Improving rehabilitation in sarcopenia: a randomized-controlled trial utilizing a muscle-targeted food for special medical purposes

Mariangela Rondanelli, Emanuele Cereda, Catherine Klersy, Milena Anna Faliva, Gabriella Peroni, Mara Nichetti, Clara Gasparri, Giancarlo Iannello, Daniele Spadaccini, Vittoria Infantino, Riccardo Caccialanza, Simone Perna, Mariangela Rondanelli, Emanuele Cereda, Catherine Klersy, Milena Anna Faliva, Gabriella Peroni, Mara Nichetti, Clara Gasparri, Giancarlo Iannello, Daniele Spadaccini, Vittoria Infantino, Riccardo Caccialanza, Simone Perna

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is a disease associated with aging and a negative prognosis. Consensus-based treatment consists in targeting muscle mass and function through physical exercise, optimization of protein intake, and vitamin D supplementation, but evidence is lacking. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a muscle-targeted nutritional support on the outcome of a physical exercise rehabilitation programme.

Methods: In a single-site, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial (NCT03120026; May 2017 to December 2018), old (≥65 years) adults [N = 140 (63% female patients; age, 81 ± 6 years)] without severe cognitive impairment, who were found to have sarcopenia by European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2010 criteria and hospitalized for physical rehabilitation, were randomized to receive until discharge (for at least 4 weeks and up to 8 weeks) a whey protein-based nutritional formula enriched with leucine and vitamin D or an iso-caloric control formula twice daily in addition to a standard hospital diet. The primary endpoint was the change in 4 m gait speed per month. Key secondary endpoints addressed the change in physical performance: chair-stand test, timed up and go test, and short physical performance battery. Other secondary outcomes were the change in functional status, muscle strength and mass, cognitive status, and quality of life. The proportion of patients who improved their rehabilitation intensity profile and overall economic benefits (using length of stay and duration of rehabilitation as surrogate measures) were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 161 patients were screened and 140 were randomized to study interventions. Thirteen patients (experimental, n = 6; placebo, n = 7) discontinued the intervention because they disliked the product and intention-to-treat analyses were based on patients reassessed at discharge [n = 127 (66% female patients; age, 81 ± 6 years)]. Supplementation with the experimental formula (n = 64) resulted in greater increase in mean gait speed {0.061 m/s/month [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.043 to 0.080]} than placebo [n = 63; -0.001 m/s/month (95%CI, -0.008 to 0.006)]: mean difference, 0.063 m/s/month (95%CI, 0.043 to 0.082) (P < 0.001). A significant effect was also found for muscle mass (P < 0.03) and all key secondary outcomes, functional and cognitive endpoints (P < 0.001 for all). Supplementation resulted also in higher proportion of patients improving their rehabilitation intensity profile (P = 0.003) and being discharged home (P = 0.002); shorter rehabilitation (P < 0.001); and hospital stay (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: In old adults with sarcopenia admitted to hospital for rehabilitation the consumption of a whey protein-based nutritional formula enriched with leucine and vitamin D improved physical performance and function, as well as muscle mass, and reduced the intensity and costs of care.

Keywords: Leucine; Nutritional support; Rehabilitation; Sarcopenia; Vitamin D; Whey protein; rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work.

Dr Cereda reports the following conflicts of interest (not for the present study):

  1. Consulting or Advisory Role: Nutricia S. p. A., Akern S.r.l., Wunder Sa.Bi. s.r.l., Fondazione Grigioni per il Morbo di Parkinson.

  2. Speaker's Honoraria: Nutricia S. p. A., Nestlè Health Science.

Dr Klersy is a statistical consultant with Nutricia S. p. A. (inclusive of the present work). All the other authors declare no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years. All authors declare no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

© 2020 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. on behalf of the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Duration of rehabilitation (A) and length of stay (B) by randomization group in the modified intention to treat population. CI, confidence interval

References

    1. Vitale G, Cesari M, Mari D. Aging of the endocrine system and its potential impact on sarcopenia. Eur J Intern Med 2016. Nov;35:10–15.
    1. Dhillon RJ, Hasni S. Pathogenesis and mManagement of sSarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med 2017. Feb;33:17–26.
    1. Rudrappa SS, Wilkinson DJ, Greenhaff PL, Smith K, Idris I, Atherton PJ. Human sSkeletal mMuscle dDisuse aAtrophy: eEffects on mMuscle pProtein sSynthesis, bBreakdown, and iInsulin rResistance—‐aA qQualitative rReview. Front Physiol 2016. Aug;7:361.
    1. Kalyani RR, Corriere M, Ferrucci L. Age‐related and disease‐related muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014. Oct;2:819–829.
    1. Cereda E, Veronese N, Caccialanza R. The final word on nutritional screening and assessment in older persons. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2018. Jan;21:24–29.
    1. Anker SD, Morley JE, von Haehling S. Welcome to the ICD‐10 code for sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016. Dec;7:512–514.
    1. Wall BT, Dirks ML, van Loon LJ. Skeletal muscle atrophy during short‐term disuse: implications for age‐related sarcopenia. Ageing Res Rev 2013. Sep;12:898–906.
    1. Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: rReport of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010. Jul;39:412–423.
    1. Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019. Jan 1;48:16–31.
    1. Norman K, Otten L. Financial impact of sarcopenia or low muscle mass— ‐ aA short review. Clin Nutr 2018. Sep 27. pii;S0261‐5614:32464–32466.
    1. Coen PM, Musci RV, Hinkley JM, Miller BF. Mitochondria as a tTarget for mMitigating sSarcopenia. Front Physiol 2019. Jan 10;9:1883.
    1. Dangin M, Guillet C, Garcia‐Rodenas C, et al. The rate of protein digestion affects protein gain differently during aging in humans. J Physiol 2003. Jun 1;549:635–644.
    1. Boirie Y, Guillet C. Fast digestive proteins and sarcopenia of aging. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2018. Jan;21:37–41.
    1. Borack MS, Volpi E. Efficacy and safety of leucine supplementation in the elderly. J Nutr 2016. Dec;146:2625S–2629S.
    1. Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, et al. Evidence‐based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT‐AGE Study Group. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013. Aug;14:542–559.
    1. Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Rabenda V, et al. The effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle power: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014. Nov;99:4336–4345.
    1. Salles J, Chanet A, Giraudet C, et al. 1,25(OH)2‐vitamin D3 enhances the stimulating effect of leucine and insulin on protein synthesis rate through Akt/PKB and mTOR mediated pathways in murine C2C12 skeletal myotubes. Mol Nutr Food Res 2013. Dec;57:2137–2146.
    1. Bauer JM, Verlaan S, Bautmans I, et al. Effects of a vitamin D and leucine‐enriched whey protein nutritional supplement on measures of sarcopenia in older adults, the PROVIDE study: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015. Sep 1;16:740–747.
    1. Rondanelli M, Klersy C, Terracol G, et al. Whey protein, amino acids, and vitamin D supplementation with physical activity increases fat‐free mass and strength, functionality, and quality of life and decreases inflammation in sarcopenic elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 2016. Mar;103:830–840.
    1. Dimori S, Leoni G, Fior L, Gasparotto F. Clinical nutrition and physical rehabilitation in a long‐term care setting: preliminary observations in sarcopenic older patients. Aging Clin Exp Res 2018. Aug;30:951–958.
    1. Barichella M, Cereda E, Pinelli G, et al. Muscle‐targeted nutritional support for rehabilitation in patients with parkinsonian syndrome. Neurology 2019. Jul 30;93:e485–e496.
    1. Vellas B, Fielding R, Bhasin S, et al. International cConference on fFrailty and sSarcopenia rResearch tTask fForce. Sarcopenia Trials in Specific Diseases: Report by the International Conference on Frailty and Sarcopenia Research Task Force. J Frailty Aging 2016;5:194–200.
    1. Magni E, Binetti G, Bianchetti A, Rozzini R, Trabucchi M. Mini‐mMental sState eExamination: a normative study in Italian elderly population. Eur J Neurol 1996. May;3:198–202.
    1. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982;14:377–381.
    1. World Health Organization . Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1995;854:1–452.
    1. Bassani IS. Atlante Ragionato di Alimentazione. Milano: Istituto Scotti Bassani per la ricerca e l'informazione scientifica e nutrizionale; 1989.
    1. Cereda E. Mini nutritional assessment. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2012. Jan;15:29–41.
    1. Janssen I, Baumgartner RN, Ross R, Rosenberg IH, Roubenoff R. Skeletal muscle cutpoints associated with elevated physical disability risk in older men and women. Am J Epidemiol 2004. Feb 15;159:413–421.
    1. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, et al. Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community‐dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging 2009. Dec;13:881–889.
    1. Hardy R, Cooper R, Shah I, Harridge S, Guralnik J, Kuh D. Is chair rise performance a useful measure of leg power? Aging Clin Exp Res. Oct‐Dec 2010;22:412–418.
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142–148.
    1. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self‐reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994. Mar;49:M85–M94.
    1. Mahoney FI, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965. Feb;14:61–65.
    1. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self‐maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969. Autumn;9:179–186.
    1. Tinetti ME. Performance‐oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986. Feb;34:119–126.
    1. Tombaugh TN. Trail mMaking tTest A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. Mar 19:203–214.
    1. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12‐item sShort‐fForm hHealth sSurvey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996. Mar;34:220–233.
    1. Cavaliere B. Metodo di determinazione degli Indici di Complessità Assistenziale (ICA): dieci anni di sviluppo e sperimentazione. AICM Journal ‐ Giornale Italiano di Case Management 2013;2:6–15.
    1. Cohen J. A Power primer. Psychol Bull 1992. Jul;112:155–159.
    1. Norman G, Monteiro S, Salama S. Sample size calculations: should the emperor'’s cloche be off the peg or made to measure? BMJ 2012;345:e5278.
    1. Volkert D, Beck AM, Cederholm T, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clin Nutr 2019. Feb;38:10–47.
    1. Deutz NE, Bauer JM, Barazzoni R, et al. Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group. Clin Nutr 2014. Dec;33:929–936.
    1. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, et al. GLIM Core Leadership Committee, GLIM Working Group. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition— ‐ aA consensus report from the globalclinical nutrition community. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019. Feb;10:207–217.
    1. Wright J, Baldwin C. Oral nutritional support with or without exercise in the management of malnutrition in nutritionally vulnerable older people: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Nutr 2018. Dec;37:1879–1891.
    1. Beaudart C, Biver E, Reginster JY, et al. Validation of the SarQoL®, a specific health‐related quality of life questionnaire for sSarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017. Apr;8:238–244.
    1. Netz Y. Is tThere a pPreferred mMode of eExercise for cCognition eEnhancement in oOlder aAge?—‐aA nNarrative rReview. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019. Mar 29;6:57.
    1. Liberman K, Njemini R, Luiking Y, et al. Thirteen weeks of supplementation of vitamin D and leucine‐enriched whey protein nutritional supplement attenuates chronic low‐grade inflammation in sarcopenic older adults: the PROVIDE study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2019. Jun;31:845–854.
    1. Ethgen O, Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Bruyère O, Reginster JY. The fFuture pPrevalence of sSarcopenia in Europe: aA cClaim for pPublic hHealth aAction. Calcif Tissue Int 2017. Mar;100:229–234.
    1. Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, et al. Physical fFrailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management. J Nutr Health Aging 2019;23:771–787.
    1. Cawthon PM, Travison TG, Manini TM, et al. Sarcopenia dDefinition and oOutcomes cConsortium cConference participants. Establishing the lLink bBetween lLean mMass and gGrip sStrength cCut‐points wWith mMobility Ddisability and oOther hHealth oOutcomes: Proceedings of the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium Conference. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2019. Mar 14; In Press;10.1093/gerona/glz081.
    1. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006. May;54:743–749.
    1. Kwon S, Perera S, Pahor M, et al. What is a meaningful change in physical performance? Findings from a clinical trial in older adults (the LIFE‐P study). J Nutr Health Aging 2009. Jun;13:538–544.
    1. Alley DE, Hicks GE, Shardell M, et al. Meaningful improvement in gait speed in hip fracture recovery. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011. Sep;59:1650–1657.
    1. Lewek MD, Sykes R 3rd. Minimal dDetectable cChange for gGait sSpeed dDepends on bBaseline sSpeed in iIndividuals wWith cChronic sStroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 2019. Apr;43:122–127.
    1. Beaudart C, Rolland Y, Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, et al. Assessment of Mmuscle fFunction and pPhysical pPerformance in dDaily cClinical pPractice: aA position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Calcif Tissue Int 2019. Jul;105:1–14.
    1. von Haehling S, Morley JE, Coats AJS, Anker SD. Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2019. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019. Jul;10:1143–1145.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi