Data-Driven Personalized Feedback to Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial

Stein Olav Skrøvseth, Eirik Årsand, Fred Godtliebsen, Ragnar M Joakimsen, Stein Olav Skrøvseth, Eirik Årsand, Fred Godtliebsen, Ragnar M Joakimsen

Abstract

Background: A mobile phone-based application can be useful for patients with type 1 diabetes in managing their disease. This results in large datasets accumulated on the patient's devices, which can be used for individualized feedback. The effect of such feedback is investigated in this article.

Materials and methods: We developed an application that included a data-driven feedback module known as Diastat for patients on self-measured blood glucose regimens. Using a stepped-wedge design, both groups initially received an application without Diastat. Group 1 activated Diastat after 4 weeks, whereas Group 2 activated Diastat 12 weeks after startup (T1). End points were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and number of out-of-range (OOR) measurements (i.e., outside the range 72-270 mg/dL).

Results: Thirty patients were recruited to the study, and 15 were assigned to each group after the initial meeting. There were no significant differences between groups at T1 in HbA1c or OOR events. Overall, all patients had a decrease of 0.6 percentage points in mean HbA1c (P < 0.001) and 14.5 in median OOR events over 2 weeks (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The study does not provide evidence that data-driven feedback improves glycemic control. The decrease in HbA1c was sizeable and significant, even though the study was not powered to detect this. The overall improvement in glycemic control suggests that, in general, mobile phone-based interventions can be useful in diabetes self-management.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01774149.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Screenshots of components of the Diabetes Diary with the Diastat module installed: (left panel) the main page of the diary; (upper middle panel) periodicity graph over 24 h; (upper right panel) periodicity graph over 1 week; (lower middle panel) trend display showing one short-term increasing trend and one longer-term decreasing trend; and (lower right panel) situation matching, where the top section shows the best matched situations to the current and the lower section shows the chosen situation in context. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/dia
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Flowchart. Vertical lines indicate physical meetings with adjacent numbers indicating number of patients met. Dashed lines are meetings where the Diabetes Diary was deployed. Shaded areas indicate periods where registrations are used for calculations of out-of-range measurements. White numbers are active patients (i.e., who had sufficient recordings for analysis in the period). Numbers in parentheses are how many met for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements. Dates shown are those used for analysis and when the majority of the patients met. Because of practical considerations not all patients were able to meet on the day indicated, but they did meet on dates as close as possible. Randomization was done immediately after the initial meeting.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Changes in primary end point and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level over the study: (left panel) HbA1c and (right panel) number of measurements outside the optimal range (out of range). Each line shows one eligible patient. Mean (left panel) and median (right panel) values are shown as diamonds for each time period and group.

References

    1. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, et al. : Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2011;28:455–463
    1. Charpentier G, Benhamou P-Y, Dardari D, et al. : The Diabeo software enabling individualized insulin dose adjustments combined with telemedicine support improves HbA1c in poorly controlled type 1 diabetic patients: a 6-month, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter trial (TeleDiab 1 Study). Diabetes Care 2011;34:533–539
    1. Chomutare T, Fernandez-Luque L, Årsand E, et al. : Features of mobile diabetes applications: review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e65.
    1. Goyal S, Cafazzo JA: Mobile phone health apps for diabetes management: current evidence and future developments. QJM 2013;106:1067–1069
    1. Rossi MC, Nicolucci A, Lucisano G, et al. : Impact of the “Diabetes Interactive Diary” telemedicine system on metabolic control, risk of hypoglycemia, and quality of life: a randomized clinical trial in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013;15:670–679
    1. Marcolino MS, Maia JX, Alkmim MBM, et al. : Telemedicine application in the care of diabetes patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013;8:e79246.
    1. Siriwardena LSAN, Wickramasinghe WAS, Perera KLD, et al. : A review of telemedicine interventions in diabetes care. J Telemed Telecare 2012;18:164–168
    1. Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ: Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ 2011;343:d3805.
    1. Franc S, Borot S, Ronsin O, et al. : Telemedicine and type 1 diabetes: is technology per se sufficient to improve glycaemic control? Diabetes Metab 2014;40:61–66
    1. Arsand E, Frøisland DH, Skrøvseth SO, et al. : Mobile health applications to assist patients with diabetes: lessons learned and design implications. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012;6:1197–1206
    1. Trento M, Borgo E, Kucich C, et al. : Quality of life, coping ability, and metabolic control in patients with type 1 diabetes managed by group care and a carbohydrate counting program. Diabetes Care 2009;32:e134.
    1. Siegelaar SE, Holleman F, Hoekstra JBL, et al. : Glucose variability; does it matter? Endocr Rev 2010;31:171–182
    1. Ceriello A, Ihnat MA: ‘Glycaemic variability’: a new therapeutic challenge in diabetes and the critical care setting. Diabet Med 2010;27:862–867
    1. Skrøvseth SO, Årsand E, Godtliebsen F, et al. : Model-driven diabetes care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013;14:139.
    1. Skrøvseth SO, Årsand E, Godtliebsen F, et al. : Mobile phone-based pattern recognition and data analysis for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:1098–1104
    1. Wand MP, Jones MC. Kernel Smoothing. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1995
    1. Skrøvseth SO, Bellika JG, Godtliebsen F: Causality in scale space as an approach to change detection. PLoS One 2012;7:e52253.
    1. Hothorn T, Hornik K: exactRankTests: Exact Distributions for Rank and Permutation Tests. R package version 0.8-27. 2013. (accessed February12, 2015)
    1. Ellis SE, Speroff T, Dittus RS, et al. : Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient Educ Counsel 2004;52:97–105
    1. Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, et al. : Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Transl Behav Med 2011;1:53–71
    1. Tatara N, Årsand E, Skrøvseth SO, et al. : Long-term engagement with a mobile self-management system for people with type 2 diabetes. JMIR mhealth uhealth 2013;1:e1.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi