Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group, William G Herrington, Natalie Staplin, Christoph Wanner, Jennifer B Green, Sibylle J Hauske, Jonathan R Emberson, David Preiss, Parminder Judge, Kaitlin J Mayne, Sarah Y A Ng, Emily Sammons, Doreen Zhu, Michael Hill, Will Stevens, Karl Wallendszus, Susanne Brenner, Alfred K Cheung, Zhi-Hong Liu, Jing Li, Lai Seong Hooi, Wen Liu, Takashi Kadowaki, Masaomi Nangaku, Adeera Levin, David Cherney, Aldo P Maggioni, Roberto Pontremoli, Rajat Deo, Shinya Goto, Xavier Rossello, Katherine R Tuttle, Dominik Steubl, Michaela Petrini, Dan Massey, Jens Eilbracht, Martina Brueckmann, Martin J Landray, Colin Baigent, Richard Haynes

Abstract

Background: The effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease who are at risk for disease progression are not well understood. The EMPA-KIDNEY trial was designed to assess the effects of treatment with empagliflozin in a broad range of such patients.

Methods: We enrolled patients with chronic kidney disease who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 20 but less than 45 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area, or who had an eGFR of at least 45 but less than 90 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams) of at least 200. Patients were randomly assigned to receive empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of progression of kidney disease (defined as end-stage kidney disease, a sustained decrease in eGFR to <10 ml per minute per 1.73 m2, a sustained decrease in eGFR of ≥40% from baseline, or death from renal causes) or death from cardiovascular causes.

Results: A total of 6609 patients underwent randomization. During a median of 2.0 years of follow-up, progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 432 of 3304 patients (13.1%) in the empagliflozin group and in 558 of 3305 patients (16.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.82; P<0.001). Results were consistent among patients with or without diabetes and across subgroups defined according to eGFR ranges. The rate of hospitalization from any cause was lower in the empagliflozin group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.95; P = 0.003), but there were no significant between-group differences with respect to the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes (which occurred in 4.0% in the empagliflozin group and 4.6% in the placebo group) or death from any cause (in 4.5% and 5.1%, respectively). The rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions: Among a wide range of patients with chronic kidney disease who were at risk for disease progression, empagliflozin therapy led to a lower risk of progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes than placebo. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and others; EMPA-KIDNEY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03594110; EudraCT number, 2017-002971-24.).

Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The primary outcome of kidney disease progression or death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 432 participants (13.1%) in the empagliflozin group and 558 participants (16.9%) in the placebo group. This represented 42 fewer primary outcomes per 1000 patients treated for 2 years.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The primary outcome of kidney disease progression or death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 432 participants (13.1%) in the empagliflozin group and 558 participants (16.9%) in the placebo group. This represented 42 fewer primary outcomes per 1000 patients treated for 2 years.
Figure 3. Effect of allocation to empagliflozin…
Figure 3. Effect of allocation to empagliflozin on estimated glomerular filtration rate
Shown are forest plots of the hazard ratios for the primary outcome according to key prespecified baseline subgroups (with the diamond representing the overall result). Hazard ratios, confidence intervals, and P values were estimated with the use of Cox proportional-hazards regression models, adjusted for age, sex, prior diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) and region. Tests for heterogeneity or trend in the hazard ratio for subgroups were estimated through the inclusion of relevant interaction terms. Error bars presented are 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Fox CS, Matsushita K, Woodward M, et al. Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;380(9854):1662–73. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61350-6. (In eng)
    1. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic Kidney Disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238–1252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32064-5.
    1. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):861–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011161.
    1. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):851–60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011303. (In eng)
    1. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD. The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(20):1456–62. doi: 10.1056/nejm199311113292004. (In eng)
    1. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, et al. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295–2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744.
    1. Heerspink HJL, Stefansson BV, Correa-Rotter R, et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1436–1446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816.
    1. Bakris GL, Agarwal R, Anker SD, et al. Effect of Finerenone on Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(23):2219–2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2025845.
    1. Pitt B, Filippatos G, Agarwal R, et al. Cardiovascular Events with Finerenone in Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2021 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110956.
    1. Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, et al. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):260–72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60687-X.
    1. Levey AS, Coresh J. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2012;379(9811):165–80.:S0140-6736(11)60178-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60178-5. [pii] (In eng)
    1. Wheeler DC, Stefansson BV, Jongs N, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on major adverse kidney and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease: a prespecified analysis from the DAPA-CKD trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(1):22–31. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30369-7.
    1. Staplin N, Roddick AJ, Emberson J, et al. Net effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibition in different patient groups: a meta-analysis of large placebo-controlled randomized trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;41:101163. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101163.
    1. EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group. Design, recruitment, and baseline characteristics of the EMPA-KIDNEY trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022;37(7):1317–1329. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac040.
    1. Herrington WG, Preiss D, Haynes R, et al. The potential for improving cardio-renal outcomes by sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibition in people with chronic kidney disease: a rationale for the EMPA-KIDNEY study. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11(6):749–761. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfy090.
    1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12. 50/9/604 [pii] (In eng)
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31(1):103–15.
    1. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. British Journal of Cancer. 1976;34(6):585–612.
    1. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. British Journal of Cancer. 1977;35(1):1–39.
    1. Peto R, Peto J. Asymptotically efficient invariant test procedures. J Roy Stat Soc. 1972;135(2):185–207.
    1. Cox DR. Regression Models and Life-Tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34(2):187. In English) (<Go to ISI>>://A1972N572600003)
    1. Rogers JK, Yaroshinsky A, Pocock SJ, Stokar D, Pogoda J. Analysis of recurrent events with an associated informative dropout time: Application of the joint frailty model. Statistics in Medicine. 2016;35(13):2195–2205. doi: 10.1002/sim.6853.
    1. Vonesh EF, Greene T, Schluchter MD. Shared parameter models for the joint analysis of longitudinal data and event times. Statistics in Medicine. 2006;25(1):143–163. doi: 10.1002/sim.2249.
    1. Levey AS, Gansevoort RT, Coresh J, et al. Change in Albuminuria and GFR as End Points for Clinical Trials in Early Stages of CKD: A Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation in Collaboration With the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(1):84–104. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.06.009.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi