The Relationship Between Stage of Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy and Pattern Electroretinogram Latency

Vittorio Porciatti, Diego E Alba, William J Feuer, Janet Davis, John Guy, Byron L Lam, Vittorio Porciatti, Diego E Alba, William J Feuer, Janet Davis, John Guy, Byron L Lam

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the baseline steady-state pattern electroretinogram (SS-PERG) of patients with G11778A Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) with different stages of visual acuity (VA) loss before allotopic gene therapy (GT).

Methods: Patients (n = 28) were enrolled into groups (GT I: chronic bilateral VA ≤35 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS]; GT II: acute bilateral VA ≤35 ETDRS; GT III: acute unilateral, VA ≤35 ETDRS, and better eye VA ≥70 ETDRS) and tested with SS-PERG together with 210 age-matched normal controls (NCs). SS-PERG amplitude (nV) and latency (ms) of each eye were averaged for groups GT I, GT II, and NC. Symptomatic eyes (GT III-S) and asymptomatic eyes (GT III-A) of group GT III were included separately and accounted for by using generalized estimating equation (GEE) methods.

Results: Compared to NC, SS-PERG amplitudes were reduced similarly by approximately 50% (P < 0.001) among all GT groups (NC > GT I, GT II, GT III-S, and GT III-A). SS-PERG latencies were shorter by ≥3.5 ms in all LHON groups and differed by disease stage (G III-A < NC, P = 0.002; GT III-S < GT III-A, P = 0.01; GT II < GT III-S, P = 0.03; GT I < NC, P < 0.001, but not different from other GT groups, all P > 0.1).

Conclusions: Although SS-PERG amplitude reduction did not distinguish between disease stages, SS-PERG latency shortening occurred in asymptomatic eyes and symptomatic eyes and distinguished between disease stages.

Translational relevance: SS-PERG latency shortening is consistent with primary damage of smaller/slower axons and sparing of larger/faster axons and may provide an objective staging of LHON, which may be helpful to determine efficacy in LHON trials.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: V. Porciatti, None; D.E. Alba, None; W.J. Feuer, None; J. Davis, None; J. Guy, None; B.L. Lam, None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Outline of SS-PERG setup. (A) Pattern stimulus. (B) Surface electrode placement. (C) The SS-PERG and noise waveforms for each eye (continuous lines) in response to one stimulus cycle (two pattern reversals). The dashed sinusoidal waveforms superimposed to the SS-PERG waveforms represent the frequency-domain component that is measured. The vertical arrows represent the SS-PERG amplitude (zero-to-peak amplitude of the isolated sinusoidal component) and the horizontal arrow represents the SS-PERG latency (time-to-peak of the isolated sinusoidal component). (D) Examples of SS-PERG waveforms recorded in representative subjects of study groups (NC = normal controls; GT I = bilateral-chronic; GT II = bilateral-acute; GT III-A = unilateral asymptomatic; and GT III-S = unilateral symptomatic). Note in D that waveforms of all LHON groups, compared to controls, have reduced amplitude, and are shifted to the left (shortened latency).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Changes in SS-PERG amplitude and latency with increasing stage of LHON symptoms. Distribution of amplitude (A) and latency (B) data in different study groups (NC = normal controls; GT I = chronic bilateral; GT II = acute bilateral; GT III-A = acute unilateral asymptomatic eyes; and GT III-S = acute unilateral symptomatic eyes). Note in A and B that interquartile ranges (boxes) of all LHON groups do not overlap with corresponding interquartile ranges of normal controls, and the medians tend to decrease with increasing stage except for the chronic bilateral LHON group.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Correlation between SS-PERG amplitude and SS-PERG latency. The scattergram includes data of both normal controls (smaller black symbols) and the patients with LHON groups with different stages of the disease (larger symbols with different color). NCs, normal controls; GT I, chronic bilateral; GT II, acute bilateral; GT III-A, acute unilateral asymptomatic eyes; GT III-S, acute unilateral symptomatic eyes. Note that both amplitude and latency are reduced in patients with LHON (r = 0.40, P < 0.001), and the magnitude of reduction depends on the stage of condition.

References

    1. Prado RC, Moura FC.. Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy with Interval of Visual Loss Greater Than 12 Months. Neuroophthalmology. 2016; 40: 243–246.
    1. Wallace DC, Singh G, Lott MT, et al. .. Mitochondrial DNA mutation associated with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Science. 1988; 242: 1427–1430.
    1. Sadun AA, La Morgia C, Carelli V. Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2011; 13: 109–117.
    1. Riordan-Eva P, Harding AE.. Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy: the clinical relevance of different mitochondrial DNA mutations. J Med Genet. 1995; 32: 81–87.
    1. Majander A, Robson AG, Joao C, et al. .. The pattern of retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Mitochondrion. 2017; 36: 138–149.
    1. Porciatti V. Electrophysiological assessment of retinal ganglion cell function. Exp Eye Res. 2015; 141: 164–170.
    1. Hess RF, Baker CL Jr.. Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol. 1984; 51: 939–951.
    1. Bach M, Brigell MG, Hawlina M, et al. .. ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG): 2012 update. Doc Ophthalmol. 2013; 126: 1–7.
    1. Parisi V, Ziccardi L, Sadun F, et al. .. Functional Changes of Retinal Ganglion Cells and Visual Pathways in Patients with Chronic Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy during One Year of Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2019; 126: 1033–1044.
    1. Porciatti V, Ventura LM.. Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111: 161–168.
    1. Wang M, Guo H, Li S, et al. .. Electrophysiological and Structural Changes in Chinese Patients with LHON. J Ophthalmol. 2020; 2020: 4734276.
    1. Guy J, Feuer WJ, Porciatti V, et al. .. Retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in asymptomatic G11778A: Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 841–848.
    1. Monsalve P, Triolo G, Toft-Nielsen J, et al. .. Next Generation PERG Method: Expanding the Response Dynamic Range and Capturing Response Adaptation. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017; 6: 5.
    1. Porciatti V, Burr DC, Morrone MC, Fiorentini A.. The effects of aging on the pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in humans. Vision Res. 1992; 32: 1199–1209.
    1. Bode SF, Jehle T, Bach M.. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma suspects: new findings from a longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 4300–4306.
    1. Falsini B, Bardocci A, Porciatti V, Bolzani R, Piccardi M.. Macular dysfunction in multiple sclerosis revealed by steady-state flicker and pattern ERGs. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 82: 53–59.
    1. Bowd C, Tafreshi A, Vizzeri G, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Weinreb RN.. Repeatability of pattern electroretinogram measurements using a new paradigm optimized for glaucoma detection. J Glaucoma. 2009; 18: 437–442.
    1. Fredette MJ, Anderson DR, Porciatti V, Feuer W.. Reproducibility of pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with a range of severity of disease with the new glaucoma paradigm. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 957–963.
    1. Lam BL, Feuer WJ, Abukhalil F, Porciatti V, Hauswirth WW, Guy J.. Leber hereditary optic neuropathy gene therapy clinical trial recruitment: year 1. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010; 128: 1129–1135.
    1. Lam BL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, et al. .. Trial end points and natural history in patients with G11778A Leber hereditary optic neuropathy : preparation for gene therapy clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014; 132: 428–436.
    1. Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Davis JL, et al. .. Gene Therapy for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy: Initial Results. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 558–570.
    1. Norcia AM, Appelbaum LG, Ales JM, Cottereau BR, Rossion B.. The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review. J Vis. 2015; 15: 4.
    1. Ozdamar O, Toft-Nielsen J, Bohorquez J, Porciatti V.. Relationship between transient and steady-state pattern electroretinograms: theoretical and experimental assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 8560–8570.
    1. Toft-Nielsen J, Bohorquez J, Ozdamar O.. Unwrapping of transient responses from high rate overlapping pattern electroretinograms by deconvolution. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 125: 2079–2089.
    1. Ying GS, Maguire MG, Glynn R, Rosner B.. Tutorial on Biostatistics: Linear Regression Analysis of Continuous Correlated Eye Data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2017; 24: 130–140.
    1. Ying GS, Maguire MG, Glynn R, Rosner B.. Tutorial on Biostatistics: Statistical Analysis for Correlated Binary Eye Data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018; 25: 1–12.
    1. Monsalve P, Ren S, Jiang H, et al. .. Retinal ganglion cell function in recovered optic neuritis: Faster is not better. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018; 129: 1813–1818.
    1. Sadun AA, Win PH, Ross-Cisneros FN, Walker SO, Carelli V.. Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy differentially affects smaller axons in the optic nerve. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 98: 223–232; discussion 232-225.
    1. Jiang H, Gameiro GR, Hu H, et al. .. Shortened Pattern Electroretinogram Latency and Impaired Autoregulatory Dynamics to Steady-State Stimuli in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2021; 41: 60–68.
    1. Guy J, Feuer WJ, Davis JL, et al. .. Gene Therapy for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy: Low- and Medium-Dose Visual Results. Ophthalmology. 2017; 124: 1621–1634.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi