Impact of referral templates on the quality of referrals from primary to secondary care: a cluster randomised trial

Henrik Wåhlberg, Per Christian Valle, Siri Malm, Ann Ragnhild Broderstad, Henrik Wåhlberg, Per Christian Valle, Siri Malm, Ann Ragnhild Broderstad

Abstract

Background: The referral letter is an important document facilitating the transfer of care from a general practitioner (GP) to secondary care. Hospital doctors have often criticised the quality and content of referral letters, and the effectiveness of improvement efforts remains uncertain.

Methods: A cluster randomised trial was conducted using referral templates for patients in four diagnostic groups: dyspepsia, suspected colorectal cancer, chest pain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The GP surgery was the unit of randomisation. Of the 14 surgeries served by the University Hospital of North Norway Harstad, seven were randomised to the intervention group. Intervention GPs used referral templates soliciting core clinical information when initiating a new referral in one of the four clinical areas. Intermittent surgery visits by study personnel were also carried out. A total of 500 patients were included, with 281 in the intervention and 219 in the control arm. Referral quality scoring was performed by three blinded raters. Data were analysed using multi-level regression modelling. All analyses were conducted on intention-to-treat basis.

Results: In the final multilevel model, referrals in the intervention group scored 18% higher (95% CI (11%, 25%), p < 0.001) on the referral quality score than the control group. The model also showed that board certified GPs and GPs in larger surgeries produced referrals of significantly higher quality.

Conclusion: In this study, the dissemination of referral templates coupled with intermittent surgery visits produced higher quality referrals.

Trial registration: This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is NCT01470963.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Inclusion process. Flow chart of the inclusion process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Referral quality. Referral quality by diagnostic group, uncorrected for clustering, presented as percentages

References

    1. Garasen H, Johnsen R. The quality of communication about older patients between hospital physicians and general practitioners: a panel study assessment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:133. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-133.
    1. Tuomisto LE, Erhola M, Kaila M, Brander PE, Kauppinen R, Puolijoki H, Kekki P. The Finnish national asthma programme: communication in asthma care--quality assessment of asthma referral letters. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:50–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00645.x.
    1. Ong SP, Lim LT, Barnsley L, Read R. General practitioners’ referral letters--Do they meet the expectations of gastroenterologists and rheumatologists? Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35:920–2.
    1. Dentith GE, Wilson KE, Dorman M, Girdler NM. An audit of patient referrals to the sedation department of Newcastle Dental Hospital. Prim Dent Care. 2010;17:85–91. doi: 10.1308/135576110791013857.
    1. Syed AA, Large DM. Quality of GPs’ referral letters to diabetes secondary care. Practical Diabetes International. 2003;20:165–9. doi: 10.1002/pdi.488.
    1. Newton J, Hutchinson A, Hayes V, Mccoll E, Mackee I, Holland C. Do clinicians tell each other enough? An analysis of referral communications in two specialties. Fam Pract. 1994;11:15–20. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.1.15.
    1. Shaw I, Smith KM, Middleton H, Woodward L. A letter of consequence: referral letters from general practitioners to secondary mental health services. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:116–28. doi: 10.1177/1049732304270725.
    1. Bodek S, Ghori K, Edelstein M, Reed A, MacFadyen RJ. Contemporary referral of patients from community care to cardiology lack diagnostic and clinical detail. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:595–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00902.x.
    1. Grol R, Rooijackers-Lemmers N, van Kaathoven L, Wollersheim H, Mokkink H. Communication at the interface: do better referral letters produce better consultant replies? Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:217–9.
    1. Westerman RF, Hull FM, Bezemer PD, Gort G. A study of communication between general practitioners and specialists. Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40:445–9.
    1. Cheng J, Beltran-Agullo L, Trope GE, Buys YM. Assessment of the quality of glaucoma referral letters based on a survey of glaucoma specialists and a glaucoma guideline. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:126–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.027.
    1. Jiwa M, Coleman M, McKinley RK. Measuring the quality of referral letters about patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Postgrad Med J. 2005;81:467–9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.027516.
    1. Canadian Medical Association. National Survey: experiences with referrals from primary to specialty care. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Medical Association; 2013.
    1. Patel NN, D’Souza J, Rocker M, Townsend E, Morris-Stiff G, Manimaran M, Magee TR, Galland RB, Lewis MH. Prioritisation of vascular outpatient appointments cannot be based on referral letters alone. Surgeon. 2008;6:140–3. doi: 10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80108-4.
    1. Goodwin N, Dixon A, Poole T, Raleigh V. Improving the quality of care in general practice. London: The King's Fund; 2011
    1. Newton J, Eccles M, Hutchinson A. Communication between general practitioners and consultants: what should their letters contain? BMJ. 1992;304:821–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6830.821.
    1. Ree AO: Medisinsk faglig innhold i henvisninger. Trondheim: The Norwegian Direcorate for Health; 2003.
    1. Ree AO: Medisinsk faglig innhold i epikriser. Trondheim: The Norwegian Direcorate for Health; 2002.
    1. Martinussen PE. Referral quality and the cooperation between hospital physicians and general practice: The role of physician and primary care factors. Scand J Public Health. 2013;41:874. doi: 10.1177/1403494813498951.
    1. Rokstad IS, Rokstad KS, Holmen S, Lehmann S, Assmus J. Electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: an intervention study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013;31:166–71. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2013.824155.
    1. OECD. What Future for Health Spending? OECD Economics Department Policy Notes, No. 19 June 2013; 2013.
    1. Wahlberg H, Valle PC, Malm S, Broderstad AR. Practical health co-operation - the impact of a referral template on quality of care and health care co-operation: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:7. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-7.
    1. Carlsen B, Norheim OF. Changes in Norwegian physicians’ perception of their gatekeeper role. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2003;21:209–13. doi: 10.1080/02813430310004155.
    1. Jiwa M, Mathers N, Walters S. Quality of information on referrals to colorectal surgeons: towards consensus. Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18:72–7. doi: 10.1185/030079902125000309.
    1. Nygaard E, Kårikstad V. Prioriteringsveileder - Fordøyelsessykdommer. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2009.
    1. Nygaard E, Kårikstad V. Prioriteringsveileder - Lungesykdommer. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2008.
    1. Nygaard E, Kårikstad V. Prioriteringsveileder - Hjertemedisinske sykdommer. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2009.
    1. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee BTS statement on criteria for specialist referral, admission, discharge and follow-up for adults with respiratory disease. Thorax. 2008;63:i1–16. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.087627.
    1. Snow V, Barry P, Fihn SD, Gibbons RJ, Owens DK, Williams SV, Weiss KB, Mottur-Pilson C, the ACP/ACC Chronic Stable Angina Panel Evaluation of primary care patients with chronic stable Angina: guidelines from the American College of physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:57–64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00015.
    1. Malm S, Schirmer H. Hjertesak: Riktigere prioritering av pasienter! Fastlegenytt (2). 2010. UNN. 6-3-0012.
    1. Erhardt L, Herlitz J, Bossaert L, Halinen M, Keltai M, Koster R, Marcassa C, Quinn T, van Weert H. Task force on the management of chest pain. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1153–76. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3194.
    1. Kostopoulou O, Delaney BC, Munro CW. Diagnostic difficulty and error in primary care--a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2008;25:400–13. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn071.
    1. Murphy CL, Sheane B, Durcan I, O’Shea FD, Doran M, Cunnane G. Benefits of pre-referral preparation for rheumatology clinics. Ir Med J. 2013;106:275–7.
    1. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213–20. doi: 10.1037/h0026256.
    1. Maclure M, Willett WC. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126:161–9. doi: 10.1093/aje/126.2.161.
    1. Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted Kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1973;33:613–9. doi: 10.1177/001316447303300309.
    1. Brenner H, Kliebsch U. Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Epidemiology. 1996;7:199–202. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199603000-00016.
    1. Mathieu JE, Aguinis H, Culpepper SA, Chen G. Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97:951–66. doi: 10.1037/a0028380.
    1. Marshall SW. Power for tests of interaction: effect of raising the type I error rate. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2007;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-4-4.
    1. Eldridge S, Kerry S. A practical guide to cluster randomised trials in health services research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012.
    1. Emslie C, Grimshaw J, Templeton A. Do clinical guidelines improve general practice management and referral of infertile couples? BMJ. 1993;306:1728–31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6894.1728.
    1. Jiwa M, Walters S, Mathers N. Referral letters to colorectal surgeons: the impact of peer-mediated feedback. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:123–6.
    1. Jillian M, Louise C, Sara T, Iain C, Jeremy G, Alastair L, Heather B, Graham W. Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate guidelines for the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface. BMJ. 2001;322:1282. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1282.
    1. Akbari A, Mayhew A, Al-Alawi MA, Grimshaw J, Winkens R, Glidewell E, Pritchard C, Thomas R, Fraser C. Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4:CD005471.
    1. Coulter A, Noone A, Goldacre M. General practitioners’ referrals to specialist outpatient clinics. I. Why general practitioners refer patients to specialist outpatient clinics. BMJ. 1989;299:304–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6694.304.
    1. Ringberg U, Fleten N, Deraas T, Hasvold T, Forde O. High referral rates to secondary care by general practitioners in Norway are associated with GPs’ gender and specialist qualifications in family medicine, a study of 4350 consultations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:147. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-147.
    1. Forde OH, Breidablik HJ, Ogar P. Do differences in referral rates threaten the goal of equity in health care? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2011;131:1878–81. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.10.1450.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. Jiwa M, Skinner P, Coker AO, Shaw L, Campbell MJ, Thompson J. Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-65.
    1. Légaré F. Assessing barriers and facilitators to knowledge use. In: Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge Translation in Health Care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2009.
    1. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, Robertson N. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;3:CD005470.
    1. Jellema P, van der Windt DA, Bruinvels DJ, Mallen CD, van Weyenberg SJ, Mulder CJ, de Vet HC. Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:c1269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1269.
    1. Norheim OF, Allgott B, Gjul GK, Kjellevold A, Moen A, Sjøli S, et al. Åpent og rettferdig - prioriteringer i helsetjenesten (open and fair - priorities in the health care services). Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2014.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi