Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques

Eelco Wassenaar, Ernst Schoenmaeckers, Johan Raymakers, Job van der Palen, Srdjan Rakic, Eelco Wassenaar, Ernst Schoenmaeckers, Johan Raymakers, Job van der Palen, Srdjan Rakic

Abstract

Background: Persistent, activity-limiting pain after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) appears to be related to fixation of the implanted mesh. A randomized study comparing commonly used fixation techniques with respect to postoperative pain and quality of life has not previously been reported.

Methods: A total of 199 patients undergoing non-urgent LVIHR in our unit between August 2005 and July 2008 were randomly assigned to one of three mesh-fixation groups: absorbable sutures (AS) with tacks; double crown (DC), which involved two circles of tacks and no sutures; and nonabsorbable sutures (NS) with tacks. All operations were performed by one of two experienced surgeons, who used a standardized technique and the same type of mesh and mesh-fixation materials. The severity of the patients' pain was assessed preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively by using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated by administering a standard health survey before and 3 months after surgery. Results in the three groups were compared.

Results: The AS, DC, and NS mesh-fixation groups had similar patient demographic, hernia and operative characteristics. There were no significant differences among the groups in VAS scores at any assessment time or in the change in VAS score from preoperative to postoperative evaluations. The QoL survey data showed a significant difference among groups for only two of the eight health areas analyzed.

Conclusion: In this trial, the three mesh-fixation methods were associated with similar postoperative pain and QoL findings. These results suggest that none of the techniques can be considered to have a pain-reduction advantage over the others. Development of new methods for securing the mesh may be required to decrease the rate or severity of pain after LVIHR.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00537927.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of participants’ progress through the randomized study comparing three methods of mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair. Values in parentheses are numbers of patients. AS absorbable sutures, DC double-crown method, NS nonabsorbable sutures, MI myocardial infarction

References

    1. Rudmik LR, Schieman C, Dixon E, Debru E. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a review of the literature. Hernia. 2006;10:110–119. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0066-6.
    1. Sajid MS, Bokhari SA, Mallick AS, Cheek E, Baig MK. Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2008;197:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.051.
    1. Pham CT, Perera CL, Watkin DS, Maddern GJ. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:4–15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0182-8.
    1. Franklin ME, Jr, Gonzalez JJ, Jr, Glass JL, Manjarrez A. Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an 11-year experience. Hernia. 2004;8:23–27. doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0163-8.
    1. Wassenaar EB, Schoenmaeckers EJ, Raymakers JT, Rakic S. Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505 repairs. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:825–832. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0146-z.
    1. Costanza MJ, Heniford BT, Arca MJ, Mayes JT, Gagner M. Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernias. Am Surg. 1998;64:1121–1127.
    1. Samuel K, Miller SK, Carey SD, Rodriguez FJ, Smoot RT., Jr . Complications and their management. In: LeBlanc KA, editor. Laparoscopic hernia surgery: an operative guide. London: Arnold; 2003. pp. 161–169.
    1. Eriksen JR, Poornoroozy P, Jørgensen LN, Jacobsen B, Friis-Andersen HU, Rosenberg J. Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2009;13:13–21. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0414-9.
    1. Carbonell AM, Harold KL, Mahmutovic AJ, Hassan R, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Local injection for the treatment of suture site pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Am Surg. 2003;69:688–692.
    1. Bageacu S, Blanc P, Breton C, Gonzales M, Porcheron J, Chabert M, Balique JG. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia: a retrospective study of 159 patients. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:345–348. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-0018-2.
    1. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G. Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg. 2003;238:391–400.
    1. Carbajo MA, Martp del Olmo JC, Blanco JI, Toledano M, de la Cuesta C, Ferreras C, Vaquero C. Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:118–122. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9079-0.
    1. LeBlanc KA. Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: complications—how to avoid and handle. Hernia. 2004;8:323–331. doi: 10.1007/s10029-004-0250-5.
    1. Wassenaar EB, Raymakers JT, Rakic S. Removal of transabdominal sutures for chronic pain after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:514–516. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181462b9e.
    1. Morales-Conde S, Cadet H, Cano H, Bustos M, Martín J, Morales-Mendez S. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without sutures—double crown technique: our experience after 140 cases with a mean follow-up of 40 months. Int Surg. 2005;90(3 Suppl):S56–S62.
    1. Hasson HM. Open laparoscopy. Biomed Bull. 1984;5:1–6.
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. LeBlanc KA. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: are transfascial sutures necessary? A review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:508–513. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9032-8.
    1. Nguyen SQ, Divino CM, Buch KE, Schnur J, Weber KJ, Katz LB, Reiner MA, Aldoroty RA, Herron DM. Postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective comparison of sutures versus tacks. JSLS. 2008;12:113–116.
    1. Wassenaar EB, Raymakers JT, Rakic S. Impact of the mesh fixation technique on operation time in laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias. Hernia. 2008;12:23–25. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0269-5.
    1. Paajanen H. Do absorbable mesh sutures cause less chronic pain than nonabsorbable sutures after Lichtenstein inguinal herniorrhaphy? Hernia. 2002;6:26–28. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0048-2.
    1. Chelala E, Thoma M, Tatete B, Lemye AC, Dessily M, Alle JL. The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: mid-term analysis of 400 cases. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:391–395. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9014-x.
    1. Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Croce E. Use of fibrin glue (Tissucol) in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:409–413. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9108-5.
    1. Eriksen JR, Bech JI, Linnemann D, Rosenberg J. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (Tisseel) vs. titanium tacks: a randomised controlled experimental study in pigs. Hernia. 2008;12:483–491. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0375-z.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi