Best practices in scaling digital health in low and middle income countries

Alain B Labrique, Christina Wadhwani, Koku Awoonor Williams, Peter Lamptey, Cees Hesp, Rowena Luk, Ann Aerts, Alain B Labrique, Christina Wadhwani, Koku Awoonor Williams, Peter Lamptey, Cees Hesp, Rowena Luk, Ann Aerts

Abstract

Healthcare challenges in low and middle income countries (LMICs) have been the focus of many digital initiatives that have aimed to improve both access to healthcare and the quality of healthcare delivery. Moving beyond the initial phase of piloting and experimentation, these initiatives are now more clearly focused on the need for effective scaling and integration to provide sustainable benefit to healthcare systems.Based on real-life case studies of scaling digital health in LMICs, five key focus areas have been identified as being critical for success. Firstly, the intrinsic characteristics of the programme or initiative must offer tangible benefits to address an unmet need, with end-user input from the outset. Secondly, all stakeholders must be engaged, trained and motivated to implement a new initiative, and thirdly, the technical profile of the initiative should be driven by simplicity, interoperability and adaptability. The fourth focus area is the policy environment in which the digital healthcare initiative is intended to function, where alignment with broader healthcare policy is essential, as is sustainable funding that will support long-term growth, including private sector funding where appropriate. Finally, the extrinsic ecosystem should be considered, including the presence of the appropriate infrastructure to support the use of digital initiatives at scale.At the global level, collaborative efforts towards a less-siloed approach to scaling and integrating digital health may provide the necessary leadership to enable innovative solutions to reach healthcare workers and patients in LMICs. This review provides insights into best practice for scaling digital health initiatives in LMICs derived from practical experience in real-life case studies, discussing how these may influence the development and implementation of health programmes in the future.

Keywords: Digital health; Health policy; Health system; Intervention; Programme sustainability; low and middle income countries; mHealth.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This review paper did not involve collection of data from individuals.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to publication.

Competing interests

Christina Wadhwani and Ann Aerts are employees of the Novartis Foundation.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual model of the MAPS Toolkit to measure digital health project maturity across six axes [2]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Practical considerations for scaling digital health initiatives in LMICs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Working groups of the Health Data Collaborative (2016) [34]

References

    1. Wilson K, Gertz B, Arenth B, Salisbury N. The Journey to Scale: Moving Together past Digital Health Pilots. Path. 2014:1–47.
    1. WHO. The MAPS toolkit: mHealth Assessment and Planning for Scale; 2015. p. 106. .
    1. Principles for digital Development 2014. . Accessed 17 Oct 2017.
    1. Novartis Foundation . Telemedicine Project in Ghana Healthcare. 2010.
    1. CommCare . Introducing CommCare Solutions. 2017. pp. 1–3.
    1. King C, Hall J, Banda M, Beard J, Bird J, Kazembe P, et al. Electronic data capture in a rural African setting: Evaluating experiences with different systems in Malawi. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:1–6. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.25878.
    1. Surka Sam, Edirippulige Sisira, Steyn Krisela, Gaziano Thomas, Puoane Thandi, Levitt Naomi. Evaluating the use of mobile phone technology to enhance cardiovascular disease screening by community health workers. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2014;83(9):648–654. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.008.
    1. Smart Register. THRIVE Bangladesh: Health Focus and Application Use. 2017;:2017. . Accessed 19 Oct 2017.
    1. El Arifeen S, Christou A, Reichenbach L, Osman FA, Azad K, Islam KS, et al. Community-based approaches and partnerships: Innovations in health-service delivery in Bangladesh. Lancet. 2013;382:2012–2026. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62149-2.
    1. FHI 360. Community-based Hypertension Improvement Project (ComHIP). 2016;:1–2. . Accessed 19 Oct 2017.
    1. Lamptey P, Laar A, Adler AJ, Dirks R, Caldwell A, Prieto-Merino D, et al. Evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (ComHIP) in Ghana: data from a baseline survey. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:368. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4260-5.
    1. M-TIBA. What is M-TIBA? 2017;:6–11. . Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
    1. Agarwal S, Rosenblum L, Goldschmidt T, Carras M, Goal N, Labrique AB. Mobile Technology in Support of Frontline Health Workers. John Hopkins Univ Glob mHealth Initiat 2016. 2016;:86.
    1. World Health Organization. mDiabetes , an innovative programme to improve the health of people with diabetes in Senegal. 2017. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
    1. BBC Mobile Action. How does the Mobile Kunji audio visual job aid support engagement between front line health workers and their beneficiaries in Bihar, India? 2015. .
    1. Huang F, Blaschke S, Lucas H. Beyond pilotitis: taking digital health interventions to the national level in China and Uganda. Glob Health. 2017;13:49. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0275-z.
    1. Columbia International eHealth Laboratory. CIEL / MVP Concept Dictionary. 2017;:2017. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
    1. OpenHIE. Working to Help Underserved Environments Better Leverage Their Healthcare Data. 2017;:1–7. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
    1. Smart Register. About OpenSRP. 2017;:2017. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
    1. OpenMRS. About OpenMRS. 2017;:1–5. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
    1. OpenDataKit. About OpenDataKit. 2013;:1–2. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
    1. Flaming A, Canty M, Javetski G, Lesh N. The CommCare Evidence Base for Frontline Workers. 2015.
    1. Baylies Carolyn. The meaning of health in Africa. Review of African Political Economy. 1986;13(36):62–73. doi: 10.1080/03056248608703687.
    1. Department of Health R of SA. MomConnect. 2017;:1–2. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
    1. USAID. Use of technology in the Ebola response in West Africa 2014. .
    1. IntraHealth International. The mHero story. 2017;:10–2. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
    1. PATH. The journey to better data for better health in Tanzania. .
    1. Dimagi. Managing Devices at Scale: Key learnings from managing thousands of devices in a large-scale mobile health project. .
    1. World Health Organization, International Telecommunication Union. National eHealth Strategy Toolkit. World Heal Assem Resolut ITU World Telecom Dev Conf Resolut. 2012;:1–2. doi:978 92 4 154846 5.
    1. Health Data Collaborative. Health Data Collaborative: Better Data, Better Health 2017;:1–4. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
    1. Health Data Collaborative. Health Data Collaborative: Operational Workplan 2016-2017. 2017. .
    1. Digital Impact Alliance (DIAL). What we do. 2017. . Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
    1. PATH . Digital Square: New global initiative will connect the world for better health through digital technology. 2017. pp. 1–7.
    1. Health Data Collaborative. Health Data Collaborative: Data for Health and Sustain Dev. 2017. .
    1. Broadband Commission for Sustain Development Digital Health: A Call for Government Leadership and Cooperation between ICT and Health. 2017. . Accessed Aug 2018.
    1. Moore GE. Moore’s law. 2007;:1–15. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi