Reproductive autonomy and contraceptive use among women in Hanoi, Vietnam

Nghia Nguyen, Jessica Londeree, Linh H Nguyen, Dung H Tran, Maria F Gallo, Nghia Nguyen, Jessica Londeree, Linh H Nguyen, Dung H Tran, Maria F Gallo

Abstract

Objective: Reproductive autonomy (i.e., power to control and decide about contraceptive use, pregnancy and childbearing) could determine a woman's capacity to use contraception. Although the Reproductive Autonomy Scale was developed to quantitatively assess women's reproductive autonomy, it has not been validated in any population outside the United States.

Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional study of reproductive-age, sexually active women in Hanoi, Vietnam, who did not desire pregnancy. We administered a questionnaire containing the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and calculated composite scores of the measure's three subscales: (1) decision-making power, (2) freedom from coercion and (3) communication ability. To assess internal consistency, we calculated Cronbach's alpha score for each subscale. We used logistic regression to evaluate differences in subscale scores between women who did and did not engage in unprotected sex in the past month.

Results: Analysis is based on 500 participants; of these women, 17% (n = 85) engaged in unprotected sex in the past month. Subscales had moderate to high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.65-0.87). Mean subscale scores did not vary between women who did and did not engage in recent unprotected sex. Unprotected sex in the past month was not associated with decision-making power (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.20), freedom from coercion (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.52-1.67) or communication ability (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.92-3.09).

Conclusion: Findings highlight the need to develop and validate a new measure for reproductive autonomy for populations outside the United States or to adapt the existing measure for these contexts.

Keywords: Contraception; Measurement; Reproductive autonomy; Unprotected sex; Vietnam.

© 2019 The Authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Contraceptive method use among women who did not engage in unprotected sex in the past month.

References

    1. Bearak J., Popinchalk A., Alkema L., Sedgh G. Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e380–e389.
    1. Tsui A.O., McDonald-Mosley R., Burke A.E. Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:152–174.
    1. Gipson J.D., Koenig M.A., Hindin M.J. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plan. 2008;39:18–38.
    1. Singh S., Sedgh G., Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Stud Fam Plan. 2010;41:241–250.
    1. Tschann J.M., Adler N.E., Millstein S.G., Gurvey J.E., Ellen J.M. Relative power between sexual partners and condom use among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31:17–25.
    1. Upadhyay U., Dworkin S., Weitz T., Greene Foster D. The development and validation of a reproductive autonomy scale. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45:19–41.
    1. Ketema H., Erulkar A. Married adolescents and family planning in rural Ethiopia: understanding barriers and ppportunities. Afr J Reprod Health. 2018;22:26–34.
    1. Olakunde B.O., Sam-Agudu N.A., Patel T.Y., Hunt A.T., Buffington A.M., Phebus T.D. Uptake of permanent contraception among women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a literature review of barriers and facilitators. Contraception. 2019;99:205–211.
    1. Dansereau E., Schaefer A., Hernández B., Nelson J., Palmisano E., Ríos-Zertuche D. Perceptions of and barriers to family planning services in the poorest regions of Chiapas, Mexico: a qualitative study of men, women, and adolescents. Reprod Health. 2017;14:129.
    1. Bogale B., Wondafrash M., Tilahun T., Girma E. Married women’s decision making power on modern contraceptive use in urban and rural southern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:342.
    1. Schuler S.R., Rottach E., Mukiri P. Gender norms and family planning decision-making in Tanzania: a qualitative study. J Public Health Africa. 2011;2:e25.
    1. Rahnama P., Hidarnia A., Shokravi F.A., Kazemnejad A., Oakley D., Montazeri A. Why Iranian married women use withdrawal instead of oral contraceptives? A qualitative study from Iran. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:289.
    1. Mon M.M., Liabsuetrakul T. Predictors of contraceptive use among married youths and their husbands in a rural area of Myanmar. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012;24:151–160.
    1. Grace K.T., Anderson J.C. Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018;19:371–390.
    1. Miller E., Jordan B., Levenson R., Silverman J.G. Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81:457–459.
    1. Hubacher D., Trussell J. A definition of modern contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2015;92:420–421.
    1. Kamiya Y. Women’s autonomy and reproductive health care utilisation: empirical evidence from Tajikistan. Health Policy. 2011;102:304–313.
    1. Saleem A., Pasha G.R. Women’s reproductive autonomy and barriers to contraceptive use in Pakistan. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13:83–89.
    1. Princewill C.W., De Clercq E., Riecher-Rössler A., Jegede A.S., Wangmo T., Elger B.S. Education and reproductive autonomy: the case of married Nigerian women. Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2017;7:231–244.
    1. Wright R.L., Fawson P.R., Siegel E., Jones T., Stone K. Predictors of reproductive autonomy among a rural university population. Health Soc Work. 2018;43:235–242.
    1. Rahman M. Women’s autonomy and unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant women in Bangladesh. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:1206–1214.
    1. Klingberg-Allvin M., Binh N., Johansson A., Berggren V. One foot wet and one foot dry: transition into motherhood among married adolescent women in rural Vietnam. J Transcult Nurs. 2008;19:338–346.
    1. Vietnam Population and Housing Census . GSO; Hanoi: 2009. Education in Vietnam: an analysis of key indicators; p. 2011.
    1. UNFPA—United Nations Population Fund World population dashboard: Viet Nam. 2019. [Online]. Available.
    1. Committee for Population, Family and Children Vietnam & ORC Macro. Demographic and Health Survey . Committee for Population; Family and Children Vietnam and ORC Macro: 2002. Hanoi and Calverton, MD; p. 2003.
    1. Sedgh G., Henshaw S., Singh S., Ahman E., Shah I.H. Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet. 2007;370:1338–1345.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi