The development and validation of a CT-based radiomics signature for the preoperative discrimination of stage I-II and stage III-IV colorectal cancer

Cuishan Liang, Yanqi Huang, Lan He, Xin Chen, Zelan Ma, Di Dong, Jie Tian, Changhong Liang, Zaiyi Liu, Cuishan Liang, Yanqi Huang, Lan He, Xin Chen, Zelan Ma, Di Dong, Jie Tian, Changhong Liang, Zaiyi Liu

Abstract

Objectives: To investigative the predictive ability of radiomics signature for preoperative staging (I-IIvs.III-IV) of primary colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods: This study consisted of 494 consecutive patients (training dataset: n=286; validation cohort, n=208) with stage I-IV CRC. A radiomics signature was generated using LASSO logistic regression model. Association between radiomics signature and CRC staging was explored. The classification performance of the radiomics signature was explored with respect to the receiver operating characteristics(ROC) curve.

Results: The 16-feature-based radiomics signature was an independent predictor for staging of CRC, which could successfully categorize CRC into stage I-II and III-IV (p <0.0001) in training and validation dataset. The median of radiomics signature of stage III-IV was higher than stage I-II in the training and validation dataset. As for the classification performance of the radiomics signature in CRC staging, the AUC was 0.792(95%CI:0.741-0.853) with sensitivity of 0.629 and specificity of 0.874. The signature in the validation dataset obtained an AUC of 0.708(95%CI:0.698-0.718) with sensitivity of 0.611 and specificity of 0.680.

Conclusions: A radiomics signature was developed and validated to be a significant predictor for discrimination of stage I-II from III-IV CRC, which may serve as a complementary tool for the preoperative tumor staging in CRC.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; computed tomography; predictor; radiomics signature; stage.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any possible conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves…
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the radiomics signature in the training dataset and validation dataset
Figure 1a-1b. represents the ROC curves of radiomics signature for training dataset, validation dataset, respectively.
Figure 2. Signature scores for each patient…
Figure 2. Signature scores for each patient regarding the classification of tumor stage (I-II vs. III-IV) in the training dataset and validation dataset
Figure 2a-2b. represents the signature scores distribution in the training (2a) and validation (2b) dataset. The blue marks indicate stage I-II CRC patients, while the gold marks indicate stage III-IV CRC patients. The solid line presents the best cutoff of radiomics signature for the discrimination of stage I-II and stage III-IV CRC patients, below which patients are discriminated to be stage I-II CRC patients and above which patients are discriminated to be CRC stage III-IV patients. The cutoff value is 0.392.
Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves…
Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the maximum diameter, clinical model and combined model
Figure 3a-3f. represents the ROC curves of maximum diameter (training: Figure 3a.; validation: Figure 3b.), clinical model (training: Figure 3c.; validation: Figure 3d.) and combined model (training: Figure 3e.; validation: Figure 3f.).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4a-4f. represents the ROC curves of radiomics signature for each subgroup when stratified by gender (male: Figure 4a.; female: Figure 4b.), age (<=65: Figure 4c.; >65: Figure 4d.), histological grade (poorly differentiated: 4e; well-moderately differentiated: 4f).
Figure 5. Signature scores for each patient…
Figure 5. Signature scores for each patient regarding the classification of tumor stage (I-II vs. III-IV) in subgroups
The blue marks indicate stage I-II CRC patients, while the gold marks indicate stage III-IV CRC patients. The solid line presents the best cutoff of radiomics signature for the discrimination of stage I-II and stage III-IV CRC patients, below which patients are discriminated to be stage I-II CRC patients and above which patients are discriminated to be CRC stage III-IV patients. The cutoff values for the discrimination in subgroups were as follow: male, 0.391; female, 0.425; age 65, 0.477; poorly differentiated, 0.391; well-moderately differentiated, 0.392, respectively).

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262.
    1. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, Alteri R, Robbins AS, Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:252–271. doi: 10.3322/caac.21235.
    1. Compton CC, Greene FL. The staging of colorectal cancer: 2004 and beyond. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:295–308.
    1. Kijima S, Sasaki T, Nagata K, Utano K, Lefor AT, Sugimoto H. Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:16964–16975. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16964.
    1. Acunas B, Rozanes I, Acunas G, Celik L, Sayi I, Gokmen E. Preoperative CT staging of colon carcinoma (excluding the recto-sigmoid region) Eur J Radiol. 1990;11:150–153. doi: 10.10160720-048X90166-9.
    1. Burton S, Brown G, Bees N, Norman A, Biedrzycki O, Arnaout A, Abulafi AM, Swift RI. Accuracy of CT prediction of poor prognostic features in colonic cancer. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:10–19. doi: 10.1259/bjr/19492531.
    1. Dighe S, Purkayastha S, Swift I, Tekkis PP, Darzi A, A'Hern R, Brown G. Diagnostic precision of CT in local staging of colon cancers: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:708–719. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.024.
    1. Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M, Marinelli T, Genovesi D, Bonomo L. Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography--initial experience. Radiology. 2004;231:83–90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2311021152.
    1. Hennedige T, Teo L, Ang B, Cheong WK, Venkatesh SK. Accuracy of preoperative CT for local staging in colorectal carcinomas. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:475–480.
    1. Kanamoto T, Matsuki M, Okuda J, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Yoshikawa S, Narabayashi I, Kawasaki H, Tanaka K, Yamamoto T, Tanigawa N, Egashira Y, Shibayama Y. Preoperative evaluation of local invasion and metastatic lymph nodes of colorectal cancer and mesenteric vascular variations using multidetector-row computed tomography before laparoscopic surgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:831–839. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3180517af3.
    1. Tan YN, Li XF, Li JJ, Song YM, Jiang B, Yang J, Yuan Y. The accuracy of computed tomography in the pretreatment staging of colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:1207–1212. doi: 10.5754/hge14081.
    1. Tezcan D, Turkvatan A, Turkoglu MA, Bostanci EB, Sakaogulllari Z. Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of single portal venous phase multidetector computed tomography. Clin Imaging. 2013;37:1048–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.08.003.
    1. Ng F, Ganeshan B, Kozarski R, Miles KA, Goh V. Assessment of primary colorectal cancer heterogeneity by using whole-tumor texture analysis: contrast-enhanced CT texture as a biomarker of 5-year survival. Radiology. 2013;266:177–184. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120254.
    1. Ganeshan B, Goh V, Mandeville HC, Ng QS, Hoskin PJ, Miles KA. Non-small cell lung cancer: histopathologic correlates for texture parameters at CT. Radiology. 2013;266:326–336. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112428.
    1. Ganeshan B, Abaleke S, Young RC, Chatwin CR, Miles KA. Texture analysis of non-small cell lung cancer on unenhanced computed tomography: initial evidence for a relationship with tumour glucose metabolism and stage. Cancer Imaging. 2010;10:137–143. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2010.0021.
    1. Ganeshan B, Skogen K, Pressney I, Coutroubis D, Miles K. Tumour heterogeneity in oesophageal cancer assessed by CT texture analysis: preliminary evidence of an association with tumour metabolism, stage, and survival. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.08.012.
    1. Birkhahn M, Mitra AP, Cote RJ. Molecular markers for bladder cancer: the road to a multimarker approach. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007;7:1717–1727. doi: 10.1586/14737140.7.12.1717.
    1. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, Zegers CM, Gillies R, Boellard R, Dekker A, Aerts HJ. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036.
    1. Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB, Forster K, Aerts HJ, Dekker A, Fenstermacher D, Goldgof DB, Hall LO, Lambin P, Balagurunathan Y, Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:1234–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.010.
    1. Dewhurst C, Rosen MP, Blake MA, Baker ME, Cash BD, Fidler JL, Greene FL, Hindman NM, Jones B, Katz DS, Lalani T, Miller FH, Small WC, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria pretreatment staging of colorectal cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9:775–781. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.07.025.
    1. Smith NJ, Bees N, Barbachano Y, Norman AR, Swift RI, Brown G. Preoperative computed tomography staging of nonmetastatic colon cancer predicts outcome: implications for clinical trials. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:1030–1036. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603646.
    1. Miles KA, Ganeshan B, Griffiths MR, Young RC, Chatwin CR. Colorectal cancer: texture analysis of portal phase hepatic CT images as a potential marker of survival. Radiology. 2009;250:444–452. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2502071879.
    1. Dong X, Xing L, Wu P, Fu Z, Wan H, Li D, Yin Y, Sun X, Yu J. Three-dimensional positron emission tomography image texture analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: relationship between tumor 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake heterogeneity, maximum standardized uptake value, and tumor stage. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34:40–46. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835ae50c.
    1. Coroller TP, Grossmann P, Hou Y, Rios Velazquez E, Leijenaar RT, Hermann G, Lambin P, Haibe-Kains B, Mak RH, Aerts HJ. CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114:345–350. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.015.
    1. Leijenaar RT, Carvalho S, Hoebers FJ, Aerts HJ, van Elmpt WJ, Huang SH, Chan B, Waldron JN, O'Sullivan B, Lambin P. External validation of a prognostic CT-based radiomic signature in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:1423–1429. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1061214.
    1. Parmar C, Leijenaar RT, Grossmann P, Rios Velazquez E, Bussink J, Rietveld D, Rietbergen MM, Haibe-Kains B, Lambin P, Aerts HJ. Radiomic feature clusters and prognostic signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11044. doi: 10.1038/srep11044.
    1. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S, Bussink J, Monshouwer R, Haibe-Kains B, Rietveld D, Hoebers F, Rietbergen MM, Leemans CR, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5006.
    1. Ng F, Kozarski R, Ganeshan B, Goh V. Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:342–348. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.10.023.
    1. Kim DW, Kim HJ, Kim KW, Byun JH, Song KB, Kim JH, Hong SM. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas at dynamic enhanced CT: comparison between grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma and grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumour. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1375–1383. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3532-z.
    1. Mimae T, Miyata Y, Mimura T, Ito H, Nakayama H, Okumura S, Yoshimura M, Okada M. Radiologic findings to predict low-grade malignant tumour among clinical T1bN0 lung adenocarcinomas: lessons from histological subtypes. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45:767–773. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv078.
    1. Lu X, Lu J. The significance of detection of serum miR-423-5p and miR-484 for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Clin Lab. 2015;61:187–190.
    1. Xu WH, Chen YD, Hu Y, Yu JK, Wu XG, Jiang TJ, Zheng S, Zhang SZ. Preoperatively molecular staging with CM10 ProteinChip and SELDI-TOF-MS for colorectal cancer patients. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2006;7:235–240. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0235.
    1. Lubner MG, Stabo N, Lubner SJ, Del Rio AM, Song C, Halberg RB, Pickhardt PJ. CT textural analysis of hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer: pre-treatment tumor heterogeneity correlates with pathology and clinical outcomes. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2331–2337. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0438-4.
    1. Tibshirani R. The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Stat Med. 1997;16:385–395. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970228)16:4<385::AID-SIM380>;2-3.
    1. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
    1. DeLong DM, DL C-P. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–845.
    1. Katz MH. Multivariable analysis: a primer for readers of medical research. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:644–650.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi