Magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: 5-year follow-up results

G Rees Cosgrove, Nir Lipsman, Andres M Lozano, Jin Woo Chang, Casey Halpern, Pejman Ghanouni, Howard Eisenberg, Paul Fishman, Takaomi Taira, Michael L Schwartz, Nathan McDannold, Michael Hayes, Susie Ro, Binit Shah, Ryder Gwinn, Veronica E Santini, Kullervo Hynynen, W Jeff Elias, G Rees Cosgrove, Nir Lipsman, Andres M Lozano, Jin Woo Chang, Casey Halpern, Pejman Ghanouni, Howard Eisenberg, Paul Fishman, Takaomi Taira, Michael L Schwartz, Nathan McDannold, Michael Hayes, Susie Ro, Binit Shah, Ryder Gwinn, Veronica E Santini, Kullervo Hynynen, W Jeff Elias

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate, at 4 and 5 years posttreatment, the long-term safety and efficacy of unilateral MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy for medication-refractory essential tremor in a cohort of patients from a prospective, controlled, multicenter clinical trial.

Methods: Outcomes per the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST), including postural tremor scores (CRST Part A), combined hand tremor/motor scores (CRST Parts A and B), and functional disability scores (CRST Part C), were measured by a qualified neurologist. The Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) was used to assess quality of life. CRST and QUEST scores at 48 and 60 months post-MRgFUS were compared to those at baseline to assess treatment efficacy and durability. All adverse events (AEs) were reported.

Results: Forty-five and 40 patients completed the 4- and 5-year follow-ups, respectively. CRST scores for postural tremor (Part A) for the treated hand remained significantly improved by 73.3% and 73.1% from baseline at both 48 and 60 months posttreatment, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Combined hand tremor/motor scores (Parts A and B) also improved by 49.5% and 40.4% (p < 0.0001) at each respective time point. Functional disability scores (Part C) increased slightly over time but remained significantly improved through the 5 years (p < 0.0001). Similarly, QUEST scores remained significantly improved from baseline at year 4 (p < 0.0001) and year 5 (p < 0.0003). All previously reported AEs remained mild or moderate, and no new AEs were reported.

Conclusions: Unilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy demonstrates sustained and significant tremor improvement at 5 years with an overall improvement in quality-of-life measures and without any progressive or delayed complications. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01827904 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Keywords: MRI; essential tremor; focused ultrasound; functional neurosurgery; thalamotomy.

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Cosgrove, Ghanouni, Eisenberg, and Santini received clinical or research support from InSightec for the study described. Dr. Lozano is a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Insightec and the scientific director for Functional Neuromodulation. Dr. Ghanouni is a consultant for InSightec and SonALASense. Dr. Taira is a consultant for and receives honoraria from InSightec Japan. Dr. Santini receives support from Biogen and Genentech for non–study-related clinical or research effort and receives honoraria from the American Academy of Neurology and International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Dr. Hynynen receives royalties from InSightec. Dr. Elias is a consultant for InSightec.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
A: Observed change in CRST Part A (postural tremor) scores from baseline (BL) at the annual follow-up, calculated by separate t-tests per visit. Boxes indicate medians with interquartile ranges; whiskers, ranges; and plus signs, means. The mean score values (standard deviations) are noted in blue type. B: Mean observed change in CRST Part A (postural tremor) scores from baseline at the annual follow-up. Mo = month. Figure is available in color online only.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
A: Observed change in CRST Parts A and B (tremor/motor) scores from baseline at the annual follow-up, calculated by separate t-tests per visit. Boxes indicate medians with interquartile ranges; whiskers, ranges; and plus signs, means. The mean score values (standard deviations) are noted in blue type. B: Mean observed change in CRST Parts A and B (tremor/motor) scores from baseline at the annual follow-up. Figure is available in color online only.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
A: Observed change in CRST Part C (disability) scores from baseline at the annual follow-up, calculated by separate t-tests per visit. Boxes indicate medians with interquartile ranges; whiskers, ranges; and plus signs, means. The mean score values (standard deviations) are noted in blue type. B: Mean observed change in CRST Part C (disability) scores from baseline at the annual follow-up. Figure is available in color online only.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Observed change in total QUEST scores from baseline at the annual follow-up, calculated by separate t-tests per visit. Boxes indicate medians with interquartile ranges; whiskers, ranges; and plus signs, means. The mean score values (standard deviations) are noted in blue type. Figure is available in color online only.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Observed change in QUEST dimension subscores from baseline at the annual follow-up, calculated by separate t-tests per visit. Boxes indicate medians with interquartile ranges; whiskers, ranges; and plus signs, means. The mean score values (standard deviations) are noted in blue type. Graphs are shown only for the significant dimension outcomes. Figure is available in color online only.

References

    1. Elias WJ, Huss D, Voss T, et al. A pilot study of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(7):640–648.
    1. Elias WJ, Lipsman N, Ondo WG, et al. A randomized trial of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):730–739.
    1. Halpern CH, Santini V, Lipsman N, et al. Three-year follow-up of prospective trial of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. Neurology. 2019;93(24):e2284–e2293.
    1. Chang JW, Park CK, Lipsman N, et al. A prospective trial of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: results at the 2-year follow-up. Ann Neurol. 2018;83(1):107–114.
    1. Tröster AI, Pahwa R, Fields JA, Tanner CM, Lyons KE. Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST): development and initial validation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005;11(6):367–373.
    1. Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, et al. Long-term evaluation of deep brain stimulation of the thalamus. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(4):506–512.
    1. Zhang K, Bhatia S, Oh MY, Cohen D, Angle C, Whiting D. Long-term results of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(6):1271–1276.
    1. Krishna V, Sammartino F, Cosgrove R, et al. Predictors of outcomes after focused ultrasound thalamotomy. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(2):229–237.
    1. Paschen S, Forstenpointner J, Becktepe J, et al. Long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: An observer-blinded study. Neurology. 2019;92(12):e1378–e1386.
    1. Harary M, Segar DJ, Hayes MT, Cosgrove GR. Vol. 126. World Neurosurg.; 2019. Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation versus focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor; pp. e144–e152.
    1. Giordano M, Caccavella VM, Zaed I, et al. Comparison between deep brain stimulation and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of essential tremor: a systematic review and pooled analysis of functional outcomes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91(12):1270–1278.
    1. Martínez-Fernández R, Mahendran S, Pineda-Pardo JA, et al. Bilateral staged magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for the treatment of essential tremor: a case series study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92(9):927–931.
    1. Iorio-Morin C, Yamamoto K, Sarica C, et al. Bilateral focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor (BEST-FUS Phase 2 Trial) Mov Disord. 2021;36(11):2653–2662.
    1. Iorio-Morin C, Hodaie M, Lozano AM. Adoption of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: why so much fuss about FUS? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92(5):549–554.
    1. Fahn S, Tolosa E, Marin C. Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: Jankovic J, Tolosa E, editors. Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders. 1993. pp. 271–280. Williams & Wilkins.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi