A survey of healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain relief in labor for women in Ethiopia

Mary McCauley, Catriona Stewart, Birhanu Kebede, Mary McCauley, Catriona Stewart, Birhanu Kebede

Abstract

Background: To explore healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes to the need for pain relief for women in labor.

Methods: A structured questionnaire (n = 200) distributed to healthcare providers working in the obstetric departments, including theatres, of three public hospitals in different settings (rural, peri-urban and urban) in Ethiopia. Descriptive analysis was performed using Excel 2013 and SPSS version 22 for associations.

Results: The response rate was 81.5% with 164 questionnaires completed. The majority, 79% of respondents, understood that women can feel moderate to severe pain in labor and 77% were of the opinion that labor pain should be relieved. However, common practices included only supportive measures such as breathing and relaxation exercises, back massage and support from family. The general attitude of healthcare providers is that labor is a natural process, women should be able to cope and that pain relief is not a priority for women in labor. More than half, 52% of healthcare providers had safety concerns with using pharmacological methods to relieve pain in labor.

Conclusion: The majority of healthcare providers understand that women suffer significant pain during labor. However, providing effective pain relief is currently not provided as part of routine intra-partum care in Ethiopia.

Keywords: Awareness; Ethiopia; Healthcare providers; Labor; Pain relief.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Questions regarding knowledge and attitudes regarding the use of pain relief in labor

References

    1. National Institute for Health Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth (CG190). London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. . Published 2014. Accessed 1 June 2015.
    1. World Health Organization. Promoting Effective Perinatal Care. Essential Antenatal, Perinatal and Postpartum Care. . Published 2002. Accessed 1 June 2015.
    1. Olayemi O, Aimakhu CO, Udoh ES. Attitudes of patients to obstetric analgesia at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23(1):38–40. doi: 10.1080/0144361021000043209.
    1. Olayemi O, Aimakhu CO, Akinyemi OA. The influence of westernisation on pain perception in labour among parturients at the University College Hospital, Ibadan. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26(4):329–331. doi: 10.1080/01443610600595028.
    1. World Health Organization . Ethopia statistics. 2015.
    1. World Health Organization . World Health Statistics 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
    1. Roro MA, Hassen EM, Lemma AM, Gebreyesus SH, Afework MF. Why do women not deliver in health facilities: a qualitative study of the community perspectives in south central Ethiopia? BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):556. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-556.
    1. Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):S160–S172.
    1. James JN, Prakash KS, Ponniah M. Awareness and attitudes towards labour pain and labour pain relief of urban women attending a private antenatal clinic in Chennai, India. Indian J Anaesth. 2012;56(2):195–198. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.96331.
    1. Vargas-Schaffer G. Is the WHO analgesic ladder still valid? Twenty-four years of experience. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(6):514–517.
    1. Taneja B, Nath K, Dua C. Clinical audit on the existing attitudes and knowledge of obstetricians regarding labour analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2004;48(3):185–188.
    1. Ogboli-Nwasor EO, Adaji SE. Between pain and pleasure: pregnant women’s knowledge and preferences for pain relief in labor, a pilot study from Zaria, Northern Nigeria. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014;8(5):S20–S24. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.144059.
    1. Hug I, Chattopadhyay C, Mitra GR, Kar Mahapatra RM, Schneider MC. Maternal expectations and birth-related experiences: a survey of pregnant women of mixed parity from Calcutta, India. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008;17(2):112–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.10.004.
    1. Mugambe JM, Nel M, Hiemstra LA, Steinberg WJ. Knowledge of and attitude towards pain relief during labour of women attending the antenatal clinic of Cecilia Makiwane Hospital, South Africa: original research. S Afr Fam Pract. 2007;49(4):16. doi: 10.1080/20786204.2007.10873535.
    1. Nabukenya MT, Kintu A, Wabule A, Muyingo MT, Kwizera A. Knowledge, attitudes and use of labour analgesia among women at a low-income country antenatal clinic. BMC Anesth. 2015;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0078-9.
    1. Okeke CI, Merah NA, Cole SU, Osibogun A. Knowledge and perception of obstetric analgesia among prospective parturients at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2005;12(4):258–261.
    1. Tunçalp O, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gülmezoglu AM, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1045–1049. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13451.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi