Protocol for a prospective mixed-methods longitudinal study to evaluate the dynamics of contraceptive use, discontinuation, and switching in Kenya

Susan Ontiri, Lilian Mutea, Maxwell Muganda, Peter Mutanda, Carolyne Ajema, Stephen Okoth, Solomon Orero, Ruth Odhiambo, Regien Biesma, Jelle Stekelenburg, Mark Kabue, Susan Ontiri, Lilian Mutea, Maxwell Muganda, Peter Mutanda, Carolyne Ajema, Stephen Okoth, Solomon Orero, Ruth Odhiambo, Regien Biesma, Jelle Stekelenburg, Mark Kabue

Abstract

Background: More women are accessing modern contraceptive use in Kenya, however, contraceptive discontinuation has stagnated over the decades. Any further increase in contraceptive use will most likely be from past users, hence understanding the dynamics of discontinuation while addressing quality of family planning services offered at health facilities and communities is critical for increasing the contraceptive prevalence rate and reducing the unmet need of family planning. The paper presents a study protocol that intends to evaluate the dynamics of contraceptive use, discontinuation, and switching among women of reproductive age initiating use of a contraceptive method.

Methods: This longitudinal mixed-methods study is being conducted in Migori and Kitui counties, Kenya. A formative assessment using Interviews with adolescents, older women, heterosexual couples, health care workers, and community health volunteers explored barriers to contraceptive continuation and perspectives on discontinuation utilizing a qualitative cross sectional study design. Following the formative assessment, a client-centered intervention focusing on improving quality of family planning services, including counseling, will be implemented in 10 health facilities. A 24-month prospective cohort study among women of reproductive age initiating contraception with follow-up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months will then be undertaken to assess the discontinuation rates, examine the dynamics of contraceptive use, discontinuation and switching, and further explore barriers and enablers for contraceptive continuation and switching among the study population.

Discussion: In sub-Saharan Africa, contraceptive discontinuation studies have mainly been based on survey data that is collected retrospectively. By implementing a longitudinal mixed-methods study, we gain deeper insights into the contraceptive dynamics influencing the decision to continue, discontinue, and even switch following implementation of a client-centered intervention that enhances quality of care. Additionally, the study will shed more light on the profile of women discontinuing contractive use and further explore individual and couple-level dynamics influencing decision-making on continuation and discontinuation. The findings of this study will provide information that can be used to develop and implement human-centered interventions that focus on improving quality of family planning services and consequently improved continuation rates and overall satisfaction with method.

Trial registration: The study is registered with the Clinical Trials Registry, NCT03973593 .

Keywords: Contraception; Counseling; Discontinuation; Interventions; Quality of care; Side effects; Study protocol; Switching.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the prospective cohort study

References

    1. Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012;380:149–156. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60609-6.
    1. Cahill N, Sonneveldt E, Stover J, Weinberger M, Williamson J, Wei C, et al. Modern contraceptive use, unmet need, and demand satisfied among women of reproductive age who are married or in a union in the focus countries of the family planning 2020 initiative: a systematic analysis using the family planning estimation tool. Lancet. 2018;391:870–882. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33104-5.
    1. Dasgupta A, Weinberger M, Bellows B, Brown W. “New users” are confusing our counting: reaching consensus on how to measure “additional users” of family planning. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5:6–14. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00328.
    1. Jain AK, Obare F, RamaRao S, Askew I. Reducing unmet need by supporting women with met need. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013;39(3):133. doi: 10.1363/3913313.
    1. Castle S, Askew I. Contraceptive discontinuation: reasons, challenges, and solutions. Population Council and FP2020. 2015. . Accessed 24 July 2019.
    1. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Alkema L, Sedgh G. Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(4):e380–e389. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30029-9.
    1. Blanc AK, Curtis SL, Croft TN. Monitoring contraceptive continuation: links to fertility outcomes and quality of care. Stud Fam Plan. 2002;33:127–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2002.00127.x.
    1. Jain AK. The leaking bucket phenomenon in family planning [internet]. Change Cf, editor2014. . Accessed 24 July 2019.
    1. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Health/Kenya, National AIDS Control Council/Kenya, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Population NCf, Development/Kenya. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Rockville, MD, USA; 2015.
    1. Performance monitoring and accountability 2020 (PMA2020) project ICfRH-K. PMA 2018 Kenya round 7 family planning brief Baltimore MD: PMA 2020, Bill and Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; 2018.
    1. Bertrand JT, Escudero G, Soukaloun D, Kounnavong S, Pengdy B, Boupha B. Compendium of indicators for evaluating reproductive health programs: MEASURE evaluation, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina; 2002.
    1. Leite IC, Gupta N. Assessing regional differences in contraceptive discontinuation, failure and switching in Brazil. Reprod Health. 2007;4(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-4-6.
    1. Ali M, Seuc A, Rahimi A, Festin M, Temmerman M. A global research agenda for family planning: results of an exercise for setting research priorities. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;92:93–98. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.122242.
    1. Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plan. 1990;21:61–91. doi: 10.2307/1966669.
    1. Manzi A, Hirschhorn LR, Sherr K, Chirwa C, Baynes C, Awoonor-Williams JK. Mentorship and coaching to support strengthening healthcare systems: lessons learned across the five population health implementation and training partnership projects in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:831. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2656-7.
    1. Mariani B. The effect of mentoring on career satisfaction of registered nurses and intent to stay in the nursing profession. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
    1. Ali MM, Cleland JG, Shah IH. Causes and consequences of contraceptive discontinuation: evidence from 60 demographic and health surveys. World Health Organization Geneva; 2012.
    1. Bradley SE, Schwandt H, Khan S. Levels, trends, and reasons for contraceptive discontinuation. DHS analytical studies no. 20. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro; 2009.
    1. The S-Curve: Putting mCPR Growth into Context. Track20, 2017. . Accessed 24 July 2019.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi