-caval shunting in rats. Pharmacology & Toxicology 80: 147–151.
    1. Dasarathy S, Muc S, Hisamuddin K, Edmison JM, Dodig M, et al. (2007) Altered expression of genes regulating skeletal muscle mass in the portacaval anastamosis rat. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 292: G1105–G1113.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi