Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) for Spanish Dancers

Blanca de-la-Cruz-Torres, Irene Barrera-García-Martín, Carlos Romero-Morales, Shaw Bronner, Blanca de-la-Cruz-Torres, Irene Barrera-García-Martín, Carlos Romero-Morales, Shaw Bronner

Abstract

A growing number of research papers regarding Spanish-speaking dancers justifies the need for an adapted Spanish version of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS). The objective of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate the DFOS for Spanish-speaking dancers. A sample of 127 healthy and injured professional and pre-professional dancers were recruited. Test-retest reliability of DFOS-Sp was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients. Construct validity compared DFOS-Sp to the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) using Pearson correlations. Principal component analysis identified factors and internal-item consistency. Sensitivity was evaluated by generating receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve analyses. A subgroup of 51 injured dancers were followed across three time-points to examine responsiveness using repeated measures analysis of variance. Injured scores were analyzed for floor and ceiling effects. The DFOS-Sp showed high test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 ≥ 0.92). DFOS-Sp scores had moderate construct validity compared with SF-36 physical component summary scores (r ≥ 0.56). Principal component analysis (PCA) supported uni-dimensionality explaining 58% of the variance with high internal consistency (α = 0.91).Area under the curve (AUC) sensitivity values were excellent (AUC ≥ 0.82). There were significant differences across time (p < 0.001), demonstrating responsiveness to change, with no floor or ceiling effects. The DFOS-Sp demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and validity in Spanish-speaking dancers, with comparable psychometric performance to the English-language version.

Keywords: cross-cultural adaptation; dance; musculoskeletal injury; patient-reported outcome measure; physical therapy diagnosis; validation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the steps for translation of the DFOS (English to Spanish). Abbreviations: Sp, Spanish; DFOS, Dance Functional Outcome Survey.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for DFOS-Sp total, ADL and Technique scores. Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; Tech, Technique; DFOS-Sp total, Spanish Dance Functional Outcome Survey total.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Injuries categorized by diagnosis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean ±SD DFOS-Sp and SF-36 scores across three time-points. Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; DFOS, Dance Functional Outcome Survey; PCS, physical component summary; MCS, mental component summary.

References

    1. Allen N., Nevill A.M., Brooks J.H.M., Koutedakis Y., Wyon M.A. The effect of a comprehensive injury audit program on injury incidence in ballet: A 3-year prospective study. Clin. J. Sports Med. 2013;23:373–378. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3182887f32.
    1. Batista C.G., Martins E.O. The prevalence of pain in classical ballet dancers. J. Health Sci. Inst. 2010;28:47–49.
    1. Aquino C.F., Cardoso V.A., Machado N.C., Franklin J.S., Augusto V.G. Análise da relação entre dor lombar e desequilíbrio de força muscular em bailarinas. Fisioter. Mov. 2010;23:399–408. doi: 10.1590/S0103-51502010000300007.
    1. Picon A.P., Franchi S.S. Análise antropométrica dos pés de praticantes de ballet clássico que utilizam sapatilhas de ponta. Rev. Uniara. 2007;20:177–188. doi: 10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2007.v11i1.239.
    1. Simões R.D., Anjos A.F.P. O ballet clássico e as implicações anatômicas e biomecânicas de sua prática para os pés e tornozelo. Rev. Fac. Educ. Fís. Unicamp. 2010;8:117–132. doi: 10.20396/conex.v8i2.8637745.
    1. Bronner S., McBride C., Gill A. Musculoskeletal injuries in professional modern dancers: A prospective cohort study of 15 years. J. Sports Sci. 2018;36:1880–1888. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1423860.
    1. Ramkumar P.N., Farber J., Arnouk J., Varner K.E., McCulloch P.C. Injuries in a professional ballet dance company: A 10-year retrospective study. J. Dance Med. Sci. 2016;20:30–37. doi: 10.12678/1089-313X.20.1.30.
    1. Leanderson C., Leanderson J., Wykman A., Strender L.E., Johansson S.E. Sundquist, K. Musculoskeletal injuries in young ballet dancers. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2011;19:1531–1535. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1445-9.
    1. Van Seters C., Van Rijn R.M., Van Middelkoop M., Stubbe J.H. risk factors for lower-extremity injuries among contemporary dance students. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2020;30:60–66. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000533.
    1. Bronner S., Chodock E., Urbano I.E.R., Smith T. Psychometric properties of the dance functional outcome survey (dfos): Reliability, validity and responsiveness. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2019;49:64–79. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8247.
    1. Bronner S., Novella T., Becica L. Management of a delayed-union sesamoid fracture in a dancer. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2007;37:529–540. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2472.
    1. Bronner S., Ojofeitimi S., Rose D. Repair and rehabilitation of extensor hallucis longus and brevis tendon lacerations in a professional dancer. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2008;38:362–370. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2749.
    1. Filipa A., Barton K. Physical therapy rehabilitation of an adolescent pre-professional dancer following os trigonum excision: A case report. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2018;48:194–203. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7508.
    1. Ojofeitimi S., Bronner S., Becica L. Conservative management of second metatarsophalangeal joint instability in a professional dancer: A case report. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2016;46:114–123. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.5824.
    1. Roussel N.A., De Kooning M., Nijs J., Wouters K., Cras P., Daenen L. The Role of sensorimotor incongruence in pain in professional dancers. Mot. Control. 2015;19:271–288. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0074.
    1. Smith T.R. Management of dancers with symptomatic accessory navicular: 2 case reports. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2012;42:465–473. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3809.
    1. Sobrino F.J., Guillen P. Overuse injuries in professional ballet: Influence of age and years of professional practice. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2017;5:1–11. doi: 10.1177/2325967117712704.
    1. De-la-Cruz-Torres B., Barrera-García-Martín I., Albornoz-Cabello M. Immediate effects of ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation versus physical exercise on performance of the flexor hallucis longus muscle in professional dancers: A randomised clinical trial. Acupunct. Med. 2019;37:91–97. doi: 10.1177/0964528419826103.
    1. De-la-Cruz-Torres B., Barrera-García-Martín I., Romero-Morales C. Comparative effects of one-shot electrical stimulation on performance of the flexor hallucis longus muscle in professional dancers: Percutaneous versus transcutaneous? Neuromodulation. 2019 doi: 10.1111/ner.13040. in press.
    1. De-la-Cruz-Torres B., Barrera-García-Martín I., De-la-Cueva-Reguera M., Bravo-Aguilar M., Abuín-Porras V., Romero-Morales C. Ultrasound imaging features of the Achilles Tendon in dancers. Is there a correlation between the imaging and clinical findings? A cross-sectional study. Phys. Ther. Sport. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.03.004. in press.
    1. Maher C.G., Costa L.O.P. The relevance of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics for physical therapy instruments. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 2007;11:245–252. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552007000400002.
    1. Smith T.R., Filipa A., Paterno M., Bronner S. Reliability and Validity of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) in Adolescent Dancers; Proceedings of the APTA Combined Sections Meeting; New Orleans, LA, USA. 21–24 February 2018.
    1. Ware J.E., Jr., Snow K.K., Kosinski M., Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; Boston, MA, USA: 1993.
    1. Valovich-McLeod T.C., Bay R.C., Parsons J.T., Sauers E.L., Snyder A.R. Recent injury and health-related quality of life in adolescent athletes. J. Athl. Train. 2009;44:603–610. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.6.603.
    1. Alonso J., Prieto L., Anto J.M. The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): An instrument for measuring clinical results. Med. Clin. 1995;104:771–776.
    1. Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Guillemin F., Ferraz M.B. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
    1. Wild D., Grove A., Martin M., Eremenco S., McElroy S., Verjee-Lorenz A., Erikson P. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.
    1. Sperber A.D. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(Suppl. 1):S124–S128. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016.
    1. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., Lang A.G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods. 2009;41:1149–1160. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
    1. Suhr D.D. Principal component analysis vs. exploratory factor analysis; Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual SAS® Users Group International Conference (SUGI 30); Philadelphia, PA, USA. 10–13 April 2005.
    1. Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J. Biomed. Inform. 2014;48:193–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013.
    1. Munro B.H. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. 3rd ed. JB Lippincott; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1997.
    1. Domholdt E. Physical Therapy Research: Principles and Applications. W. B. Saunders Company; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2000.
    1. Fowler J., Jarvis P., Chevannes M. Practical Statistics for Nursing and Health Care. John Wiley & Sons; West Sussex, UK: 2002.
    1. Naal F.D., Impellizzeri F.M., Von Eisenhart-Rothe R., Mannion A.F., Leunig M. Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of the hip outcome score in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Arthr. Care Res. 2012;64:1770–1775. doi: 10.1002/acr.21746.
    1. Kane R.L. Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. Aspen; Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 1997.
    1. Terwee C.B., Bot S.D., De Boer M.R., Vvan der Windt D.A., Knol D.L., Dekker J., Bouer L.M., De Vet H.C. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
    1. Yong A.G., Pearce S. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials Quant. Methods Psychol. 2013;9:79–94. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079.
    1. Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Patrick D.L., Alonso J., Stratford P.W., Knol D.L., Bouter L.M., De Vet H.C. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
    1. De Knikker R., El Hadouchi M., Velthuis M., Wittink H. The Dutch version of the Victoria Institute of Sports Assessment—Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in Dutch patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Nederlands Tijdschr. Fysiother. 2008;118:34–41.
    1. Hernandez-Sanchez S., Poveda-Pagan E.J., Alakhdar-Mohmara Y., Hidalgo M.D., Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C., Arias-Buria J.L. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire for spanish athletes with achilles tendinopathy. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2018;48:111–120. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7402.
    1. Martin R.L., Irrgang J.J., Burdett R.G., Conti S.F., Van Swearingen J.M. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:968–983. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601113.
    1. Binkley J.M., Stratford P.W., Lott S.A., Riddle D.L. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys. Ther. 1999;79:371–383.
    1. Martin R.L., Kelly B.T., Philippon M.J. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:1304–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.027.
    1. Marx R.G., Jones E.C., Allen A.A., Altchek D.W., O’Brien S.J., Rodeo S.A., Williams R.J., Warren R.F., Wickiewicz T.L. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2001;83:1459–1469. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200110000-00001.
    1. Stratford P.W., Binkley F.M., Riddle D.L. Health status measures: Strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys. Ther. 1996;76:1109–1123. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.10.1109.
    1. Mandrekar J.N. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010;5:1315–1316. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d.
    1. Williams V.J., Piva S.R., Irrgang J.J., Crossley C., Fitzgerald G.K. Comparison of reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported clinical outcome measures in knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2012;42:716–723. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4038.
    1. Yeung T.S., Wessel J., Stratford P., Macdermid J. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the lower extremity functional scale for inpatients of an orthopaedic rehabilitation ward. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2009;39:468–477. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2971.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi