Two-year results after convective radiofrequency water vapor thermal therapy of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

Christopher M Dixon, Edwin Rijo Cedano, Dalibor Pacik, Vítězslav Vit, Gabriel Varga, Lennart Wagrell, Thayne R Larson, Lance A Mynderse, Christopher M Dixon, Edwin Rijo Cedano, Dalibor Pacik, Vítězslav Vit, Gabriel Varga, Lennart Wagrell, Thayne R Larson, Lance A Mynderse

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of convective radiofrequency (RF) water vapor thermal therapy in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); a pilot study design with 2-year follow-up evaluations.

Patients and methods: Men aged ≥45 years with an International Prostate Symptom Score ≥13, a maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤15 mL/s, and prostate volume 20-120 cc were enrolled in a prospective, open-label pilot study using convective RF water vapor energy with the Rezūm System. Patients were followed up for 2 years after transurethral thermal treatment at 3 international centers in the Dominican Republic, Czech Republic, and Sweden. The transurethral thermal therapy utilizes radiofrequency to generate wet thermal energy in the form of water vapor injected through a rigid endoscope into the lateral lobes and median lobe as needed. Urinary symptom relief, urinary flow, quality of life (QOL) impact, sexual function, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results: LUTS, flow rate, and QOL showed significant improvements from baseline; prostate volumes were appreciably reduced. Sexual function was maintained and no de novo erectile dysfunction occurred. The responses evident as early as 1 month after treatment remained consistent and durable over the 24 months of study. Early AEs were typically transient and mild to moderate; most were related to endoscopic instrumentation. No procedure related to late AEs were seen.

Conclusion: The Rezūm System convective RF thermal therapy is a minimally invasive treatment for BPH/LUTS which can be performed in the office or as an outpatient procedure with minimal associated perioperative AEs. It has no discernable effect on sexual function and provides significant improvement of LUTS that remain durable at 2 years.

Keywords: benign prostatic hyperplasia; convective RF; lower urinary tract symptoms; minimally invasive; water vapor thermal therapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Christopher M Dixon and Thayne R Larson have consulted with NxThera in the clinical trial design. Lennart Wagrell has served as a consultant to NxThera for other projects. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of contiguous ablation zones in the prostate after convective RF water vapor thermal therapy; example shows 3 treatments per side.
Figure 2
Figure 2
IPSS changes throughout 24 months after convective RF water vapor thermal therapy. Notes: Also plotted are results from a randomized, blinded, sham controlled trial showing similarity of outcomes over 12 months. Values are the mean absolute IPSS, errors bars represent 95% CI. Abbreviations: IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; CI, confidence interval; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IPSS responses after convective RF water vapor thermal therapy including (A) storage and voiding categories of symptoms and (B) 7 individual question responses. Abbreviation: IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Improvements in IPSS from baseline in patients with moderate and severe LUTS. Note: *P<0.0001 vs baseline. Abbreviations: IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms.

References

    1. Hutchison A, Farmer R, Chapple C, et al. Characteristics of patients presenting with LUTS/BPH in six European countries. Eur Urol. 2006;50(3):555–561.
    1. Parsons JK, Wilt TJ, Wang PY, Barrett-Connor E, Bauer DC, Marshall LM. Progression of lower urinary tract symptoms in older men: a community based study. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1915–1920.
    1. Fenter TC, Naslund MJ, Shah MB, Eaddy MT, Black L. The cost of treating the 10 most prevalent diseases in men 50 years of age or older. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(4 Suppl):S90–S98.
    1. Welch G, Weinger K, Barry MJ. Quality-of-life impact of lower urinary tract symptom severity: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Urology. 2002;59(2):245–250.
    1. Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7) Eur Urol. 2003;44(6):637–649.
    1. Hollingsworth JM, Wei JT. Economic impact of surgical intervention in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urology. 2006;8(Suppl 3):S9–S15.
    1. Speakman M, Kirby R, Doyle S, Ioannu C. Burden of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) – focus on the UK. BJU Int. 2015;115(4):508–519.
    1. American Urological Association Guideline: Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Mar, 2010. [Accessed October 10, 2016]. revised. Available from: .
    1. European Association of Urology Guidelines on the management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) Mar, 2015. [Accessed October 10, 2016]. Available from: .
    1. Dixon CM, Cedano ER, Mynderse LA, Larson TR. Transurethral convection water vapor as a treatment for lower urinary tract symptomology due to benign prostatic hyperplasia using the Rezūm® system: evaluation of acute ablative capabilities in the human prostate. Res Rep Urol. 2015;7:13–18.
    1. Dixon C, Cedano ER, Pacik D, et al. Efficacy and safety of Rezūm system water vapor treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 2015;86(5):1042–1047.
    1. Mynderse LA, Hanson D, Robb RA, et al. Rezūm system water vapor treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia: Validation of convective thermal energy transfer and characterization with magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional renderings. Urology. 2015;86(1):122–127.
    1. McVary KT, Gange SN, Gittelman MC, et al. Minimally invasive prostate convective water vapor energy (WAVE) ablation: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2016;195(5):1529–1539.
    1. Data on file, NxThera, Inc. Maple Grove, MN, USA:
    1. Narayan P, Tewari A, Members of the United States 93–01 Study Group A second phase III multicenter placebo controlled study of 2 dosages of modified release tamsulosin in patients with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 1998;160(5):1701–1706.
    1. Chapple CR, Montorsi F, Tammela TL, et al. Sildosin therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with suspected benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled clinical trial performed in Europe. Eur Urol. 2011;59(3):342–352.
    1. Denholm SW, Conn IG, Newsam JE, Chisholm GD. Morbidity following cystoscopy: comparison of flexible and rigid techniques. Br J Urol. 1990;66(2):152–154.
    1. Hoffman RM, Monga M, Elliott SP, et al. Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12(9):CD004135.
    1. Bouza C, López T, Magro A, Navalpotro L, Amate JM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral needle ablation in symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. BMC Urol. 2006;21:14–31.
    1. McVary KT, Gange SN, Gittelman MC, et al. Erectile and ejaculatory function preserved with convective water vapor energy treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH: randomized controlled study. J Sex Med. 2016;13(6):924–933.
    1. Sorokin I, Schatz A, Welliver C. Placebo medication and sham surgery responses in benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments: Implications for clinical trials. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;169(10):73–83.
    1. Welliver C, Kottwitz M, Feustel P, McVary K. Clinically and statistically significant changes seen in sham surgery arms of randomized, controlled benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery trials. J Urol. 2015;194(6):1682–1687.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi