Open-Label Crossover Oral Bioequivalence Pharmacokinetics Comparison for a 3-Day Loading Dose Regimen and 15-Day Steady-State Administration of SUBA-Itraconazole and Conventional Itraconazole Capsules in Healthy Adults

George R Thompson 3rd, Phoebe Lewis, Stuart Mudge, Thomas F Patterson, Bruce P Burnett, George R Thompson 3rd, Phoebe Lewis, Stuart Mudge, Thomas F Patterson, Bruce P Burnett

Abstract

Super bioavailability (SUBA) itraconazole (S-ITZ), which releases drug in the duodenum, and conventional itraconazole (C-ITZ), which releases drug in the stomach, were compared in two pharmacokinetic (PK) studies: a 3-day loading dose study and a 15-day steady-state administration study. These were crossover oral bioequivalence studies performed under fed conditions in healthy adult volunteers. In the loading dose study, C-ITZ (two doses of 100 mg each) and S-ITZ (two doses of 65 mg each) were administered three times daily for 3 days and once on day 4 (n = 15). For the steady-state administration study, C-ITZ (two doses of 100 mg each) and S-ITZ (two doses of 65 mg each) were administered twice daily for 14 days and a last dose was administered 30 min after a meal on day 15 (n = 16). Blood samples collected throughout both studies were analyzed for ITZ and hydroxy-ITZ (OH-ITZ) levels. Least-squares geometric means were used to compare the maximum peak concentration of drug after administration at steady state prior to administration of the subsequent dose (Cmax_ss), the minimum drug level after administration prior to the subsequent dose (Ctrough), and the area under the curve over the dosing interval (AUCtau) of each formulation. The ratios of itraconazole (ITZ) and OH-ITZ for S-ITZ to C-ITZ were between 107% and 118% in both studies for Cmax_ss, Ctrough, and AUCtau, which were within the U.S. FDA-required bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. At the end of the steady-state administration study, 13 of 16 volunteers obtained higher mean ITZ blood Ctrough levels of >1,000 ng/ml when they were administered S-ITZ (81%) than when they were administered C-ITZ (44%). The study drugs were well tolerated in both studies, with similar adverse events (AEs). All treatment-emergent AEs resolved after study completion. One volunteer receiving C-ITZ discontinued due to a treatment-unrelated AE in the steady-state administration study. No serious AEs were reported. Total, trough, and peak ITZ and OH-ITZ exposures were similar between the two formulations. Therefore, SUBA-ITZ, which has 35% less drug than C-ITZ, was bioequivalent to C-ITZ in healthy adult volunteers and exhibited a safety profile similar to that of C-ITZ.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03572049.

Keywords: absorption; antifungal agents; bioequivalence; itraconazole; pharmacokinetics.

Copyright © 2020 Thompson et al.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Day 1 to day 15 plasma levels of itraconazole (A) and hydroxyitraconazole (B) for the SUBA-itraconazole (solid line) and conventional itraconazole (dashed line) formulations.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Fifteen-day steady-state patient-level data for the geometric mean Ctrough values for conventional itraconazole (CI) and SUBA-itraconazole (SI). The dotted line represents the geometric mean of the conventional itraconazole plasma trough level (1,034 ng/ml).
FIG 3
FIG 3
Fifteen-day steady-state patient-level crossover PK data for the geometric mean plasma AUCtau (left), Ctrough (middle), and Cmax_ss (right) values for itraconazole achieved with the conventional itraconazole (C-ITZ) and SUBA-itraconazole (S-ITZ) formulations. Data are represented as whisker plots for both each group and the individual volunteer response (lines).
FIG 4
FIG 4
Three-day steady-state patient-level crossover PK data for the geometric mean plasma AUCtau (left), Ctrough (middle), and Cmax_ss (right) values for the conventional itraconazole (C-ITZ) and SUBA-itraconazole (S-ITZ) formulations. Data are represented as whisker plots for both each group and the individual volunteer response (lines).

References

    1. Lindsay J, Mudge S, Thompson GR III. 2018. Effects of food and omeprazole on a novel formulation of super bioavailability itraconazole in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01723-18. doi:10.1128/AAC.01723-18.
    1. Wiederhold NP, Pennick GJ, Dorsey SA, Furmaga W, Lewis JS, Patterson TF, Sutton DA, Fothergill AW. 2014. A reference laboratory experience of clinically achievable voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole concentrations within the bloodstream and cerebral spinal fluid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:424–431. doi:10.1128/AAC.01558-13.
    1. Glasmacher A, Hahn C, Leutner C, Molitor E, Wardelmann E, Losem C, Sauerbruch T, Marklein G, Schmidt-Wolf IG. 1999. Breakthrough invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients after prophylaxis with itraconazole. Mycoses 42:443–451. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0507.1999.00505.x.
    1. Abuhelwa AY, Foster DJ, Mudge S, Hayes D, Upton RN. 2015. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole for oral SUBA-itraconazole and Sporanox capsule formulations in healthy volunteers in fed and fasted states. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:5681–5696. doi:10.1128/AAC.00973-15.
    1. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2020. Tolsura (SUBA-itraconazole, 65 mg capsule). Accessed February 2020 .
    1. U.S. FDA. 2020. Approval package for Tolsura (SUBA-itraconazole, 65 mg capsule). Accessed February 2020 .
    1. U.S. FDA. 1999. Guidance for industry, applications covered by section 505(b)(2). Accessed February 2020 .
    1. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2020. Sporanox (itraconazole, 100 mg capsule) prescribing information. Accessed February 2020 .
    1. Al-Badr AA, El-Subbagh IE. 2009. Itraconazole: comprehensive profile, p 193–264. In Brittain H. (ed), Profiles of drug substances, excipients and related methodology, 1st ed, vol 35 Academic Press, New York, NY.
    1. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2020. Sporanox (itraconazole, 10 mg/mL solution), prescribing information. Accessed February 2020 .
    1. Potter M, Donnelly J. 2004. The role of itraconazole in preventing and treating systemic fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. Acta Haematol 111:175–180. doi:10.1159/000076530.
    1. Glasmacher A, Prentice A, Gorschlüter M, Engelhart S, Hahn C, Djulbegovic B, Schmidt-Wolf IG. 2003. Itraconazole prevents invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients treated for hematologic malignancies: evidence from a meta-analysis of 3,597 patients. J Clin Oncol 21:4615–4626. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.04.052.
    1. Therapeutic Goods Administration. 2020. Lozanoc (itraconazole, 50 mg capsule) prescribing information. Accessed February 2020 .
    1. Nield B, Larsen SR, van Hal SJ. 2019. Clinical experience with new formulation SUBA-itraconazole for prophylaxis in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation or treatment for haematological malignancies. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:3049–3055. doi:10.1093/jac/dkz303.
    1. Barone JA, Koh JG, Bierman RH, Colaizzi JL, Swanson KA, Gaffar MC, Moskovitz BL, Mechlinski W, Van de Velde V. 1993. Food interaction and steady-state pharmacokinetics of itraconazole capsules in healthy male volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:778–784. doi:10.1128/aac.37.4.778.
    1. Van Peer A, Woestenborghs R, Heykants J, Gasparini R, Gauwenbergh G. 1989. The effects of food and dose on the oral systemic availability of itraconazole in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 36:423–426. doi:10.1007/BF00558308.
    1. Mudge S, Lewis P, Burnett BP. 2019. Relative bioavailability of single oral doses of SUBA-itraconazole 65mg capsule compared to conventional itraconazole 100mg capsule administered under fasted and fed conditions in healthy adult volunteers, poster 2229 Abstr Infectious Disease Week, Washington, DC.
    1. Cartledge JD, Midgely J, Gazzard BG. 1997. Itraconazole solution: higher serum drug concentrations and better clinical response rates than the capsule formulation in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients with candidosis. J Clin Pathol 50:477–480. doi:10.1136/jcp.50.6.477.
    1. Grigg AP, Brown M, Roberts AW, Szer J, Slavin MA. 2004. A pilot study of targeted itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with graft-versus-host disease at high risk of invasive mold infections following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 34:447–453. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1704614.
    1. Andes D, Pascual A, Marchetti O. 2009. Antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: established and emerging indications. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:24–34. doi:10.1128/AAC.00705-08.
    1. Lamy T, Bernard M, Courtois A, Jacquelinet C, Chevrier S, Dauriac C, Grulois I, Guiguen C, Le Prise PY. 1998. Prophylactic use of itraconazole for the prevention of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in high risk neutropenic patients. Leuk Lymphoma 30:163–174. doi:10.3109/10428199809050939.
    1. Denning DW, Lee JY, Hostetler JS, Pappas P, Kauffman CA, Dewsnup DH, Galgiani JN, Graybill JR, Sugar AM, Catanzaro A, Gallis H, Perfect JR, Dockery B, Dismukes WE, Stevens DA. 1994. NIAID Mycoses Study Group multicenter trial of oral itraconazole therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Am J Med 97:135–144. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(94)90023-X.
    1. Sharkey PK, Rinaldi MG, Dunn JF, Hardin TC, Fetchick RJ, Graybill JR. 1991. High-dose itraconazole in the treatment of severe mycoses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:707–713. doi:10.1128/aac.35.4.707.
    1. Lestner JM, Roberts SA, Moore CB, Howard SJ, Denning DW, Hope WW. 2009. Toxicodynamics of itraconazole: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring. Clin Infect Dis 49:928–930. doi:10.1086/605499.
    1. Lestner J, Hope WW. 2013. Itraconazole: an update on pharmacology and clinical use for treatment of invasive and allergic fungal infections. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 9:911–926. doi:10.1517/17425255.2013.794785.
    1. Lindsay J, Sandaradura I, Wong K, Arthur C, Stevenson W, Kerridge I, Fay K, Coyle L, Greenwood M. 2017. Serum levels, safety and tolerability of new formulation SUBA-itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with haematological malignancy or undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:3414–3419. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx295.
    1. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2020. Endemic mycoses treatment with SUBA-itraconazole vs itraconazole (MSG15). Accessed February 2020 .
    1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. 2019. Medical dictionary for regulatory activities. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Geneva, Switzerland: .
    1. Chow SC, Liu JP. 1992. Some related problems in bioavailability studies, ch. 12. In Design and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi