A complex behavioural change intervention to reduce the risk of diabetes and prediabetes in the pre-conception period in Malaysia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Jutta K H Skau, Awatef Binti Amer Nordin, Julius C H Cheah, Roslinah Ali, Ramli Zainal, Tahir Aris, Zainudin Mohd Ali, Priya Matzen, Regien Biesma, Jens Aagaard-Hansen, Mark A Hanson, Shane A Norris, Jutta K H Skau, Awatef Binti Amer Nordin, Julius C H Cheah, Roslinah Ali, Ramli Zainal, Tahir Aris, Zainudin Mohd Ali, Priya Matzen, Regien Biesma, Jens Aagaard-Hansen, Mark A Hanson, Shane A Norris

Abstract

Background: Over the past two decades, the population of Malaysia has grown rapidly and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Malaysia has dramatically increased, along with the frequency of obesity, hyperlipidaemia and hypertension. Early-life influences play an important role in the development of non-communicable diseases. Indeed, maternal lifestyle and conditions such as gestational diabetes mellitus or obesity can affect the risk of diabetes in the next generation. Lifestyle changes can help to prevent the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. This is a protocol for an unblinded, community-based, randomised controlled trial in two arms to evaluate the efficacy of a complex behavioural change intervention, combining motivational interviewing provided by a community health promoter and access to a habit formation mobile application, among young Malaysian women and their spouses prior to pregnancy.

Method/design: Eligible subjects will be Malaysian women in the age group 20 to 39 years, who are nulliparous, not diagnosed with diabetes and own a smartphone. With an alpha-value of 0.05, a statistical power of 90 %, 264 subjects will need to complete the study. Subjects with their spouses will be randomised to either the intervention or the control arm for an 8-month period. The primary endpoint is change in waist circumference from baseline to end of intervention period and secondary endpoints are changes in anthropometric parameters, biochemical parameters, change in health literacy level, dietary habits, physical activity and stress level. Primary endpoint and the continuous secondary endpoints will be analysed in a linear regression model, whereas secondary endpoints on an ordinal scale will be analysed by using the chi-squared test. A multivariate linear model for the primary endpoint will be undertaken to account for potential confounders. This study has been approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health Malaysia (protocol number: NMRR-14-904-21963) on 21 September 2015.

Discussion: This study protocol describes the first community-based randomised controlled trial, to examine the efficacy of a complex intervention in improving the pre-pregnancy health of young Malaysian women and their spouses. Results from this trial will contribute to improve policy and practices regarding complex behavioural change interventions to prevent diabetes in the pre-conception period in Malaysia and other low- and middle-income country settings.

Trial registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) on 30 November 2015, Identifier: NCT02617693 .

Keywords: Complex behavioural change intervention; E-health; Lifestyle intervention; Malaysia; Motivational counselling; Pre-conception; Pre-pregnancy.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow diagram of the Jom Mama trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Screen shot from the web application, showing the couples’ dashboard. Screen shot a Shows the overview of all couples under one community health promoter (CHP). The traffic lights give an indication on how active the couple are in performing their selected challenges. The second column indicates when the couple was last active on the mobile application. The last column informs when the CHP has the next appointment with the couple. Screen shot b Shows the progress over time for one couple. The graphic can shift between wife and husband and, in this example, it is only showing the wife. The upper columns indicate how many times the challenges have been performed per month. The lower columns indicate how many times each challenge has been performed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Screen shots of mobile application. a The main screen, showing the couple’s process for the particular month. The icons on top illustrate the categories of the different challenges selected (two physical activity challenges and one healthy eating challenge). In the middle, is the progress bar, showing the progress of the user and her spouse for this particular month. Lowest, are the selected challenges listed and how many times they should be performed in one week. b By tapping on the challenges, a description of the different challenge is showing (example of the healthy eating challenge). c When the challenge has been performed, the subject will ‘check-in’, and by doing that be awarded 2 points for performing the challenges. d A timer can be set for each challenge, so a reminder will be send to the subject on the given time to perform the challenge. e The subject is selecting the challenge out of a list set challenges. f The Flash challenge is a bonus challenge, which the subject can select when it becomes available. This occurs randomly during the intervention period. The Flash challenge will give extra points

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation (IDF) IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2014.
    1. Institute for Public Health (IPH) National Health and Morbidity Survey 2015 (NHMS 2015). Vol. II: non-communicable diseases, risk factors and other health problems. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2015.
    1. Institute for Public Health (IPH) National Health and Morbidity Survey 1996 (NHMS 1996). Vol. II: non-communicable diseases. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health; 1996.
    1. Ivy JL. Role of exercise training in the prevention and treatment of insulin resistance and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Sports Med. 1997;24:321–36. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199724050-00004.
    1. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1343–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105033441801.
    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393–403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.
    1. Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, Wang JX, Yang WY, An ZX, et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(4):537–44. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.537.
    1. Wareham NJ. The long-term benefits of lifestyle interventions for prevention of diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:441–2. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70074-9.
    1. Li G, Zhang P, Wang J, An Y, Gong Q, Gregg EW, et al. Cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and diabetes incidence after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 23-year follow-up study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:474–80. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70057-9.
    1. Neve M, Morgan PJ, Jones PR, Collins CE. Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2010;11:306–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00646.x.
    1. Wieland LS, Falzon L, Sciamanna CN, Trudeau KJ, Brodney S, Schwartz JE, et al. Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012
    1. Brown MJ, Sinclair M, Liddle D, Hill AJ, Madden E, Stockdale J. A systematic review investigating healthy lifestyle interventions incorporating goal setting strategies for preventing excess gestational weight gain. PLoS One. 2012
    1. Pal K, Eastwood SV, Michie S, Farmer AJ, Barnard ML, Peacock R, et al. Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013
    1. Franz MJ, Bantle JP, Beebe CA, Brunzell JD, Chiasson JL, Garg A, et al. Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:148–98. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.1.148.
    1. International Society for DOHaD. What is DOHaD? 2014. . Accessed 23 Oct 2015.
    1. Ge ZJ, Zhang CL, Schatten H, Sun QY. Maternal diabetes mellitus and the origin of non-communicable diseases in offspring: the role of epigenetics. Biol Reprod. 2014;90:139. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.118141.
    1. Inadera H. Developmental origins of obesity and type 2 diabetes: molecular aspects and role of chemicals. Environ Health Prev Med. 2013;18:185–97. doi: 10.1007/s12199-013-0328-8.
    1. Hanson M, Gluckman PD, Ma RC, Matzen P, Biesma RG. Early life opportunities for prevention of diabetes in low and middle income countries. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1025. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1025.
    1. American Diabetes Association (ADA) Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl 1):88–90.
    1. Bartholow LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Planning health promotion programs: an Intervention Mapping approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006.
    1. Norris SA, Anuar H, Matzen P, Cheah JCH, Jensen BB, Hanson M. The life and health challenges of young Malaysian couples: results from a stakeholder consensus and engagement study to support non-communicable disease prevention. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14 Suppl 2. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-S2-S6.
    1. Institute for Public Health (IPH) National Health and Morbidity Survey 2011 (NHMS 2011). Vol. II: non-communicable diseases. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health; 2011.
    1. Department of Statistics Malaysia. Population distribution and basic demographic characteristics report 2010 – Ethnic composition. 2010. [Online] . Accessed 25 Nov 2015.
    1. Chan JM, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Obesity, fat distribution, and weight gain as risk factors for clinical diabetes in men. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:361–9.
    1. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesity-related health risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:379–84.
    1. Brenner DR, Tepylo K, Eny KM, Cahill LE, El-Sohemy A. Comparison of body mass index and waist circumference as predictors of cardiometabolic health in a population of young Canadian adults. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2010;2:28. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-2-28.
    1. Eriksson J, Lindstrom J, Valle T, Aunola S, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al. Prevention of type II diabetes in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance: the Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS) in Finland. Study design and 1-year interim report on the feasibility of the lifestyle intervention programme. Diabetologia. 1999;42:793–801. doi: 10.1007/s001250051229.
    1. Crandall J, Schade D, Ma Y, Fujimoto WY, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler S, et al. The influence of age effects of lifestyle modification and metformin in prevention of diabetes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:1075–81. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.10.1075.
    1. Oldroyd JC, Unwin NC, White M, Imrie K, Mathers JC, Alberti KG. Randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of behavioural interventions to modify cardiovascular risk factors in men and women with impaired glucose tolerance: outcome at 6 months. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2001;52:29–43. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(00)00244-8.
    1. Bo S, Ciccone G, Baldi C, Benini L, Dusio F, Forastiere G, et al. Effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention on metabolic syndrome. A randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1695–703. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0399-6.
    1. Orozco LJ, Buchleitner AM, Gimenez-Perez G, Roque I, Figuls M, Richter B, et al. Exercise or exercise and diet for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008
    1. WHO STEPS Surveillance. Guide to physical measurements. 2008. . Accessed 25 Nov 2015.
    1. HLS-EU Consortium. Comparative report of health literacy in eight EU member states. The European health literacy survey HLS-EU. 2012. . Accessed 25 Nov 2015
    1. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.
    1. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44:227–39. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657.
    1. Koivusalo SB, Rono K, Klemetti MM, Roine RP, Lindström J, Erkkola M, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus can be prevented by lifestyle intervention: The Finnish Gestational Diabetes Prevention Study (RADIEL) Diabetes Care. 2015
    1. Guelinckx I, Devlieger R, Mullie P, Vansant G. Effect of lifestyle intervention on dietary habits, physical activity, and gestational weight gain in obese pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;91:373–80. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28166.
    1. Quinlivan JA, Lam LT, Fisher J. A randomised trial of a four-step multidisciplinary approach to the antenatal care of obese pregnant women. Aust N J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;91:141–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01268.x.
    1. Phelan S, Phipps MG, Abrams R, Darroch F, Schaffner A, Wing RR, et al. Randomized trial of a behavioural intervention to prevent excessive gestational weight gain: The fit for delivery study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;39:772–9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.005306.
    1. Vinter CA, Jensen DM, Ovesen P, Beck-Nielsen H, Jørgensen JS, et al. The Lip (Lifestyle in Pregnancy) study: a randomized controlled trial of lifestyle intervention in 360 obese pregnant women. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2502–7. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1150.
    1. Whitworth M, Dowswell T. Routine pre-pregnancy health promotion for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009
    1. Shawe J, Delbarere I, Ekstrand M, Hegaard HK, Larsson M, Mastroiacovo P, et al. Preconception care policy, guidelines, recommendations and services across six European countries: Belgium (Flanders), Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi