Correlation between biological and mechanical properties of extracellular matrix from colorectal peritoneal metastases in human tissues

Ewelina Lorenc, Luca Varinelli, Matteo Chighizola, Silvia Brich, Federica Pisati, Marcello Guaglio, Dario Baratti, Marcello Deraco, Manuela Gariboldi, Alessandro Podestà, Ewelina Lorenc, Luca Varinelli, Matteo Chighizola, Silvia Brich, Federica Pisati, Marcello Guaglio, Dario Baratti, Marcello Deraco, Manuela Gariboldi, Alessandro Podestà

Abstract

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are common routes of dissemination for colorectal cancer (CRC) and remain a lethal disease with a poor prognosis. The properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are important in cancer development; studying their changes is crucial to understand CRC-PM development. We studied the elastic properties of ECMs derived from human samples of normal and neoplastic PM by atomic force microscopy (AFM); results were correlated with patient clinical data and expression of ECM components related to metastatic spread. We show that PM progression is accompanied by stiffening of the ECM, increased cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) activity and increased deposition and crosslinking in neoplastic matrices; on the other hand, softer regions are also found in neoplastic ECMs on the same scales. Our results support the hypothesis that local changes in the normal ECM can create the ground for growth and spread from the tumour of invading metastatic cells. We have found correlations between the mechanical properties (relative stiffening between normal and neoplastic ECM) of the ECM and patients' clinical data, like age, sex, presence of protein activating mutations in BRAF and KRAS genes and tumour grade. Our findings suggest that the mechanical phenotyping of PM-ECM has the potential to predict tumour development.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
YM distributions for the normal (green) and neoplastic (red) conditions from peritoneal ECMs for the 14 patients considered in the study. (A) Violin plots obtained by pooling all YM values from all FCs acquired in all regions of interest (ROIs) for a specific condition. The median value is represented by a white dot and black thick lines represent upper and lower quartiles. (B) Plots showing the distribution of median YM values measured from all force volumes (FVs) collected in different ROIs for each specific condition (green and black dots). Black bars represent the mean of the median values and the corresponding standard deviation of the mean, respectively (see “Statistics” section). The asterisk indicates statistical significance of the difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Images of tissue samples from patients 2, 6, 8 and 12–14, for visualisation of cell nuclei (DAPI staining) and αSMA, magnification 10x; scale bar length is 50 µm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Images of tissue samples from patients 2, 6, 8 and 12–14, for visualization of collagen and control staining (Picrosirius Red and haematoxylin and eosin—H&E—staining, respectively), magnification ×4; scale bar length is 100 µm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) YM values (mean median value ± std of the mean) of healthy ECMs of the 13 patients affected by adenocarcinoma versus their age (circles and crosses represent men and females, respectively). (B) YM values as in (A) for patients who did not (−) and did (+) undergo chemotherapy. (C–H) Relative stiffening of the neoplastic ECMs from the same patients, versus: (C) chemotherapic treatment; (D) the patients’ age; (E) the presence of protein activating mutations in KRAS and BRAF genes; (F) the patients’ sex; (G) histology—MA mucinous adenocarcinoma, AS adenocarcinoma of the sigma, A adenocarcinoma, H tumour grade.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The figure summarises the main molecular and physical events that contribute to peritoneal metastatic niche development and ECM remodelling. Cancer cells exert their effect on the peritoneal metastasis microenvironment through three main modes: (1) the release of specific growth factors, such as TGFβ, leading to the recruitment of resident fibroblasts and their activation into CAF. (2) The production of exosomes that trigger the microenvironment and mediate the activation of CAFs and the polarisation of macrophages into M2 phenotype. (3) The production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which contribute to enhancing the activity of CAFs and M2 macrophages by promoting the TGFβ pathway in a paracrine manner. Together, these events contribute to the production and/or deposition of naïve ECM and the concomitant increase in ECM stiffness, both around the site of injury and at distant sites in the peritoneal cavity, which may be a sign of disease progression.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Schematic representation of the nanomechanical measurement. (A) Optical image of an ECM (normal peritoneum-derived from patient 8), with the AFM cantilever and the selected region of interest for the indentation experiment. Slices with thickness between 100 and 200 μm are semi-transparent, which allows to select regions for the analysis that look sufficiently uniform and smooth. The red grid represents the locations where force curves (FCs) are acquired (scale bar length—50 µm). In the inset, the experimental setup for indentation measurements and the optical beam deflection system are shown. (B) Typical rescaled approaching force vs indentation curve. The red circle highlights the contact point. Only the portion of the curve characterized by positive indentation is considered for the Hertzian fit (Eq. (1) and also shown in the inset). (C) The map of Young’s modulus values extracted by the FCs acquired in the region of interest shown in (A). (D) Histogram representing the distribution of YM values represented in the mechanical map in (C). Under the hypothesis of a log-normal distribution, a Gaussian fit in semi-log scale allows to identify the median YM value, as the centre of the Gaussian curve.

References

    1. Ceelen W, Ramsay RG, Narasimhan V, Heriot AG, de Wever O. Targeting the tumor microenvironment in colorectal peritoneal metastases. Trends Cancer. 2020;6:236–246. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.12.008.
    1. Jayne D. Molecular biology of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat. Res., 2007;134:21–33.
    1. Lemoine L, Sugarbaker P, van der Speeten K. Pathophysiology of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: Role of the peritoneum. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016;22:7692–7707. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7692.
    1. Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2010;123:4195–4200. doi: 10.1242/jcs.023820.
    1. Lu P, Weaver VM, Werb Z. The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression. J. Cell Biol. 2012;196:395–406. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201102147.
    1. Deville SS, Cordes N. The extracellular, cellular, and nuclear stiffness, a trinity in the cancer resistome—A review. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:1376. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01376.
    1. Winkler J, Abisoye-Ogunniyan A, Metcalf KJ, Werb Z. Concepts of extracellular matrix remodelling in tumour progression and metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5120. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18794-x.
    1. Cox TR. The matrix in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2021;21:217–238. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00329-7.
    1. Karsdal MA, et al. Extracellular matrix remodeling: The common denominator in connective tissue diseases possibilities for evaluation and current understanding of the matrix as more than a passive architecture, but a key player in tissue failure. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2013;11:70–92. doi: 10.1089/adt.2012.474.
    1. Nebuloni M, et al. Insight on colorectal carcinoma infiltration by studying perilesional extracellular matrix. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:22522. doi: 10.1038/srep22522.
    1. Bissell MJ, Hines WC. Why don’t we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression. Nat. Med. 2011;17:320–329. doi: 10.1038/nm.2328.
    1. Handorf AM, Zhou Y, Halanski MA, Li WJ. Tissue stiffness dictates development, homeostasis, and disease progression. Organogenesis. 2015;11:1–15. doi: 10.1080/15476278.2015.1019687.
    1. Levental KR, et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell. 2009;139:891–906. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.027.
    1. Butcher DT, Alliston T, Weaver VM. A tense situation: Forcing tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:108–122. doi: 10.1038/nrc2544.
    1. Chaudhuri O, Cooper-White J, Janmey PA, Mooney DJ, Shenoy VB. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature. 2020;584:535–546. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2.
    1. Luque T, et al. Local micromechanical properties of decellularized lung scaffolds measured with atomic force microscopy. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:6852–6859. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.044.
    1. Jorba I, Uriarte JJ, Campillo N, Farré R, Navajas D. Probing micromechanical properties of the extracellular matrix of soft tissues by atomic force microscopy. J. Cell Physiol. 2017;232:19–26. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25420.
    1. Hunter Joyce M, et al. Phenotypic basis for matrix stiffness-dependent chemoresistance of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin. Front. Oncol. 2018;8:337. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00337.
    1. Czekay RP, Cheon DJ, Samarakoon R, Kutz SM, Higgins PJ. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: Mechanisms of tumor progression and novel therapeutic targets. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:1231. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051231.
    1. Nurmik M, Ullmann P, Rodriguez F, Haan S, Letellier E. In search of definitions: Cancer-associated fibroblasts and their markers. Int. J. Cancer. 2020;146:895–905. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32193.
    1. Cirri P, Chiarugi P. Cancer associated fibroblasts: The dark side of the coin. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2011;1:482–497.
    1. Alessandrini A, Facci P. AFM: A versatile tool in biophysics. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2005;16:65–92. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/16/6/R01.
    1. Holuigue H, et al. Force sensing on cells and tissues by atomic force microscopy. Sensors. 2022;22:2197. doi: 10.3390/s22062197.
    1. Gavara N. A beginner’s guide to atomic force microscopy probing for cell mechanics. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2017;80:75–84. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22776.
    1. Puricelli L, Galluzzi M, Schulte C, Podestà A, Milani P. Nanomechanical and topographical imaging of living cells by atomic force microscopy with colloidal probes. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2015;86:33705. doi: 10.1063/1.4915896.
    1. Viji Babu PK, Rianna C, Mirastschijski U, Radmacher M. Nano-mechanical mapping of interdependent cell and ECM mechanics by AFM force spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:12317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48566-7.
    1. Lekka M, Pabijan J, Orzechowska B. Morphological and mechanical stability of bladder cancer cells in response to substrate rigidity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2019;1863:1006–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.03.010.
    1. Pattem J, et al. Dependency of hydration and growth conditions on the mechanical properties of oral biofilms. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95701-4.
    1. Pattem J, et al. A multi-scale biophysical approach to develop structure-property relationships in oral biofilms. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23798-1.
    1. Alcaraz J, Otero J, Jorba I, Navajas D. Bidirectional mechanobiology between cells and their local extracellular matrix probed by atomic force microscopy. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018;73:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.020.
    1. Deptuła P, et al. Tissue rheology as a possible complementary procedure to advance histological diagnosis of colon cancer. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020;6:5620–5631. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00975.
    1. Shimshoni E, et al. Distinct extracellular–matrix remodeling events precede symptoms of inflammation. Matrix Biol. 2021;96:47–68. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2020.11.001.
    1. Jorba I, et al. Nonlinear elasticity of the lung extracellular microenvironment is regulated by macroscale tissue strain. Acta Biomater. 2019;92:265–276. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.023.
    1. Alfano M, et al. Linearized texture of three-dimensional extracellular matrix is mandatory for bladder cancer cell invasion. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36128. doi: 10.1038/srep36128.
    1. Plodinec M, et al. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012;7:757–765. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.167.
    1. Stylianou A, Lekka M, Stylianopoulos T. AFM assessing of nanomechanical fingerprints for cancer early diagnosis and classification: From single cell to tissue level. Nanoscale. 2018;10:20930–20945. doi: 10.1039/C8NR06146G.
    1. Kohn JC, Lampi MC, Reinhart-King CA. Age-related vascular stiffening: Causes and consequences. Front. Genet. 2015;6:112. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00112.
    1. Arthroplasty TK, et al. Stiffening of human skin fibroblasts with age. Biophys. J. 2010;99:2434–2442. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.08.026.
    1. Berdyyeva TK, Woodworth CD, Sokolov I. Human epithelial cells increase their rigidity with ageing in vitro: Direct measurements. Phys. Med. Biol. 2005;50:81–92. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/1/007.
    1. Huynh J, et al. Age-related intimal stiffening enhances endothelial permeability and leukocyte transmigration. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011;3:112. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002761.
    1. Lieber SC, et al. Aging increases stiffness of cardiac myocytes measured by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004;287:645–651. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00564.2003.
    1. White A, et al. A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7.
    1. Mosca L, Barrett-Connor E, Kass Wenger N. Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: What a difference a decade makes. Circulation. 2011;124:2145–2154. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.968792.
    1. Plodinec, M. et al. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 757–765 (2012).
    1. Najafi M, Farhood B, Mortezaee K. Extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness and degradation as cancer drivers. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:2782–2790. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27681.
    1. Varinelli L, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix as scaffold for cancer organoid cultures of colorectal peritoneal metastases. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;14:mjac064. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjac064.
    1. Acerbi I, et al. Human breast cancer invasion and aggression correlates with ECM stiffening and immune cell infiltration. Integr. Biol. (United Kingdom) 2015;7:1120–1134. doi: 10.1039/c5ib00040h.
    1. Akhtar M, Haider A, Rashid S, Al-Nabet ADMH. Paget’s ‘seed and soil’ theory of cancer metastasis: An idea whose time has come. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2019;26:69–74. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000219.
    1. Chaudhuri O, et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness and composition jointly regulate the induction of malignant phenotypes in mammary epithelium. Nat. Mater. 2014;13:970–978. doi: 10.1038/nmat4009.
    1. Seo BR, et al. Collagen microarchitecture mechanically controls myofibroblast differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:11387–11398. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919394117.
    1. Mishra DK, Miller RA, Pence KA, Kim MP. Small cell and non small cell lung cancer form metastasis on cellular 4D lung model. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4358-x.
    1. Grey JFE, Campbell-Ritchie A, Everitt NM, Fezovich AJ, Wheatley SP. The use of decellularised animal tissue to study disseminating cancer cells. J. Cell Sci. 2019;132:219907.
    1. Miyauchi Y, et al. A novel three-dimensional culture system maintaining the physiological extracellular matrix of fibrotic model livers accelerates progression of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09391-y.
    1. Sensi F, D’Angelo E, D’Aronco S, Molinaro R, Agostini M. Preclinical three-dimensional colorectal cancer model: The next generation of in vitro drug efficacy evaluation. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;234:181–191. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26812.
    1. Ferreira LP, Gaspar VM, Mano JF. Decellularized extracellular matrix for bioengineering physiomimetic 3D in vitro tumor models. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:1397–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.04.006.
    1. Genovese L, et al. Cellular localization, invasion, and turnover are differently influenced by healthy and tumor-derived extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2014;20:2005–2018. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0588.
    1. Júnior, C. et al. Multi-step extracellular matrix remodelling and stiffening in the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 1708 (2023).
    1. Butt HJ, Cappella B, Kappl M. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: Technique, interpretation and applications. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2005;59:1–152. doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2005.08.003.
    1. Indrieri M, Podestà A, Bongiorno G, Marchesi D, Milani P. Adhesive-free colloidal probes for nanoscale force measurements: Production and characterization. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2011;82:023708. doi: 10.1063/1.3553499.
    1. Butt HJ, Jaschke M. Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology. 1995;6:1–7. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/6/1/001.
    1. Chighizola M, Puricelli L, Bellon L, Podestà A. Large colloidal probes for atomic force microscopy: Fabrication and calibration issues. J. Mol. Recognit. 2021;34:e2879. doi: 10.1002/jmr.2879.
    1. Schillers H, et al. Standardized nanomechanical atomic force microscopy procedure (SNAP) for measuring soft and biological samples. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:5117. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05383-0.
    1. Hertz H. Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1881;1881:156–171.
    1. Kontomaris S-V. The Hertz model in AFM nanoindentation experiments: Applications in biological samples and biomaterials. Micro Nanosyst. 2018;10:11–22. doi: 10.2174/1876402910666180426114700.
    1. Chen J, Lu G. Finite element modelling of nanoindentation based methods for mechanical properties of cells. J. Biomech. 2012;45:2810–2816. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.037.
    1. Dimitriadis EK, Horkay F, Maresca J, Kachar B, Chadwick RS. Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 2002;82:2798–2810. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75620-8.
    1. Garcia PD, Garcia R. Determination of the elastic moduli of a single cell cultured on a rigid support by force microscopy. Biophys. J. 2018;114:2923–2932. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.05.012.
    1. Gavara N, Chadwick RS. Determination of the elastic moduli of thin samples and adherent cells using conical atomic force microscope tips. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012;7:733–736. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.163.
    1. Meazza C, et al. AKT1 and BRAF mutations in pediatric aggressive fibromatosis. Cancer Med. 2016;5:1204–1213. doi: 10.1002/cam4.669.
    1. David FN, Cramer H. Mathematical methods of statistics. Biometrika. 1947;34:374.
    1. Alper JS, Gelb RI. Standard errors and confidence intervals in nonlinear regression: comparison of Monte Carlo and parametric statistics. J. Phys. Chem. 1990;94:4747–4751. doi: 10.1021/j100374a068.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi