Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin With or Without Veliparib in Patients With Pancreas Adenocarcinoma and a Germline BRCA/PALB2 Mutation

Eileen M O'Reilly, Jonathan W Lee, Mark Zalupski, Marinela Capanu, Jennifer Park, Talia Golan, Esther Tahover, Maeve A Lowery, Joanne F Chou, Vaibhav Sahai, Robin Brenner, Hedy L Kindler, Kenneth H Yu, Alice Zervoudakis, Shreya Vemuri, Zsofia K Stadler, Richard K G Do, Neesha Dhani, Alice P Chen, David P Kelsen, Eileen M O'Reilly, Jonathan W Lee, Mark Zalupski, Marinela Capanu, Jennifer Park, Talia Golan, Esther Tahover, Maeve A Lowery, Joanne F Chou, Vaibhav Sahai, Robin Brenner, Hedy L Kindler, Kenneth H Yu, Alice Zervoudakis, Shreya Vemuri, Zsofia K Stadler, Richard K G Do, Neesha Dhani, Alice P Chen, David P Kelsen

Abstract

Purpose: Five percent to 9% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) develop in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 or PALB2 (gBRCA/PALB2+) mutation. Phase IB data from a trial that used cisplatin, gemcitabine, and veliparib treatment demonstrated a high response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) in this population. We designed an open-label, randomized, multicenter, two-arm phase II trial to investigate cisplatin and gemcitabine with or without veliparib in gBRCA/PALB2+ PDAC.

Patients and methods: Eligible patients had untreated gBRCA/PALB2+ PDAC with measurable stage III to IV disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Treatment for patients in arm A consisted of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 intravenously on days 3 and 10; treatment for patients in arm B was the same as that for patients in arm A, and arm A also received veliparib 80 mg orally twice per day on days 1 to 12 cycled every 3 weeks. The primary end point was RRs of arm A and arm B evaluated separately using a Simon two-stage design. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, DCR, OS, safety, and correlative analyses.

Results: Fifty patients were evaluated by modified intention-to-treat analysis. The RR for arm A was 74.1% and 65.2% for arm B (P = .55); both arms exceeded the prespecified activity threshold. DCR was 100% for arm A and 78.3% for arm B (P = .02). Median progression-free survival was 10.1 months for arm A (95% CI, 6.7 to 11.5 months) and 9.7 months for arm B (95% CI, 4.2 to 13.6 months; P = .73). Median OS for arm A was 15.5 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 24.3 months) and 16.4 months for arm B (95% CI, 11.7 to 23.4 months; P = .6). Two-year OS rate for the entire cohort was 30.6% (95% CI, 17.8% to 44.4%), and 3-year OS rate was 17.8% (95% CI, 8.1% to 30.7%). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities for arm A versus arm B were 13 (48%) versus seven (30%) for neutropenia, 15 (55%) versus two (9%) for thrombocytopenia, and 14 (52%) versus eight (35%) for anemia.

Conclusion: Cisplatin and gemcitabine is an effective regimen in advanced gBRCA/PALB2+ PDAC. Concurrent veliparib did not improve RR. These data establish cisplatin and gemcitabine as a standard approach in gBRCA/PALB2+ PDAC.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram. PARPi, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) Best target responses in arm A and arm B. A waterfall plot depicts the percent change in tumor size from baseline in all patients in the study (N = 47). Three patients (arm B) had clinical progression before their first scan and are omitted from this figure. The number of patients with a partial response was 35 (70%). (B) Treatment duration and survival. A swimmer plot depicts the overall survival and indicates the treatment duration. One patient was consented but did not receive treatment and was omitted from the figure. Two patients from arm A remain on study treatment. (*) Denotes patients who were alive at the time of data analysis.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival (PFS) and (B) overall survival (OS).

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi