Phase 1 randomized trial of a plant-derived virus-like particle vaccine for COVID-19

Brian J Ward, Philipe Gobeil, Annie Séguin, Judith Atkins, Iohann Boulay, Pierre-Yves Charbonneau, Manon Couture, Marc-André D'Aoust, Jiwanjeet Dhaliwall, Carolyn Finkle, Karen Hager, Asif Mahmood, Alexander Makarkov, Matthew P Cheng, Stéphane Pillet, Patricia Schimke, Sylvie St-Martin, Sonia Trépanier, Nathalie Landry, Brian J Ward, Philipe Gobeil, Annie Séguin, Judith Atkins, Iohann Boulay, Pierre-Yves Charbonneau, Manon Couture, Marc-André D'Aoust, Jiwanjeet Dhaliwall, Carolyn Finkle, Karen Hager, Asif Mahmood, Alexander Makarkov, Matthew P Cheng, Stéphane Pillet, Patricia Schimke, Sylvie St-Martin, Sonia Trépanier, Nathalie Landry

Abstract

Several severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are being deployed, but the global need greatly exceeds the supply, and different formulations might be required for specific populations. Here we report Day 42 interim safety and immunogenicity data from an observer-blinded, dose escalation, randomized controlled study of a virus-like particle vaccine candidate produced in plants that displays the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (CoVLP: NCT04450004 ). The co-primary outcomes were the short-term tolerability/safety and immunogenicity of CoVLP formulations assessed by neutralizing antibody (NAb) and cellular responses. Secondary outcomes in this ongoing study include safety and immunogenicity assessments up to 12 months after vaccination. Adults (18-55 years, n = 180) were randomized at two sites in Quebec, Canada, to receive two intramuscular doses of CoVLP (3.75 μg, 7.5 μg, and 15 μg) 21 d apart, alone or adjuvanted with AS03 or CpG1018. All formulations were well tolerated, and adverse events after vaccination were generally mild to moderate, transient and highest in the adjuvanted groups. There was no CoVLP dose effect on serum NAbs, but titers increased significantly with both adjuvants. After the second dose, NAbs in the CoVLP + AS03 groups were more than tenfold higher than titers in Coronavirus 2019 convalescent sera. Both spike protein-specific interferon-γ and interleukin-4 cellular responses were also induced. This pre-specified interim analysis supports further evaluation of the CoVLP vaccine candidate.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors except M.P.C. either are employees of Medicago or receive salary support from Medicago (B.J.W.).

Figures

Fig. 1. Trial profile—participant disposition.
Fig. 1. Trial profile—participant disposition.
Enrollment and follow-up of study participants vaccinated with 3.75 µg, 7.5 µg or 15 µg CoVLP with or without AS03 or CpG1018 adjuvant after the first and second dose administration. One participant in the 3.75 µg + AS03 treatment group did not receive the second vaccination as per protocol owing to a grade 3 AE (fatigue) after the first dose but agreed to have blood collection for immunogenicity. One participant in the 15 µg + CpG1018 treatment group withdrew consent before the second vaccination and consequently did not have blood collection at Day 21 and Day 42. Both participants were excluded from the per-protocol set. For more details of participant disposition, see Table 1. PP, per-protocol.
Fig. 2. Solicited local and systemic AEs…
Fig. 2. Solicited local and systemic AEs 7 d after the first or second vaccine dose.
Participants were monitored for solicited local (a) and systemic (b) AEs from the time of vaccination through 7 d after vaccine administration. There was no grade 4 (potentially life-threatening) event. Participants who reported no AEs make up the remainder of the 100% calculation (data not shown). If any of the solicited AEs persisted beyond Day 7 after each vaccination (when applicable), it was recorded as an unsolicited AE. Fever was defined as oral temperature ≥38.0 °C.
Fig. 3. Humoral response to CoVLP alone…
Fig. 3. Humoral response to CoVLP alone or with adjuvants.
Serum antibodies of participants vaccinated with 3.75 µg, 7.5 µg or 15 µg CoVLP with or without AS03 or CpG1018 adjuvant were measured to S protein by ELISA (a) and in neutralization assays based on a VSV pseudovirus (b) or live virus (c) and presented here as reciprocal titers. Inverted green triangles are used for unadjuvanted CoVLP groups; upright red triangles are used for the CoVLP + AS03 groups; and blue squares are used for the CoVLP + CpG1018 groups. Convalescent sera or plasma were collected at least 14 d after a positive diagnosis of COVID-19 (RT–PCR) from individuals whose illness was classified as mild, moderate or severe/critical (n = 35). These samples were analyzed in the anti-S ELISA and both neutralization assays; results (right panels). Horizontal bars and numbers in the figure indicate geometric means. Error bars indicate 95% CIs. Significant differences among Days 0 and 21 or Days 0 and 42 for each formulation are indicated by a hashtag (#P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, ####P < 0.0001; paired two-sided t-test of log-transformed values, GraphPad Prism v8.1.1). Significant differences between unadjuvanted and adjuvanted regimens for Days 21 and 42 are indicated by an asterisk (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA of log-transformed values, GraphPad Prism v8.1.1). The PsVNA50 is reciprocal of the serum dilution at which a decrease in luminescence ≥50% was observed in the PNA. The PRNT50 is the reciprocal serum dilution at which ≥50% of the cells were free from infection in the MNA.
Fig. 4. Cellular immune response to CoVLP…
Fig. 4. Cellular immune response to CoVLP alone or with adjuvants.
Frequencies of S protein-specific production of IFN-γ (a) or IL-4 (b) at baseline (Day 0) and 21 d after the first (Day 21) or second (Day 42) vaccine dose with 3.75-µg, 7.5-µg or 15-µg doses of CoVLP with or without adjuvants (CpG1018 and AS03). PBMCs were stimulated ex vivo with a peptide pool covering the entire S protein (15-mers with 11-amino acid overlap). Bars and numbers in the figure indicate group medians, and error bars indicate 95% CI. The median pre-vaccination values in both assays across all groups was 0. Significant differences between Day 0 and Day 21 or between Day 0 and Day 42 for each vaccine regimen are indicated by a hashtag (#P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, ####P < 0.0001; unpaired two-sided t-test; the figure illustrates matched subject data, GraphPad Prism v8.1.1). Significant differences among adjuvanted vaccine and unadjuvanted vaccine regimens at Day 21 and Day 42 are indicated by an asterisk (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis test, GraphPad Prism v8.1.1). SPC, spot-forming cell.

References

    1. Zhou P, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard.
    1. Wang M, et al. Evaluation of current medical approaches for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat. Care. 2021;11:45–52.
    1. Attaway AH, Scheraga RG, Bhimraj A, Biehl M, Hatipoğlu U. Severe covid-19 pneumonia: pathogenesis and clinical management. BMJ. 2021;372:n436.
    1. de Wit E, van Doremalen N, Falzarano D, Munster VJ. SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:523–534.
    1. Burki T. CEPI: preparing for the worst. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017;17:265–266.
    1. Funk, C. D., Laferriere, C. & Ardakani, A. Target product profile analysis of COVID-19 vaccines in phase III clinical trials and beyond: an early 2021 perspective. Viruses13, 418 (2021).
    1. Koch T, Mellinghoff SC, Shamsrizi P, Addo MM, Dahlke C. Correlates of vaccine-induced protection against SARS-CoV-2. Vaccines. 2021;9:238.
    1. Sui, Y., Bekele, Y. & Berzofsky, J. A. Potential SARS-CoV-2 immune correlates of protection in infection and vaccine immunization. Pathogens10, 138 (2021).
    1. Dagotto G, Yu J, Barouch DH. Approaches and challenges in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:364–370.
    1. Sariol A, Perlman S. Lessons for COVID-19 immunity from other coronavirus infections. Immunity. 2020;53:248–263.
    1. Sette A, Crotty S. Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Cell. 2021;184:861–880.
    1. Huang AT, et al. A systematic review of antibody mediated immunity to coronaviruses: kinetics, correlates of protection, and association with severity. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4704.
    1. McMahan K, et al. Correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Nature. 2021;590:630–634.
    1. Simonovich VA, et al. A randomized trial of convalescent plasma in Covid-19 severe pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:619–629.
    1. Bloch EM, et al. Deployment of convalescent plasma for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:2757–2765.
    1. Iyer, A. S. et al. Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patients. Sci. Immunol.5, eabe0367 (2020).
    1. Dan JM, et al. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection. Science. 2021;371:eabf4063.
    1. Legros V, et al. A longitudinal study of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients reveals a high correlation between neutralizing antibodies and COVID-19 severity. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2021;18:318–327.
    1. Marot S, et al. Rapid decline of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among infected healthcare workers. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:844.
    1. Lau EHY, et al. Neutralizing antibody titres in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:63.
    1. Tang F, et al. Lack of peripheral memory B cell responses in recovered patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a six-year follow-up study. J. Immunol. 2011;186:7264–7268.
    1. Zuo J. et al. Robust SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity is maintained at 6 months following primary infection. Nat. Immunol. 10.1038/s41590-021-00902-8 (2021).
    1. Ng OW, et al. Memory T cell responses targeting the SARS coronavirus persist up to 11 years post-infection. Vaccine. 2016;34:2008–2014.
    1. Channappanavar R, Fett C, Zhao J, Meyerholz DK, Perlman S. Virus-specific memory CD8 T cells provide substantial protection from lethal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J. Virol. 2014;88:11034–11044.
    1. Brisse M, Vrba SM, Kirk N, Liang Y, Ly H. Emerging concepts and technologies in vaccine development. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:583077.
    1. D’Aoust MA, et al. The production of hemagglutinin-based virus-like particles in plants: a rapid, efficient and safe response to pandemic influenza. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010;8:607–619.
    1. Hamilton, A., Voinnet, O., Chappell, L. & Baulcombe, D. Two classes of short interfering RNA in RNA silencing. EMBO J. 21, 4671–4679 (2002).
    1. Pillet S, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent plant-derived virus like particle influenza vaccine candidate—two randomized phase II clinical trials in 18 to 49 and ≥50 years old adults. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0216533.
    1. Pillet S, et al. A plant-derived quadrivalent virus like particle influenza vaccine induces cross-reactive antibody and T cell response in healthy adults. Clin. Immunol. 2016;168:72–87.
    1. Landry N, et al. Influenza virus-like particle vaccines made in Nicotiana benthamiana elicit durable, poly-functional and cross-reactive T cell responses to influenza HA antigens. Clin. Immunol. 2014;154:164–177.
    1. Ward, B. J. et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a plant-derived, quadrivalent, virus-like particle influenza vaccine in adults (18–64 years) and older adults (≥65 years): two multicentre, randomised phase 3 trials. Lancet396, 1491–1503 (2020).
    1. Grabowski GA, Golembo M, Shaaltiel Y. Taliglucerase alfa: an enzyme replacement therapy using plant cell expression technology. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2014;112:1–8.
    1. Herbert AS, et al. Development of an antibody cocktail for treatment of Sudan virus infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:3768–3778.
    1. Grifoni A, et al. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell. 2020;181:1489–1501.
    1. Sette A, Crotty S. Pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2: the knowns and unknowns. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:457–458.
    1. Cohet C, et al. Safety of AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccines: a review of the evidence. Vaccine. 2019;37:3006–3021.
    1. HEPLISAV-B. Package insert (Dynavax Technologies, 2018).
    1. Hyer R, McGuire DK, Xing B, Jackson S, Janssen R. Safety of a two-dose investigational hepatitis B vaccine, HBsAg-1018, using a toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant in adults. Vaccine. 2018;36:2604–2611.
    1. Scheiermann J, Klinman DM. Clinical evaluation of CpG oligonucleotides as adjuvants for vaccines targeting infectious diseases and cancer. Vaccine. 2014;32:6377–6389.
    1. Huang X, Yang Y. Targeting the TLR9-MyD88 pathway in the regulation of adaptive immune responses. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2010;14:787–796.
    1. Pandemrix. Package insert (GlaxoSmithKline).
    1. Penn-Nicholson A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of candidate vaccine M72/AS01E in adolescents in a TB endemic setting. Vaccine. 2015;33:4025–4034.
    1. van der Most, R. G. et al. Long-term persistence of cell-mediated and humoral responses to A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus vaccines and the role of the AS03 adjuvant system in adults during two randomized controlled trials. Clin. Vaccine Immunol.24, e00553-16 (2017)
    1. Makarkov AI, et al. Plant-derived virus-like particle vaccines drive cross-presentation of influenza A hemagglutinin peptides by human monocyte-derived macrophages. NPJ Vaccines. 2019;4:17.
    1. Hodgins B, et al. A single intramuscular dose of a plant-made virus-like particle vaccine elicits a balanced humoral and cellular response and protects young and aged mice from influenza H1N1 virus challenge despite a modest/absent humoral response. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2017;24:e00273–17.
    1. Pillet S, et al. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to H5N1 plant-made virus-like particle vaccine are differentially impacted by alum and GLA-SE adjuvants in a phase 2 clinical trial. NPJ Vaccines. 2018;3:3.
    1. Arunachalam P. S. et al Adjuvanting a subunit COVID-19 vaccine to induce protective immunity. Nature10.1038/s41586-021-03530-2 (2021).
    1. Acosta PL, Caballero MT, Polack FP. Brief history and characterization of enhanced respiratory syncytial virus disease. Clin. Vaccin. Immunol. 2015;23:189–195.
    1. Lambert PH, et al. Consensus summary report for CEPI/BC March 12–13, 2020 meeting: assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine. 2020;38:4783–4791.
    1. Crotty S. Follicular helper CD4 T cells (TFH) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011;29:621–663.
    1. Poland GA, Ovsyannikova IG, Crooke SN, Kennedy RB. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development: current status. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020;95:2172–2188.
    1. Gómez-Rial J, Rivero-Calle I, Salas A, Martinón-Torres F. Role of monocytes/macrophages in Covid-19 pathogenesis: implications for therapy. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020;13:2485–2493.
    1. Ward BJ, et al. Human antibody response to N-glycans present on plant-made influenza virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines. Vaccine. 2014;32:6098–6106.
    1. Munoz F. M. et al. Vaccine-associated enhanced disease: case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.055 (2021).
    1. COVAX. Workshop Report: COVAX Clinical Development & Operations and Enabling Sciences SWAT Teams Workshop on Immune correlates, SARS-CoV-2 variants, and ‘mix & match’: how vaccine developer approaches might be impacted by emerging data. (25 February 2021).
    1. Jeyanathan M, et al. Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:615–632.
    1. Willliams, T. & Burgers, W. SARS-CoV-2 evolution and vaccines: cause for concern? Lancet Respir. Med.9, 333–335 (2021).
    1. Wrapp D, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263.
    1. D’Aoust MA, et al. Influenza virus-like particles produced by transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana induce a protective immune response against a lethal viral challenge in mice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2008;6:930–940.
    1. D’Aoust, M. A., Couture, M., Lavoie, P. O. & Vezina, L. P. Virus like particle production in plants. . (2012).
    1. Law, B. & Sturkenboom, M. SPEAC. Safety Platform for Emergency Vaccines. D2.3 Priority List of Adverse Events of Special Interest: COVID-19. Report v1.1. (2020).
    1. Law, B. & Sturkenboom, M. SPEAC. Safety Platform for Emergency Vaccines. D2.3 Priority List of Adverse Events of Special Interest: COVID-19. Report v2.0 (2020).
    1. Hicks, J. et al. Serologic cross-reactivity of SARS-CoV-2 with endemic and seasonal betacoronaviruses. J. Clin. Immunol. 10.1007/s10875-021-00997-6 (2021).
    1. Manenti A, et al. Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies using a CPE-based colorimetric live virus micro-neutralization assay in human serum samples. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:2096–2104.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi