Anatomical basis and physiological role of cerebrospinal fluid transport through the murine cribriform plate

Jordan N Norwood, Qingguang Zhang, David Card, Amanda Craine, Timothy M Ryan, Patrick J Drew, Jordan N Norwood, Qingguang Zhang, David Card, Amanda Craine, Timothy M Ryan, Patrick J Drew

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flows through the brain, transporting chemical signals and removing waste. CSF production in the brain is balanced by a constant outflow of CSF, the anatomical basis of which is poorly understood. Here, we characterized the anatomy and physiological function of the CSF outflow pathway along the olfactory sensory nerves through the cribriform plate, and into the nasal epithelia. Chemical ablation of olfactory sensory nerves greatly reduced outflow of CSF through the cribriform plate. The reduction in CSF outflow did not cause an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP), consistent with an alteration in the pattern of CSF drainage or production. Our results suggest that damage to olfactory sensory neurons (such as from air pollution) could contribute to altered CSF turnover and flow, providing a potential mechanism for neurological diseases.

Keywords: anosmia; cerebrospinal fluid; cribriform; intracranial pressure; mouse; neuroscience; olfatory nerve.

Conflict of interest statement

JN, QZ, DC, AC, TR, PD No competing interests declared

© 2019, Norwood et al.

Figures

Figure 1.. Structure of the calcified tissue…
Figure 1.. Structure of the calcified tissue of the cribriform plate and its relationship to olfactory sensory neuron axons.
For schematics: olfactory nerve (ON), neuroepithelium (NE), cribriform plate (CP), olfactory bulb (OB) and glomeruli (yellow circles). D = dorsal, R = rostral, M = medial, and L = lateral. (A) Sagittal view of a microCT scan of a mouse skull. Black planes bracket the area of the CP. (B) Anterior-looking view of the CP from microCT image. (C) Area indicated by purple box in (B). (D) Photograph of the CP from the same point of view as the CT reconstruction in (C). Scale bar 1 mm. E) Sagittal view of the OB and CP junction illustrating the curved structure of the CP. (F) Max intensity projection of a 1.67 mm thick section of the CP depicting the major foramina (yellow arrows) and crista galli (blue arrow). Scale bar 1 mm. (G–H) Mean ± standard deviation plotted. Circles and squares represent means of individual animals. (G) Left: Comparison of total foramina area between Swiss Webster and C57BL/6J mice: (t(4) = 1.32, p=0.256, n = 3 for each group, ttest2). Comparison of the total area of the CP between Swiss Webster and C57BL/6J mice: (t(4) = 4.55, p=0.021, n = 3 for each group, ttest2). (*p≤0.05). (H) Comparison of the ratio of the foramina area and CP area between Swiss Webster and C57BL/6J mice: (t(4) = 0.3891, p=0.7170, n = 3 for each group, ttest2). (I) Schematic of the sagittal plane of the mouse skull and brain showing the relationship of the OB and nerve junction to the CP. (J) Sagittal view of the area within the pink box in (I), depicting OSNs crossing the CP and terminating in the OB and glomeruli. (K) Coronal view of the black dashed line in (I) illustrating the location of the CP relative to the OBs and NE. (L–M) Immunofluorescent staining, OMP (red) and DAPI (blue). Scale bars 250 μm. (L) Sagittal plane, area depicted in (J), showing the two main OSN axon bundles (yellow arrows) that pass through the major foramina of the CP. (M) Coronal plane, area indicated in (K), showing OSN axon bundles that traverse the minor foramina of the CP along the crista galli.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. Cribriform plate morphology…
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. Cribriform plate morphology in Swiss Webster and C57BL/6J mice.
(A) Reconstructed microCT image of the anterior side of the CP of a Swiss Webster mouse, showing the perforated ridge along the centerline (crista galli). Four major foramen are observed laterally from the crista galli, with one dorsal and one medial foramen on each side of the midline. (B) Same as (A), except for a C57BL/6J mouse. (C) Max projection of the CP of a Swiss Webster mouse, note similarity to (A). Scale bar 1 mm. (D) Max projection of the CP of a C57BL/6J mouse, note similarity to (B). Note that the scans in (A) and (B) were taken with different scanners with different spatial resolutions: GE v|tome|x L 300 high-resolution nano/microCT scanner was used for all Swiss Webster mice, and an OMNI-X HD600 industrial microCT scanner was used for the C57BL/6J samples.
Figure 2.. Aquaporin 1 and blood vessels…
Figure 2.. Aquaporin 1 and blood vessels are present in the cribriform plate and olfactory nerve junction.
For schematics: olfactory nerve (ON), neuroepithelium (NE), cribriform plate (CP), olfactory bulb (OB) and glomeruli (yellow circles). D = dorsal, R = rostral, M = medial, and L = lateral). (A) Schematic of the sagittal plane of the mouse skull and brain showing the relationship of the OB and nerve junction to the CP. (B) Sagittal view of the area within the pink box in (A), depicting OSNs crossing the CP and terminating in the OB and glomeruli. (C) Coronal view of the black dashed line in (A) illustrating the location of the CP relative to the OBs and NE. D) Area depicted by the pink box in (A), showing the presence of FITC-albumin filled blood vessels (white) along the medial ON. (E) Magnified area of (D). (F–O) Immunofluorescent staining, OMP (red), AQP1 (green), AQP4 (purple), DiI (white), and DAPI (blue). (F–G) Area depicted by the pink box in (A), showing the expression of AQP1 (F) at the junction of the OB and medial ON and in the lamina propria of the NE. (H–I) Area depicted by the orange box in (A), showing the expression of AQP1 at the junction of the OB and lateral ON and in the lamina propria of the NE. (J–K) Magnified area of (H–I). (L) AQP1 expression, in the area indicated in (C), is present in the lining of the smaller foramina along the midline of the crista galli, on the olfactory nerve layer of the OB, and in the lamina propria of the NE. (M–O) DiI-labeled endothelial cells of blood vessels traversing the smaller foramina of the CP alongside ONs (M) and lined with AQP-1 (N–O) or AQP-4 (O), area indicated by purple box in (C). (D, F–I, L) Scale bars 250 μm. (E, J–K, M–O) Scale bars 50 μm.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.. Localization of aquaporins…
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.. Localization of aquaporins at the olfactory nerve and bulb junction.
For schematics: olfactory nerve (ON), neuroepithelium (NE), cribriform plate (CP), olfactory bulb (OB) and glomeruli (yellow circles). D = dorsal, R = rostral, M = medial, and L = lateral. (A) Schematic of the sagittal plane of the mouse skull and brain, showing the relationship of the OB and nerve junction to the CP. (B) Sagittal view of the area within the pink box in (A), depicting OSNs crossing the CP and terminating in the OB and glomeruli. (C) Coronal view of the black dashed line in (A) illustrating the location of the CP relative to the OBs and NE. (D) Immunofluorescent staining of area in (C), demonstrating the expression of AQP1, but not AQP3, along the periphery of the OB and lining the foramina of the CP. Both AQP1 and AQP3 were observed lining the lamina propria of the NE. (E) Area depicted by the blue box in (A), expression of AQP1 and AQP3 lining the lamina propria of the NE. (F–G) AQP4 (magenta), GFAP (green), OMP (red), and DAPI (blue). Examining the expression of AQP4 at the junction of the medial OB and ON and the lamina propria of the NE. (F) Expression of AQP4 is observed lining the lamina propria of the NE and co-localizing with GFAP along the ON. (G) Expression of AQP4 is observed lining the lamina propria of the NE and not co-localizing with OMP. (H–K) Area indicated by purple box in (C). (H) Expression of AQP4 (magenta) is observed lining foramina of the CP. (I) Expression of AQP1 (green) and AQP2 (light blue) in foramina of the CP. (J–K) AQP1 (green) and Vimentin (red) are expressed by different cell types in the foramina of the CP. L–M) Co-localization of AQP4 (magenta) and GFAP (green) on astrocytic end feet in the cortex. (M) Area indicated by yellow box in (L). (N–O) Immunofluorescent staining of mouse kidney tissue. (N) Expression of AQP2 (light blue) and AQP5 (red) in the renal cortex of the kidney. O) Expression of AQP1 (green) and AQP3 (yellow) in the renal medulla of the mouse kidney. (D–G) Scale bars 250 μm. (H–K, L, N–O) Scale bars 50 μm. (M) Scale bar 20 μm.
Figure 3.. Localization of lymphatic vessels at…
Figure 3.. Localization of lymphatic vessels at the cribriform plate and olfactory bulb junction.
For schematics: olfactory nerve (ON), neuroepithelium (NE), cribriform plate (CP), olfactory bulb (OB) and glomeruli (yellow circles). D = dorsal, R = rostral, M = medial, and L = lateral. (A) Schematic of the sagittal plane of the mouse skull and brain showing the relationship of the OB and nerve junction to the CP. (B) Sagittal view of the area within the pink box in (A), depicting OSNs crossing the CP and terminating in the OB and glomeruli. (C) Coronal view of the black dashed line in (A) illustrating the location of the CP relative to the OBs and NE. (D–K) Immunofluorescent staining: LYVE1 (magenta), FITC-albumin (green), and DAPI (blue) in LYVE1-tdtomato mice. (D–E) Localization of LYVE1+ vessels along the medial olfactory nerve, sagittal area indicated in (B), depicting LYVE1+/FITC-albumin negative vessels (putative lymphatic vessels) running parallel to the olfactory nerve. (F–G) Area indicated by green box in (B), magnified area of (D–E). (H) Localization of LYVE1+ vessels in the nasal epithelium and traversing the CP, coronal area indicated in (C). (I) Area indicated by purple box in (C), magnified area of (H), depicting LYVE1+ vessels traversing foramina of the CP. (J) Localization of LYVE1+ vessels and blood vessels (labeled with FITC-albumin) in the nasal epithelium and traversing the CP, coronal area indicated in (C). (K) Area indicated by purple box in (C), magnified area of (H), depicting only blood vessels (labeled with FITC-albumin) traversing foramina of the CP. (D–E, H, J) Scale bars 250 μm. (F–G, I, K) Scale bars 50 μm.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.. Lymphatic vessels in…
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.. Lymphatic vessels in lymph nodes and dura express LYVE1, as do non-lymphatic vessels and cells in the brain.
(A–D) LYVE1-GFP (Ai6) mice were used for these experiments. (A–B) Superficial lymph nodes in the neck: DiI (white) and LYVE1 (magenta). No cross-labeling is observed between DiI+ blood vessels and LYVE1+ lymphatic vessels. (C–D) Dura: DiI (white), LYVE1 (yellow), and DAPI (blue). (E) Schematic of the sagittal view of the mouse brain showing the ROIs for (F–I). (F–I) LYVE1-tdtomato (Ai14) mice were used for these experiments. FITC-albumin filled LYVE1-tdtomato mice. LYVE1 (magenta), FITC-albumin (green), and DAPI (blue). F–G) A penetrating vessel (FITC-albumin filled) with LYVE1+ vascular endothelial cells (F) in the upper layers of the cortex, area indicated by the blue box in (A). (H–I) A non-vascular cell of unknown type expressing LYVE1 in the frontal cortex (H), area indicated by orange box in (A). (A–B) Scale bar 500 μm. C–D, H–I) Scale bar 250 μm. (F–G) Scale bar 50 μm.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2.. LYVE1 expression in…
Figure 3—figure supplement 2.. LYVE1 expression in the murine brain is not cell-type specific.
(A) Schematic of the sagittal view of the mouse brain showing the ROIs for (B–Q). (B–Q) Immunofluorescence staining of GFAP, NeuN, MRC1, Oligo1, CD164, CD31, or Phalloidin in a LYVE1-GFP (Ai6) mouse in the cortex, in the area indicated by the blue box in (A), unless specified. (B) No overlap was observed between GFAP+ and LYVE1+ cells. (C) Zoomed in area in (B). (D) No overlap was observed between NeuN+ and LYVE1+ cells. (E) Zoomed in area in (D). (F) Minimal overlap was observed between MRC1+ and LYVE1+ cells in the area indicated by the pink box in (A). (G) Minimal overlap was observed between MRC1+ and LYVE1+ cells in the area indicated by the yellow box in (A). (H) No overlap was observed between Oligo1+ and LYVE1+ cells. (I) Zoomed in area in (H). (J–K) LYVE1+ cell of unknown type, area indicated by yellow box in (A). (L) No overlap was observed between CD164+ and LYVE1+ cells in the area indicated by the pink box in (A). (M) No overlap was observed between CD164+ and LYVE1+ cells in the area indicated by the yellow box in (A). (N) Overlap was observed between CD31+ and LYVE1+ cells in the area indicated by the blue box in (A). (O) Zoomed in area in (N). (P) Overlap was observed between Phalloidin and LYVE1+ cells in the area indicated by the blue box in (A). (Q) Zoomed in area in (N). (B, D, H) Scale bar 250 μm. (C, E–G, I, L–N, P) Scale bar 50 μm. (J–K) Scale bar 25 μm. (O, Q) Scale bar 20 μm.
Figure 4.. Visualization of CSF flow into…
Figure 4.. Visualization of CSF flow into the nasal cavity and spinal column by injection of Evans blue dye into the cisterna magna.
(A) Schematic of the sagittal plane of the mouse skull and brain depicting the flow of CSF (blue arrows) and location of EB injection into the cisterna magna. (B) Sagittal, midline cut of a decalcified skull and spinal column after a cisterna magna EB injection. Scale bar 3 mm. (C) A decalcified and SeeDB-cleared spinal column (cut between C2 and C3, with C3 at the top of the picture) after a cisterna magna EB injection. Scale bar 2 mm. D) Area depicted by pink box in (A), showing drainage of EB dye across the CP into the nasal cavity. Scale bar 1 mm. (E) Localization of EB dye in the deep cervical lymph nodes (purple arrows) after a cisterna magna EB injection. Scale bar 1 mm.
Figure 5.. Visualization of CSF flow into…
Figure 5.. Visualization of CSF flow into the nasal cavity by injection of 3kDa-FITCDextran into the cisterna magna.
(A) Schematic of the sagittal plane of the mouse skull and brain depicting the flow of CSF (blue arrows) and location of 3kDa-FITCDextran injection into the cisterna magna. (B–I) Fluorescent images of a mouse skull and brain 35 min after a 3kDa-FITCDextran (green) cisterna magna injection. (B) Skull outlined by white dashed lines. 3kDa-FITCDextran is observed in the cisterna magna and the nasal cavity. (C) Area indicated by pink box in (A). FITC 3kD-Dextran is observed in the nasal cavity. Scale bar 500 μm. (D–I) Fluorescent images of a mouse skull and brain 35 min after a 3kDa-FITCDextran (green) cisterna magna injection into a LYVE1-tdTomato (Ai14) mouse. LYVE1 (magenta) and DAPI (blue). (D–F) Area indicated by white box in (C). 3kDa-FITCDextran is observed draining into the nasal cavity along the olfactory nerve. LYVE1+ vessels are observed running parallel to the olfactory nerve. Scale bar 250 μm (G-I) Area indicated by white box in (F). 3kD-FITCDextran is observed moving along and through LYVE1+ vessels. Scale bar 50 μm.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.. Anatomic route of…
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.. Anatomic route of olfactory bulb injected 3kDa-FITCDecxtran dye.
For schematics: olfactory nerve (ON), neuroepithelium (NE), cribriform plate (CP), olfactory bulb (OB) and glomeruli (yellow circles). (A) Sagittal view of the mouse skull and brain depicting OSNs crossing the CP and terminating in the OB and glomeruli. (B) Immunofluorescent staining of area in (A), after an injection of 3kDa-FITCDextran injected into the olfactory bulb. OMP+ OSNs (magenta) and the dye (green) are observed crossing the CP into the nasal cavity. Scale bar 250 µm. (C) Stacked image of the area depicted by yellow box in (B). Orthogonal views of the stack are shown: right panel (YZ) view and bottom panel (XZ) view.
Figure 6.. Effects of ZnSO 4 treatment…
Figure 6.. Effects of ZnSO4 treatment on behavior and olfactory sensory nerve axons.
(A) Percent weight loss of vehicle (blue) and ZnSO4 treated (black) mice after treatment. There was a significant difference in weight of ZnSO4-treated mice compared to control mice 1 week (p=0.001, n = 17 for vehicle and n = 25 for treated, ttest2) and 4 weeks (p=0.004, n = 17 for vehicle and n = 25 for treated, ttest2) after treatment. Mean ± standard deviation plotted. **p≤0.01 ***p≤0.001 (B) Photo of a Swiss Webster mouse on the running wheel. (C) Actogram of the activity of a single mouse before and after ZnSO4 treatment. Treatment time indicated by pink line. (D) Individual counts of total wheel activity per day (vehicle = blue, ZnSO4treated = gray), bold line is the mean of each group. No significant difference observed between groups (p=0.5189, KSTAT = 0.3750, n = 8 for each group, K-S test). (E) Schematic: sagittal plane depicting OSNs crossing the CP and synapsing onto the OB and glomeruli (yellow circles). (F–M) Immunofluorescent staining of area depicted in (E), OMP (red), LYVE1 (magenta) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar 250 μm. (F, J) Vehicle Control. (G, K) Two days after ZnSO4 treatment. (H, L) Ten days after ZnSO4 treatment. (I, M) Thirty days after ZnSO4 treatment. Swiss Webster mice were used for (F–I) and LYVE1-GFP (Ai6) mice were used for (J–M). (N) Quantification of OMP signal fluorescence for vehicle (n = 14) mice compared to 2 (t(8) = 0.1429, p=0.8898, n = 5, post-hoc ttest2), 10 (t(13) = 15.71, p≤0.001, n = 8, post-hoc ttest2) and 30 (t(13) = 25.39, p≤0.001, n = 9, post-hoc ttest2) days after ZnSO4 treatment. Mean ± standard deviation plotted. Circles, triangles, and squares represent means of individual animals. ***p≤0.001.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.. ZnSO 4 -treatment…
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.. ZnSO4-treatment causes olfactory bulb degeneration.
(A) Comparison of the area of olfactory bulb for vehicle and ZnSO4-treated 2 days (t(5) = 0.0073, p=0.9945, n = 3 for vehicle and n = 4 treated, post-hoc ttest2), 10 days (t(12) = 6.46, p≤0.001, n = 7 for each group, post-hoc ttest2), and 30 days (t(12) = 6.712, p≤0.001, n = 7 for each group, post-hoc ttest2) after treatment. Mean ± standard deviation plotted. (B) Quantification of the OMP mean fluorescence of vehicle–treated mice. No significant differences were observed (F(2, 16)=0.02775, p=0.9727, 2 day n = 5, 10 day n = 8, 30 day n = 6, one-way ANOVA) showing a lack of olfactory degeneration. Mean ± standard deviation plotted. Circles, squares, and triangles represent means of individual animals. (C–F) Thionin-nissl staining 30 days post-ZnSO4 treatment of Swiss Webster and C57BL/6J vehicle mice (C–D) and 30 days post ZnSO4-treated mice (E–F). Note increased space between OB and CP and change in morphology of the neuroepithelium in ZnSO4-treated mice. Scale bar 1 mm.
Figure 6—figure supplement 2.. Genetic and histological…
Figure 6—figure supplement 2.. Genetic and histological assays show no inflammatory response in the brain or choroid plexus to ZnSO4 treatment.
(A–D) AQP1, Klotho, NF-κβ, or RelA mRNA detected in the ventricle and choroid plexus of ZnSO4-treated and vehicle control mice. mRNA was extracted from adult choroid plexus tissue, converted to cDNA, and normalized based on GAPDH expression. (A) PCR products of ZnSO4 treated and vehicle control mice 2 days after treatment depicted by pictures of the agarose gels after amplification with the specific primers. (B) Normalization of mRNA expression by GAPDH expression (n = 3 each group). No significant difference (n = 3 for each group, ttest2) in expression was observed for all proteins assessed between ZnSO4-treated and vehicle mice: AQP1 (p=0.1347), Klotho (p=0.7550), NF-κβ (p=0.4990), or RelA (p=0.7623). (C) Immunofluorescence staining of GFAP (green) and DAPI (blue) in the mouse cortex. Left panel vehicle and right panel 2 days after ZnSO4 treatment. No inflammatory response (GFAP) is observed 2 days after ZnSO4 treatment, as compared to vehicle control. Scale bar 50 µm. (D) PCR products of ZnSO4 and vehicle control mice 10 days after treatment depicted by pictures of the of the agarose gels after amplification with the specific primers. (E) Normalization of mRNA expression by GAPDH expression (n = 3 each group, ttest2). No significant difference was observed for all proteins assessed between ZnSO4 treated and vehicle mice: AQP1 (p=0.3158), Klotho (p=0.6276), NF-κβ (p=0.3803), or RelA (p=0.3097). (F) Immunofluorescence staining of GFAP (green) and DAPI (blue) in the mouse cortex. Left panel vehicle and right panel 10 day ZnSO4 treated. No inflammatory response (GFAP) is observed 10 days after ZnSO4 treatment, compared to vehicle control. Scale bar 50 µm.
Figure 7.. ZnSO 4 treatment decreases CSF…
Figure 7.. ZnSO4 treatment decreases CSF outflow through the cribriform plate ipsilateral to treatment.
(A) Sagittal view schematic depicting direction of CSF flow and location of a cisterna magna injection of Evans blue. (B–D) Sagittal view of decalcified and cut skull for imaging after Evans blue injection, area indicated by pink box in (A). ROI indicated by blue box. Scale bar 1 mm. (B) Vehicle control. (C) 10 days after ZnSO4 treatment. (D) 30 days after ZnSO4 treatment. (E–G) Plot of the intensity of the Evans blue dye as a function rostral-caudal distance. (E) Vehicle control, ROI of area measured indicated by blue box in (B). (F) 10 day ZnSO4 treated, ROI of area measured indicated by blue box in (C). (G) 30 days after ZnSO4 treatment, ROI of area measured indicated by blue box in (D). (H) Comparison of all dye curves of all vehicle- (gray) and ZnSO4-treated (purple) groups for each time point after treatment: 2 day, n = 3 vehicle and n = 5 treated. 10 day, n = 5 for each group. 30 day, n = 6 vehicle and n = 11 for treated. Means plotted as bold lines. (I–K) Mean is plotted as height of bar. Circles represent individual animals. (I) Mean of the center of mass location of the dye curve plotted for vehicle- and ZnSO4-treated animals 2 (t(6) = 0.7489, p=0.4822, n = 3 vehicle and n = 5 treated, post-hoc ttest2), 10 (t(15) = −4.4921, p=0.0004, n = 5 for each group, post-hoc ttest2), and 30 ((t(15) = −3.7539, p=0.0019, n = 6 vehicle and n = 11 for treated, post-hoc ttest2) days after treatment. J) Mean dye peak location plotted for vehicle and ZnSO4-treated animals 2 (t(6) = −1.5082, p=0.1822, n = 3 vehicle and n = 5 treated, post-hoc ttest2), 10 (t(15) = −2.8064, p=0.0133, n = 5 for each group, post-hoc ttest2), and 30 (t(15) = −3.0014, p=0.0089, n = 6 vehicle and n = 11 for treated, post-hoc ttest2) days after treatment. (K) Maximum dye peak value plotted for vehicle and ZnSO4-treated animals 2 (t(6) = −1.4187, p=0.2058, n = 3 vehicle and n = 5 treated, post-hoc ttest2), 10 (t(15) = 0.7982, p=0.4372, n = 5 for each group, post-hoc ttest2), and 30 (t(15) = 0.2052, p=0.8402, n = 6 vehicle and n = 11 for treated, post-hoc ttest2) days after treatment. *p≤0.05 **p≤0.01. ***p≤0.001.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1.. ZnSO 4 treatment…
Figure 7—figure supplement 1.. ZnSO4 treatment impacts CSF outflow on the side contralateral to treatment.
(A) Sagittal view of the skull depicting direction of CSF flow and location of cisterna magna injection of EB. (B–E) Sagittal view of decalcified and cut skull of the ipsilateral side for imaging after EB injection in the cisterna magna, area indicated by black box in (A). (F–I) Contralateral side of ZnSO4 treatment. Scale bar 1 mm. (B, F) Vehicle control. (C, G) 2 days post-ZnSO4 treatment. (D, H) 10 days post-ZnSO4 treatment. (E, I) 30 days post-ZnSO4 treatment. (J) Comparison of all dye intensity curves of all vehicle (gray) and ZnSO4 treated (purple) animals for each treatment duration: 2 day, n = 3 vehicle and n = 5 treated. 10 day, n = 5 for each group. 30 day, n = 6 vehicle and n = 11 for treated. Means of the group plotted as thicker lines. (K–M) Mean is plotted as height of bar. Circles represent individual animals. (K) Mean center of mass of the dye intensity on the side contralateral to the treatment for vehicle- and zinc-treated animals after 2 (t(6) = −0.0290, p=0.9978, n = 3 vehicle and n = 5 treated, post-hoc ttest2), 10 (t(8) = 2.4522, p=0.0398, n = 5 for each group, post-hoc ttest2), and 30 (t(15) = 1.2746, p=0.2218, n = 6 vehicle and n = 11 for treated, post-hoc ttest2) days of treatment. (L) Mean dye peak location of the contralateral side plotted for vehicle- and zinc-treated animals after 2 (t(6) = 0.6881, p=0.5171, n = 3 vehicle and n = 5, post-hoc ttest2), 10 (t(8) = 2.4056, p=0.0428, n = 5 for each group, post-hoc ttest2), and 30 (t(15) = 3.4097, p=0.0039, n = 6 vehicle and n = 11 for treated, post-hoc ttest2) days of treatment. (M) Maximum dye peak value of the contralateral side plotted for vehicle and ZnSO4-treated animals after 2 (t(6) = −3.8517, p=0.0084, n = 3 vehicle and n = 5 treated, post-hoc ttest2), 10 (t(8) = 0.5298, p=0.6107, n = 5 for each group, post-hoc ttest2), and 30 (t(15) = −0.3148, p=0.7573, n = 6 vehicle and n = 11 for treated, post-hoc ttest2) days of treatment. *p≤0.05. **p≤0.01.
Figure 8.. Longer-duration dye injections show ZnSO…
Figure 8.. Longer-duration dye injections show ZnSO4 treatment blocks CSF flow across the cribriform plate.
(A) Sagittal view of the skull depicting direction of CSF flow and location of cisterna magna injection of EB. (B–C) Localization of EB dye in the deep cervical lymph nodes (orange circles) after a cisterna magna EB injection. Scale bar 500 µm. (B) Vehicle control. (C) 30 days after ZnSO4 treatment. (D–E) Sagittal view of decalcified and cut skull of the ipsilateral side for imaging after EB injection in the cisterna magna. ROI indicated by orange box. Scale bar 1 mm. (D) Vehicle control. (E) 30 days after ZnSO4 treatment. (F) Plot of the intensity of the Evans blue dye as a function rostral-caudal distance for vehicle (gray) and ZnSO4-treated (blue) groups 30 days after treatment. ROI indicated by orange box in (D–E). (G) Mean of the center of mass (t(10) = −3.2015, p=0.0095, n = 5 vehicle and n = 7 treated, post-hoc ttest2) and dye peak (t(10) = −1.6604, p=0.1278, n = 5 vehicle and n = 7 treated, post-hoc ttest2) location of the curve plotted for vehicle- and ZnSO4-treated animals 30 days after treatment. (H) Vehicle (top) and 30 days after ZnSO4 treatment (bottom) decalcified and SeeDB cleared spinal columns after cisterna magna EB injection. Scale bar 500 mm.
Figure 9.. Visualization of effects of intranasal…
Figure 9.. Visualization of effects of intranasal ZnSO4 treatment on CSF flow with 3kDa-FITC Dextran.
(A) Schematic of a sagittal view of the skull, depicting direction of CSF flow and location of cisterna magna injection of 3kDa-FITCDextran. (B–C) Sagittal view of decalcified and cut skull for imaging after FITC-dextran injection, area indicated by pink box in (A). Scale bar 500 µm. (B) Vehicle control. (C) 10 day ZnSO4 treated. (D–E) Plot of the intensity of the 3kDa-FITC Dextran dye as a function of rostral-caudal distance. (D) Vehicle control, ROI of area measured indicated by white box in (B). (E) 10 days after ZnSO4 treatment, ROI of area measured indicated by white box in (C). (F–G) Mean ± standard deviation plotted. Circles and squares represent means of individual animals. (F) Comparison of the center of mass location of the dye peak between the vehicle (black) and ZnSO4 (orange) treated groups (t(12) = −3.1805, p=0.0079, n = 6 vehicle and n = 8 treated, post-hoc ttest2). (G) Comparison of the location of the dye peak between the vehicle (black) and ZnSO4 (orange) treated groups (t(12) = −3.5384, p=0.0041, n = 6 vehicle and n = 8 treated, post-hoc ttest2). **p≤0.01. Note that the time between cisterna magna injection and sacrifice was different in the FITC-dextran and EB injections (35 vs. 20 min respectively) due to the different molecular weights of the dyes.
Figure 10.. Intranasal ZnSO 4 treatment does…
Figure 10.. Intranasal ZnSO4 treatment does not affect ICP but decreases CSF movement down the spinal column.
(A) Left panel, example trace showing intracranial pressure (ICP) change during a locomotion bout in an animal that has been injected with aCSF in the cisterna magna. The ICP becomes elevated slightly over baseline when the animal moves, consistent with previous results (Gao and Drew, 2016). The tick marks in the upper panel indicates locomotion events, defined as times where the treadmill acceleration exceeds a thereshold (Huo et al., 2014). Subsequent panels show ICP change during locomotion in animals injected with Kaolin, vehicle control, or ZnSO4 treatment, respectively. (B–D) Mean ± standard deviation plotted. Circles represent individual animals. (B) Mean of each group of ICP during rest (1 hr after isoflurane) after kaolin injection (Kaolin) and 10, 30, and 60 days after treatment (ZnSO4). The orange shaded circle indicates the same animal showing in (A). (C) Same as (B) but for ICP during locomotion. Comparison of ICP during locomotion for aCSF and kaolin injected mice (t(4) = 5.88, p=0.0042, n = 3 for each group, ttest2). (D) Same as (B) but for stationary (resting) periods in the 2 min immediately after the cessation of isoflurane. (B–D) No statistically significant differences were observed between ZnSO4-treated and control animal at rest or during locomotion for all treatment durations (Table 2). (E) Top panel: A decalcified and SeeDB-cleared spinal column after a cisterna magna EB injection. Bottom panel: Red channel only displaying the trace (yellow line) used for quantifying pixel intensity. Scale bar 2 mm. (F) Vehicle (top) and 10 days after ZnSO4 treatment (bottom) decalcified and SeeDB cleared spinal columns after cisterna magna EB injection. (G) Trace obtained and graphed to display dye intensity of EB along the spinal column (distance) quantified after cisterna magna injections. (H) Comparisons of the distance of dye movement along the spinal column after an EB cisterna magna injection in mice intranasally treated with vehicle or ZnSO4, 2 (t(5) = 0.6921, p=0.5197, n = 3 vehicle and n = 4 treated, ttest2), 10 (t(12) = 5.069, p=0.00028, n = 8 vehicle and n = 6 treated, ttest2), and 30 days (t(9) = 4.571, p=0.00134, n = 3 vehicle and n = 8 treated, ttest2), after treatment. Mean ± standard deviation plotted. *p≤0.05 **p≤0.01 ***p≤0.001.

References

    1. Ablimit A, Matsuzaki T, Tajika Y, Aoki T, Hagiwara H, Takata K. Immunolocalization of water channel aquaporins in the nasal olfactory mucosa. Archives of Histology and Cytology. 2006;69:1–12. doi: 10.1679/aohc.69.1.
    1. Adams DR, Ajmani GS, Pun VC, Wroblewski KE, Kern DW, Schumm LP, McClintock MK, Suh HH, Pinto JM. Nitrogen dioxide pollution exposure is associated with olfactory dysfunction in older U.S. adults. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology. 2016;6:1245–1252. doi: 10.1002/alr.21829.
    1. Ajmani GS, Suh HH, Pinto JM. Effects of ambient air pollution exposure on olfaction: a review. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2016;124:1683–1693. doi: 10.1289/EHP136.
    1. Al Kawas S, Amizuka N, Bergeron JJM, Warshawsky H. Immunolocalization of the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor and cathepsin B in the enamel organ and alveolar bone of the rat incisor. Calcified Tissue International. 1996;59:192–199. doi: 10.1007/s002239900108.
    1. Albeck MJ, Skak C, Nielsen PR, Olsen KS, Børgesen SE, Gjerris F. Age dependency of resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1998;89:275–278. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.2.0275.
    1. Antila S, Karaman S, Nurmi H, Airavaara M, Voutilainen MH, Mathivet T, Chilov D, Li Z, Koppinen T, Park JH, Fang S, Aspelund A, Saarma M, Eichmann A, Thomas JL, Alitalo K. Development and plasticity of meningeal lymphatic vessels. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2017;214:3645–3667. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170391.
    1. Aspelund A, Antila S, Proulx ST, Karlsen TV, Karaman S, Detmar M, Wiig H, Alitalo K. A dural lymphatic vascular system that drains brain interstitial fluid and macromolecules. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2015;212:991–999. doi: 10.1084/jem.20142290.
    1. Au WW, Treloar HB, Greer CA. Sublaminar organization of the mouse olfactory bulb nerve layer. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2002;446:68–80. doi: 10.1002/cne.10182.
    1. Bhatnagar KP, Kallen FC. Cribriform plate of ethmoid, olfactory bulb and olfactory acuity in forty species of bats. Journal of Morphology. 1974;142:71–89. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051420104.
    1. Bird DJ, Amirkhanian A, Pang B, Van Valkenburgh B. Quantifying the cribriform plate: influences of allometry, function, and phylogeny in carnivora. The Anatomical Record. 2014;297:2080–2092. doi: 10.1002/ar.23032.
    1. Bird DJ, Murphy WJ, Fox-Rosales L, Hamid I, Eagle RA, Van Valkenburgh B. Olfaction written in bone: cribriform plate size parallels olfactory receptor gene repertoires in mammalia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018;285:20180100. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0100.
    1. Bloch O, Auguste KI, Manley GT, Verkman AS. Accelerated progression of kaolin-induced hydrocephalus in aquaporin-4-deficient mice. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2006;26:1527–1537. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600306.
    1. Boulton M, Young A, Hay J, Armstrong D, Flessner M, Schwartz M, Johnston M. Drainage of CSF through lymphatic pathways and arachnoid villi in sheep: measurement of 125I-albumin clearance. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 1996;22:325–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1996.tb01111.x.
    1. Bradbury MW, Cserr HF, Westrop RJ. Drainage of cerebral interstitial fluid into deep cervical lymph of the rabbit. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 1981;240:F329–F336. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1981.240.4.F329.
    1. Bradbury MW, Cole DF. The role of the lymphatic system in drainage of cerebrospinal fluid and aqueous humour. The Journal of Physiology. 1980;299:353–365. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013129.
    1. Bradbury MW, Westrop RJ. Factors influencing exit of substances from cerebrospinal fluid into deep cervical lymph of the rabbit. The Journal of Physiology. 1983;339:519–534. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014731.
    1. Buck L, Axel R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell. 1991;65:175–187. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-X.
    1. Buiakova OI, Baker H, Scott JW, Farbman A, Kream R, Grillo M, Franzen L, Richman M, Davis LM, Abbondanzo S, Stewart CL, Margolis FL. Olfactory marker protein (OMP) gene deletion causes altered physiological activity of olfactory sensory neurons. PNAS. 1996;93:9858–9863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9858.
    1. Burd GD. Morphological study of the effects of intranasal zinc sulfate irrigation on the mouse olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb. Microscopy Research and Technique. 1993;24:195–213. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070240302.
    1. Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Reed W, Maronpot RR, Henríquez-Roldán C, Delgado-Chavez R, Calderón-Garcidueñas A, Dragustinovis I, Franco-Lira M, Aragón-Flores M, Solt AC, Altenburg M, Torres-Jardón R, Swenberg JA. Brain inflammation and Alzheimer's-like pathology in individuals exposed to severe air pollution. Toxicologic Pathology. 2004;32:650–658. doi: 10.1080/01926230490520232.
    1. Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Kavanaugh M, Block M, D'Angiulli A, Delgado-Chávez R, Torres-Jardón R, González-Maciel A, Reynoso-Robles R, Osnaya N, Villarreal-Calderon R, Guo R, Hua Z, Zhu H, Perry G, Diaz P. Neuroinflammation, hyperphosphorylated tau, diffuse amyloid plaques, and down-regulation of the cellular prion protein in air pollution exposed children and young adults. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 2012;28:93–107. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110722.
    1. Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Jewells V, Galaz-Montoya C, van Zundert B, Pérez-Calatayud A, Ascencio-Ferrel E, Valencia-Salazar G, Sandoval-Cano M, Carlos E, Solorio E, Acuña-Ayala H, Torres-Jardón R, D'Angiulli A. Interactive and additive influences of gender, BMI and apolipoprotein 4 on cognition in children chronically exposed to high concentrations of PM2.5 and ozone. APOE 4 females are at highest risk in Mexico City. Environmental Research. 2016a;150:411–422. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.026.
    1. Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Reynoso-Robles R, Vargas-Martínez J, Gómez-Maqueo-Chew A, Pérez-Guillé B, Mukherjee PS, Torres-Jardón R, Perry G, Gónzalez-Maciel A. Prefrontal white matter pathology in air pollution exposed Mexico city young urbanites and their potential impact on neurovascular unit dysfunction and the development of alzheimer's disease. Environmental Research. 2016b;146:404–417. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.031.
    1. Chen H, Kwong JC, Copes R, Tu K, Villeneuve PJ, van Donkelaar A, Hystad P, Martin RV, Murray BJ, Jessiman B, Wilton AS, Kopp A, Burnett RT. Living near major roads and the incidence of dementia, Parkinson's disease, and multiple sclerosis: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 2017a;389:718–726. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32399-6.
    1. Chen H, Kwong JC, Copes R, Hystad P, van Donkelaar A, Tu K, Brook JR, Goldberg MS, Martin RV, Murray BJ, Wilton AS, Kopp A, Burnett RT. Exposure to ambient air pollution and the incidence of dementia: a population-based cohort study. Environment International. 2017b;108:271–277. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.020.
    1. Chen LF, Greene WC. Shaping the nuclear action of NF-kappaB. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2004;5:392–401. doi: 10.1038/nrm1368.
    1. Cheng H, Saffari A, Sioutas C, Forman HJ, Morgan TE, Finch CE. Nanoscale particulate matter from urban traffic rapidly induces oxidative stress and inflammation in olfactory epithelium with concomitant effects on brain. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2016;124:1537–1546. doi: 10.1289/EHP134.
    1. Cserr HF, Knopf PM. Cervical lymphatics, the blood-brain barrier and the immunoreactivity of the brain: a new view. Immunology Today. 1992a;13:507–512. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(92)90027-5.
    1. Cserr HF, Harling-Berg CJ, Knopf PM. Drainage of brain extracellular fluid into blood and deep cervical lymph and its immunological significance. Brain Pathology. 1992b;2:269–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1992.tb00703.x.
    1. Cserr HF, Patlak CS. Secretion and Bulk Flow of Interstitial Fluid. In: Bradbury M. W. B, editor. Physiology and Pharmacology of the Blood-Brain Barrier. Vol. 103. Handbook of experimental pharmacology; 1992c. pp. 245–258.
    1. Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Momjian S, Pickard JD. Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Physiological Measurement. 2004;25:R51–R76. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/5/R01.
    1. Damkier HH, Brown PD, Praetorius J. Cerebrospinal fluid secretion by the choroid plexus. Physiological Reviews. 2013;93:1847–1892. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00004.2013.
    1. de Leon MJ, Li Y, Okamura N, Tsui WH, Saint-Louis LA, Glodzik L, Osorio RS, Fortea J, Butler T, Pirraglia E, Fossati S, Kim HJ, Carare RO, Nedergaard M, Benveniste H, Rusinek H. Cerebrospinal fluid clearance in alzheimer disease measured with dynamic PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2017;58:1471–1476. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.187211.
    1. Dickinson ME, Flenniken AM, Ji X, Teboul L, Wong MD, White JK, Meehan TF, Weninger WJ, Westerberg H, Adissu H, Baker CN, Bower L, Brown JM, Caddle LB, Chiani F, Clary D, Cleak J, Daly MJ, Denegre JM, Doe B, Dolan ME, Edie SM, Fuchs H, Gailus-Durner V, Galli A, Gambadoro A, Gallegos J, Guo S, Horner NR, Hsu CW, Johnson SJ, Kalaga S, Keith LC, Lanoue L, Lawson TN, Lek M, Mark M, Marschall S, Mason J, McElwee ML, Newbigging S, Nutter LM, Peterson KA, Ramirez-Solis R, Rowland DJ, Ryder E, Samocha KE, Seavitt JR, Selloum M, Szoke-Kovacs Z, Tamura M, Trainor AG, Tudose I, Wakana S, Warren J, Wendling O, West DB, Wong L, Yoshiki A, MacArthur DG, Tocchini-Valentini GP, Gao X, Flicek P, Bradley A, Skarnes WC, Justice MJ, Parkinson HE, Moore M, Wells S, Braun RE, Svenson KL, de Angelis MH, Herault Y, Mohun T, Mallon AM, Henkelman RM, Brown SD, Adams DJ, Lloyd KC, McKerlie C, Beaudet AL, Bućan M, Murray SA, International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium, . Jackson Laboratory. Infrastructure Nationale PHENOMIN, Institut Clinique de la Souris (ICS) Charles River Laboratories. MRC Harwell. Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. RIKEN BioResource Center High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature. 2016;537:508–514. doi: 10.1038/nature19356.
    1. Doba N, Reis DJ. Localization within the lower brainstem of a receptive area mediating the pressor response to increased intracranial pressure (the cushing response) Brain Research. 1972;47:487–491. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90655-5.
    1. Doty RL, Hastings L. Neurotoxic exposure and olfactory impairment. Clinics in Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001;1:547–575.
    1. Doty RL, Kamath V. The influences of age on olfaction: a review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;5:1–20. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00020.
    1. Drew PJ, Shih AY, Driscoll JD, Knutsen PM, Blinder P, Davalos D, Akassoglou K, Tsai PS, Kleinfeld D. Chronic optical access through a polished and reinforced thinned skull. Nature Methods. 2010;7:981–984. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1530.
    1. Edelstein AD, Tsuchida MA, Amodaj N, Pinkard H, Vale RD, Stuurman N. Advanced methods of microscope control using μmanager software. Journal of Biological Methods. 2014;1:10. doi: 10.14440/jbm.2014.36.
    1. Edvinsson L, Lindvall M. Autonomic vascular innervation and vasomotor reactivity in the choroid plexus. Experimental Neurology. 1978;62:394–404. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(78)90063-8.
    1. Ekberg JA, Amaya D, Chehrehasa F, Lineburg K, Claxton C, Windus LC, Key B, Mackay-Sim A, St John JA. OMP-ZsGreen fluorescent protein transgenic mice for visualisation of olfactory sensory neurons in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2011;196:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.008.
    1. Erlich SS, McComb JG, Hyman S, Weiss MH. Ultrastructural morphology of the olfactory pathway for cerebrospinal fluid drainage in the rabbit. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1986;64:466–473. doi: 10.3171/jns.1986.64.3.0466.
    1. Ethell DW. Disruption of cerebrospinal fluid flow through the olfactory system may contribute to Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 2014;41:1021–1030. doi: 10.3233/JAD-130659.
    1. Feinstein P, Mombaerts P. A contextual model for axonal sorting into glomeruli in the mouse olfactory system. Cell. 2004;117:817–831. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.011.
    1. Freedman FB, Johnson JA. Equilibrium and kinetic properties of the evans blue-albumin system. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content. 1969;216:675–681. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1969.216.3.675.
    1. Ganrot K, Laurell CB. Measurement of IgG and albumin content of cerebrospinal fluid, and its interpretation. Clinical Chemistry. 1974;20:571–573.
    1. Gao YR, Ma Y, Zhang Q, Winder AT, Liang Z, Antinori L, Drew PJ, Zhang N. Time to wake up: studying neurovascular coupling and brain-wide circuit function in the un-anesthetized animal. NeuroImage. 2017;153:382–398. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.069.
    1. Gao YR, Drew PJ. Determination of vessel cross-sectional area by thresholding in radon space. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2014;34:1180–1187. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.67.
    1. Gao YR, Drew PJ. Effects of voluntary locomotion and calcitonin Gene-Related peptide on the dynamics of single dural vessels in awake mice. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2016;36:2503–2516. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3665-15.2016.
    1. Guild SJ, Saxena UA, McBryde FD, Malpas SC, Ramchandra R. Intracranial pressure influences the level of sympathetic tone. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2018;315:R1049–R1053. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00183.2018.
    1. Harrell MI, Iritani BM, Ruddell A. Lymph node mapping in the mouse. Journal of Immunological Methods. 2008;332:170–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.11.012.
    1. Hartmann DA, Underly RG, Grant RI, Watson AN, Lindner V, Shih AY. Pericyte structure and distribution in the cerebral cortex revealed by high-resolution imaging of transgenic mice. Neurophotonics. 2015;2:041402. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.2.4.041402.
    1. Hoff JT, Reis DJ. Localization of regions mediating the cushing response in CNS of cat. Archives of Neurology. 1970;23:228–240. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1970.00480270038006.
    1. Hubbs AF, Cumpston AM, Goldsmith WT, Battelli LA, Kashon ML, Jackson MC, Frazer DG, Fedan JS, Goravanahally MP, Castranova V, Kreiss K, Willard PA, Friend S, Schwegler-Berry D, Fluharty KL, Sriram K. Respiratory and olfactory cytotoxicity of inhaled 2,3-pentanedione in Sprague-Dawley rats. The American Journal of Pathology. 2012;181:829–844. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.05.021.
    1. Huo BX, Smith JB, Drew PJ. Neurovascular coupling and decoupling in the cortex during voluntary locomotion. Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34:10975–10981. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1369-14.2014.
    1. Huo BX, Gao YR, Drew PJ. Quantitative separation of arterial and venous cerebral blood volume increases during voluntary locomotion. NeuroImage. 2015;105:369–379. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.030.
    1. Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, Benveniste H, Vates GE, Deane R, Goldman SA, Nagelhus EA, Nedergaard M. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Science Translational Medicine. 2012;4:147ra111. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748.
    1. Imamura F, Hasegawa-Ishii S. Environmental Toxicants-Induced immune responses in the olfactory mucosa. Frontiers in Immunology. 2016;7:1–7. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00475.
    1. Jalalvand E, Robertson B, Tostivint H, Löw P, Wallén P, Grillner S. Cerebrospinal Fluid-Contacting neurons sense pH changes and motion in the hypothalamus. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2018;38:7713–7724. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3359-17.2018.
    1. Johansson PA, Dziegielewska KM, Ek CJ, Habgood MD, Møllgård K, Potter A, Schuliga M, Saunders NR. Aquaporin-1 in the choroid plexuses of developing mammalian brain. Cell and Tissue Research. 2005;322:353–364. doi: 10.1007/s00441-005-1120-x.
    1. Johnston M, Zakharov A, Papaiconomou C, Salmasi G, Armstrong D. Evidence of connections between cerebrospinal fluid and nasal lymphatic vessels in humans, non-human primates and other mammalian species. Cerebrospinal Fluid Research. 2004;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1743-8454-1-2.
    1. Johnston M, Zakharov A, Koh L, Armstrong D. Subarachnoid injection of microfil reveals connections between cerebrospinal fluid and nasal lymphatics in the non-human primate. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 2005;31:632–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2005.00679.x.
    1. Jones HC. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure and resistance to absorption during development in normal and hydrocephalic mutant mice. Experimental Neurology. 1985;90:162–172. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(85)90049-4.
    1. Kalmey JK, Thewissen JG, Dluzen DE. Age-related size reduction of foramina in the cribriform plate. The Anatomical Record. 1998;251:326–329. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199807)251:3<326::AID-AR7>;2-T.
    1. Ke MT, Fujimoto S, Imai T. SeeDB : a simple and morphology-preserving optical clearing agent for neuronal circuit reconstruction. Nature Neuroscience. 2013;16:1154–1161. doi: 10.1038/nn.3447.
    1. Kida S, Pantazis A, Weller RO. CSF drains directly from the subarachnoid space into nasal lymphatics in the rat. anatomy, histology and immunological significance. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 1993;19:480–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1993.tb00476.x.
    1. Knudsen FW, Andersen M, Krag C. The arterial supply of the clavicle. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 1989;11:211–214. doi: 10.1007/BF02337824.
    1. Koh L, Zakharov A, Nagra G, Armstrong D, Friendship R, Johnston M. Development of cerebrospinal fluid absorption sites in the pig and rat: connections between the subarachnoid space and lymphatic vessels in the olfactory turbinates. Anatomy and Embryology. 2006;211:335–344. doi: 10.1007/s00429-006-0085-1.
    1. König K, Heissler HE, Zumkeller M, Rickels E. Age-dependence of cerebrospinal parameters. Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplement. 2005;95:315–318.
    1. Kosteljanetz M. “Intracranial pressure: cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and pressure-volume relations,”. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum. 1987;111:1–23.
    1. Kovács T. Mechanisms of olfactory dysfunction in aging and neurodegenerative disorders. Ageing Research Reviews. 2004;3:215–232. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2003.10.003.
    1. Kumar NN, Lochhead JJ, Pizzo ME, Nehra G, Boroumand S, Greene G, Thorne RG. Delivery of immunoglobulin G antibodies to the rat nervous system following intranasal administration: distribution, dose-response, and mechanisms of delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2018;286:467–484. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.08.006.
    1. Kuro-o M, Matsumura Y, Aizawa H, Kawaguchi H, Suga T, Utsugi T, Ohyama Y, Kurabayashi M, Kaname T, Kume E, Iwasaki H, Iida A, Shiraki-Iida T, Nishikawa S, Nagai R, Nabeshima YI. Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing. Nature. 1997;390:45–51. doi: 10.1038/36285.
    1. Leinenga G, Langton C, Nisbet R, Götz J. Ultrasound treatment of neurological diseases--current and emerging applications. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2016;12:161–174. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.13.
    1. Li Y, Song Y, Zhao L, Gaidosh G, Laties AM, Wen R. Direct labeling and visualization of blood vessels with lipophilic carbocyanine dye DiI. Nature Protocols. 2008;3:1703–1708. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.172.
    1. Lindvall M, Edvinsson L, Owman C. Sympathetic nervous control of cerebrospinal fluid production from the choroid plexus. Science. 1978;201:176–178. doi: 10.1126/science.663649.
    1. Lochhead JJ, Thorne RG. Intranasal delivery of biologics to the central nervous system. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2012;64:614–628. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.11.002.
    1. Louveau A, Smirnov I, Keyes TJ, Eccles JD, Rouhani SJ, Peske JD, Derecki NC, Castle D, Mandell JW, Lee KS, Harris TH, Kipnis J. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature. 2015;523:337–341. doi: 10.1038/nature14432.
    1. Ma Q, Ineichen BV, Detmar M, Proulx ST. Outflow of cerebrospinal fluid is predominantly through lymphatic vessels and is reduced in aged mice. Nature Communications. 2017;8:1434. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01484-6.
    1. Ma Q, Ries M, Decker Y, Müller A, Riner C, Bücker A, Fassbender K, Detmar M, Proulx ST. Rapid lymphatic efflux limits cerebrospinal fluid flow to the brain. Acta Neuropathologica. 2019;137:151–165. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1916-x.
    1. Maloveska M, Danko J, Petrovova E, Kresakova L, Vdoviakova K, Michalicova A, Kovac A, Cubinkova V, Cizkova D. Dynamics of Evans blue clearance from cerebrospinal fluid into meningeal lymphatic vessels and deep cervical lymph nodes. Neurological Research. 2018;40:372–380. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1446282.
    1. Marmarou A, Shulman K, LaMorgese J. Compartmental analysis of compliance and outflow resistance of the cerebrospinal fluid system. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1975;43:523–534. doi: 10.3171/jns.1975.43.5.0523.
    1. Marques F, Sousa JC, Coppola G, Falcao AM, Rodrigues AJ, Geschwind DH, Sousa N, Correia-Neves M, Palha JA. Kinetic profile of the transcriptome changes induced in the choroid plexus by peripheral inflammation. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2009;29:921–932. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.15.
    1. May C, Kaye JA, Atack JR, Schapiro MB, Friedland RP, Rapoport SI. Cerebrospinal fluid production is reduced in healthy aging. Neurology. 1990;40:500–503. doi: 10.1212/WNL.40.3_Part_1.500.
    1. McBride K, Slotnick B, Margolis FL. Does intranasal application of zinc sulfate produce anosmia in the mouse? an olfactometric and anatomical study. Chemical Senses. 2003;28:659–670. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjg053.
    1. McComb JG. Recent research into the nature of cerebrospinal fluid formation and absorption. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1983;59:369–383. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.3.0369.
    1. Mollanji R, Bozanovic-Sosic R, Zakharov A, Makarian L, Johnston MG. Blocking cerebrospinal fluid absorption through the cribriform plate increases resting intracranial pressure. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2002;282:R1593–R1599. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00695.2001.
    1. Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM. Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. Jama. 2002;288:2307–2312. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2307.
    1. Nagelhus EA, Ottersen OP. Physiological roles of aquaporin-4 in brain. Physiological Reviews. 2013;93:1543–1562. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2013.
    1. Nagra G, Koh L, Zakharov A, Armstrong D, Johnston M. Quantification of cerebrospinal fluid transport across the cribriform plate into lymphatics in rats. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2006;291:R1383–R1389. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00235.2006.
    1. Naruse I, Ueta E. Hydrocephalus manifestation in the genetic polydactyly/ arhinencephaly mouse (Pdn/Pdn) Congenital Anomalies. 2002;42:27–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2002.tb00851.x.
    1. Nielsen S, Nagelhus EA, Amiry-Moghaddam M, Bourque C, Agre P, Ottersen OP. Specialized membrane domains for water transport in glial cells: high-resolution immunogold cytochemistry of aquaporin-4 in rat brain. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17:171–180. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-01-00171.1997.
    1. Oshio K, Watanabe H, Song Y, Verkman AS, Manley GT. Reduced cerebrospinal fluid production and intracranial pressure in mice lacking choroid plexus water channel Aquaporin-1. The FASEB Journal. 2005;19:76–78. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-1711fje.
    1. Papaiconomou C, Bozanovic-Sosic R, Zakharov A, Johnston M. Does neonatal cerebrospinal fluid absorption occur via arachnoid projections or extracranial lymphatics? American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2002;283:R869–R876. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00173.2002.
    1. Pham THM, Baluk P, Xu Y, Grigorova I, Bankovich AJ, Pappu R, Coughlin SR, McDonald DM, Schwab SR, Cyster JG. Lymphatic endothelial cell sphingosine kinase activity is required for lymphocyte egress and lymphatic patterning. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2010;207:17–27. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091619.
    1. Pihlström H, Fortelius M, Hemilä S, Forsman R, Reuter T. Scaling of mammalian ethmoid bones can predict olfactory organ size and performance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2005;272:957–962. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2993.
    1. Pizzo ME, Wolak DJ, Kumar NN, Brunette E, Brunnquell CL, Hannocks MJ, Abbott NJ, Meyerand ME, Sorokin L, Stanimirovic DB, Thorne RG. Intrathecal antibody distribution in the rat brain: surface diffusion, perivascular transport and osmotic enhancement of delivery. The Journal of Physiology. 2018;596:445–475. doi: 10.1113/JP275105.
    1. Pollay M. The function and structure of the cerebrospinal fluid outflow system. Cerebrospinal Fluid Research. 2010;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1743-8454-7-9.
    1. Procino G, Mastrofrancesco L, Sallustio F, Costantino V, Barbieri C, Pisani F, Schena FP, Svelto M, Valenti G. AQP5 is expressed in type-B intercalated cells in the collecting duct system of the rat, mouse and human kidney. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2011;28:683–692. doi: 10.1159/000335762.
    1. Redzic ZB, Preston JE, Duncan JA, Chodobski A, Szmydynger-Chodobska J. The choroid plexus-cerebrospinal fluid system: from development to aging. Current Topics in Developmental Biology. 2005;71:1–52. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)71001-2.
    1. Roberts RO, Christianson TJ, Kremers WK, Mielke MM, Machulda MM, Vassilaki M, Alhurani RE, Geda YE, Knopman DS, Petersen RC. Association between olfactory dysfunction and amnestic mild cognitive impairment and alzheimer disease dementia. JAMA Neurology. 2016;73:93–101. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2952.
    1. Rodriguez-Gil DJ, Treloar HB, Zhang X, Miller AM, Two A, Iwema C, Firestein SJ, Greer CA. Chromosomal location-dependent nonstochastic onset of odor receptor expression. Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30:10067–10075. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1776-10.2010.
    1. Sakai H, Sato K, Kai Y, Shoji T, Hasegawa S, Nishizaki M, Sagara A, Yamashita A, Narita M. Distribution of aquaporin genes and selection of individual reference genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis in multiple tissues of the mouse. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2014;92:789–796. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2014-0157.
    1. Semba RD, Moghekar AR, Hu J, Sun K, Turner R, Ferrucci L, O'Brien R. Klotho in the cerebrospinal fluid of adults with and without Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience Letters. 2014;558:37–40. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.10.058.
    1. Shields SD, Moore KD, Phelps PE, Basbaum AI. Olfactory ensheathing glia express aquaporin 1. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2010;518:4329–4341. doi: 10.1002/cne.22459.
    1. Shih AY, Mateo C, Drew PJ, Tsai PS, Kleinfeld D. A polished and reinforced Thinned-skull window for Long-term imaging of the mouse brain. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2012;61:4–9. doi: 10.3791/3742.
    1. Shirey MJ, Smith JB, Kudlik DE, Huo BX, Greene SE, Drew PJ. Brief anesthesia, but not voluntary locomotion, significantly alters cortical temperature. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2015;114:309–322. doi: 10.1152/jn.00046.2015.
    1. Silver I, Kim C, Mollanji R, Johnston M. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance in sheep: impact of blocking cerebrospinal fluid transport through the cribriform plate. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 2002;28:67–74. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2002.00373.x.
    1. Silverberg G, Mayo M, Saul T, Fellmann J, McGuire D. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Cerebrospinal Fluid Research. 2006;3:7. doi: 10.1186/1743-8454-3-7.
    1. Simms D, Cizdziel P, Chomczynski P. TRIzol: a new reagent for optimal single-step isolation of RNA. Focus. 1993;15:99–102.
    1. Simon MJ, Iliff JJ. Regulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in neurodegenerative, neurovascular and neuroinflammatory disease. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 2016;1862:442–451. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.10.014.
    1. Smith AJ, Yao X, Dix JA, Jin BJ, Verkman AS. Test of the 'glymphatic' hypothesis demonstrates diffusive and aquaporin-4-independent solute transport in rodent brain parenchyma. eLife. 2017;6:e27679. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27679.
    1. Sofroniew MV. Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation. Trends in Neurosciences. 2009;32:638–647. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.08.002.
    1. Souza SA, Souza MM, Gregório LC, Ajzen S. Anterior ethmoidal artery evaluation on coronal CT scans. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2009;75:101–106. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30839-9.
    1. Stewart WB, Greer CA, Teicher MH. The effect of intranasal zinc sulfate treatment on odor-mediated behavior and on odor-induced metabolic activity in the olfactory bulbs of neonatal rats. Developmental Brain Research. 1983;8:247–259. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(83)90009-3.
    1. Syková E, Nicholson C. Diffusion in brain extracellular space. Physiological Reviews. 2008;88:1277–1340. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2007.
    1. Szentistvanyi I, Patlak CS, Ellis RA, Cserr HF. Drainage of interstitial fluid from different regions of rat brain. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 1984;246:F835–F844. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1984.246.6.F835.
    1. Takata K, Matsuzaki T, Tajika Y. Aquaporins: water channel proteins of the cell membrane. Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 2004;39:1–83. doi: 10.1016/j.proghi.2004.03.001.
    1. Talamo BR, Rudel R, Kosik KS, Lee VM, Neff S, Adelman L, Kauer JS. Pathological changes in olfactory neurons in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 1989;337:736–739. doi: 10.1038/337736a0.
    1. Talamo BR, Feng WH, Perez-Cruet M, Adelman L, Kosik K, Lee MY, Cork LC, Kauer JS. Pathologic changes in olfactory neurons in Alzheimer's disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1991;640:1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb00182.x.
    1. Tsai PS, Kaufhold JP, Blinder P, Friedman B, Drew PJ, Karten HJ, Lyden PD, Kleinfeld D. Correlations of neuronal and microvascular densities in murine cortex revealed by direct counting and colocalization of nuclei and vessels. Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:14553–14570. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3287-09.2009.
    1. Tsutsumi S, Ono H, Yasumoto Y. A possible venous connection between the cranial and nasal cavity. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2016;38:911–916. doi: 10.1007/s00276-016-1650-9.
    1. Tsutsumi S, Ono H, Ishii H, Yasumoto Y. An undescribed venous pathway intervening between the olfactory fossa and nasal vestibule. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2019;41:485–490. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02208-9.
    1. Tuor UI, Kelly PA, Edvinsson L, McCulloch J. Neuropeptide Y and the cerebral circulation. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 1990;10:591–601. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.110.
    1. Umans BD, Liberles SD. Neural sensing of organ volume. Trends in Neurosciences. 2018;41:911–924. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.07.008.
    1. Verkman AS, Tradtrantip L, Smith AJ, Yao X. Aquaporin water channels and hydrocephalus. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2017;52:409–416. doi: 10.1159/000452168.
    1. Walter BA, Valera VA, Takahashi S, Ushiki T. The olfactory route for cerebrospinal fluid drainage into the peripheral lymphatic system. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 2006;32:388–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2006.00737.x.
    1. Wang Y, Lang L, Huang P, Wang Z, Jacobson O, Kiesewetter DO, Ali IU, Teng G, Niu G, Chen X. In vivo albumin labeling and lymphatic imaging. PNAS. 2015;112:208–213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414821112.
    1. Weed LH. The absorption of cerebrospinal fluid into the venous system. American Journal of Anatomy. 1923;31:191–221. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000310302.
    1. Welch K, Friedman V. The cerebrospinal fluid valves. Brain. 1960;83:454–469. doi: 10.1093/brain/83.3.454.
    1. Weller RO, Kida S, Zhang ET. Pathways of fluid drainage from the brain--morphological aspects and immunological significance in rat and man. Brain Pathology. 1992;2:277–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1992.tb00704.x.
    1. Weller RO, Sharp MM, Christodoulides M, Carare RO, Møllgård K. The meninges as barriers and facilitators for the movement of fluid, cells and pathogens related to the rodent and human CNS. Acta Neuropathologica. 2018;135:363–385. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1809-z.
    1. Wulf E, Deboben A, Bautz FA, Faulstich H, Wieland T. Fluorescent phallotoxin, a tool for the visualization of cellular actin. PNAS. 1979;76:4498–4502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4498.
    1. Yamada S, DePasquale M, Patlak CS, Cserr HF. Albumin outflow into deep cervical lymph from different regions of rabbit brain. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 1991;261:H1197–H1204. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1991.261.4.H1197.
    1. Yamamoto H, Omelchenko I, Shi X, Nuttall AL. The influence of NF-kappaB signal-transduction pathways on the murine inner ear by acoustic overstimulation. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2009;87:1832–1840. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22018.
    1. Yang YX, Lu QK, Liao JC, Dang RS. Morphological characteristics of the anterior ethmoidal artery in Ethmoid roof and endoscopic localization. Skull Base. 2009;19:311–317. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1115323.
    1. Yang L, Kress BT, Weber HJ, Thiyagarajan M, Wang B, Deane R, Benveniste H, Iliff JJ, Nedergaard M. Evaluating glymphatic pathway function utilizing clinically relevant intrathecal infusion of CSF tracer. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2013;11:107. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-107.
    1. Zakharov A, Papaiconomou C, Koh L, Djenic J, Bozanovic-Sosic R, Johnston M. Integrating the roles of extracranial lymphatics and intracranial veins in cerebrospinal fluid absorption in sheep. Microvascular Research. 2004;67:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2003.08.004.
    1. Zou YM, Lu D, Liu LP, Zhang HH, Zhou YY. Olfactory dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2016;12:869–875. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S104886.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi