Effectiveness of On-Court Resistive Warm-Ups on Change of Direction Speed and Smash Velocity during a Simulated Badminton Match Play in Well-Trained Players

Man Tong Chua, Kin Ming Chow, Danny Lum, Andrew Wei Han Tay, Wan Xiu Goh, Mohammed Ihsan, Abdul Rashid Aziz, Man Tong Chua, Kin Ming Chow, Danny Lum, Andrew Wei Han Tay, Wan Xiu Goh, Mohammed Ihsan, Abdul Rashid Aziz

Abstract

In badminton, power production can be enhanced through the fundamental practice of a dynamic warm-up with resistance conditioning activity to induce a post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) effect. The use of heavy resistance exercise in the form of heavy weights to induce PAPE during competition is not logistically practical in the badminton arena. Thus, there is a need to investigate the use of easily available alternative preconditioning stimuli to induce a similar potentiating effect in badminton-specific performance. This study adopted a repeated-measures design of three warm-up conditions: control (CON), weighted wearable resistance (WWR), and resistance band variable resistance (BVR). Fourteen badminton players from the national training squad (11 males, 3 females, age 18 ± 1 y) completed the experimental sessions in random order. Change of direction speed (CODS) and smash velocity (SV) tests were performed at five timepoints-baseline test after the warm-up and at the end of each of the four exercise blocks of a simulated match play protocol. CODS was significantly faster under the two resistance warm-up conditions (WWR and BVR) compared to the CON condition at baseline (-0.2 s ± 0.39 and -0.2 s ± 0.46, p = 0.001 and 0.03, g = 0.47 and 0.40, respectively), but there were no differences at the other timepoints (all p > 0.05). SV was significantly faster for all the four exercise blocks than at baseline under all three warm-up conditions (p = 0.02), but there were no differences in SV between the three warm-up conditions across all the five measured timepoints (p = 0.15). In conclusion, implementing resistance (~10% body weight) in sport-specific plyometric exercises using WWR or BVR during warm-up routines may induce PAPE effects on the change of direction speed but not smash velocity, in well-trained badminton players, as compared with the same warm-up exercises using bodyweight (i.e., CON condition). The positive effects of CODS were, however, observed only at the start of the match and possibly lasted for up to between 5 and 10 min of match play.

Keywords: agility; dynamic; muscle potentiation; quickness; resistant exercise; wearable resistance.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study experimental procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Layout of badminton court for simulated match rallies, change of direction speed (CODS), and smash velocity (SV) tests.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change of direction speed (CODS) (a) and smash velocity (SV) (b) across all five timepoints. * Main effect of time p < 0.05, and post hoc tests revealed significantly faster CODS at exercise block 4 as compared to baseline and exercise block 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change of direction speed, CODS (a) and smash velocity, SV (b) at baseline relative to mean values of exercise blocks 1 to 4. * Interaction effect of trial × time p < 0.05, and post hoc tests revealed significantly faster CODS in weighted wearable resistance (WWR) and banded variable resistance (BVR) as compared to CON condition at baseline. # Main effect of time p < 0.05, and post hoc tests revealed significantly faster SV during the 4 exercise blocks than at baseline under all three warm-up conditions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percentage difference (%DIFF) of change of direction speed (CODS) in WWR (a) and BVR (b) vs. CODS–SWC in CON at each measured timepoint. SWC observed at baseline, exercise block 1 to exercise block 3 in (a) and baseline in (b).

References

    1. Phomsoupha M., Laffaye G. The science of badminton: Game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Sports Med. 2014;45:473–495. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0287-2.
    1. Hughes M.G., Cosgrove M. Badminton. In: Winter E.M., Jones A.M., Davison R.C., Bromley P.D., Mercer T.M., editors. Sport and Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines: The British Association of Sport and Exercise Science Guide. Routledge; London, UK: 2006. pp. 214–219.
    1. Sturgess S., Newton R.U. Design and implementation of a specific strength program for badminton. Strength Cond. J. 2008;30:34–41. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e3181771008.
    1. Tiwari L.M., Rai V., Srinet S. Relationship of selected motor fitness components with the performance of badminton player. Asian J. Phys. Educ. Comput. Sci. Sports. 2011;5:88–91.
    1. Chang T.K., Chan K.Y., Spowage A.C. Local sensor system for badminton smash analysis; Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Intrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference; Singapore. 5–7 May 2009;
    1. Bishop D. Warm up II. Sports Med. 2003;33:483–498. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00002.
    1. Kilduff L., Finn C., Baker J., Cook C., West D. Preconditioning strategies to enhance physical performance on the day of competition. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2013;8:677–681. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.8.6.677.
    1. Tillin N., Bishop D. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation and its effect on performance of subsequent explosive activities. Sports Med. 2009;39:147–166. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200939020-00004.
    1. Sale D. Postactivation potentiation: Role in human performance. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2002;30:138–143. doi: 10.1097/00003677-200207000-00008.
    1. Cuenca-Fernández F., Smith I., Jordan M., MacIntosh B., López-Contreras G., Arellano R., Herzog W. Nonlocalized postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE) effects in trained athletes: A pilot study. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2017;42:1122–1125. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0217.
    1. Blazevich A., Babault N. Post-activation potentiation versus post-activation performance enhancement in humans: Historical perspective, underlying mechanisms, and current issues. Front. Physiol. 2019;10:1359. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01359.
    1. Zois J., Bishop D., Ball K., Aughey R. High-intensity warm-ups elicit superior performance to a current soccer warm-up routine. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 2011;14:522–528. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.03.012.
    1. Aandahl H., Von Heimburg E., Van den Tillaar R. Effect of postactivation potentiation induced by elastic resistance on kinematics and performance in a roundhouse kick of trained martial arts practitioners. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2018;32:990–996. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001947.
    1. Lum D. Effects of various warm-up protocol on special Judo fitness test performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2019;33:459–465. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001862.
    1. Maloney S., Turner A., Miller S. Acute effects of a loaded warm-up protocol on change of direction speed in professional badminton players. J. Appl. Biomech. 2014;30:637–642. doi: 10.1123/jab.2014-0048.
    1. Thompsen A., Kackley T., Palumbo M., Faigenbaum A. Acute effects of different warm-up protocols with and without a weighted vest on jumping performance in athletic women. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2007;21:52–56. doi: 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00010.
    1. Lum D., Chen S.E. Comparison of loaded countermovement jump with different variable resistance intensities on inducing post-activation potentiation. J. Sci. Sport Exerc. 2020;2:167–172. doi: 10.1007/s42978-020-00055-4.
    1. Phomsoupha M., Berger Q., Laffaye G. Multiple repeated sprint ability test for badminton players involving four changes of direction: Validity and Reliability (part 1) J. Strength Cond. Res. 2018;32:423–431. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002307.
    1. Phomsoupha M., Laffaye G. Shuttlecock velocity during a smash stroke in badminton evolves linearly with skill level. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2014;17((Suppl. S1)):140–141. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2014.931550.
    1. Lachenbruch P., Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1989;84:1096. doi: 10.2307/2290095.
    1. Hedges L.V. Distribution theory for glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. J. Educ. Stat. 1981;6:107. doi: 10.3102/10769986006002107.
    1. Hopkins W.G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30:1–15. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001.
    1. Turki O., Dhahbi W., Gueid S., Hmaied S., Souaifi M., Khalifa R. Dynamic warm-up with a weighted vest: Improvement of repeated change-of-direction performance in young male soccer layers. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2020;15:196–203. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0800.
    1. Reiman M., Peintner A., Boehner A., Cameron C., Murphy J., Carter J. Effects of dynamic warm-up with and without a weighted vest on lower extremity power performance of high school male athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010;24:3387–3395. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f159bd.
    1. Barreira J., Chiminazzo J.G.C., Fernandes P.T. Analysis of point difference established by winners and losers in games of badminton. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport. 2016;16:687–694. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868916.
    1. Ariff H.M., Rambely A.S. Determination of torques at upper limb joints during jumping in badminton smash via Kane’s method. In: Kwon Y.H., Shim J., Shim J.K., Shin I.S., editors. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of Biomechanics in Sports; Seoul, Korea. 14–18 July 2008; pp. 73–76.
    1. Ramasamy Y., Usman J., Sundar V. Ground reaction force and kinematics of forehand jumping smash among elite Malaysian badminton players. ISBS Proc. Arch. 2019;37:173.
    1. Li S., Zhang Z., Wan B., Wilde B., Shan G. The relevance of body positioning and its training effect on badminton smash. J. Sports Sci. 2016;35:310–316. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1164332.
    1. Badminton World Federation Level 2—BWF Development. Retrieved 2 June 2021. [(accessed on 2 June 2021)]. Available online: .
    1. Abian-Vicen J., Castanedo A., Abian P., Gonzalez-Millan C., Salinero J.J., Coso J.D. Influence of successive badminton matches on muscle strength, power, and body-fluid balance in elite players. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2014;9:689–694. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0269.
    1. Abián P., Coso J.D., Salinero J.J., Gallo-Salazar C., Areces F., Ruiz-Vicente D., Abián-Vicén J. Muscle damage produced during a simulated badminton match in competitive male players. Res. Sports Med. 2015;24:104–117. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2015.1076416.
    1. Girard O., Brocherie F., Ihsan M. Does ischemic pre-conditioning during the recovery period between two successive matches preserve physical performance in badminton doubles players? Int. J. Racket Sports Sci. 2020;2:1–8.
    1. Harris R.C., Edwards R.H., Hultman E., Nordesjo L.O., Nylind B., Sahlin K. The time course of phosphorylcreatine resynthesis during recovery of the quadriceps muscle in man. Pflug. Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 1976;367:137–142. doi: 10.1007/BF00585149.
    1. Newton R., Murphy A., Humphries B., Wilson G., Kraemer W., Häkkinen K. Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper-body movements. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 1997;75:333–342. doi: 10.1007/s004210050169.
    1. Gabbett T., Jenkins D., Abernethy B. Relative importance of physiological, anthropometric, and skill qualities to team selection in professional rugby league. J. Sports Sci. 2011;29:1453–1461. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.603348.
    1. Paterson S., McMaster D.T., Cronin J. Assessing change of direction ability in badminton athletes. Strength Cond. J. 2016;38:18–30. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000241.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi